Wednesday, 30 June 2010

The correct to punish crime in Britain that is also Islamic

Flog them in public to punish them and to give the public the satisfaction of witnessing this.

Then send them on their way.

And execute the ones who deserve to be executed to remove the possibility of their ever reoffending

Of course, because this would work beautifully, the liberals will object and bleat about compassion, tolerance and wring their hands.  However, the time for regime-change comes ever closer the more the vacuity of liberal thinking shows itself up for what it is: pernicious, ineffectual, incoherent and intellectually bankrupt.

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

Google - the Bull in a China Shop

Google are like a bull in a, heh heh, China shop.   Why do they think they are?  Do they really think the Chinese government are going to allow themselves to be pushed around by a bunch of American upstarts?  Google had a tantrum, and the Chinese government spoke softly,  wielding a big stick ....

Shirley Brown, Kid Creole and the Coconuts

I would equate "coconut" with being black and aspirational.  It is a backhanded compliment really.  If I were black, I would like those whom I have  left behind in the ghetto, in Labour and the LibDems to call me coconut, if they are disposed to be envious and insulting. 

I do hope however that Shirley Brown will appeal against being found guilty of "racially aggravated harassment", which is ridiculous. One single offensive comment cannot constitute harassment.

I have a nasty feeling that whoever in the CPS who approved this prosecution must have been a woman, though I am happy to be corrected if I am wrong.  As we all know, women are more censorious and irrational than men as well as having a poorer grasp of such principles as free speech.  They also find it harder to forgive, being the weaker sex.

Monday, 28 June 2010

Why the UK Middle Classes are Fucked

The white working classes have their worst vices of short-termism encouraged, but the white middle classes are fucked too, as a class, but they are too liberal and stupid to admit it.  The middle classes are being fucked by high taxes, and the inability to afford access to a decent education for their children.  Any political party worth its salt would aim their policies shamelessly at the lower middle classes, and offer selective education. Unfortunately, these are the policies of UKIP and BNP and are therefore labelled by the liberal establishment as "extreme".

Toby Young, who thinks Gove's academy schools are going to save people like him, has seen the mirage and is busily pursuing it.  It is a big fat con, I said, and you are being fucked by the cunts of convictionless Conservatism.  And so he has blocked me on Facebook. 

Whisper "racist" and "extremist" into the ears of any member of the spineless middle classes and watch them all run for cover. 

A degenerate matriarchal administration with their eunuch slaves too afraid of condemning unmarried mothers, working mothers and bad employees is running and ruining Western civilisation, ruled by Mumsnet "values", but you won't hear much of that in the liberal media, or even the publications that supposedly support  Conservative values. They too are the eunuchs slaves of the liberal establishment, you see, of Free Love and FemiNazism.

Sunday, 27 June 2010

Why I have no wish to become MP

Becoming MP is the occupation of being paid by the taxpayer to lose the ability to speak your mind.

What sane and honourable person would willingly do that, and then be treated like shit and expected to live on rations?

Why Liberals and Feminists are not called extremists though everyone else who disagrees with them is.

Because they are in charge. 

Friday, 25 June 2010

The Nanny State now becomes the Bully State

The Free Society and the Manifesto Club present
Bad laws that threaten individual liberty

Thursday June 24, 2010 Chaired by James Panton (Manifesto Club), speakers include Josie Appleton (Manifesto Club), Isabella Sankey (policy director, Liberty), Simon Clark (director, The Free Society), Mark Wallace (campaign director, Taxpayers Alliance) and Philip Johnston (Daily Telegraph and author, Bad Laws: An Explosive Analysis of Britain’s Petty Rules, Health and Safety Lunacies and Madcap Laws)

Isabella Sankey went on about control orders and the rights of those suspected of terrorism.

Mark Wallace, brought up a Methodist, enumerated the number of words found in various pieces of legislation, showing a pattern of word increase in proportion to the erosion of our liberties.  He mentioned the false distinction between economic and civil liberty.

Josie Appleton spoke of state informants, state licensing of normal activities such as dancing, and schools having such things as lunchbox policies (to police our diet) and photography policies (to police Britain's ubiquitous paedophiles).  We are a nation obsessed about paedophilia, terrorism and binge drinking.  These days a priest could be defrocked for refusing a CRB check, she said.  

Philip Johnston pointed out that the people who say "It's a free country" are also the people who say "There ought to be a law against it."  "Our liberties depend on the silence of the law," he quoted Hobbes.  Now, because we are mostly in receipt of welfare in one form or another, we all have permanent client status, ie we are now all clients of the state.  He quoted A J P Taylor:

“Until August 1914 a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state, beyond the post office and the policeman.  He could live where he liked and as he liked.  He had no official number or identity card.  He could travel abroad or leave his country for ever without a passport or any sort of official permission.  He could exchange his money for any other currency without restriction or limit.  He could buy goods from any country in the world on the same terms as he bought goods at home.  For that matter, a foreigner could spend his life in this country without permit and without informing the police.  Unlike the countries of the European continent, the state did not require its citizens to perform military service.  An Englishman could enlist, if he chose, in the regular army, the navy, or the territorials.  He could also ignore, if he chose, the demands of national defence.  Substantial householders were occasionally called on for jury service.  Otherwise, only those helped the state who wished to do so.  The Englishman paid taxes on a modest scale:  nearly £200 million in 1913-14, or rather less than 8 per cent. of the national income.  The state intervened to prevent the citizen from eating adulterated food or contracting certain infectious diseases.  It imposed safety rules in factories, and prevented women, and adult males in some industries, from working excessive hours.  The state saw to it that children received education up to the age of 13.  Since 1 January 1909, it provided a meagre pension for the needy over the age of 70.  Since 1911, it helped to insure certain classes of workers against sickness and unemployment.  This tendency towards more state action was increasing.  Expenditure on the social services had roughly doubled since the Liberals took office in 1905.  Still, broadly speaking, the state acted only to help those who could not help themselves.  It left the adult citizen alone.

I did ask a question:

"Liberty is the freedom to go to heaven or to hell in our own way and, as we all know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.  It has been said by Benjamin Franklin that those who prize security over liberty deserve neither.  Are the British, after so many years of the nanny state, people who deserve neither?"

Mark Wallace attempted an answer the gist of which was that comedians such as Frankie Boyle are now questioning the system and that this is in itself cause for optimism.  I remain a little sceptical, however. 

Friday, 18 June 2010

Free Schools instead of State Schools another Government Gimmick

So when it goes tits up you can't even blame the government. It's a gimmick, Toby, another fucking gimmick, just like "compassionate Conservatism" is a continuation of socialism, just like the "Big Society" is a continuation of Big Government.

The only way to stop this is to disenfranchise those bitches at Mumsnet who are always whingeing for more state handouts and more nannying legislation.

The only way to do it is to challenge feminism - the Enemy of Family Values and the Enemy of Reason, and repeal all anti-discrimination thoughtcrime legislation that the BNP have been saying we should for years now.

The Koran would support my proposal:  "There is no compulsion in belief."  (2:256)

All we want to do is send our children to a decent school.  Do we have to fucking run it too??

In this country, we do.  Fucking fuckers in government should get a grip.  We are not all of us so completely dumbed down after decades of crap state education that we are too thick to see yet another government pulling yet another fast one.

My proposals for the New Model Comprehensive can be seen at:

There is of course no one left in the UK capable of teaching the 3 Rs anymore.  We will probably, for a while at least, have to hire teachers from Zimbabwe and Singapore after promising them that their safety will be guaranteed at all times in school with armed guards, who will pistol whip any little bastard who gives any teacher any problems.

Academy Schools are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act either .

A post about me and my Amazing Facebook Friends [Who Are Glorious and Great] at Ben Woodham's blog

I particularly enjoyed:

"She is instead simply an animal flinging its own faeces through the bars of its cage. She is an object lesson in the true danger of the internet, and that is not Facebook, Twitter or the democratisation of knowledge. It is that, with enough determination – and she has no shortage of that – any disturbed person can make a noise loud enough to be heard above the din. Some may say it was ever thus, but I think that their voices are louder, and carry farther, than has been possible before."

Best of all he mentions my Facebook friends and warns Cameron's "shiny new intake" of MPs to stay away off my friends' list.  Only the more senior and experienced politicians are intellectually strong enough to take my views without rejecting the milk of liberal orthodoxy they are still suckling from, apparently.

So, are you senior and experienced enough to be my Facebook friend?

Clicking through to her Facebook profile reveals that she has in excess of 1,100 “friends”, of whom a disproportionate amount either:

a. are politicians

[including: Zac Goldsmith (Con, Richmond Park), Sir Alan Haslehurst (Con, Saffron Walden), Angela Eagle (Lab, Wallasey), Austin Mitchell (Lab, Great Grimsby), Boris Johnson (Con, Mayor of London), Ed Vaizey (Con, Wantage), Eric Pickles (Con, Brentwood and Ongar), Jean-Marie Le Pen (France, the French), John Prescott, Ken Livingstone, Lynne Featherstone (Lib Dem, Horney and Wood Gren), Margarets Beckett and Hodge (Lab, Derby South, Barking), Michael Fabricant (Con, Lichfield), Ming Campbell (Lib Dem, North East Fife), Nigel Evans (Con, Ribble Valley), Peter Lilley (Con, Hitchen and Harpenden), Peter Mandelson, Shahid Malik, Simon Hughes (Lib Dem, Bermondsey and Old Southwark), Tony McNulty, and Adrian Edmonson (Vivian, The Young Ones)]


b. use the St George Flag as their profile picture.

And, of course, Andrew Neil, but that’s only to be expected.

Now, of course, being a “friend” on Facebook does not imply any kind of endorsement. Many of these people are clearly on Ms Khaw’s list so that she can keep an eye on what they’re up to; Shami Chakrabarti, for instance, cannot have much in common with Ms Khaw, personally or ideologically.

Still, it might be worth David Cameron’s shiny new intake bearing in mind that, no matter the value of Facebook as a promotional tool, it hardly looks good to to call Claire Khaw a “friend” in any context.

There’s a cross-party flavour to this ‘Khaw Committee’, and that is reflected in her belief that our country needs only one party. Luckily for us, she’s already created it at

My alternative to Professor Becker's idea to make immigrants pay to come here

I never got the chance to ask my question though I had my arm raised the whole time.  Professor Roger Middleton who was chairing the panel looked in my direction many times, but it was as if I was invisible.  My arm even adopted a slight swaying motion, but it was hopeless.

The question I would have asked was this:

"Would it not just be simpler if we just reintroduced slavery in the form of a five-year period of indentured labour?  Then all the illegals would flee of their own accord or stay and be of service to the British Nation.  They would be taken to a National Slave Processing Centre where their skills could be assessed and categorised.  British employers would apply for the slave labour of their choice and these slaves would be deployed, for a fee, to the slave-hirer.  Ownership of the slaves remains with the State.    
After 5 years they are free to go home.  But if they submit to another 5 years of  indentured labour, they become full British Citizens.  All the labour they gave to the country would be rewarded with a sum of money - a Manumission Grant - to assist them in starting life in this country as British citizens.
Slave-Visitors will be a new public sector job title.  This is to see that slaves are not abused.  This is unlikely to happen as ownership of the slave vests in the state and the government would demand compensation if state property is damaged by the slave hirer.  
This country could also export slaves in the form of single mothers who are a charge on the state, including their variously-fathered feral children.  There is a shortage of women in China so this would go down rather well with these single Chinese men who can't find a wife.  This would also assist in servicing the National Debt.   
There is no reason why bankrupts and ex-bankers who have brought this country to its knees with their casino banking should not be enslaved too, is there, Professor Becker?"

Dying with Dignity

I would choose firing squad too, rather than be put down like an animal.

I would prefer a public execution too, so one can wave, nod and wink at friends, ask for a last cigarette, smoke in a public place ....

In Tudor times beheadings were reserved only for the aristocracy.  They made a final speech, put their heads on the block and then raised their arms to indicate they were ready for the chop.  Female members of the aristocracy were supposed to take it like a man too.

Thursday, 17 June 2010

Join the BNP and meet the Queen?

Floyd Codlin has rather naughtily suggested to me on Facebook yesterday:

"given that Mr Griffin has invited himself to the Queens Garden party, can we take it that you'll be "this is proof we're not racist" arm candy on the great day.."

I must confess that this has played rather on my imagination.  I am persuaded that it would be rather good PR for the Party and I think I could sacrifice just one Thursday to visit Buckingham Palace, for the good of the Party.  If truth be told, I now find myself practising very low curtsies and rehearsing what to say when I am asked: "And what do you do?"

Will Prince Charles be there?  We could have a good old discussion about Islam and its environmental friendliness and sustainability.  If Henry VIII had been Muslim, he would not have had any problem divorcing Catherine of Aragon when she failed to give him a son.  Indeed, he could have just kept her and married Jane Seymour too.  In fact, if Charles had been Muslim, he would not have had to wait that long to marry Camilla.

I may even suggest to the Chairman that it may be an idea to now promise to disestablish the Church of England in our next manifesto.  It is high time the Church of England - so hostile to the BNP - to be subjected to a spot of disestablishmentarianism and a religion more fit for purpose established in its place.  I propose calling it The Mosque of Racially-Inclusive British Nationalism (or perhaps just The Mosque of Britain), but with the clergy wearing the same kind of vestments as before and the same hymns sung, so as not to alarm the populace unduly.  Excised will be any reference to the Trinity and banned forever the barbaric practice of pretending to drink Christ's blood and eat Christ's flesh.

Finally, instead of the Archbishop of Canterbury we can have an Ayatollah of Cambridge - I have in mind that thrillingly bearded Islamic scholar with his deep mellifluous tones and his sensationally sensible views.

What do people think?

What the BNP are for

The BNP are the unofficial, unacknowledged and often unheeded think tank of the LibLabCon. We perform the public service of telling the Ugly Truth and we do it because we have this strange inexplicable urge to do so even though we get no thanks for it.

It has been said that politics is a vocation, ie something you do because you cannot help it, even when you know there's no money in it, like teaching, soldiering, nursing and the priesthood.

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

Why shouldn't the agents of the Afghanistan invasion not be insulted if you disapprove of it?

Isn't a bit hypocritical and incoherent to condemn the invasion of Afghanistan and then forbid Muslims from mounting insulting protests, eg
'Butchers return' and 'What are you dying for? £18k'.

against the agents of the invasion, ie British troops? I think British soldiers who die in Afghanistan should know that their sacrifices are not being appreciated.

In fact, they should go AWOL if they had any sense.  Why anyone would die for Bush, Blair, Brown and now Cameron and Clegg is absolutely beyond me.

Tuesday, 15 June 2010

The thin veneer that separates us from barbarism

Only a thin veneer of civilisation separates us from barbarism, and it is knowing what would happen to us if we did what we really wanted to do to others.

Eddy Butler and his proposed leadership challenge

There is something a little shocking and disturbing about the nastiness of the blog attacking Eddy Butler - which is also linked to this blog, in case anyone's interested.

I do not believe anyone can win under the current leadership rules anyway - not even if the clone of the current incumbent decided to contest the leadership himself.  Such unpleasant remarks about another long-serving member of the party is therefore as unsubtle as using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. 

It would have been nice to clear the air with an EGM about the constitution - widely felt to be a dictator's charter, but apparently, it is not to be, and this is the reason why Eddy felt he had no alternative but to challenge the leadership.

It is not a comfortable read for anyone within the party or thinking of joining the party or, in my case anyway, someone who has just joined the party.

My position remains that the constitution should be more democratic under the same leadership.  If activists  are getting upset, and feeling unappreciated or disgruntled, then kinder methods ought to be used in the way of attempting to allay their concerns, rather than giving the message in no uncertain terms that "if you cross us you are as good as dead in nationalist politics". 

But I guess I am just a soft-headed, soft-hearted rather naive woman who has just joined a party and is a little dismayed at how BNP activists treat other other.  I suppose it is a little too much to expect them to all kiss and make-up, stop washing dirty linen in public and resolve this thing amicably like gentlemen?

Monday, 14 June 2010

The Utility of God

A unique and omnipotent God is the creation of Man.

Yahweh, God or Allah is the most powerful entity conceivable by Man.

It therefore makes sense to put Man's creation in service of mankind.  The most powerful concept conceivable by Man should be used to serve Man in his government, politics and law. 

After all, what else is God for?

Friday, 11 June 2010

Islam's racial neutrality and Judaism emphasis on race and lineage


"Mankind! We created you from a male and female, and made you into peoples and tribes so that you might come to know each other. The noblest among you in God's sight is that one of you who best performs his duty. God is All-Knowing, All-Aware." (The Qur'an , 49:13)


1.  the concept of the Jews being The Chosen People.  
2.  the implication that the Chosen People are racially superior to those not chosen by God
3.  the fact that Judaism is an ethno-religion
4.  the fact that Zionism is a species of ethno-nationalism

Thursday, 10 June 2010

Another reason to convert to Islam?

Another reason to be Muslim, according to Prince Charles.

Maybe the BNP should promise to disestablish the Church of England so he can convert to Islam?

Henry VIII would have been a happier husband and the English a happier reign if their king had been Muslim.

Islam allows divorce. Orthodox Judaism and Catholicism, hypocritically, does not.

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

Verse in Koran implicitly condones prostitution and by extension brothel-keeping

YUSUFALI: Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which Allah has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is Allah, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them),

PICKTHAL: And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till Allah give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of Allah which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye may seek enjoyment of the life of the world, if they would preserve their chastity. And if one force them, then (unto them), after their compulsion, lo! Allah will be Forgiving, Merciful.

SHAKIR: And let those who do not find the means to marry keep chaste until Allah makes them free from want out of His grace. And (as for) those who ask for a writing from among those whom your right hands possess, give them the writing if you know any good in them, and give them of the wealth of Allah which He has given you; and do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, when they desire to keep chaste, in order to seek the frail good of this world's life; and whoever compels them, then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

It is only sinful if you compel your slave girls.

If you do not compel them then it is OK.

Prostitution should certainly not of course be forced. If it is a willing transaction between punter and prostitute, then it is OK.

If your slave girls desire manumission then prostitution is one of the ways of earning it, then you must allow them the ways and means to obtain their manumission.

Therefore an Islamic state would legalise brothel-keeping.

Interestingly, a liberal-feminist state wishes to outlaw it. Hypocrisy and irrationality, anyone?

Tuesday, 8 June 2010

Government Spending and Electoral Reform

1. Cut all foreign aid.

2. Cut all child benefit.

3. Cut all translation from English into foreign languages so foreigners can know where and what and how to claim British state largesse. (If they want to come and milk the system they can pay to learn how to do it out of their own fucking pockets and hire a local who speaks their language.)

4. Withdraw troops from Afghanistan NOW.

5. Abolish National Insurance.

7. Abolish Disability Benefit.

8. Dismantle social services. Can anyone really convincingly claim that Baby P's survival would have benefited society? He would be some perve raping your daughter before dismembering and eating her and then pleading his rotten childhood as an excuse, should he be caught. Parents should have the right of life or death over their children until they have reached the age of majority. If someone kills his or her children it is none of our business. We won't ask them to babysit our children, that's all. This would make children show proper respect to their parents, and this would make people want to have children again, easing the labour shortage. A falling population is always a sign of civilisational decline. Let us at least attempt to reverse this.

9. Abolish student loans, reintroduce scholarships, but only for real subjects. No sports studies, sociology, academic philosophy and crap like that.

10. Dismantle most of the NHS and privatise the rest.

Cut all expensive and ineffective medical treatments for people over retirement age with no dependents.

Cut all expensive but effective medical treatments for people over retirement age with no dependents.

Cut even cheap and effective medical treatments for people who are unlikely to have dependents and who have a proven record of criminality and unemployability, eg Down's Syndrome and other forms of mental disability, drug-addicts, criminals, long-tern unemployed.

They can always go private, go to a charity hospital or into a hospice.

We're all gonna die anyway.

1. Reintroduce public executions.

2. Reintroduce public floggings.

3. Reintroduce fault in divorce.

4. Establish soup kitchens so that no one actually starves.

5. Establish Labour Exchange Centres, ie provide a FREE service locally and nationally that puts someone who wants a job in touch with someone who wants a job done.

6. Make bastardy a disgrace.

7. Introduce of a system of charity broking so that someone with spare dosh can give to someone in need of it, a bit like Eye Need.

8. Establish local and national marriage bureaux to encourage marriage.

9. Establish a system of Marital Relationship Management. Under this system all couples will have to appoint a mutually agreed Friend of the Marriage (a mutual friend before the marriage would be ideal) to whom they can complain about each other. This Friend of the Marriage will make a record of events and opinions, as well as make helpful and conciliatory suggestions so that the couple stay married. However, if this is impossible, a record of fault can be established and be taken into account in any divorce settlement. In the event of uxoricide or homicidal widowhood, the court should have a ready-prepared record of the marriage within which may contain evidence of motive as well as a history of violence.

10. Establish a single party state. This means all MPs would be deemed to be a member of only one party, ie the Party of National Interest, which will have a Party Rule Book applicable to all. These rules will protect the rights of individual members from the leader and his cronies and certainly their right to privacy, property, position in the party and free speech. All party whips will be retired. All MPs will have a residential connection to the constituency they represent, and never be parachuted in by the party. All MPs will be subjected to annual elections just like CEOs and other directors at a shareholders' AGM.

12. Establish the New Model Comprehensive as described at

13. Citizens' militias will be established so that they can be called up to keep order. If the CHAVs, NEETs, and single mum sluts, slags and slappers and their feral offspring get restive, the locals who know who they are and where they live will sort them out.

14. Abolish the minimum wage.

15. Reintroduce slavery to ease any possible labour shortages and to make use of the labour of bankrupts and convicted criminals. (A maximum 5 year term of slavery should not be exceeded to protect their yumanrites.)

16. Reintroduce orphanages so those inclined to adopt can see which are the most loveable and youngest ones, without faffing around for 3 years with the Adoption Agency only to be given an emotionally-damaged and disruptive child.

17. Establish Homes for Fallen Women and their Illegitimate Children if these single mothers will not give up their babies to orphanages.

18. Legalise brothel-keeping.

In other words, cut spending, cut taxes and cut regulation (especially the Equal Pay Act and all anti-discrimination legislation).

Er, that's it.

My main occupation

I see myself in the gutter splashing its contents at passersby in order to draw their attention to the fact that our sewage disposal services are no longer working.

Should and Ought, Must and Should

The Romans use the same word for "must" and "should".

"Debeo" is the Latin word for "I should" and "I must".

We should of course do the things we must.

We must then do the things we should.

"Should" could mean "likely to happen, all things being equal". It also means "the proposal being discussed *is* the correct moral action to take".

But only the wise know both whether something is going to happen and whether it is morally satisfactory.

Monday, 7 June 2010

Why the Koran rejects the Trinity

Christianity is the religion of women and slaves, Nietzsche said.

It insists that its adherents proclaim the lie of the trinity, ie that Jesus is the Divine Begotten Son of God, because their very salvation depends on it.

You can imagine what doing this for a whole lifetime would do to your character. You really would be completely stupefied by the effort or be such a practitioner of deceit and hypocrisy you would have deceived yourself on most important matters of morality, as well as made yourself unable to tell the difference between a truth and a lie.

Is a "debate" at Intelligence Squared as dull as it sounds?

An "advertorial" by the Telegraph for Intelligence Squared, perhaps.

I don't know anyone who would pay £25 just for the privilege of attending any of these dull debates, do you?

Look at the list of these very dull topics.

The question should not be "Is X Y?" but "Should X be done?"

Why are they not doing what is perfectly obvious to me?

Is it a conspiracy to bore us to death and put us off politics? I really think people would have more fun at a BNP meeting or attending one of Anjem Choudary's sermons.

Please, please, please just let me know if you would consider paying £25 to listen to these people drone on about what they think *is* or *is not* rather than what should or should not be done?

I really need to know.

I don't believe for one moment that Charles Moore, who wrote the advertorial, would for one moment pay £25 to attend a debate hosted by these people. He would only attend if he were speaking or was given a freebie, as would I.

A proper debate would consist of the following elements:

1. A premise (eg The invasion of Iraq took place)

2. An argument (eg It was a good idea, or not, depending on which side of the argument you are on.)

3. A rebuttal (eg "Oh yes it was" or "Oh no, it wasn't".)

4. A conclusion (eg the vote that would take place after all the above 3 have taken place.)

I don't think these people at IQ even know that. Weird.

Exploring Islam Foundation

It just makes me want to deface those posters. The guy they used in the "I believe in Social Justice" poster is not exactly the finest example of Muslim manhood, is it? Pockmarked face, horrible goatee moustache, young and bald. Some Muslim men have beautifully trimmed beards. They might as well have used Yasser Arafat or Osama Bin Laden as idealised Muslims. What is wrong with these people??!!

It is like the BNP using Hitler or skinheads and swastikas to advertise their party. Really crap campaign, and here am I, with my wonderful Caliphate-promoting ideas, all lying around gathering dust, unused and eager.

I was at this Islamophobia Conference on Saturday

There were some Muslims saying:

"Muslims care about unemployment!"

"Muslims care about the environment!"

I must say I was very tempted to shout:

"Do Muslims care about immigration? (Come on, Brothers and Sisters, you can tell me!) What about the EU? Are you Europhile or Eurosceptic?"

There was no opportunity for me to put this question. It was very much a "We speak, you listen" kind of conference.

It is not going to persuade people that Muslims are either lovable or harmless, that's all I am saying. It will just reinforce all the stereotypes.

"Ugly Muslim man with ugly Islamic goatee beard ... "

"Another bloody towelhead ... " etc.

"Why can't you just agree with us without going around looking like ragheads and blowing us up?"

Actually, I think it is pointless to tell people that Muslims are mostly harmless, decent and lovable.

The fact is people love to hate Muslims.

The only way to get round that is to show why it might be advantageous to be a Muslim. comes to mind, though it may have some presentational problems.

If they hired me, I could run a real poster campaign for them.

Islam is ...

... the synthesis of the Abrahamic faiths

Thesis - Judaism
Antithesis - Christianity
Synthesis - Islam

or it is the religion of backward brown people the Europeans once conquered but who are now effecting a reverse invasion and now want to blow them up. ...

Britain takes another step closer to becoming a one-party state

First we had Gordon's GOATS.

Now we have a Labour MP working with the ConDem Coalition.

Only a matter of time before we become a de jure as well as a de facto one-party state.

I just want it on record that I am offering to help draft the constitution to this unique party of National Interest.

BNP the unpaid, unofficial and only occasionally-heeded think tank of the LibLabCon

Is Ed Balls getting ready to join the Bigot National Party? Or will he just raid its manifesto for more lovely policies that most members of the public agree with?

The BNP does not need to be in power to win. It is the unpaid and unofficial policy think tank of the LibLabCon. Already the Milliband Brothers are distancing themselves from the invasion of "Afraq" which of course the BNP were dead against the moment that misbegotten idea was a twinkle in Blair and Bush's eyes.

Watch Labour veer to the right of the ConDems!

It's showtime, folks!

They will be withdrawing from the EU next, you watch my words.

Then capital and corporal punishment will be restored, together with family values, after the abolition of child benefit whereupon illegitimacy and single mummery will again be condemned ....

Hitler's contribution to the establishment of the state of Israel should be acknowledged

If it hadn't been for Hitler Zionism would still be dead in the water. Why do Zionists never acknowledge Hitler's contribution to the establishment of the State of Israel? The laws against Holocaust Denial are there to prevent the denial of Hitler's massive contribution of 5 to 7 million Jews.

When they celebrate the birth of their nation, does it occur to them to celebrate Hitler's birthday too? (It is 20 April 1889 if anyone's interested.)

This was what made Western Christian guilt kick in after they acknowledged centuries of being nasty to the Jews. Anti-Semitism was and remains endemic in the West. (It should be pointed out that the Semitic races include Arabs too. Hatred of Jews and Muslims remains sustained and visceral in 21st century Culturally Christian Europe.)

Now, is there something about Trinitarian Christianity that makes Christians particularly intolerant of any forensic analysis of its doctrine?

There used to be laws that made it very inadvisable to deny the Trinity if you want to hang on to your job or your life.

Why would people wish to deny the Trinity? Because it is reasonable to do so, I would have thought. It is such a dishonest and irrational doctrine that many ignorant white people who call themselves Christians are not even aware that they are supposed to believe in it. This is because of the "bums on pews" policy of desperation that lets anyone in, promoted by an Anglican Church who represent a religion that is no longer fit for purpose.

All the Abrahamic faiths are meant to promote family values. Anglican Christian doctrine does not quite manage this, does it?

Many Christians are made to recite the creed without comprehension. You can be sure it exists because it is only the non-European Christians who know what it's all about. They at least know what the deal is: believe that Christ is the Divine Son of God and you will be saved from hell, whatever your sins.

Still not quite getting it?

Let me simplify it then:

"It is not enough to believe in God. You have to believe that Christ is also Divine Son of God. Sorry, but this the non-negotiable essence of Christianity. That is why the Jews, Muslims and Unitarians are gonna roast in hell. The Inquisition was to save these people from themselves."

The Inquisition was what happened when too many Jews and Muslims started denying the Trinity. Only something like the Inquisition could shut them up good and proper.

The Koran explicitly denies the trinity because it is irrational and amoral. To say God is One in Three is still polytheism and idolatry. Well, it is, isn't it?

Does it sound a bit like a liberal democracy invading other countries to save them for themselves? For their own good? Like Iraq and Afghanistan? You betcha!

Christian guilt thus saw it is as politic to rob the land of Peter Arab to pay Paul Zionist as well as to conduct the occasional pogrom.

Why do the words "Christian" and "hypocrisy" go hand in hand?

We hate and fear the people we have wronged.

Does a religion that makes you declare a lie to be truth have an effect on your intellect and your morals and indeed your very civilisation?

It can be seen that the period of Roman decline can be linked to Constantine's conversion of his empire to the religion of women and slaves.

Is it not about time we disestablished the Church of England, and put something more fit for purpose in its place?

I don't suppose this country is quite ready for a Mosque of Britain, but it would probably be as well to start talking about it, to prepare the ground, rather as Cameron today is now gingerly preparing us for changes in our lifestyle expectations and what diminished expectations we ought to have have of the state for the next few decades ....

I can already think of a lecturer in divinity who would make an excellent Ayatollah of Cambridge.

A Win-Win Situation

A win-win situation is when you don't care if you win or not.

Sunday, 6 June 2010

Tom Harris MP for Leader of the Labour Party!

This is what I posted on Tom Harris' wall, urging him to throw his hat in the ring for the leadership contest, for which the deadline is 9 June (which is also my mother's birthday):

"Look, Tom, throw your hat in the ring anyway and promise you will do everything in your power to

1. have a referendum on withdrawing from the EU
2. effect an immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan
3. abolish child benefit for all
4. reintroduce corporal and capital punishment
5. reintroduce fault in divorce
6. replace Academy Schools with the New Model Comprehensive

[above slightly revised]

I mean, just listen to Ed Balls today on immigration! They are just stealing BNP policies one by one. But we don't mind, because we are generous and liberal like that. When they are all taken and adopted, we will just think up some more for you to steal. The BNP - better than any old think tank, eh?

Just go even further than the other leadership contenders and it is as good as in the bag.

Just be very very clear about what you are offering. If they are shocked and appalled, then the strategy will have worked.

If you talk about fiscal responsibility and keeping the value of the pound in your pocket, you may even get a few Tories voting for you once you are leader.

Nothing wrong I have suggested above contradicts clause iv.

The Labour Party believes that "by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few, where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, and where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect."

Good luck! x x x

He may have left it a bit late to get nominations from 33 MPs, but anything is possible in theory!


"The years come galloping swiftly by.
We watch a while, then remember we must follow."

A rather charming and innovative idea, showing that you can be both Muslim *and* a technocratic time-manager is an effort to revive the Productivity Islam teaches us. Through Quran, Seerah and history of the Islamic Civilization, shares how Islam teaches us to be productive in our every day life.

Check our brand new iPhone app -! It's bound to make you productive! schedules your tasks through an easy to use interface and utilizes PROVEN time management technique called “Time-blocking”. More importantly, it schedules your tasks around local salah times so you don't miss your prayers!

Check it out: and and

The British and their much-vaunted "democracy" ie their corrupt, sclerotic, irrational oligarchy

The Green Party got only 285,616 votes but now have an MP.

The combined Eurosceptic vote of UKIP and BNP was 1.6 million (plus 64,826 if you want to count the idiots who vote for the English Democrats).

This perfectly illustrates what a crap system of "democracy" we have.

There are more Eurosceptic parties than there are Europhile parties.

There are more people who were against the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan than who were for it.

Call this either rational or democratic?

But the British are easily frightened, enslaved by their fear of being called Fascist Nazi Racist Extremists.

"Misrule Britannia, Britannia ruled by knaves.
Britons shall forever remain as slaves!"

Comparative Legal Studies

"The foundation of Jewish law is extreme harshness and that of Christianity extreme laxity, while the Shariah of Muhammad is in the middle of such matters. That is why it is most perfect of all systems of law.*"

Page 309 of The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam by Yusuf Al-Qaradawi

Tafsir by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, vol 6, p51, with some condensation

Friday, 4 June 2010

Zionist ideology summarised

Zionism is an ethno- nationalist ideology that states you have a right to inhabit the land of your ancestors even though you no longer possess the title deed, provided you have powerful friends.

Anyone who doesn't like it can just fuck off. Indeed, you wish they would. Indeed, if they won't go, you will damn well make them go.

Why not, if you can? Who cares about justice and fairness? That's just for wimps, isn't it?

Bunch of filthy raghead cockcroaches anyway. The West, who are the powerful friends of the Zionists, hates Muslims.

Even nationalists - like those in the BNP - who ought to sympathise with the plight of any indigenous people being dispossessed, cannot bring themselves to sympathise with Muslims. That is because they hate Muslims and wish they would leave their country.

They of course understand why Israelis would wish to expel and exterminate Muslims and secretly and not so secretly sympathise with the Israelis. That is what BNP supporters would like to happen: wipe Muslims off the face of this earth and never be offended by the sight of mosques, minarets and Muslims in their land ever again.

The presence of Muslims in their midst are visible reminders of their own helplessness.

Rather than examine the dishonourable role that British has played in the establishment of the State of Israel, they prefer to cling to their hatred of Muslims rather than admit that their wonderful government and political system could ever have done anything wrong, even if they themselves are victims of misrule by their own government who are members of their own race.

That's racial and cultural chauvinism for you.

Curiously inconsistent, is it not? I think so anyway.

That is of course so much easier than picking up a book and attending talks about the plight of the Palestinians and other suchlike victims of misrule in foreign lands.

The history of foreign lands and the plight of foreign victims of misrule have no interest and relevance for white nationalists. There is nothing to be learnt from these foreigners and these foreign goings-on.

History is boring. Hatred at least gives you the illusion of certainty. At least one knows at a visceral level how much one hates Muslims and Pakistani cities in the UK ...

Zionism is a species of ethno-nationalism

I would like to hear from anyone who disagrees with this.

"Zionism perfectly represents the political reality that might is right."

I would be interested to hear from anyone who disagrees with this statement.

David Laws and his £40,000 fuck

Interesting how many MP-hating people cannot see their hypocrisy and small-minded vindictiveness when they proclaim the villainy of Laws for daring to claim £40K for his London accommodation.

This seems to arise from a number of unspoken and questionable assumptions here.

1. What is legitimately claimable as an expense becomes "theft", "corruption" and "fraud" if you have sex with your landlord or your landlady.

2. Your fuck buddy is obliged to give you stuff for free. (However, if that were so then no one would be anyone's fuck buddy, would they?)

3. MPs do not have a right to any privacy.

4. All are obliged to given an up to date list of their sex partners, especially MPs.

5. It is quite in order for an MP to suffer the loss of £40K for the foul crime of having sex with his landlord or landlady.

6. £40K is a reasonable sum to pay for a fuck.

This is when the MP concerned should ask: "Is it cos I is an MP?"

The answer would be: "Of course it is! The fact that you exist, let alone are paid and are allowed to claim any expenses paid at all is an affront to civilised values."

Bit extreme, but many educated liberals and libertarians take this view.

Hypocrisy and small-minded vindictiveness go hand in hand with MP-hating libertarians and liberals.

Page 66 states:

"Partner means one of a couple, whether of the same sex or of the opposite sex (the other being a Member) who although not married to each other or civil partners are living together and treat each other as spouses."

If I don't tell friends and family that my landlord or landlady is my sex partner, then I am not treating him or her like a spouse, am I?

Stupidity, cowardice, hypocrisy and vindictiveness rule OK in the UK.

Tuesday, 1 June 2010

David Laws and his landlord lover

Supposing you are an MP, live in Yeovil and have to travel to London frequently on parliamentary business.

You rent a flat or stay at a B&B. This is an allowable expense for which you can claim.

You fuck your landlord or landlady from time to time over time. You certainly don't go around telling your friends and family that you and your landlord (or landlady) are an item.

Suddenly an allowable expense is no longer an allowable expense.

Is this quite right? Or a gross invasion of your privacy as well as that of your landlord's (or your landlady's)?

Only in Britain, eh?

Israel attacks a ship in international waters

Wouldn't it be nice to have a political party that promises the voters a referendum on British foreign policy?