Racial superiority is all about having more money and bigger and better guns than the people whose asses you kick. It would stand to reason that this is by no means assured for all time and the colour of your skin does not protect you at all from the vicissitudes of bad government.
The reason why politically respectable white people in the liberal establishment refused to express racial pride was because they knew they were already supreme and it would just be demeaning for them to go on about it, the way the white working classes do (because they have nothing else to be proud of but the colour of their skin).
It is a bit like old rich families (ie those who are not nouveau riche) not crowing about how much they earn and own, because they are wise enough to know that ostentatiously displaying their wealth only excites hatred and envy in those who could never hope to have even a fraction of what they earn.
I happened to be born Chinese though no input of my own. I could have been born white, or black or brown, but I was born Chinese. (Those who are familiar with the rules of reincarnation will doubtless conclude that I must have been a very good person indeed in my former life.)
It is not enough to be born Chinese, however, to do what I do. One has to speak the language, know the people, know the country's history, know its political system and know its laws to do what I do, which is to presume to tell the British what is good for them. (I have been privileged by my family and cultural background to have married parents who are still married and with an extended family who filled in the gaps of my parents' parenting and who have always valued education. All this I commend to all people of all races, for I want others to also have what I have enjoyed, believing that this would make the world a better place.) I claim to be able to know better than any white indigenous Briton what is good for their country precisely because I am foreign, for sometimes you are in a better position be objective and effective if you not the person afflicted, for example, when you need a foreign object removed from your eye.
The wiser Chinese politicians who deal with foreigners would be careful not to go on about their racial superiority because that is already assumed. To go on about it would just be crass, and that was why liberal politicians would shut up poor white people who live amongst lots of black people when they do anything to assert their racial pride or show fear of other races in close proximity, eg in the Deep South and South Africa.
We should of course be generous when we can afford to be. Meanness is to be despised, especially in the wealthy, but it is quite hypocritical to be generous with other people's money and to be hospitable to foreigners on behalf of others who do not wish to be hospitable to be foreigners and whom you inconvenience because you wish to be hospitable, yet do not suffer the inconvenience and alarm that the white urban proletariat suffer when the racial composition of their neighbourhoods is changed very noticeably in a short space of time.
But white liberal politicians would always live in white neighbourhoods and be surrounded by white people and therefore feel none of the fear and hatred that white people surrounded by other races feel. To shut them up they would call them racist, and ignore, vilify and marginalise them, because they are poor and lowly and the poor and lowly are always marginalised, despised and hated, the world over.
It should be noted that these white liberal politicians are so despicably hypocritical, cowardly and callous that they do not tell tell white urban proletariat whose interests they are supposed to represent that their bastard-breeding welfare-scrounging ways are wrong, because that would lose them votes. Instead, they leave them to rot in their sink school comps, bribe them with more benefits that would make them even more useless, promiscuous and illegitimate, and only hit them on the head when they manifest any behaviour or attitude that identifies them as "racist", to shut them up.
Liberals too despise religion, feeling that they are too clever to believe in God, without for once acknowledging that the proletariat, most of whom are not moral philosophers, operate only through the promptings of their ability to feel pain and pleasure. Most of them are now promiscuous and illegitimate, but cannot or will not accept that illegitimacy is bad for them. This is because they have never had the experience of any moral teaching (Christian or otherwise) that told them that Lust is a sin and that illegitimacy is a Bad Thing for their society and their nation. It will take a great deal of patience and energy to sort them out. This is what happens when you, as an able bodied person, kick away the crutches of the moral cripple. You will find yourselves in the end obliged to carry him on your shoulders or leaving him to the wolves when he cannot keep up.
This is how things in Britain seem to me as a foreigner.