1. It is the idea that the biggest gang you can be in that is big enough to matter and small enough to care is the nation.
2. The nation consists of different tribes who have agreed to become or remain a part of that nation because the benefits are perceived to be greater than the cost.
3. The purpose of nationalism is to promote the long term national interest.
4. If (3) is true then it is incumbent on any nationalist to discuss the subject of eugenics and to promote it through recognising the primacy of the institutions of marriage and family and acknowledging how feminism has desecrated those two institutions through causing widespread illegitimacy and degeneracy.
Ethno-nationalism is nothing more than whingeing and asking for things that you should already now know you will never get ie forcible repatriation of other races, apartheid and racial privileges.
That is why it is a DEAD DUCK.
However, there is nothing stopping you from preferring your own people within a legal system that is racially neutral.
Ummah translates itself as nation from the Arabic.
I prefer this version of nationhood.
That is so much better than ethno-nationalism which proposes the forcible repatriation of non-white British citizens, apartheid or racial privileges, which only makes nationalists feared, hated and despised for being socially retarded and politically unrealistic.
Racially neutral but radical civic nationalism will be quite exciting enough. Please do not think it is going to be boring just because you find UKIP and the English Democrats deadly dull.