Wednesday, 31 October 2012

MemeGenerator Morpheus on Jimmy Savile No 2

MemeGenerator Morpheus on Jimmy Savile No 1

Happy Halloween 2012

I am a Spelling Nazi

Savile Unravels: Seeing Right Through the Anti-Savile Hysteria by Steve Moxon

I reproduce Steve Moxon's post in a way that I hope is easier on the eye than what he displayed on his blog.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Savile Unravels: Seeing Right Through the Anti-Savile Hysteria

There is still no compelling evidence – that is, evidence that amounts to proof beyond reasonable doubt (or anything near it) – that Savile was the serious sex abuser as he is portrayed. And we know from similar hysterias in the recent past – notably over what turned out to be the entirely groundless 'satanic sex abuse' supposed paedophile rings with countless 'victims' – that you can get a great multiplying of allegations even in the absence of any truthful basis. What is more, the spurious 'satanic sex abuse' scandals were in respect of alleged events that were current or in the recent past, whereas the events re Savile are decades in the past and therefore very likely to be the result of 'false memories'. The psychology of constructing fabrications of past events is a human universal, and is rife whenever there is a highly salient seed upon which a construction can be made. A famous and larger-than-life individual who had myriad inconsequential encounters with others is almost bound to be the subject of a plethora of 'false memory'-based supposed incidents.

     So what can we say for definite about Savile (apart from that he was on the odd side of larger-than-life, if not a creep)? Well, Savile was a personification of the role he was expected to fill. As a DJ his job was to create a fun and indeed sexual atmosphere by flirting or mock-flirting. The obvious fact is that his position, as a foremost media star within pop music culture in the febrile atmosphere of the pop music scene in its heyday, was one of an alpha-male, and as such he had and was seen to have sexual licence. Not only would it be that Savile felt able to approach girls/women sexually, but girls/women would expect and in many cases not be averse to this. Girls usually would at least go along with it, if not be actively facilitative. It must be borne in mind that just as someone in Savile's position would be both particularly attracted to and be in a position to act on his attraction to females at the peak of their appeal – a few years post-puberty, at the start of their sexual lives; correspondingly, females, in being sexually attracted to conspicuously successful males, would have been attracted to Savile, and notwithstanding a considerable age difference.

     The particularly high-status older male together sexually with the nubile girl, as we can see throughout history, is as natural as it gets. Only in contemporary Western culture since the advent of the 'political-correctness' political-philosophy within the past two decades has this been regarded as a form of abuse. It is most certainly not 'paedophilia', which is defined precisely as an exclusive sexual interest in individuals below the age of puberty. Not only is Savile's interest clearly in post-pubertal girls, but it is not established even then that he had the exclusive interest necessary for a categorisation of 'hebephilia' (corresponding to 'paedophilia' but re adolescents, not children). His extraordinary position meant that he could indulge in a narrow preference for the most highly nubile females, and simply to have promiscuous sex with them without having to offer long-term partnership. This is wildly beyond any realistic hope for all but a very small minority of males, but certainly not beyond their normal dreams. The scope of Savile's sexual interest a psychiatrist would tell you is normal for males.

     The upshot is that the sexual dynamics in which Savile found himself essentially were much more of a two-way street, with interactions that were mutually reinforcing. It is not at all hard to see how all this could ratchet up so that Savile got all too used to the dynamics and took liberties, as they say. It may be that instead of a formalised peck on the cheek, Savile would kiss on the mouth. There is a new 'Savile meme' of his cigar-smoke-smelling tongue rammed into unsuspecting mouths, and this likely reflects this extension of repertoire, but is also likely to be an exaggeration. Exaggeration is natural human behaviour to make an event more significant than it otherwise would be. Regarding sexual behaviour there is always the dimension that for girls/women any form of sex is often regretted because of the question that it raises of sexual proprietariness. [The main form of mutual denigration that females employ is to portray in terms of sexual over-availability. This is because it injures a female's chances of securing a male long-term (as opposed to a short-term) partner. It is the key weapon in female intra-sexual competition.] For this reason, any accusation by a female against a male of inappropriate sexual behaviour should always be regarded with some suspicion. This goes completely against the current politically dominant philosophy of 'political correctness' contempt for the male, and this is a key feature of the current hysteria against Savile.

     If you then add the media feeding frenzy, which provides a huge platform for attention-seeking, and additionally the prospect of large sums in compensation payouts with minimal need to supply proof in respect of any individual incident; then you have the perfect storm to actively facilitate women to come forward to redefine as coerced past sexual behaviour to which there was acquiescence if not full mutuality. Max Clifford points out that most of the many women coming forward to him appear to be fabricating – either exaggerating out of all proportion or making up the whole thing.

     To return to the issue of the nubile girl: contemporary age-of-consent law reflects a pejorative view of sex with nubiles stemming from Victorian times that is now anachronistic. The average age of puberty back then was 17, whereas now it is eleven and still falling. If the girls Savile preferred indeed were aged fifteen or fourteen, given the contemporary reality of the age of sexual maturity out of childhood, then sexual attraction to girls at these ages is normal. The objection that sexual maturity is not emotional maturity is true only inasmuch as full 'emotional' maturity may well not be until age sixteen: the onset of 'emotional' maturity is from the hormonal surge at the beginning of puberty, in that it is this hormonal surge which initiates the adult reorganisation of the brain. In consequence, there is sufficient emotional maturity by age of first sex. Clearly, the evolutionary process would never have given rise to females having sex before they were fully ready to engage in it and deal with the consequences. The brain in fact does not reach full maturity in terms of an end to profound plasticity, until age twenty-five. No-one suggests that sexual activity should be proscribed by law until that age. The average age of first penetrative sex is difficult to ascertain, but it is generally agreed to be below age sixteen – age fifteen (15.0 or 15.3 years) according to the 1999 Global Sex Survey. Yet this is an average taken across all age groups: the age of first sex of someone now aged 60 or 70 is likely to be considerably older than someone now aged fourteen. Thus, the age of first sex for today's adolescents is likely to be around fourteen if not younger. Furthermore, the definition in law of sex in terms of age-of-consent is regarding any orifice and any form of penetration (penis, finger, object), or even non-penetration, it would seem, if it involves the labia/vulva. The average age of onset of any such sexual behaviour inevitably will be notably lower still than re full penile-penetrative sex.

     It is true, of course, that some girls are still very immature in all respects at age fourteen, but this is in large part a 'class' issue, given that epigenetic changes to girls born into less socially structured and secure environments – notably single-parent families in 'underclass' and other 'lower' class milieu -- bring about especially early puberty, resulting in a polarisation in average age of puberty according to broad social grouping. Augmenting this is the highly protracted adolescence and early adulthood of the middle-class education track. The issue then becomes one of an imposition on others of criminal law from a middle-class reality which is particularly inappropriate for some other social groups.

     There is then the problem for such as Savile, that even if there is a desire not to infringe the arbitrary law, of how to ascertain the age of girls so as not to fall foul of the age-of-consent law. Given the falling age of puberty resulting in girls of fourteen/fifteen appearing to be years older, and the ubiquity of young girls lying about their age; then it is near impossible for a male not to fall foul of the law if he is engaging in a large volume of sexual activity. Therefore, even if Savile was mindful of this and trying to be careful, he would have ended up behaving in a way that might appear similar to how is being portrayed.

     It is a further issue as to whether or not Savile was actually coercive – that is, intentionally so – in his behaviour. He hardly needed to be, and even if he actually tried to be careful in this respect, given the volume of sexual activity then with the regular miscommunication between the sexes (especially in the light of mixed signalling by females of coyness and 'come-on'), it would be fully expected that errors would be made. Compounding with the above-mentioned retrospective redefinition of consensual sex as coercive, it is almost inevitable that accusations would accrue to someone in Savile's position, irrespective of his actual character.

     The allegations against Savile in respect of institutionalised girls look odd given Savile's access to girls generally. It could be that he realised that any complaint against him re such girls would tend not to be believed, and on this basis he targeted them; but his brazen attitude more widely belies this. Whether or not from his hubris as a celebrity, Savile may have regarded engagement with the girls sexually as in a real sense bringing them out of their institutionalisation and normalising to thereby actually benefit them; just as when he took them to the Top-of-the-Pops or Jim'll-Fix-It studios for recordings. The institutionalisation of such girls may well have led them more than usual to go along with the behaviour, such that a spiral of miscommunication could ensue, with Savile being unwittingly coercive. It is very easy to take the perspective that if Savile did indeed have sex with these sort of girls, that this is a simple abuse of authority and a very serious one; but the sexual dynamics above outlined apply, and there is an ever clearer basis for a retrospective redefinition of sex as coercive.

     The issue of harm is held to be self-evident, and in any case it is argued that sexual coercion of females of any age, let alone at or under the age-of-consent, is fundamentally unacceptable. This stems from the very deepest biological/evolutionary reasons: the essential basis of all social system in 'policing' male access to sex (which is for reasons beyond my scope here). The obvious harm ancestrally and historically is the obvious one that a girl could end up with a child by a male who is merely indulging in extra-pair sex (and therefore is not intending to support the girl and any subsequent child) and/or is in any case somehow an unsuitable male – that is, lacking in 'good genes' (the basis of male attractiveness across biology). Well, Savile was a very high-status male and there is only one case (so far as I'm aware) in which a putative victim alleges that an abortion was required. It is not clear whether or not Savile used condoms – if, indeed, it is clear that much of the alleged actual penetrative sex took place. Irrespective of these considerations, the harm that is alluded to is the supposed most serious harm of child sex abuse. But even if there was abuse, there was no child sex abuse (unless the outlier allegation of sex with a pre-pubertal boy is proven) because the girls were all past the age of puberty. [In any case, meta-studies on the adult clinical-psychological sequelae of child sex abuse show a very surprising minimal if not null impact.] One woman is claiming that Savile's hand up her skirt when on air in a TOTP filming when she was a teenager has resulted in her subsequent broken marriage, yet there is nothing apparent in the video that she was even upset at the time. Such is the ludicrosity of the cases springing to light.

Overall, there are multiple inter-related and mutually reinforcing facets to the hysteria over Savile, and the essential truths of the male-female dynamics are being completely ignored. The feeding frenzy is feeding upon itself and may turn out to have emanated from little real meat in the first place. It may well be that Savile went beyond an excessive laddishness to exploit the lucky situation in which he found himself, to become reckless as to the acquiescence of girls to engage in sex. It may further be the case that Savile turned into (or was from the outset) an out-and-out abuser, but as yet this is unproven and there appears to be no way forward even in principle whereby it could be proven.

     The Savile hysteria is a marker for our times, which will distinguish them as being peculiarly at odds with human nature and remarkably intolerant and plain stupid. Savile has become an emblem for a cultural hatred of the male. As a relatively low-status male myself, I hardly have great affection for high-status males such as was Savile; even those who behave as perfect gentlemen. The concern must be that if this is how we now jump to malign even high-status males, then as regards the majority of males – boys as well as men – we can only marvel at the extent of prejudice and contempt directed towards them.

# posted by Steve Moxon @ 12:15 PM

Protect our children from paedos by protecting them from feminism

The writer and former England rugby international Brian Moore says he isn’t at all surprised the DJ’s victims didn’t speak up earlier. As long as victims live in fear of not being listened to, they won’t talk.

Every child deserves to have a responsible adult parent who is not an abuser that it can go to should something like this happen.

The standard of parenting of the average child has gone down, while the opportunities for abuse has increased.

That is because the British are now DEGENERATE.

Degeneracy means being inferior to your parents in intellect, education, morals and physical attributes.

The British are now degenerate because they tolerate female promiscuity which  is an essential pillar of feminism.

The working mum became the norm, then the divorced mum and then the Slut Single Mum.

Feminism turns your women into sluts, and then SSMs.  When most of your people are sluts and bastards then your civilisation will DIE, after being exploited by the rest of the world,  of course.

Frightened British men dig their own graves while the matriarchy consolidates its power over the Savile affair

The blogger Steve Moxon was very interesting about how most heterosexual men would find adolescent girls under the age of consent sexually attractive.

"If you showed photos of average girls ages fifteen or fourteen to the average man and did not label them with the girls' ages, then all normal men would find them attractive and would react sexually. [This can be measured physiologically, so there is no need to rely on possibly dishonest verbal responses.]"

The point is that men are programmed to find females at the height of their fertility attractive.

The point is that men cannot say NO to no-strings sex.

The modus operandi of the matriarchy is to seduce men into accepting sex, and then punish them for accepting.

The only way to control this rather one-sided fight in favour of women is for men to say that it is not OK to be a Slut Single Mum.

In case you men still don't get it, what is happening now over the Savile affair is a witch hunt. This is the matriarchy consolidating its power.

Dead and retired old male celebs are being done over.

Once that happens the younger male celebs will start getting done over too.

Too bad there are so many young men prepared to collude with it to vent their outrage at these accused men because they are perceived to be so evil the moment they are accused that they do not deserve a fair trial.

Anyone who asserts this principle on behalf of all who are accused of paedophilia is automatically accused of being a supporter of paedophiles, as I have found at

The lower classes like venting about paedos because they already know they are lower than immigrants, and want someone lower than themselves to kick around.

Who is a paedo? Anyone who has had sex with anyone under 16.

And we know what sluts these fatherless schoolgirls brought up by their SSMs are these days, don't we?

When young men start getting old they will join the category of becoming a potential paedo too.

When that happens no one will care what happens to them any more.

Their mothers will be dead, their wives will have divorced them, and they will have lost touch with their children.

This the future, guys.

No alpha male is going to be seen to be defending paedos by standing up for their right to be treated as innocent TILL PROVEN GUILTY, after a fair trial.

Nobody has noticed that what Savile is being subjected to is trial by media in the Kangaroo Court of Public Opinion. That is not a fair trial, by the way, and Public Opinion is a strong but gullible monster.

If they cannot give Jimmy Savile a fair trial when he was alive, then he will be given an unfair trial when he is dead.   That is what the matriarchy has done to this long-established principle of British justice, while even senior male lawyers fear to point this out.

And when he is convicted, the BBC must pay.

Who funds the BBC?  Anyone in Britain who owns a TV.

These imbecilic male licence fee payers are busily piling up their own funeral pyre.

Don't expect any man in any political party to defend the beta male.

Not Cameron, not Clegg, not Miliband.

Not Farage, not Griffin nor anyone else in the even smaller and even more useless parties.

The closest the beta male has to someone that behaves like an alpha male and is prepared to defend him is ME.

But you all think I am mad, don't you?

Mad or the wrong race or the wrong sex.

And so, almost without exception, you think you should join the hysterical denunciation of Savile and others associated with him, so that you are not seen to be siding with the paedos.

But you are just digging your own graves and setting yourselves up to be even more emasculated, even more despised and even more likely to be accused of being a paedo the next time you say or do anything a woman or a child might find offensive and irritating.

Pity the men of Matriarchal Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.  If they think they are already oppressed, they ain't seen nothing yet.

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Are you man enough to like "Are SSMs bad for Western Civilisation?"?
Are you man enough to "like" Are SSMs bad for Western Civilisation?"?

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
Please don't tag me in any of your photos.

Claire Khaw
Have you liked the page though?

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend

Claire Khaw
Why not?
Are SSMs GOOD for Western civilisaton????
Prove it!
It is like asking you to agree with me that the earth is round.
And you can't even bring yourself to do that. What a coward.

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
I don't like tacky/trashy pages. I'm not inclined to use terms like "SSM". My problem here is rubbish pages and low standard talk.

Claire Khaw
Do you agree with me though that widespread illegitimacy is not good for Britain?

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
It's obviously not good for Britain. There are just better avenues to discuss such issues than one of your nutty pages.

Claire Khaw
Where then?
Tell me where!

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
Serious pages and serious people (that excludes far-right bigots and weirdos). You can search for them yourself.

Claire Khaw
Name just one! You can't.
Not a single political party in the land supports marriage.

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
Mainstream parties and politicians can provide better forums for discussion. Try to take your advocacy there (I can't say if they'll take you seriously though). Goodbye.

Claire Khaw
They don't and won't talk about it, AND YOU KNOW IT!
You can't find me a SINGLE LINK.

Lily-livered "Conservative" Facebook friend
Give me a break. Goodbye.

Claire Khaw
Your silence is all I need to win the argument. Goodbye.

Are you man enough to like the Justice for Jimmy and the BBC Facebook page?

Claire Khaw needs a like too. ;-)

Lily-livered BNP Facebook friend

Claire Khaw

Lily-livered BNP Facebook friend
becuse he is guilty

Claire Khaw
The BNP get a bad press. Why do you think everyone thinks they are guilty of racism?

Lily-livered BNP Facebook friend
because they are not racist

Claire Khaw
Ever heard of trial by media?

Lily-livered BNP Facebook friend
i know and they are probabby using it to hide the 9 muslim pedos but he is still guilty
300 victems that is sick

Claire Khaw
All the elderly male celebs are going to get done.
When that is finished the young ones will get done.
Maybe Frankie Boyle.
Maybe Russell Brand.
You are OK about an accusation being as good as a conviction?
Then you deserve all you get.
The number of accusations against you is evidence of the truth of them?
OK, that can be easily arranged.
I will just get lots of women to accuse you of the same thing, after you are retired.
You'll be ugly and old and also look like a paedo.
We all know old ugly men are all paedos, aren't they?

Lily-livered BNP Facebook friend  does not respond.


They tempt you with sex and then punish you for giving into temptation.   

A short guide to Eugenics

Would Jimmy Savile ever get a fair trial now even if he could be brought back to life?

You know he wouldn't.

If Jimmy Savile cannot get a fair trial even if he could be resurrected, should he be tried and convicted in the Kangaroo Court of Public Opinion?

So this is what British justice has now come to.   If you cannot give a man a fair trial, you wait till he is dead and give him an unfair one.   

So this is what passes for "justice" in dumbed down Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Why are the the BBC lawyers Reed Smith not making this point?

Why aren't they telling these superannuated groupies to fuck off cos the BBC ain't paying out cos no liability can be established?

If they wanted to make a complaint, they should have called cops on him when he was still alive.   If they were too scared or indecisive then it is just too bad.   Put it down to experience and move on,  instead of enriching lawyers and superannuated groupies with evidence so stale and contaminated that the cops decided that it was pointless to continue their investigations.

Is it cos Reed Smith are stupid, not fit for purpose, or cos they want to string this whole stupid thing out, so they can be paid lots of lovely legal fees at the expense of the BBC licence fee payer?

I think we should be told.

Broadgate Tower
20 Primrose Street
London EC2A 2RS
United Kingdom
T+44 (0)20 3116 3000

Do give them a ring to find out how much they charge the BBC and therefore you, the BBC licence fee payer, per hour for their legal advice.
"Like" this Justice for Jimmy and the BBC Facebook page if you object to paying out to superannuated groupies with stale and contaminated evidence.   

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Chairman of the BBC washes his hands of it and hangs it out to dry

Chris Patten has hung the BBC out to dry. He has not protected the BBC at all. He has virtually admitted liability. Who will pay? We, the licence fee payer, of course.

He has washed his hands of the whole matter and said, "I wasn't in the saddle when all this happened.  I am just as shocked and disgusted.  Nothing to do with me, mate."

What are the BBC's lawyers doing?

Instead of saying very firmly indeed that without a trial there can be no question of liability and having to pay out to a bunch of carrion-eating ageing ex-groupies all of whose evidence is stale and contaminated, they are stringing it out, and scaring the BBC into paying more legal fees.   

How much are the fees of Reed Smith, the BBC's lawyer's,  per hour?

It doesn't even say on their website.

Much  more than you and I could afford, but we are going to pay it anyway, cos Chris Patten has virtually admitted liability.

The next lot of licence fee you pay is not going into make programmes, it is going to pay off a bunch of ageing ex-groupies, who are now a degree above the white educated male BBC executive or any formerly famous male celebrity that might  have taken advantage of groupies being groupies.

The groupies are pissing on the heads of male BBC executives, and discredited elderly deceased male celebrities.  The BBC will in turn piss on you, the one who is funding all this.

Wouldn't you rather be scared of the Secret Police or some tyrant than a bunch of immoral women who are opportunistic carrion-eating old groupies who couldn't even provide enough evidence for the police to think that an arrest would lead to conviction?

I would.
"Like" this Justice for Jimmy and the BBC Facebook page if you object to paying out to superannuated groupies with stale and contaminated evidence.  

Saturday, 27 October 2012

The Claire Khaw Law Student range of Justice for Jimmy and the BBC T-shirts
Click on link to also see front.
Click link to also see back  of T-shirt.
"Like" this Justice for Jimmy and the BBC Facebook page if you object to paying out to superannuated groupies with stale and contaminated evidence.  

Can it ever be racist to be rude to members of your own race?

Political Correctness chasing its own tail, catching it and eating it ...   

The liberal establishment destroys itself

There is no honour amongst these thieves.   Only I can save them, and only if they ask me the right questions.   But they are already running around like headless chickens.  Can they even formulate a sensible question?

What these celebrities should realise is this: they are envied and hated by the disgruntled voter, and, being male, the excuses available to women are not available to them.

The mob do not care about giving these hated envied celebrities such a thing as a fair trial.

All they know is that someone they dislike has been accused of something foul.

Therefore they are guilty and must be punished.

Even if they are not guilty they would still like to see them punished, so they can observe with grim satisfaction to each other in their schadenfreude "How are the mighty fallen."

Mob justice is all that is available to these celebs now, and saying things like "Oh, but most of my colleagues were doing it then" will only get them into more trouble.

No one will take on board what Steve Moxon says at

If Max Clifford wants to save his clients he should come to me, to give them a better chance.  I am legally trained, after all.

Smashing Pumpkins

The Claire Khaw Law Student range of Justice for Jimmy and the BBC T-shirts
"Like" this Justice for Jimmy and the BBC Facebook page if you object to paying out to superannuated groupies with stale and contaminated evidence.  

Cleaning ladies get a windfalll while soldiers paid a pittance die for women's rights in Afghanistan

"Some former full time care workers could be awarded as much as £100,000."

The matriarchy is in full swing all right.

Daryll Christopher:

"Government cleaners and some single mothers on benefits earn much more than low level soldiers who risk their lives. They are paid less simply because they are men, and the life of a man is very cheap.

Part Time cleaners £12,312 - £13,589 per annum

Full Time Rookie Soldier £13,895

I would mutiny if I were a soldier not yet dead and still with my full complement of limbs, stationed in Afghanistan paid a pittance to invade another country in the name of women's rights.

But theirs is to do and die and not ask questions of this damned demented matriarchy.

It seems they will keep dying like flies in Afghanistan too stupid to ask the reason why until there is no one left to overthrow this fucking stinking mess.

Herbert Spencer gave Hitler his eugenic ideas

"Spencer's ideas became very influential in China and Japan largely because he appealed to the reformers' desire to establish a strong nation-state with which to compete with the Western powers. His thought was introduced by the Chinese scholar Yen Fu, who saw his writings as a prescription for the reform of the Qing state."

The Chinese have the benefit of the ideas of Herbert Spencer, but the British do not.  This is ironic and tragic in view of the advanced case of national degeneracy they are now suffering as a result of decades of feminist indoctrination.

Herbert Spencer's_view_of_Jews

Uh oh!

Friday, 26 October 2012

CLOSE BUT NO CIGAR by David Jones on the Todmorden councillor elections

"The election result for my by election in Todmorden Central campaign was:

Jones, David (Independent): 127 (25.5%)
Rez, Josef Arthur (Liberal Democrat): 361 (71.5%)

Rejected Papers: 15
Turnout: 503.(22.5%)

Neither the Labour Party, nor the Conservatives fielded candidates in this high-profile ward, and the Liberal Democrats weren’t expecting me to stand either.

Before Joe Rez and I began our respective campaigns I spoke to persuade him to not resort to personal attacks, which we both agreed the campaign should be kept to voters issues which I honoured. He talked about imposing speed-limits and opposed supermarkets, whilst my local issues revolved around the decline of morality and local unemployment.

Other than my being an Independent there were two differences to my campaign:

I wanted to include as wide a possible range of nationalists in my campaign, involving nationalists of all parties, shades and varieties. My campaign included nationalists from the groups both sides of the Pennines and farther afield. I would like to thank all who supported me.

I gave my campaign a twist, not only including the traditional bread and butter issues around immigration and unemployment but a strong moral plank centred around the decline of family values, partially to counter a very strong gay vote

The local Liberal Democrat party boss Michael Taylor had other ideas however, he and his daughter decided that the Liberal Democrats best chances were to attack me as a “far right extremist” over and over. He even involved his daughter in the campaign, which I retaliated with leaflets demanding to know why an MEP would feel the need to interfere in a local election.

Polling day was going extremely well until around eight o’clock. When carloads of Pakistani voters swamped the polling station (which is odd since most of them were, as I was told, were out of the country, and very few of them I recognised either—I must say). At both the Town Hall & St. Josephs School, in which I supervised the doors on each three times, for half an hour at a time, it was clear that I was the favourite for white voters.

Central Ward is one of five (Civil Parish) Wards that make up the District Ward of Todmorden Ward. My personal vote, since the last Town Council election, has risen to a majority in my home ward and I am targeting other areas where I feel there is potential to improve my vote.

I feel that, although I did not win, I have maintained my integrity, which (politics aside) my voters consider to be both my main quality and the qualities required of a politician. The Liberal Democrats have gained a seat, but lost one thing they will never get back, their honour.

Hopefully my participation and 25.5% will serve as a model for nationalists, despite political differences, to unite and keep fighting for what we know in our hearts to be true and right, maintain our honour and keep fighting. I would like to thank all those who placed their faith in me, and to anybody who wants to write me off as a failure, adios!"

David Jones gets 25% of the vote in Todmorden councillor elections

David Jones - 127 (25% of the vote)

Joe Rez - 361

Spoilt 15%

Turnout 22.5%

Thursday, 25 October 2012

Son of Liberal Democrat councillor candidate and Todmorden Mayoral Consort a convicted burglar

May the better candidate become councillor for the good people of Todmorden.

Anti-establishment T-shirts and hoody
Click link to also see the back.
Click the link to see the back of the T-shirt.
Click on the link to also see the back.
Click on link to also see the back.
Click on link to also see the back.
Click link to also look at the back
Click link to also look at the back.

The Sheeple are Liberal Hoody

Orwell Prize for blogging suspended because of Claire Khaw

"Complaints – some specious and petty, some better founded – about bloggers or what they said would come straight to us: we have to take them seriously as no one else will and it has stretched our capacity to the limits."

Blogging is the only way an unknown political writer can come to the notice of the public.

However, The Orwell Prize, which is certainly very much a part of the liberal establishment, is absolutely determined that even this avenue will be denied to new writers, especially if they have views that offend their PC liberal feminist atheist sensibilities.

So there you are.

How ironic that it should turn out that The Orwell Prize would be the one to be the boot stamping on the face of free speech.

My 2012 submission

My 2011 submission

My 2010 submission

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Can clothes ever be racist?
Azealia Banks Boycotts Dolce & Gabbana Over 'Racist Clothes'
Video of the D&G 2013 Spring Collection complained of by rapper Azealia Banks

Can clothes be racist?

It is true that white people often do not look their best when they have to wear colourful clothes because their complexions come out as pallid and grey when they are swathed in bright colours.  But is that racist?

If so, then The Mikado (an opera by Gilbert & Sullivan with English people dressed up in kimonos) would be considered racist.

There was a dreadful film I saw called The Last Airbender with all the different races dressed up in Chinese clothes, with a Pakistani villain.   Was that racist?

Why were there no black models wearing the clothes that were clearly more suited for those of a darker skin?

Who knows, but is that racist?

My guess is that Azealia Banks and D&G are in it together for a bit of publicity.  

I would never have even looked at the clothes otherwise if not for the fact that I wanted to satisfy my curiosity about how clothes could possibly be racist.    

Racist clothes?

The Treason of the Elites by Peter Rushton

Part 1

Part 2

"Peter Rushton (of Heritage and Destiny, including Lady Michele Renouf and Richard Edmonds; no relation to J P Rushton) speaks at the 7th Memorial Meeting to John Tyndall (1934-2005). Based on Julien Benda's Trahison des Clercs, updated to the modern world, and including of course Jewish influence."

What is the point of complaining about the government when you yourself also fear to point your finger at the thing that most condemns your own people to depravity and degradation - feminism?

The Jews and Muslims seem effortlessly superior because most Jews and Muslims are not slut and bastard like the feminist-indoctrinated liberal atheist gentile.

There is no Jewish or Muslim conspiracy.   You gentiles did this to yourselves all this by yourselves and even now refuse to look under the rock from which the ugly evil slimy matriarchal monster of feminism will emerge ...

Deuteronomy 28 - Curses for Disobedience
15 However, if you do not obey the LORD your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:
16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.
17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed.
18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks.
19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out.
20 The LORD will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.[a] 21 The LORD will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess. 22 The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish. 23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron. 24 The LORD will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.
25 The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. 26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away. 27 The LORD will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured. 28 The LORD will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.
30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad. 35 The LORD will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head.
36 The LORD will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. 37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the LORD will drive you.
38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. 39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them. 40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off. 41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity. 42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land.
43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.
45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the LORD your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the LORD your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the LORD sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.
49 The LORD will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand, 50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young. 51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined. 52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the LORD your God is giving you.
53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the LORD your God has given you. 54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children, 55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities. 56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter 57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities.
58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the LORD your God— 59 the LORD will send fearful plagues on you and your descendants, harsh and prolonged disasters, and severe and lingering illnesses. 60 He will bring on you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you. 61 The LORD will also bring on you every kind of sickness and disaster not recorded in this Book of the Law, until you are destroyed. 62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the LORD your God. 63 Just as it pleased the LORD to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you. You will be uprooted from the land you are entering to possess.
64 Then the LORD will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods—gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known. 65 Among those nations you will find no repose, no resting place for the sole of your foot. There the LORD will give you an anxious mind, eyes weary with longing, and a despairing heart. 66 You will live in constant suspense, filled with dread both night and day, never sure of your life. 67 In the morning you will say, “If only it were evening!” and in the evening, “If only it were morning!”—because of the terror that will fill your hearts and the sights that your eyes will see. 68 The LORD will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

Who are the accursed?

Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners.

As the Bible implies, the foreigner who lives amongst you whom you hate and fear is merely a symptom of your malaise.

The cause of your malaise is the enemy within, between your ears (with the thoughts you think and views you hold) and between your legs with its uncontrolled carnal appetites that you like to call Sexual Liberation.

It is not liberation at all.   Embracing Sexual Liberation means only that you will be enslaved by the worst of your women while you incur the hatred, ridicule and contempt of the men of other races and nations.

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Police attempt to intimidate David Jones and pay him a visit this morning

Dave Jones looking the very model of a modern nationalist councillor

Oh dear.  It seems that the Liberal Democrats are getting nervous and putting the frighteners on David Jones of Todmorden, councillor candidate.  Polling day 25 October 2012.

Dave in front of Todmorden Town Hall, looking councillor-like

DJ to CK 9:50:

Just had 3 police round with photo of us with rifles on EDL news page (printed out), Intelligence told them to 'have a quiet word' not kick my door in."

CK to DJ:

Wot did they say?

DJ to CK 9:57:

Looked at guns, asked when photo taken [It was taken in April and the photos first appeared at], "had a complaint, wanted to sort it quietly."  When I queried who it was, they motioned my leaflet and said "councillor?"

The tweets by Liberal Democrat MEP Rebecca Taylor are quite revealing.  Looks like the LibDems are pulling out all the stops in their organ of dirty tricks in an attempt to suggest that Dave is a Nazi nutter and would be a disgrace to the office of councillor if he were ever elected.

Rebecca Taylor ‏@RTaylor_MEP
@IMG_Calderdale people can and do change (evolve?) their political views over decades, but usually not in a matter of months.
 Hide conversation   Reply  Retweet  Favorite
3:22 PM - 5 Oct 12 · Details

Actually, Rebecca, Dave told Jeffrey Marshall and me on our visit to Todmorden that he was considering "going civic" as long as a year ago before he met me.

We also bumped into your father Dr Michael Taylor on Friday evening canvassing with Joe Rez and another.  It was quite amusing the way he froze when he saw the three of us coming down the street after our country walk back into town.

The other thing that has to be said is that most of the locals stop to have a chat with Dave and he seems well-respected.   Would the locals be quite so friendly with Joe Rez, I wonder.

I must say too that Dave is a man of action and acts on ideas and doesn't just sit on new ideas for years and years and years the way lesser politicians and activists do, until they become old ideas.

We even visited  Abid Husain's shop on Saturday where he bought a lighter.   We all shook hands quite  amicably and discussed the floods.   I was interested to meet the man who seemed so cheerful even as he was telling the Today Programme about how he had to spend all night clearing up the mess left by the most recent flood.   There was something very charming about his resigned chuckle, I thought.  Abid is the Mayor of Todmorden.

Very sportingly Dave also took us on an Incredible Edible walk when Jeffrey Marshall and I praised the pretty fish and bee murals along the canal, which cannot have pleased Dave who wants them to "take their poly-tunnels with them" when they leave Todmorden, as he said in his leaflet. This was after we bumped into Helena Cook, an Incredible Edible, in the market and Dave challenged her about the "bee money".

The pretty fish mural by the Incredible Edibles

Helena and Dave spoke very civilly to each other and when she sang the praises of the things the Incredible Edibles have done for Todmorden and talked about the Bee Walk, I was intrigued and asked Dave to take us on that walk, which must have delighted Helena, who happily gave us directions.

Dave and me in front of the bee mural

Dave dislikes the Incredible Edibles because of their newfangled city ways of growing vegetables, I believe.  I am afraid I am not really familiar with the arguments about the Incredible Edibles and have have only the vaguest idea about what a poly-tunnel is.  

Rebecca Taylor ‏@RTaylor_MEP
@Jamesdbaker1 does the #Todmorden town council "independent" (kicked out of British People's Party) candidate have a gun license I wonder?
 Hide conversation  Reply  Retweet  Favorite
10:11 AM - 8 Oct 12 · Details

James Baker ‏@Jamesdbaker1
Have been handed a picture of the Todmorden town council opposition candidate posing with a gun underneath a nazi flag.
 Retweeted by Rebecca Taylor
Collapse  Reply  Retweet  Favorite
12:51 AM - 8 Oct 12 · Details

James Baker ‏@Jamesdbaker1
@robackroyd Floating around several email servers! Will see about publishing it.
Collapse  Reply  Retweet  Favorite
3:34 AM - 8 Oct 12 · Details

What George Entwistle should have done
  1. Pulled the tribute programme for Jimmy Savile.
  2. Pulled the investigation into Jimmy Savile.

That is what I would have done anyway.

You cannot pursue someone beyond the grave.   To do so would set a terribly bad precedent.   Do not speak ill of the dead, for they can no longer defend themselves.   

Imagine yourself dead and all sorts of terrible things being said about you being a paedo and everything else, just cos some people feel like sticking the knife in and humiliating your loved ones.   

Even if Jimmy Savile were guilty of everything he is accused of, his accusers should have done their accusing while he was still alive.

Nothing they say can now be proven or disproved, and all their evidence is contaminated.   

Next time someone sexually exploits you, complain about it pronto and don't wait till the perp is dead, OK?

The DG does have the air of a slightly incompetent headmaster though, so I think he will end up having to resign.   It seems he was something to do with BBC Vision which was responsible for the tribute programme.  Understandably, Entwistle did not want that pulled, perhaps out of loyalty to his old department, but that was the wrong call, O Slightly Incompetent Looking Headmaster, and you will have to pay the price, I predict.   

Let his head roll rather than make the licence fee payer pay for Jimmy Savile's gropes and under-aged sex.

Who will be the new DG, I wonder.

If the licence fee payer ends up paying for any of these shenanigans then it is one more nail in the coffin for the BBC, which should be broken up and sold, leaving just one state propaganda TV channel and radio station for the government.
"Like" this Facebook page if you don't want the BBC licence fee payer to be forced to pay out to a bunch of superannuated groupies offering stale and contaminated evidence in the hope of financial compensation.

Monday, 22 October 2012

The religion of the Matriarchy v The Religion of the Patriarchy

The religion of the Matriarchy consists of

  1. Sexual Liberal AKA Sexual Licence
  2. The Worship of Sluts
  3. The Tolerance of Slut Single Mums
  4. The promotion of Gay Marriage
  5. Higher Taxes
  6. More Laws
  7. the Desecration of Marriage as an Institution
  8. no-fault divorce
  9. the undermining of masculine authority
  10. the undermining of parental authority

The Religion of the Patriarchy consists of ... ?

Do I really need to tell you again what feminist liberal leftist socialist liberal scum have been doing to your civilisation?   

Man created God to protect him from Woman.   Only God and religion can save men from feminism now. 

Why is feminism so insidious?

Because feminism bribes men with cheap sex until all  he can think in terms of is the next fuck and next blowjob rather than the future, the long-term national interest and the next generation, and of honour, integrity and pride.   

Feminism makes men think and act like women too.   While real women know that any foreign invader will simply maintain them as they have been maintained before by their own men, the men of an invaded country will simply be killed or taken as slaves by foreign invaders.   

That is the difference then, between you and the ladies.   You won't be able to get away with being quasi-women forever, whingeing about paternity leave and the trials and tribulations of being a house-husband.

Do you think you might now like to start thinking about how you are going to challenge the matriarchy who have now taken over every important area of public life?   

Or will you use the fact that you have a job, a wife and children as an excuse to say nothing and do nothing?  

Then you are just useless degenerate scum who are really women with penises incapable of giving birth.  Such freaks of nature deserve only extermination.

Sunday, 21 October 2012

Second visit to Todmorden

Joe, who was telling us about the evils of fast food, and Dave

Kirk and Dave at the market

Dave and  me at the farm

Dave and me at his

Dave and me by the Wizard of Whirlaw

Fighting Back with Dave Jones

Dave and me outside the butchers

Jeffrey Marshall outside the butchers

Dave outside the Todmorden Town Hall

Dave and me outside Todmorden Town Hall

Dave by Todmorden Town Hall

Dave looking rather councillor-like

The rather impressive pediment of Todmorden Town Hall

Dave looking very councillor-like

Dave next to the NOTICE OF POLL with his name and Joe Rez's

Dave at the Todmorden Library with its wide selection of  books on homosexuality.  It is almost as if they are trying to promote homosexuality. Now why would they do that? 


As you are all aware, I am up against Liberal Democrat Joe Rez as an Independent for the Central Ward of the Town Council. Liberal Democrat campaigners on behalf of Mr Rez have attacked me for my stance against 'gay marriage', yet it seems to me they are relying on a bloc vote from Todmorden's sizeable Islamic community.

If the Liberal Democrats are attacking me as "homophobic", then they also attack their own Muslim and Christian voters as "homophobic". Both the Bible and Quran state that marriage is between a man and a woman and both disapprove of homosexuality.

The Quran commands believers not only to abstain from, but also to discourage homosexuality, for Muslims are exhorted to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil and it follows that Muslims must regard as evil what is expressly forbidden by the Koran.

Homosexuality is expressly forbidden by the Koran.

Now is surely the time to take a stand against 'gay marriage' when the LibLabCon oligarchy have together conspired to make it appear that anyone who is against gay marriage is immoral and odd, while liberals all over the Western world are seeking to sanctify a sin by introducing 'gay marriage'.

Christians and Muslims must stick to their scriptural principles and vote against the Liberal Democrat Joe Rez, who is also the Mayoral Consort of Abid Hussain, who is the Liberal Democrat Mayor of Todmorden and also a Muslim.

Muslims and Christians of Todmorden who are against 'gay marriage' now have the chance to make a stand against it and this opportunity must not be missed.

Gay men and women already have the civil partnership and can inherit from each other free of inheritance tax just like a husband and wife.  There is therefore no reason why they should insist on encroaching on marriage, which all right-thinking members of society must know was originally created only for men and women to bring up children of the marriage together in a stable family environment with a mother and a father.

This is surely the ideal that all of us, whatever our religion, should strive for as parents if we want to invest in the future of the next generation as well as the future of the nation.

Telling the youth of today that it is acceptable to be gay will do nothing for the next generation or Britain's intentional competitiveness, which will require a young labour force to replace the old.

Thursday 25 October is the time to make a stand against PC liberal extremism.  It may well be your last opportunity to do so.

If we look after the next generation, the next generation will look after us.

Reverend Robert West's sermon on gay marriage is at

Dave Jones speaking at the John Tyndall Memorial Meeting in Preston, hosted by the England First Party.

At the Bear Cafe.  Dave had English Breakfast tea.

Dave and me at the Bear Cafe

Dave and me in front of the bee mural by the Incredible Edibles

The mural by the canal by the Incredible Edibles

Feeling Dave's collar

Dave having his collar felt

Dave seeing us off at the station