Translate

Saturday, 2 February 2013

Will the percentage of female MPs who support gay marriage be much higher than the percentage of male MPs supporting gay marriage? What does this say about women?


http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2012/12/how-many-labour-mps-oppose-gay-marriage

http://www.c4em.org.uk/support-for-equal-marriage/

http://www.parliament.uk/about/faqs/house-of-commons-faqs/members-faq-page2/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9844514/Conservative-party-ripped-apart-by-gay-marriage-vote.html

There are 503 male MPs and 146 female MPs.

How many male MPs and female MPs will support "gay marriage"?

Will the proportion of female MPs supporting gay marriage be higher than the proportion of male MPs supporting gay marriage?

How many male MPs out of 503 of them will support gay marriage?

What will be  is the percentage of male MPs supporting gay marriage?

How many  female MPs out of 146 of them will support gay marriage?

What is the percentage of female MPs supporting gay marriage?

What is the percentage of female Tory MPs supporting gay marriage compared to the percentage of male Tory MPs supporting gay marriage?

What is the percentage of female Labour MPs supporting gay marriage compared to male Labour MPs supporting gay marriage?

Do you think marriage was invented by men or by women?

Is the way how so many women have desecrated marriage a kind of female revenge on men - a kind of civilisational vandalism, motivated by malice?

Or is it because most women are too stupid to see the point of marriage?

Marriage is eugenic while feminism and the sexual licence it promotes is dysgenic.

That is why we most babies born in the UK are born out of wedlock.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

That is why the number of learning disabled people are increasing by 5% every year.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/may/31/care-failing-those-with-learning-disability

" ... people with a learning disability, whose numbers are growing by up to 5% a year and who can require care and support costing a typical £1,500 a week."

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?

That is why the indigenous white working classes are no longer fit for the purpose of working and immigrant foreign labour is always required or British businesses would simply collapse or we would be back to wildcat strikes and the three day week.

That is why I was arrested by five policemen for saying something that offended Tourette's sufferers.  Would I be able to call the cops and get someone incarcerated for a whole day just because I was offended?  Could the Queen?  Of course not.

Only an absolutely demented society would privilege the disabled over and above their own monarch, and only a civilisation suffering from collective dementia would want to redefine the meaning of marriage so it can become the plaything of the LGBT community.

So there you have it: we live in a matriarchy and to live in a matriarchy is the civilisational equivalent of being told you have cancer, or that your rotten gangrenous limb has to be amputated or you will die.

If the proportion of female MPs supporting gay marriage is higher than the proportion of male MPs supporting gay marriage, is this indicative that women are even less to be trusted in politics than men and generally less capable of rational, moral and independent thought?

If it is the case that female MPs are less independent, less supportive of the institution of marriage and more immoral than male MPs, then it is clear that feminism has been a civilisational and moral disaster for the West.

If that is so, should we not destroy feminism before it destroys us?

Feminism is the ridiculous notion that it is either sustainable or moral to allow women to do men's jobs badly while neglecting their own work.

We will know what we must do after the House has voted on Tuesday.

No comments: