http://newbritishunion.org/policy-documents/
It is forbidden:
1. To so neglect an animal in one's ownership, care or accommodation that it thereby experiences appreciable pain or appreciable damage.
2. To use an animal unnecessarily for what clearly exceeds its powers or causes it appreciable pain, or which it-in consequence of its condition-is obviously not capable of.
3. To use and animal for demonstrations, film-making, spectacles, or other public events to the extent that these events cause the animal appreciable pain or appreciable damage to health.
4. To use a fragile, ill, overworked or old animal for which further life is a torment for any other purpose than to cause or procure a rapid, painless death.
5. To put out one's domestic animal for the purpose of getting rid of it.
6. To set or test the power of dogs on cats, foxes, and other animals.
7. To shorten the ears or the tail of a dog over two weeks old. This is allowed if it is done with anaesthesia.
8. To shorten the tail of a horse. This is allowed if it is to remedy a defect or illness of the tail and is done by a veterinarian and under anaesthesia.
9. To perform a painful operation on an animal in an unprofessional manner or without anaesthesia, or if anaesthesia in a particular case is impossible according to veterinary standards.
10. To kill an animal for fur.
11. To force-feed fowl.
12. To slaughter an animal without pre-stunning. (There are to be no exceptions to state law on the grounds of religion)
13. To operate on or handle living animals in ways that may cause appreciable pain or damage for the purpose of experiments.
I was to have been Media Spokesman for the New British Union until I realised I would have to defend all of the above. All my tactful suggestions for policy documents to be removed from display to be re-released after re-drafting while I concentrated on making the point that Fascism is not Racism were received as a personal insult.
What would Mosley or Mussolini think of men who think Fascism is about animal rights and that it would be more of a deal-breaker than race?
It is forbidden:
1. To so neglect an animal in one's ownership, care or accommodation that it thereby experiences appreciable pain or appreciable damage.
2. To use an animal unnecessarily for what clearly exceeds its powers or causes it appreciable pain, or which it-in consequence of its condition-is obviously not capable of.
3. To use and animal for demonstrations, film-making, spectacles, or other public events to the extent that these events cause the animal appreciable pain or appreciable damage to health.
4. To use a fragile, ill, overworked or old animal for which further life is a torment for any other purpose than to cause or procure a rapid, painless death.
5. To put out one's domestic animal for the purpose of getting rid of it.
6. To set or test the power of dogs on cats, foxes, and other animals.
7. To shorten the ears or the tail of a dog over two weeks old. This is allowed if it is done with anaesthesia.
8. To shorten the tail of a horse. This is allowed if it is to remedy a defect or illness of the tail and is done by a veterinarian and under anaesthesia.
9. To perform a painful operation on an animal in an unprofessional manner or without anaesthesia, or if anaesthesia in a particular case is impossible according to veterinary standards.
10. To kill an animal for fur.
11. To force-feed fowl.
12. To slaughter an animal without pre-stunning. (There are to be no exceptions to state law on the grounds of religion)
13. To operate on or handle living animals in ways that may cause appreciable pain or damage for the purpose of experiments.
I was to have been Media Spokesman for the New British Union until I realised I would have to defend all of the above. All my tactful suggestions for policy documents to be removed from display to be re-released after re-drafting while I concentrated on making the point that Fascism is not Racism were received as a personal insult.
What would Mosley or Mussolini think of men who think Fascism is about animal rights and that it would be more of a deal-breaker than race?
- Is animal welfare a girly preoccupation?
- Is vegetarianism a girly preoccupation?
- Is Britain a morbidly feminised nation?
- Is the British political establishment morbidly feminised?
- Are those who would wish to challenge the British political establishment also themselves morbidly feminised?
- Do men who join animal rights groups do it just to get pussy?
- Are men who join animal groups mostly from low income groups?
- Is how feminised the men of a nation are linked to the availability of extramarital sex?
- Is the availability of extramarital sex linked to the promiscuity of women?
- Is the easy availability of extramarital sex linked to feminisation of men who start taking on the causes favoured by women in order to have sexual access to them?
- Is it any surprise that a nation of feminised men would be invaded and exploited by men who have not been feminised?
How do you know if you are a male who has been feminised?
- You regard feminism as a sacred cow.
- You regard feminism as a sacred cow even after being reduced to the abject condition of joining Fathers4Justice (ie you have been fucked over by your ex-wife who has not only divorced you but also deprived you of your offspring) yet are still too afraid to criticise feminism.
- You refuse to criticise sluts.
- Even after you have been told of the sluts that harm do, you still refuse to criticise sluts because most of your friends and female relations are sluts anyway, and probably so is your boss and/or your girlfriend.
- You recognise that sluts are your main and only source of sex that you can afford and it wouldn't do to offend them.
- You prefer to get your sex cheap and free (but with lots of hidden charges) from sluts rather than from an honest prostitute who tells you her price up front.
- You cannot easily obtain the services of an honest prostitute because brothels are illegal in the matriarchy you live in, but you are too stupid or scared to call for the legalisation of brothels.
- You have read all of the above, understood all of the above but still refuse criticise the promiscuous female who form the parasitic pornocracy made up of SSMs (Slut or Spinster Single Mothers) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html
- You are a leader or a member of a Eurosceptic party wishing to assert British sovereignty and don't care if the whole world knows you are neurotically and pathetically afraid of offending Jews and would suspend a candidate for offending Zionists even if she did not deny the Holocaust and Holocaust Denial is not a crime in Britain, whose sovereignty you wish to assert. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/how-i-would-deal-with-ann-marie.html
- You think it is OK to be effeminate ie think, behave and express the political preferences of women to the detriment of yourself, the male sex and the long term national interest of your nation, because you have been told that feminism allows you to do so on grounds of gender equality.
- You do not see or refuse to acknowledge the shame of being dominated by the female sex who are mostly weaker, poorer and more irrational than you.
1 comment:
It's actually quite easy to get sluts. I have had taken home 2 different girls this month alone.
Post a Comment