Saturday, 19 October 2013

In the land of the free, no white man may say "monkey" within the hearing of a black man

Nor may he say "niggardly" within the hearing of a black man.

How the enemies of the West must be sneering at the subjection of the white man!

How they must think that these pussywhipped pushovers can just be pushed over and kicked in the head. Should they dare to protest, their treacherous women would only call them racist anyway, and they would be kicked even harder.

YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Truly, among your wives and your children are (some that are) enemies to yourselves: so beware of them! But if ye forgive and overlook, and cover up (their faults), verily Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. 

PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Lo! among your wives and your children there are enemies for you, therefor beware of them. And if ye efface and overlook and forgive, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. 

SHAKIR: O you who believe! surely from among your wives and your children there is an enemy to you; therefore beware of them; and if you pardon and forbear and forgive, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. 

KHALIFA: O you who believe, your spouses and your children can be your enemies; beware. If you pardon, forget, and forgive, then GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful. 

It seems that the white man has cut off his penis and served it up to his woman, minced, for supper.

It is impossible to do anything with these Western "men" who have now taken on the feminine vices of hypocrisy, cowardice and denial.  The people most affected by the cancer of feminism are the ones most frightened of denouncing feminism.  For example, Kevin Scott, who is Chairman of the British Democratic Party, has declared that criticising feminism has no place in his anti-immigration political party.  Does he even know that immigration was caused by feminism?  I think he does, because I have told him enough times, but he is afraid.

What is he afraid of?

Afraid of alienating half his potential supporters, who are women, of course, and mostly mothers of illegitimate offspring.

In short, all leaders of all political parties in Britain are afraid of sluts.

This rather explains why the white man is so anxious to invade Muslim lands for no particular reason.  It is to feel a man again.

Another example of displacement is the overseas campaigns of national leaders notably, in recent times, American presidents. An individual must have a great lust for power to attain such a position and it is not surprising that once installed he wishes to "flex his muscles" and exercise some real power. He cannot do this at home because of the interests of the people who paid for his election campaign and the agenda of other "string-pullers" behind the scenes. Hence military force is employed against some remote, often backward country instead. The masculine instinct to dominate and subdue is exercised far away because powerful vested interests have made this the path of least resistance.

They cannot now accept the truth of their real position, or they would either commit suicide or go on a killing rampage, probably.

And so they must remain sedated with football, drink, drugs and the prospect of easy cheap sex with sluts, SSMs and the illegitimate and sluttish daughters of SSMs whom they must groom for their sexual gratification, for they cannot afford anything better.

It seems that the white man these days is synonymous to paedophile.

Yet even now they refuse to do anything about it.

E Michael Jones in Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control:

"Men at the beck of passion is in may ways like a particle with no will of his own, since reason, especially morals, is the sole source of a man's ability to govern himself. Once gratification of passion becomes the definition of liberty, then liberty becomes synonymous with bondage because he who controls the passion controls the man."

Sexual freedom drives out political freedom, but soon the degenerate white man will not even know what "political freedom" means, for it is but an abstract concept, and therefore too far-removed from his base and materialist concerns for him to grasp.

No comments: