Thursday, 1 May 2014

The purpose of traditional gender roles and the patriarchy

In the simplest terms, they are when men are masculine and women are feminine. Nature (or God) gave men a unique set of strengths and weaknesses while giving women a different set of strengths and weaknesses. Traditional gender roles allows both sexes to logically maximise their strengths in ways that benefit both the individual and society. Let us look at some simple examples:

• Which sex, thanks to a stronger nurturing component, makes for better nurses and caretakers?

• Which sex, thanks to a superior analytical faculty, makes for better engineers and programmers?

• Which sex, thanks to its predisposition for accumulating power and resources, makes for better nation builders, state leaders, and executives?

• Which sex, thanks to a more innate ability at nesting and maintaining the hearth, makes for better home caretakers?

• Which sex, due to its greater desensitization to fear, is better suited to take large risks?

• Which sex, due to having a minuscule fluid contribution to the breeding process, is better suited at having a larger number of sexual partners?

• Which sex, due to having to risk its life through a 9-month gestation period, is better suited to monogamy?

Despite what modern progressives may attempt to brainwash us to believe, the answer to any of the above with “both sexes” is incorrect and dishonest. While we can take a baby girl at birth and raise her to be a Spartan warrior with immense effort and investment, it will be ten times easier to make her an accomplished mother instead. There are limitations placed within our genetics that make the pursuit of another sex's innate advantages an exercise in futility.

Traditional gender roles are important because they are the glue that holds society together. Egalitarian beliefs have not proven that they are in any way superior for humans, and if plummeting birth rates among Western nations are any indication, it may be a principal contributor to the relative cultural decline of the West behind those nations — particularly in the Middle East — that retain their traditional sex roles and outbreed those that do not. In other words, feminists on Tumblr will have a decreasing audience for their “social justice” rantings while women in the Middle East are busy filling their home with children that propagate their own culture and way of life.

Happiness surveys show that Western women are unhappier than ever, even if they have a lucrative office job or own an iPhone that provides then with nonstop entertainment and thirsty suitors. It turns out that brainwashing them to live the program of a man by achieving a career and accumulating lots of money has not made them better off in a more wholesome sense of the phrase.

At the same time, men are finding that their traditional strength of being a provider is becoming associated with being a loser. The resulting punishment is either no sex or a relationship with a woman who had dozens of sexual partners beforehand, with a 50% chance of her filing a YOLO divorce. Such an unforgiving assault on traditional masculinity is leaving men confused, frustrated, and unsure of their place in society. In the past, a man could marry a good woman from not much more than having a good job. He could come home to a wife who prepares his cigar and whisky beverage while cooking a homemade meal. But not anymore. 

Women, now trained to act like men, are too busy with their own jobs to care about dedicating themselves to a man. Instead, they seek out aloof cads for hedonistic pleasure while the provider men remain in arrested development by becoming addicted to videos game or porn.

Some men are sexually cashing in on these times, in a way that they probably would not have in the more traditional 1950s. But even in spite of the ease which ‘players’ are able to lay modern Western women, it turns out that brainwashing women to act like men with little dicks does not make them pleasant to have as girlfriends who you can trust. Where is the pair bonding?

Relationships in the West are ultimately unsatisfying. And every player will tell you that indiscriminate banging does lose its lustre after a few years, and when it does, this man would be a fool to settle down with a woman who can order a chicken tikka masala with her smartphone app but not remove mould from her bathroom tile or cook a healthy meal.

We are talking about specialisation and the division of labour with a view to EFFICIENCY. Imagine if there was another country exactly like us with the exact same racial composition and demographics etc, but run on rational grounds of EFFICIENCY.

They would soon be fucking us over big time. explains further.

As of now, there has not been a single non-religious population that has been able to reproduce above the death rate.

It is religion that makes us respect marriage. We need a policeman in our mind telling us not to do stuff we shouldn't do, like cheat on our spouses.

The whole point about wives being obedient to men is not so much to reinforce their inferiority, but to make marriage attractive to the man. Why protect and provide for a woman who is rude to you and bosses you around?

Of course, in practice, wives who have vowed obedience at their weddings are bound to have lapses of disobedience, but they can always be reminded.

The Koran says beware of your wives and children but also forgive them, so there you go.

YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Truly, among your wives and your children are (some that are) enemies to yourselves: so beware of them! But if ye forgive and overlook, and cover up (their faults), verily Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Lo! among your wives and your children there are enemies for you, therefor beware of them. And if ye efface and overlook and forgive, then lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
SHAKIR: O you who believe! surely from among your wives and your children there is an enemy to you; therefore beware of them; and if you pardon and forbear and forgive, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.


Mark Patton said...

"minuscule fluid contribution to the breeding process" You are forgetting all the child support that follows.

Claire Khaw said...

The patriarchy I have in mind to re-establish would not only lash SSMs 100 times per illegitimate offspring, it would state that no man is obliged to support any child of his if its mother was never married to him.