Translate

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

The Great Paedo Witch-hunt has begun!

UK police arrest 660 suspected paedophiles

National Crime Agency detains suspected child abusers, including doctors and teachers, and takes more than 400 children into care
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/16/660-suspected-paedophiles-arrested-uk


Who has been appointed Witchfinder General?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchfinder_General_(film)



Who is more culpable: the pornographer or the viewer of pornography?

Why do the police pursue the viewers of pornography rather than the pornographers themselves?  Is it because the former are easier to catch and convict?

I would prefer it if the police tried to catch the actual pornographers rather than speculatively take people's computers away in the hope of discovering child pornography to boost their conviction rates. In this regard my views are in harmony with Sean Gabb who was banned from attending a UKIP meeting by that moral coward Nigel Farage just for daring to say that possession of pornography should not be a criminal offence.  http://libertarianalliance.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/sean-gabb-banned-by-ukip/

Why do so many people claim that child pornography is not pornography? Very odd.




I would ban all live pornography requiring the participation of porn actors and actresses, by the way.  

All scenes of extramarital sex would be depictions of a crime in the process of being committed and the police should of course prosecute all its participants and those who aided and abetted the crime. 

004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

As for child pornography, all the above rules would also naturally apply, with harsher punishment for the harder cases eg rape would be punished more harshly than consensual fornication or adultery, the rape of a child would be attract harsher punishment than the rape of an adult etc.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/29/debate-rages-over-severity-child-porn-sentences/

"The fact that child pornography offenders can be given longer sentences than child abusers or violent offenders reflects a lack of care by Congress"

"If you vote against these harsher penalties, the sound bite is that you're protecting child pornographers, and that could be the end of somebody's career"

We already know what cowards and hypocrites our politicians are, don't we?

And we already know how the plebs love to kick someone even lower than they are.  They can no longer kick around nob-whites, foreigners and queers so they can only content themselves with kicking anyone they think is a paediatrician or a paedophile. To intervene would end you up getting your hand bitten, like taking a steak off a hungry and vicious dog, so better not, eh? 

No comments: