Hanging with some of the ladies at the International Conference on Men's Issues. — with Erin Pizzey,Karen Straughan and Dianna Thompson.
I believe my comment deleted by Teri Stodard was to the effect that there should be no women in the MRM. There should be antifeminist women, of course, but they should be segregated by sex. Otherwise, it creates a very bad impression.
Men in the MRM are already perceived as beta-omega losers. For these men to seek to speak only through the permission and encouragement of women is infantile and self-abnegating, like shy little boys needing mamma's encouragement to speak but in the meantime hiding under her skirts. If I were male, I would decline to join such an organisation knowing that doing so would lose me even more status. What real man wants to be associated with a bunch of freaks and losers and the women who want to mother them?
This is the image problem of the MRM, basically.
If men chose, they could take control again just through acting like men, but these beta-omega male losers only seek validation through the permission of their women, which is simply contemptible and embarrassing.
This video interview was just so cringe-worthy and awful I am at a loss for words. Didn't you find Paul Elam laughing at all her unfunny jokes nauseating? Swearing and saying cunt a lot while giggling and being girly is so totally disgusting and weird, I just don't know where to begin. But Elam thought this was fit for broadcast, probably because she is not unattractive as a woman. When men see a woman they fancy their brains fall out. Elam's certainly has.
When I became aware of the conference it did briefly cross my mind that I should attend. Indeed, I went so far as to enquire whether I could be one of their speakers. I did not even receive a response, either through administrative incompetence or perhaps it was the intention of the recipient to ignore me. It is probably their intention not to give me an official reason, so they do not have to explain themselves.
I am aware that Paul Elam is very anxious not to be seen as "traditionalist" and I know that Mike Buchanan once assumed that I was a religious fanatic and refused to accept my denials, but then he is a very angry, charmless little man who cannot see that masculine authority cannot return without men respecting marriage again, and society will not respect marriage again without laws that compel respect, or a religion that instills a belief in a God whose laws should be obeyed. They seem to think it is enough to whinge weakly weekly, while I think something much stronger is required.
As for MRM women, they enjoy the power of Affection Beneath, and don't want me telling them they shouldn't be there.
Affection Beneath. The underlying mechanism by which caretaking instincts are inspired is Affection Beneath; it is obviously inappropriate to seek to protect something or someone that is more powerful than you. Females seek to monopolize Affection Beneath. The immigrant's [or in this case the beta-omega male's] reduced status (accounting in part for his malleability), which many whites deny but which is plainly apparent to him, is allied to Affection Beneath. All the obstacles which females place in the path of their own males, and they are many, can appear to magically disappear in the case of an immigrant male because of AB.
Why, then, you will ask, did I ask to attend? I wished to do so only to convey a message, but it turns out I can do it more effectively without the cost and inconvenience of a trip to Detroit.
Compare the pussywhippedness of the beta-omega white Western male and the organisational and martial abilities with the Muslim male jihadist for the Caliphate and you will see why the MRM is a lost cause. I do not want to be one of these middle aged women whose capacious bosoms those pathetic men want to cry into. I actually find such men pitiful and disgusting and my maternal extincts are virtually non-existent. If such a thing is possible, I am a woman with paternal extincts and deplore the fact that someone such as I know how to be a man more than they do. What these women want to do is be seen as their protector in the way so many women enjoy having a helpless creature - especially a disabled child - in their care for a combination of attention-seeking and queue-jumping purposes. Protecting grown men must make them feel so important and special. These beta-omega males in the MRM clearly prefer a more feminine and feminised men's movement, and the public's knowledge of this will divest the movement of its virility and dignity. These men clearly don't care, because all they want is the kindness and pity of the women who wish to be kind and pity them the way a child or beggar laps up sympathy, while all I want to do is kick their collective ass, hard.
Erin Pizzey and others must feel so threatened by what I am saying, and what I say is that the antifeminist movement should be segregated by sex. That is the reason why they cannot bring themselves to say why they find me so objectionable.
Once that happens, I wonder how many of these women will want to stay in it. The ones who can bring themselves to acknowledge that they only joined to get the adoration and attention of these pathetic loser beta-omega males will not want to be competing with other females in a female-only environment, will they?
The ones who stay after being deprived of male attention will know they are doing it for the right reasons. The ones who leave to find other sources of male attention will know also know why they did it too.
For the avoidance of doubt, I will say again here what I have said elsewhere and what I would have said at the men's rights conference in Detroit, had I been allowed to attend as a speaker:
To cut off both legs of feminism, I recommend the repeal of all anti-discrimination employment legislation and the abolition of no fault divorce.