Translate

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Why do so many men insist on calling Feminism "Cultural Marxism"?

Because they are afraid of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists.

Feminism was the thin end of the wedge, and the thin end of the wedge began with the Equal Pay Act 1970.

Which group do you think would object most vociferously and is the largest and most electorally powerful group? Feminists, of course, ie the female vote. Most women these days are feminists, and feminists refuse to contemplate the repeal of the Equality Act 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act_2010

The primary purpose of the Act is to codify the complicated and numerous array of Acts and Regulations, which formed the basis of anti-discrimination law in Great Britain. This was, primarily, the Equal Pay Act 1970, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Race Relations Act 1976, the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and three major statutory instruments protecting discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age. It requires equal treatment in access to employment as well as private and public services, regardless of the protected characteristics of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

Women use their victimhood to make men feel guilty, and intersectionality is the measurement and acquisition of VICTIMHOOD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality#Intersectionality_theory_and_feminist_thought

The disabled black lesbian is the best demonstration of the use of this concept, whose purpose is to PRIVILEGE members of these minorities at the expense of the heterosexual white male of mature years, traditionally identified as sexist, homophobic, antisemitic, builders of an empire, incorrigibly racist and therefore evil and fully deserving of their punishment that will be inflicted on them during the paedo witch-hunts that even now rages against men who used to have some status in society, eg paedophile priests and entertainers.

But it all started with feminism. Feminism served as the foot in the door of the salesmen that sold you all these unwanted and pernicious ideas that everyone has now absorbed, like mother's milk, since the 1970s.

What are the consequences of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists, who are overwhelmingly sluts? (Sluts are women who will have sex with men not their husbands.)

These men will get no sex from sluts and feminists. The only other option is to take a wife (who has the right to divorce her husband for no particular reason under no-fault divorce and then take half his stuff and deprive him of his children) or hire a prostitute.

Is it any surprise that most men in Britain are gutless wimps who only live for the next cheap to free sexual encounter with a slut before the police come knocking on their door to examine their computer for kiddyporn?

I trust I have demonstrated the helplessness of the politically incorrect and hopelessly marginalised white male of mature years. Once you are old enough to look ugly, you will look like the very model of a modern British paedophile.

Why do you think Will Self was questioned by the police who had him down as a potential paedophile when he was with his son hiking? Because he is as ugly as sin.

Will Self 

The matriarchy has no respect for the old, certainly not for old ugly men.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396222/Branded-paedophile-hiking-son-WILL-SELF-reveals-nightmare.html

The revolution devour its children. 

No comments: