The patriarchy would in turn support the institutions of marriage and the family so that the current generation is better equipped to transmit the knowledge and wisdom so far gained to the next generation.
The matriarchy supported by totalitarian feminist legislation such as the Equality Act 2010 in tandem with no-fault divorce undermines marriage as well as causing standards of education and morality to deteriorate and that is why the British are getting dumber and dumber and more and more paedo.
What is liberalism but the tolerance of feminism?
What is feminism but the systematic cultivation of failure and degeneracy?
Incidentally, as a libertarian (someone who wants fewer laws and lower taxes) and a civic nationalist (someone who believes in promoting the long term national interest), I believe that a theocracy would deliver a minimum state better than any other form of government.
All advanced civlisations are patriarchies, and all declining and primitive civlisations are matriarchies.
Patriarchies are societies that condone male promiscuity, and matriarchies societies that condone female promiscuity.
There is no doubt that we are living in a feminist-created matriarchy that penalises men for their promiscuity through the CSA while rewarding women for theirs.
There is also no doubt which is the lesser evil and we should always choose the lesser evil.
Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.
Ergo the patriarchy is eugenic and the matriarchy dysgenic.
It is also feminism and the female vote in a amoral and tribal multi-party system of indiscriminate universal suffrage and that prevents the mistakes of the past from being corrected.
That is probably why ISIS is running circles round the West while it is lying on its back flailing its feet helplessly in the air ...
And that is why the West no longer understands the principle of free speech in its dementia and anomie, while insisting that free speech can only be allowed if no offence is caused, or that ice can be made by boiling water in a kettle ...