Friday, 21 November 2014

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them

James Inman, the headteacher who puts gel on his hair - ugh -  who punished  pupil Tommie Rose for his enterprise. Are men in positions of responsibility who put gel on their hair not DISGUSTING?? [SHUDDER] How likely are they to be MCSFs? 
MCSF and other acronyms explained

Tommie Rose, white, is punished.
Young Entrepreneur Of The Week: Bejay Mulenga

Bejay Mulenga, black, is praised.

But we all know about white middle class women who hate and fear white working class boys and who like posing with young men of another race because they are cute, exotic etc, right?

Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?

We also know who is in charge of the matriarchy and it sure as hell ain't the white working class female whom these white SNOBBISH middle class professional women despise together with their male counterparts. In fact, these snobbish white middle class professional women enjoy sneering at the working classes of their own race.

White women in charge of public affairs in the class above you hate you, fear you, sneer at you and don't care about you.

Know thyself, and know thine enemy.

David Willetts blames feminism over lack of jobs for working men Conservative minister's comments on social mobility trigger criticism from the Labour party and the TUC
David Willetts was MADE TO APOLOGISE for saying this.

Why Lee Rigby's mother will NEVER be ennobled by the matriarchy, unlike the professional victim that is Stephen Lawrence's mother

Would Blue Labour's conservatism lead us back to female subservience?
We know what happened to Lord Glasman, don't we? The feminazis in the Labour Party stuck their stilettos into him and destroyed his career, and Ed Miliband went along with it because he is a pissing cunting shitting pussy-whipped morally-compromised slut-fucker who would not have bothered marrying the mother of his then illegitimate offspring if he had not become the leader of the Labour Party.

Ambitious young women today are taught to ignore or suppress every natural instinct, if it conflicts with the feminist agenda posed on them. All literary and artistic works, no matter how great, that document the ambivalence of female sexuality they are trained to dismiss as “misogynous.” In other words, their minds are being programmed to secede from their bodies … there is a huge gap between feminist rhetoric and women’s actual sex lives, where feminism is of little help except with a certain stratum of deferential, malleable, white middle-class men.

Middle-class men, neutered by office life and daunted by feminist rhetoric, are shrinking. Lesbianism is increasing, since anxious, unmasculine men have little to offer. Women are simply more interesting to them. Male homosexuality is increasing, because masculinity is in crisis and because maternal consciousness, severed from the support network of the extended family, has become a psychotic system, forcing the young to struggle for life against clinging personal fantasy.

White middle-class girls at the elite colleges and universities seem to want the world handed to them on a platter. They have been sheltered, coddled and flattered. Having taught at a wide variety of institutions over my ill-starred career, I have observed that working-class or lower-middle-class girls, who are from financially struggling families and must take a patchwork of menial jobs to stay in school, are usually the least hospitable to feminist rhetoric. They see life as it is and have fewer illusions about sex. It is affluent, upper-middle class students who most spout the party line — as if the grisly hyperemotionalism of feminist jargon satisfies their hunger for meaningful experiences outside their eventless upbringing. In the absence of war, invent one.


KC said...

Seems like an enterprising young man. I'm sure they would have been happier had he been selling hand jobs in the lavatory. Then they would have declared him a local hero.

ZT said...

We need more kids to be thinking like him - guess if he was selling drugs and crap would be ok and classed normal

AS said...

Seems like the less productive somebody is in the West the more they are valued whereas the opposite is what should be held as values.

JF said...

If he had been selling his arse in the toilets.

He'd be awarded a medal of valor.

ZS said...

Look at the chewing gum underneath every school desk and litter all over school grounds. I totally understand why it's banned.

If the school wanted to run a tuck shop I'm sure they could do it far better than this little yuppie shit.

YR said...

This is ridiculous. They always find a way to stop you from getting ahead.

JF said...

So let's not encourage enterprise.

Instead let us destroy it.

AEH said...

That's actually illegal in the UK.... amazing

ZT said...

But you missing the point he did - at his age had the drive and ambition to do it

His skills needs to be harnessed for sure - or do we just want a bunch of playstation or xbox kids who smoke weed

By the way chewing gum under the seat itself creates employment - its the bloody cleaners that don't clean it

JF said...

It is in the government interest to create a generation of underachieving, uneducated morons.

Easy to fool, easy to control, easy to manipulate, easy to send to wars!

AEH said...

He cut into someone else s monopoly no doubt otherwise he wouldnt have made 14K... so whoever is pressing charges is probably a criminal in his own right

ZS said...

Chewing gum under the seat creates jobs in the same way as breaking all your neighbour's windows creates jobs.

ZT said...

you will never stop kids from being kids - nothing wrong in being innovative

AS said...

There is seriously something mentally wrong with a person that doesn't want another to not be a pot smoking chav, I'd prefer if children became innovative instead of becoming degenerates like the previous generations.

JF said...

When you try to achieve.

Many people will mock, ridicule, sneer and sabotage.

Very few people will support you and wish you well.

AEH said...

interesting .... having lived in the UK for some time .... in general people dont have a good attitude about entrepreneurial success. Peoples comments often are so negative and willing to discredit real efforts and progress by suggesting or insisting that the successful person is a cheat .... that somehow he has gone around the system and taken an unfair advantage. I was always amazed how little respect anyone would show in regards to another s efforts in success.This is one of the major cultural differences between the UK and the USA.

JF said...

The Brits will celebrate failure like a victory, and mourn success like it's failure.

JR said...

Once Liberals are in power long enough, winning becomes a crime. Before long the loser at school sports days will win the trophy. Its part of the marxist equality bollocks. Once Liberals are finished with the UK, British life will be a very mundane existence. People whinge about our sports teams doing rubbish, well no wonder when any kind of talent is discouraged

AK said...

a young lad using his i niitative to avoid the clutches of the usurous banking system ? disgraceful! How can we keep contro of the mas sesl if we have uni entrants e trying to avoid getting into debt?