Thursday, 5 February 2015

To my antifeminist American readers


AH said...

Thanks Claire. The UK parliamentary vote on war in Iraq broken down by gender is an important statistic. Thanks again.

An American could help you better than me, Claire. I'm in Australia.

Claire Khaw said...

You could apply the same principle to any controversial vote in your country too though!

AH said...

I've seen a list of Australian parliamentarians and how they voted on same-sex marriage. Gender is clear in many cases, but not for parliamentarians with doctorates. I think your principle will hold that women disproportionately supported the bill, even though it failed.

Claire Khaw said...

Collating statistics on this is the best way of showing how instinctively and unthinkingly libtard most female politicians the world over are.

mylampstand said...

So you and the mra are anti gay marriage, well now we know and this is what you call equality?

Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons on his own people, killing over 30,000 of them in the process and apparently he is a victim.

He is only a victim of his own propaganda, he told everyone he had weapons of mass destruction and they took him at his word.

Claire Khaw said...

I am anti gay marriage but I have no idea what the fucked up men who call themselves MRAs think about it. They seem to be PC jerks who are not prepared to support marriage and are in any case unmarriageable.

It is over for them anyway, but I am thinking of the next generation.

Aren't all weapons of war weapons of mass destruction?

Gender Neutrality said...

"Aren't all weapons of war weapons of mass destruction?" - No, only when they are used by the bad guys!

When the good guys kill masses of people that is liberation! freedom! democracy!

Anonymous said...

MRAs are just reverse Feminazis. 'Rights' are such bullshit.
That includes pictures, might help.