No 10 says it won't give a "running commentary" on whether David Cameron has seen this photo. Yes or no would do. pic.twitter.com/S7veiwiZgp— oliver wright (@oliver_wright) September 2, 2015
@oliver_wright @amolrajan If u think this photo is going to make people say "Let them come any time in any numbers", should you think again?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015
@pepsiplusconker @grouchiemarks @amolrajan @Independent Has @Nigel_Farage been asked if @UKIP policy has changed cos of one photo?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@KateEMcCann There should be a @YouGov poll to see if one photo of one dead child has changed UK voters' feelings about admitting migrants.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@kenanmalik @martindsewell Are you sure negative feelings against migrants were instantly dispelled by the publication of one photograph?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@martindsewell @kenanmalik Those who objected to migrants coming already knew they were risking a watery death to come to Europe.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@martindsewell @kenanmalik I don't see why the publication of one dead child should suddenly change everyone's minds towards migrants.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@FameHookerr @tomgor @VictoriaLIVE British politicians in thrall to the female vote are suddenly falling over themselves to show compassion.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@tomgor @FameHookerr @VictoriaLIVE All the political parties have been chasing the skirts of the female voters for nearly a century.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch The left are irrational and love to spill their emotions all over the place to show their compassion— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Did voters not already know before photo of a drowned boy that migrants were risking their lives on leaky boats?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch The left always trying 2 attract the female vote and women are endlessly displaying their compassion— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch Women pretend to display compassion to all and sundry because to not do so would frighten men.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch Women who hypocritically show compassion want men to put their foot down on them, but men now women.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch Isn't it alarming that UK politicians r even more easily emotionally manipulated than their voters?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch If British insist on displaying their vulnerability to emotional manipulation more migrants wl come.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch Wot happened re danegeld can easily be applied to migrants. Let them in/pay it, more will come.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@colinwforster @amolrajan @DAaronovitch While hypocritical women display their compassion, men pander to them, causing more migrants to come— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 If politicians are obviously stupider than voters, we should start seriously questioning democracy, shouldn't we?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Why are Western politicians so vulnerable to emotional blackmail? Cos they are pretending to be/pandering to women.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Female logic: Woman squawks at bug scaring her. Man squishes bug. Woman squawks at brutish man for squishing bug.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Because male politicians in thrall to female vote, they r in a state of NEUROTIC SUSPENSION. http://t.co/Hp1BtfBfFU— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Make no mistake: sluts and socialists are the enemies of society and therefore the enemy of your civilisation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Why r male politicians so pathetically stupid/cowardly/hypocritical/inconsistent? Cos they chase the female vote.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 Imagine if u had to pander to a lunatic/imbecile/slut. u wd hv to understand their mind/cater to their preferences— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
@sundersays @AdamWagner1 In the process of pandering to the person you seek to manipulate and appease, you start to think/behave like them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
Women who are single and looking tend to make indiscriminate displays of compassion because they think men prefer women who are stupid and kind.
They don't really mean it, but they feel they have to do this because they know men would be put off by rational and ruthless women with a will of iron, like me, perhaps.
Imagine if you were trying to manipulate a powerful lunatic, imbecile or a capricious woman of low intelligence and morals. You would have to find out their preferences and pander to them. Indeed, you would have to change your behaviour and mirror their behaviour and thinking in order to appease and manipulate them.
However, the danger of this is that you end up becoming like the capricious irrational and immoral slut, lunatic or imbecile you are trying to manipulate.
What will happen to your society if the rest of the world knows that no one is in charge and that the nation's perceived alpha male is even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than his voters?
Even Nigel Farage has softened his message against migrants as a result of the publication of that photo of that drowned boy.
What do you think happens to dementia sufferers, stupid sluts and imbeciles?
They would be exploited, cheated, used and abused.
This is what is happening to the West now, because no Western nation has an alpha male leading them because you cannot be an alpha male if you are afraid to criticise the worst of your women - SSMs, who are lower than prostitutes.
If there is no official alpha male who dares to criticise SSMs (Slut Single Mothers with illegitimate offspring) who are lower than prostitutes, then we live in a matriarchy, and all matriarchies without exception are primitive or declining societies. (SSMs are lower than prostitutes because prostitutes at least have the virtue of making men pay for sex and giving them a price up front, unlike sluts who pretend it is free but load it with all kinds of hidden charges for the man they are transacting with and society in general. Men must always be made to pay for sex because free slut sex corrupts their characters and turns them into men afraid of sluts in just the way a drug addict would be afraid of his drug dealer no longer selling him the drug to which he is addicted. Marriage for men is always the riskiest and most expensive form of sex, even in the days of the patriarchy.)
British politicians stopped criticising SSMs in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 after his Edgbaston speech for talking about them destroying "our human stock". http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron Male MPs have not criticised SSMs for 41 years and they are not suddenly going to start now since they are even more castrated now than they were in 1974.
Even Peter Hitchens, Britain's foremost Conservative thinker, won't criticise sluts because his late mother was an adulterous suicide. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html If the sins of the fathers are visited on their sons, then so does the weight of a mother's adultery cripple her son's ability to denounce her sin and those of others like her.
Tom Harris the former MP for Labour, didn't get away with it either. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/mar/05/welfare-children
This is why male politicians are stupider and more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters whom they presume to lead. These so called leaders are still pandering to the lowest, stupidest and most hypocritical of women still looking to trick a man into a relationship with them by pretending to be stupid and kind.
The trouble with democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that the preferences of the beta male have been entirely marginalised. All political parties chase the female vote precisely because it is capricious but crucial to being elected and staying in office.
(Why are beta males important? They are important because they do most of the work and are the ones whose lives are sacrificed if there is a war. Beta males are still important even if sluts don't fancy them and will cheat on them at the first opportunity because those of them who think "A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta" would still be maintained by the welfare state paid for out of the taxes of the beta male for making this "lifestyle choice". If beta males are demoralised and marginalised then very little work will be done and even defensive wars cannot be won. It is of course the beta male who objects to immigration.)
So this is the basis on which our much-vaunted democracy rests - the preferences and unstated agenda of stupid, immoral and irresponsible sluts with the vote whom male politicians dare not criticise because they know they cannot be reasoned with. We live in a declining and morally degenerate matriarchy all right.
Migrant crisis http://t.co/IOKxLoRDQS Easy for the media to bounce hypocritical UK politicians into weeping crocodile tears.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
Uh oh. @David_Cameron bounced into expressing compassion for drowned boy by international media. This means more migrants will come.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
UK politicians more interested in appearing compassionate than dealing with migrant crisis and reassuring the public. http://t.co/IOKxLoRDQS— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 3, 2015
My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power
Simpering BBC female journalists who coo and simper at migrant swarms: @annaholligan @ManveenRana @BethanyBellBB @wburema #migrantcrisis— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 14, 2015
BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms