Translate

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

The difference between Roosh and Sandman





Sandman:
Roosh wants to go back to traditionalism. I don't. Sorry feminism and traditionalism are both finished. Time to find a third way that cuts out the woman as "middle man."

CK:

You mean sex bots?
You are just telling as many people as you can to grow old and die alone, but with no cats.



Sandman:

Better then growing old and dying alone after a divorce. At least they can die on a mattress instead of inside their car. I'm talking about surrogacy and sex bots. I think men should have sons and raise them ourselves. That's my plan.
We should do what Christiano Ronaldo and Ricky Martin have done.

CK:

It's going to be a freak, assuming you ever get round to it.
You'd be OK being born the way you are going to birth your son, would you?

Wouldn't knowing that you were conceived like that by a weirdo dad totally fuck you up?
Footballer gets himself a surrogate baby. How many people can afford that?

How much does it cost to have a surrogate baby and then bring it up ON YOUR OWN?

Are there any self-help books on how to raise your very own MGTOW surrogate baby?

Hey, you could really make a killing if you wrote the first one!

That could be followed by a sequel HOW TO DEAL WITH YOUR SURROGATE ADOLESCENT SON DURING HIS TERRIBLE TEENS

Then you could write another one: HOW TO DEAL WITH YOUR RAGE AND DISAPPOINTMENT WHEN YOUR SURROGATE SON GOES HIS OWN WAY AWAY FROM YOU AND MARRIES A FEMINIST

Then another book can be HOW TO DEAL WITH THE HORROR OF HAVING A SURROGATE SON WHO IS A SERIAL KILLER OF MGTOWs

Sandman:

what a happy future serial killer 







CK:

I see MGTOW *not* spending any $40k they might happen to have on getting themselves a baby, even if they thought they really really really wanted a baby son ....


Sandman:

Well I've put the money aside and it's sitting there to be used for that purpose. It's cheaper then a wedding. Might as well just skip the Bridezilla.

10 comments:

JF said...

I cannot fathom why western women are so angry all the time.

They have anything and everything they could ever want.

I don't really understand what Roosh is doing.

He definitely doesn't advocate rape.
I'm certain of that.

I think he's doing a huge troll of social justice warriors.
He wanted the exact reaction he got.

SA said...

He is no spokesmen for me, for those of us who are fed up with feminism? He's a fucking twat who need's chapped.

Claire Khaw said...

Who speaks for you?

Roosh is the only alpha male anti-feminist.

RP said...

Roosh is an alpha male? Buahahhahaha

Do you even know what an alpha male is? An alpha male doesnt need an eleborate game to get women; women gravitate towards him. He doesnt need techniques to overcome their resistance; a few words, or none at all, will sufice for an alpha male. An alpha male isnt a 40 year old single loser in his mom's basement bitching about women because an alpha male has no reason to bitch.

Roosh is probably a homosexual. Its natural for Persians. But being US raised he is feeling conflicted at his natural Persian homosexuality and is angry at women.

Roosh is a gamma who leads an army of gammas. Basement dwelling retards, the lot of them.

LG said...

“In studies of social animals, the highest ranking individual is sometimes designated as the alpha . . . Alphas may achieve their status by superior physical strength and aggression, or through social efforts and building alliances within the group.”

Roosh V is an alpha male because he is the highest ranking individual in his group and among his peers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_%28ethology%29

AB said...

Claire has her own unique definition of "Alpha" to fit her theories. I'm damned if I know what it is as she kept changing the definitions and examples of them when we spent some considerable time in me trying to understand. In the end I gave up. For someone virtually obsessed by the Alpha Male ...how come she cannot define her own version of it. I care little if Roosh is or not. If he earns money from what he does by educating incapable or other needy or interested parties...that's OK too. I suggest he is neither MGTOW or MRA although he will have many feminists who will be more than happy to attack his views and attempt to poison weak minds to believe he is one or both.

Claire Khaw said...

AB doesn't like the idea of alpha males because he isn't one.

The only reason why you say he is not MGTOW or MRA is because the MGTOW and MRA you know want to dissociate themselves from his because they want to be considered respectable.

Dean Esmay and Mike Buchanan are pathetic beta male tossers.

Dean Esmay says Roosh is not an MRA at http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/media-creates-phony-narrative-to-dub-rooshv-an-mra-gamergate-returnofkings-mra-mras/

Esmay told me he had been raped by a man. We know what to think of men like him, don't we?

Mike Buchanan is also of that view at https://j4mb.wordpress.com/2016/02/04/dean-esmay-media-creates-phony-narrative-to-dub-rooshv-an-mra/ but we know it is cos he is organising a conference in London this summer, and doesn't want any trouble.

Dean Esmay is attending this conference, by the way.

MGTOW are anti-feminists, but their rason d'etre is not marrying.

Roosh is MGTOW because of what he wrote at http://www.rooshv.com/marriage-doesnt-make-sense

Claire Khaw said...

I think it is like Muslims living in the West saying ISIS is not Islamic. WE KNOW WHY THEY ARE DOING IT, right?

It is not that ISIS is not Islamic, but that Muslims living in the West don't want to be associated with them because they don't want any more trouble for being Muslim.

Claire Khaw said...

A woman might respect a man even if he says he was a victim, provided he eventually solved the problem that made him a victim, but MGTOW are not interested in solving their problem.

They know that, leaderless, all they can do is retreat further into isolation and irrelevance.

Signs of retreat and biological irrelevance:

1) Saying you want to have sex with sex bots only.

2) Saying you will never marry even if marriage could be made a good bargain for you.

3) Being obviously unmarriageable.

4) Being damaged goods because you have already admitted to being a victim.

5) Showing that you have not yet recovered from your victimhood.

6) Showing that you are going to use your victimhood to gain sympathy, which no man can do better than a woman.

7) Saying you will use surrogacy to sire a child, which you will bring up alone, without its other parent.

Claire Khaw said...

I have on more than one occasion offered to lead the anti-feminist movement, but this offer has been repeatedly rejected, probably for a combination of reasons.

1) MGTOW hate my idea of making marriage a good bargain for men again, because they really really don't want to marry.

2) I am female.

3) I am not white.

4) The only way to defenestrate feminism is to replace it with the patriarchy, which beta males don't think they are capable of even *saying*, let alone doing.

But never mind, eh? Muslims have already said they will do it for the West, because they already know how incapable white men all are.