Tuesday, 31 May 2016

Catholic angry that the doctrine of the Trinity is no longer compulsory for Catholics

Believing that Jesus is God is the sine qua non of Christianity.

What does this mean?

It means that if you don't believe Jesus is God, you ain't Christian, and only Christians go to heaven.

This was what Christians were told in pre-Enlightenment days. If you questioned this, you will find yourself falling foul of the Blasphemy Act 1697.

It made it an offence for any person, educated in or having made profession of the Christian religion, by writing, preaching, teaching or advised speaking, to deny the Holy Trinity, to claim there is more than one god, to deny the truth of Christianity and to deny the Bible as divine authority.

The first offence resulted in being rendered incapable of holding any office or place of trust. The second offence resulted in being rendered incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of taking a legacy or deed of gift, and three years imprisonment without bail.

That Jesus is the Son of God who was also God the Father who sacrificed his only son to take away our sins was the best spin his apostles could put on Jesus being a crucified revolutionary.

You would have thought that Christians would find Islam a more attractive and rational faith, but they just like the Jews preferred to ignore the Koranic injunction not to continue just as their ancestors did, just because their ancestors did it.

YUSUFALI: When it is said to them: "Follow what Allah hath revealed:" They say: "Nay! we shall follow the ways of our fathers." What! even though their fathers Were void of wisdom and guidance?
PICKTHAL: And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah hath revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our fathers. What! Even though their fathers were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?
SHAKIR: And when it is said to them, Follow what Allah has revealed, they say: Nay! we follow what we found our fathers upon. What! and though their fathers had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.  

The purpose of the Trinity is clear, at least to me. It was a conceit propagated by Christians who wanted to feel special and better than Jews. In more totalitarian, credulous and obedient times, it was easy to keep this belief going, but not in the 21st century.

Christianity has therefore under threat since the Enlightenment. Islam however does not require us to believe in an absurdity, only in what we would like to believe in anyway ie that we could have a personal God who is omnipotent and morally perfect. By merely wishing for His existence and behaving as if we believed in Him by obeying His laws because we want to be good, mere mortals can by doing this bring God into existence as well as heaven to reward ourselves and those whom we love, and hell to punish our enemies..

What's not to like?

Shakespeare realised the profound irony of God being conjured out of the imagination, creativity of mere mortal and fallible men. 

What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculties! in form and moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension, how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?

It is surely time for 21st century man to cast aside the totalitarian nonsense that is the Trinity, accept the necessity of the rule of law to keep us on the straight and narrow of morality and keep our souls and civilisation in good order. 

Sunday, 29 May 2016

British government to feminise sharia law

General principles.

The provisions of this Part are founded on the following principles, and shall be construed accordingly—

(a)the object of arbitration is to obtain the fair resolution of disputes by an impartial tribunal without unnecessary delay or expense;

(b)the parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved, subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest;

(c)in matters governed by this Part the court should not intervene except as provided by this Part.

If the public interest is the national interest, then feminism is the antithesis of the national interest, because it results in degeneracy and the decline and fall of your civilisation.

Those who who wish to impose feminism on society are the agents of the matriarchy. Theresa May has been undermining the patriarchy by undermining marriage since 2002. 

The Conservative Party's surrender to slut single mothers in 2002

The Varoufakis Guide to Avoiding Austerity

We Have Entered The Looting Stage Of Capitalism
Germany’s Assault On The IMF

Paul Craig Roberts

Having successfully used the EU to conquer the Greek people by turning the Greek “leftwing” government into a pawn of Germany’s banks, Germany now finds the IMF in the way of its plan to loot Greece into oblivion .

The IMF’s rules prevent the organization from lending to countries that cannot repay the loan. The IMF has concluded on the basis of facts and analysis that Greece cannot repay. Therefore, the IMF is unwilling to lend Greece the money with which to repay the private banks.

The IMF says that Greece’s creditors, many of whom are not creditors but simply bought up Greek debt at a cheap price in hopes of profiting, must write off some of the Greek debt in order to lower the debt to an amount that the Greek economy can service.

The banks don’t want Greece to be able to service its debt, because the banks intend to use Greece’s inability to service the debt in order to loot Greece of its assets and resources and in order to roll back the social safety net put in place during the 20th century. Neoliberalism intends to reestablish feudalism—a few robber barons and many serfs: the One Percent and the 99 percent.

The way Germany sees it, the IMF is supposed to lend Greece the money with which to repay the private German banks. Then the IMF is to be repaid by forcing Greece to reduce or abolish old age pensions, reduce public services and employment, and use the revenues saved to repay the IMF.

As these amounts will be insufficient, additional austerity measures are imposed that require Greece to sell its national assets, such as public water companies and ports and protected Greek islands to foreign investors, principally the banks themselves or their major clients.

So far the so-called “creditors” have only pledged to some form of debt relief, not yet decided, beginning in 2 years. By then the younger part of the Greek population will have emigrated and will have been replaced by immigrants fleeing Washington’s Middle Eastern and African wars who will have loaded up Greece’s unfunded welfare system.

In other words, Greece is being destroyed by the EU that it so foolishly joined and trusted. The same thing is happening to Portugal and is also underway in Spain and Italy. The looting has already devoured Ireland and Latvia (and a number of Latin American countries) and is underway in Ukraine.

The current newspaper headlines reporting an agreement being reached between the IMF and Germany about writing down the Greek debt to a level that could be serviced are false. No “creditor” has yet agreed to write off one cent of the debt. All that the IMF has been given by so-called “creditors” is unspecific “pledges” of an unspecified amount of debt writedown two years from now.

The newspaper headlines are nothing but fluff that provide cover for the IMF to succumb to pressure and violate its own rules. The cover lets the IMF say that a (future unspecified) debt writedown will enable Greece to service the remainder of its debt and, therefore, the IMF can lend Greece the money to pay the private banks.

In other words, the IMF is now another lawless Western institution whose charter means no more than the US Constitution or the word of the US government in Washington.

The media persists in calling the looting of Greece a “bailout.”

To call the looting of a country and its people a “bailout” is Orwellian. The brainwashing is so successful that even the media and politicians of looted Greece call the financial imperialism that Greece is suffering a “bailout.”

Everywhere in the Western world a variety of measures, both corporate and governmental, have resulted in the stagnation of income growth. In order to continue to report profits, mega-banks and global corporations have turned to looting. Social Security systems and public services–and in the US even the TSA airline security screening–are targeted for privatization, and indebtedness so accurately described by John Perkins in his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, is used to set up entire countries to be looted.

We have entered the looting stage of capitalism. Desolation will be the result.

Saturday, 28 May 2016

Christianity: suppose it’s gone for ever?

“The religious” now appear to young people as obscurantist bigots whose main purpose is to police sexuality, especially female sexuality, in the service of incomprehensible doctrines.
 Chief of these "incomprehensible doctrines" is respecting and continuing the practice of the human tradition of marriage. 

Institutional resistance to the rights of women and of gay people was an exceptionally stupid strategy for institutions that depends on the labour of both.

Unlike Christianity, Islam relies on the rule of [sharia] law to maintain morality, not a corruptible priesthood now riddled with sexually corrupt feminists who condone fornication or practising sodomites openly supporting gay marriage. The corruption of church clearly demonstrates how Islam is superior in doing what is the purpose of religion: maintain morality. Many have noticed that the Pope these days is no longer Catholic nor interested in propagating social conservatism or Catholic teaching, seeing it as his role first to surrender to the degenerate international matriarchy and secondly surrender to Islam. Unfit for the purpose of maintaining morality, the priesthood is now serves merely as a source of income, status and advancement for those who will do the opposite of uncompromisingly support the institution of marriage.

But the Church of England was so much a part of the old imperial state that life in post-imperial Britain was never going to be easy.

Imperialism is unsustainable without patriarchy. Its opposite - matriarchy - will only result in degeneracy and the decline and fall of a once imperial nation. 

Global warming and the still present threat of nuclear destruction both need a sense of global solidarity to overcome, and a vision of humanity that transcends narrow self-interest. If Christianity no longer can supply that, what will?

Christianity is kaput, but Islam is waiting in the wings.

The evil and dementia of feminism unopposed by Peter Hitchens, Britain's foremost Conservative writer, who calls himself a feminist

Sussex Police have caused anger on social media and from anti-rape groups for publishing a poster which appears to blame victims for being attacked.

This childless 41 year old woman who now wants to be a mother and wife won't find a decent man to marry her, but she is concerned about the number of other women who will turn out like her. Not looking good for the next generation, is it?

@ClarkeMicah is Peter Hitchens, supposedly Britain's most well-known journalist promoting British Conservatism. He however has nothing to offer the youth of today. It seems he already knows the limits of his appeal (to elderly men and women who have failed to pass on their Conservative values to their offspring assuming they have even bothered to have any) and is only waiting for death, while being relentlessly negative about every development that could be construed as positive. He won't support UKIP, the leave EU campaign nor will he write in positive terms about Donald Trump. What is he trying to do? Demoralise social conservatives, turn them into Muslims so they join ISIS in despair at his political nihilism? Who knows, but he is currently top dog of British Conservatism in the pay of the Daily Mail, who are too risk-averse to hire me instead.

Friday, 27 May 2016

Realpolitik and territorial disputes

Who really owns which piece of land? On what is his claim based? Why are some permitted to declare independence from large countries, and others not? And if there is no consistent legal or moral answer to any of these questions, what lessons should we learn from that?

Peter Hitchens' questions

Q.  Who really owns which piece of land?

A.  The person with most claim.

Q.  On what is this claim based?

A.   Possession is nine points of the law.

Q.   Why are some permitted to declare independence from large countries, and others not?

A.   It depends on the mood and the military readiness of the large countries concerned as well as the determination and military readiness of those who wish to become independent.

Q.   And if there is no consistent legal or moral answer to any of these questions, what lessons should we learn from that?"

A.  That there is everything to play for when claim to a piece of land is being disputed, by the parties disputing each other's claim to this land and those seeking to gain something from the disputing parties.

Saudi legal expert Katib Al-Shammari argues the US itself had planned and carried out 9/11

Katib Al-Shammari says that the US planned and carried out 9/11 in order to obtain hegemony over the Middle East and placed the blame for 9/11 on an ever changing list of culprits depending on Washington’s goal at the time. First, he says, it was Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Then Saddam Hussein and Iraq. A New York Court blamed Iran. Now Saudi Arabia is given the villian role. The Americans, he says, always come up with suspicious documents and claim to have evidence that they never show.

 “Lo and behold, today, we see these archives revealed before us: A New York court accuses the Iranian regime of responsibility for 9/11, and we [also] see a bill [in Congress] accusing Saudi Arabia of being behind it [sic]. This is after the previous Iraqi regime was accused of being behind it. Al-Qaeda and the Taliban were also blamed for it, and we do not know who [will be blamed] tomorrow! But [whoever it is], we will not be surprised at all, since this is the essence of how the American archives, that are civilized and respect freedoms and democracy, operate.

“The nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy… [For example,] after a period during which it did not fight anyone [i.e. following World War II], the U.S. created a new kind of war – the Cold War… Then, when the Soviet era ended, after we Muslims helped the religions and fought Communism on their [the Americans'] behalf, they began to see Muslims as their new enemy! The U.S. saw a need for creating a new enemy – and planned, organized, and carried this out [i.e. blamed Muslims for terrorism]. This will never end until it [the U.S.] accomplishes the goals it has set for itself.

“So why not let these achievements be credited to the American administration, while insurance companies pay for the damages, whether domestic or foreign? This, my dear Arab and Muslim, is the policy of the American archives.”

We all know that there are four aces in a pack. When America plays all four and uses up all its wild cards, perhaps enough people will notice.

For treason, would you prefer to be tried by English or sharia law?

"A man doth compass or imagine the death of our lord the King, or of our lady his Queen or of their eldest son and heir.”

“Violating” your majesty’s wife, the sovereign’s eldest daughter, or the wife of the heir to the throne were also treasonous acts. If you waged war against the king, aided the enemy or even killed the king’s chancellor, your crime was punishable by death.

This crime had one of the goriest punishments in English history.

First, the traitor would be tied up and drawn across rough ground by a horse. He would then be hanged to within an inch of his life. He would be disembowelled and beheaded. Then he would be cut into four sections. 

The public would watch and sometimes throw rotten food. If the traitor was a woman, she was burned. The bloody details were shared in penny pamphlets and engravings depicting the slow execution.

One of the most famous traitors in English history was Guy Fawkes, a Catholic Yorkshireman who in 1605 was arrested while guarding 36 barrels of explosives beneath the House of Lords. He was said to be planning the assassination of King James I with others in the Gunpowder Plot. He had been interrogated several times but admitted to almost nothing. 

The Treason Act is one of the earliest statutes still in force today – albeit with significant amendments.

The last time it was used in the UK was in 1945, to prosecute William Joyce, or Lord Haw-Haw, a Nazi propagandist who had aided and assisted Germany during the second world war by:

"Broadcasting to the subjects of our Lord the King propaganda on behalf of the said enemies of our Lord the King.”

Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,

It even gives the option of mercy.

Except for those who return [repenting] before you apprehend them. And know that Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

Under committing adultery with the wife of the Caliph or the wife of the Caliph's son would only attract a punishment of 100 lashes. Under English law, it is significantly more severe.

Watch, and weep, as I did.

Sluts destroy lives and create lives that will be destroyed by the consequences of their sluttery. The only language they understand is 

All these beautiful and heart-breakingly cheerful children have futures we know are hopelessly bleak. The most heart-breaking moment for me was when one of them said she hoped one day to live in a home with windows.

You can get contraception in the Philippines, actually, but still these bar girls get pregnant sometimes  accidentally on purpose, as is the wont of sluts all all over the world.

We all know the Catholic Church no longer says fornication is a mortal sin or that all fornicatresses are sluts. A class of men infamous for their homosexuality and paedophiliac tendencies understandably feel reluctant to get on their high horse about fornication when almost everyone regards premarital sex as their inalienable human right. The Catholic Church in the land of the WASP is after all a mere minority and fears to incur the wrath of its matriarchal and liberal Overlords and Overladies. Let us acknowledge then that the Catholic Church is no longer fit for the purpose of maintaining morality and has no prospect of ever regaining its moral authority within our lifetimes. If the Catholic Church is already rotten to the core, then all the  more is the Anglican Church.

Even the Conservative philosopher Stefan Molyneux dared not contradict a childless woman of 41 he was advising when she suggested that because she had had already had between 50 to 60 sex partners, you can only be a slut if you have about 100. from 1:21

I on the other hand have no problem in acknowledging that you can go from virgin to slut in just one fuck.  

The Pope in any case is only interested in negotiating the terms of the surrender of his church: first to the degenerate and sexually liberated internationally matriarchy, and then to their Muslim conquerors.

Christianity is kaput, but Islam is waiting in the wings. 

Thursday, 26 May 2016

It is possible to be a woman without being a slut, whore or feminist

The study monitored the use of the words “slut” and “whore” by UK Twitter users over three weeks from the end of April. It found that 6,500 individuals were targeted by 10,000 aggressive and misogynistic tweets in that period.

Internationally, more than 200,000 aggressive tweets using the same words were sent to 80,000 people in the same period – and according to the study, more than half of the offenders were women.

  1. Not every woman is a whore, so to call a woman a whore if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic.
  2. Not every woman is a slut, so to call a woman a slut if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic. 
  3. Surely feminists are able to accept that it is possible to be a woman without being either a whore or a slut?
  4. All feminists without exception support the right of women to have premarital sex, ie to fornicate ie be sluts.
  5. The definition of slut should be tightened up. An interesting discussion of how many sex partners a woman has to fornicate with before being called a slut can be found at from 1:21. A matter to be decided by philosopher, perhaps. The woman in question confessed to having 50 to 60 sex partners and suggested that a slut should be a woman who has had sex with upwards of 100 men.  
  6. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw expressions of social conservatism? 
  7. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw slut-shaming?
  8. Is it the intention of feminazis to desecrate the institution of marriage which can only be supported by shaming sluts? 
  9. Is it the intention of feminazis to abolish traditional marriage, because it is the foundation of all patriarchies?
  10. If more than half of the offenders who tweeted aggressively used "whore" and "slut" were women, then why can't men use those words too? 
  11. Are feminazis suggesting that only women can use the words "slut" and "whore", but not men? 
  12. Would it be an idea to have a men's, women's and unisex section of Twitter so everyone can just say what they want within the rules of their respective groups? 
  13.  It is surely only misogynistic to say, for example, "I hate women," but why are the feminazis presuming to tell us whom we may or may not hate? That would be THOUGHTCRIME.
  14. Are feminazis trying to define misogyny as "anyone women - who are mostly sluts and whores - hate"? 
  15. The corruption of language is the corruption of thought, and the corruption of thought leads to error, evil, disaster and doom.

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Why do Christians lack the confidence to prevent the death of Christianity?

I accept that Christianity is dying fast in this country. I know that many schools teach religion badly, if at all, and that ignorance is everywhere. But there is more than one response to this. You could say, as this ‘report’ does, that we should accept that this isn’t a Christian country any more, and adapt it to become a sort of religious salad of all faiths and none.

You could give up trying to teach Christianity as a living faith, and instead get children to study it as a quaint, eccentric curiosity. Or – and the weeks around Christmas are a good time to say this – we could say that we still have a chance to rebuild and restore what has been lost.

Why do we so lack the confidence to do this, and readily abandon a heritage of such power and beauty, which has brought us so much good, for a multicultural wasteland in which a dozen competing faiths squabble in the ruins, and everyone else bows to the neon gods of consumerism?

Because even Christians don't really believe that Christ is the begotten Son of God. Poor old Peter Hitchens. Fancy not knowing that if you don't believe that Jesus is simultaneously God Himself and His Son, you ain't Christian, and only Christians get to heaven.

Even Christians don't believe in this themselves.

Worse, Peter Hitchens doesn't seem to know that he is supposed to believe it. Christianity is more than motets in cathedrals and hymns in churches. The living Christian faith consists of real people who believe in all the nonsense of the Trinity in all its inglorious absurdity, or who are prepared to pretend that they believe it, by constantly repeating "Jesus is Lord," to anyone who will listen.  

These days, even the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn't even know he is supposed to believe in the Trinity.

Peter Hitchens and his ilk eg Roger Scruton , Adrian Hilton, Tim Stanley and other Conservative Christians are to be pitied for the following reasons.

  1. They haven't noticed that Britain is as Christian as  skeleton used to be human.
  2. They cannot distinguish between the form and substance of their faith. (The form consists of church buildings, hymns, candles, motets, incense, communion wine, wafer etc and the substance is the belief one is supposed to hold by dint of being Christian. Does Peter Hitchens even believe in the Trinity ie that Jesus is Lord? Who knows? He is just whingeing about shrinking congregations from what I can tell.)
  3. They are right out of ideas and their strategy for survival is to die before the shit hits the fan. 
  4. They expect Muslims to convert to Islam and to believe in a lie they themselves don't even believe in or seem to be aware of.
  5. They still call themselves feminists.
  6. They are too frightened to even discuss my ideas in unflattering terms, ie challenging feminism, electoral reform and a change of religion as a means of regenerating a clearly degenerate society.  

Why Women And Western Civilization Fall.

To all you childless women whose mothers never told you anything about sex, men, marriage or children, expecting you to discover it all by yourselves.

MGTOW: Regarding Red Pill Rage

Tuesday, 24 May 2016

On the balance of probabilities, I would have convicted. For proof beyond reasonable doubt, I would have had to acquit.

Vice President of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stuart Robert John Kerner

Hearing dates: 8 & 9 March 2016

42. The applicant Stuart Kerner was tried on an indictment containing eight counts in the Crown Court at Inner London. On 5 December 2014 he was convicted of two counts of sexual activity with a child whilst in a position of trust (counts 5 and 7). On counts 1 to 4 (inclusive), 6 and 8 he was acquitted. Those counts were allegations of either sexual activity with a child or sexual activity with a child by a person in a position of trust. The difference between those charges arose from the fact that sexual activity with a child was charged where the complainant was aged 15; sexual activity with a child in a position of trust was charged where the complainant had attained 16 years.

43. His application for leave to appeal has been referred to this court by the single judge.

The factual background
44. Kerner is a teacher with over 20 years’ experience with, inter alia, responsibility for ethics. The complainant, C, was a pupil at his school. It was acknowledged that she had behavioural problems and that she had told significant lies about herself and was an attention seeker. For example, she falsely claimed over a period of time to have been involved in a road traffic accident and that a heart defect had been discovered. She had obtained free school meals after falsely complaining that her mother had not provided food or money. There was evidence that C had formed an attraction towards the applicant and had engineered events so as to be close to him.

45. The eight counts on the indictment represented sexual activity which C said had taken place over a period between March 2011 and November 2012. Count 5 represented an incident at the end of February 2012 which C asserted was the first occasion upon which full vaginal intercourse had taken place. She also said that anal sex took place on that day. Count 7 represented events on 3 October 2012, an occasion when C said she had visited Kerner’s home for the first time and sexual relations took place.

46. The defence advanced was that no sexual activity had ever taken place between the pair.

The counts on the indictment which reflected matters recorded in C’s diary represented a fantasy on her part.

The summing up
47. The judge directed the jury to return separate verdicts in relation to each count having considered the evidence in relation to each count separately. If the jury was not sure on any count that Kerner had intentionally touched C as alleged, they should acquit. She went on to say that a central issue was whether C was a truthful and reliable witness. In the light of evidence which had been given about C’s character and honesty, the judgegave the following direction:

“It is open to you to find the defendant guilty even if you conclude that there is no corroboration or supporting evidence of C’s allegations if you are sure she is telling the truth and is a reliable witness. If, on the other hand, you retain some reservations as to whether C is a truthful and reliable witness, and therefore are not prepared to rely solely on her evidence, you will then want to look to see if there is any corroboration or supporting evidence which, despite any reservations you might have about C and the quality of her evidence, nevertheless drives you to the conclusion that you can be sure that the defendant is guilty.”

The issues on counts 5 and 7
48. Counts 5 and 7 were different from the remaining counts which depended solely on the word of C.

49. The events relating to count 5 were alleged to have taken place at the school during the school day at a time when C should have been in class. Examination of the electronically maintained school attendance records showed that there had been a suspicious alteration of the records as to C’s attendance for the material time. At the same time the applicant had free periods. Kerner and C were the only two realistic candidates for having altered the records. C would have needed to acquire a password in order to do so; Kerner had the password.

50. In relation to count 7 records showed that C and Kerner were away from school at the material time. C was able to give a detailed description of the layout of Kerner’s house which she said she had attended, contrary to Kerner’s denial. Cell site analysis of the applicant’s phone, of which C would have been unaware at the time she gave her account, showed a picture of movements of that phone consistent with C’s account of having been picked up by Kerner near the school and then driven some distance to his home where sexual activity took place, before being returned to the school.

51. The judge put the competing arguments as to the significance of the supporting evidence fully and fairly before the jury. Mr Ellis’ attempt on behalf of Kerner to portray that evidence as having been “neutralised” was wholly misconceived.

Our conclusion on the alleged inconsistency of the verdicts
52. The primary ground of appeal advanced on behalf of Kerner is that there is a logical inconsistency between the verdicts on counts 5 and 7 and the remaining counts.

53. Our conclusion is that no such inconsistency exists; the verdicts can stand together.

There is nothing unreasonable in the jury’s conclusion. As the judge foresaw in her direction to the jury, counts 5 and 7 might be viewed in a different light from the remaining counts which depended wholly on the word of C. In the case of counts 5 and 7, there was the supporting evidence which we have identified.

54. We conclude that the jury’s verdicts represent close attention to the judge’s direction and that they were only prepared to find allegations against the applicant proved where there was supporting evidence. There is thus a clear distinction between counts 5 and 7 and the other counts which leads us to reject the main ground of appeal.

The other grounds of the application for leave to appeal
55. There are subsidiary grounds of appeal.

56. The first of these asserts that by reason of a failure by the school to retain full child protection records and a failure by the police to carry out a DNA sweep of Kerner’s car and home, the trial was rendered unfair. We reject that submission. The absence of some records was raised during the trial by the defence and the jury were reminded of the issue in summing up. In any event the jury were well aware of the issues surrounding C’s credibility. It is impossible to see how any additional records could have improved Kerner’s position further. Again the issue of a failure by the police to subject the applicant’s car and home to DNA analysis, sometime after the alleged events, was raised at the trial and commented on by the judge in summing up. Both of those were matters for the jury’s consideration in deciding whether it could be sure that guilt on any count was shown. No arguable unfairness arises. We note that there was no suggestion at the trial that it should be adjourned or halted by reason of the absence of this material.

57. A further ground submits that there must be a lurking doubt as to the safety of the convictions. In this context, matters going to the credibility of C were raised, and reliance was placed on comments made by the judge at the time of verdict and in passing sentence. We are not persuaded that there is any arguable ground. The evidence as to C’s credibility was fully before the jury, and the views of the trial judge are, with respect, irrelevant. The decision in the case was for the jury not for the judge.

58. We deprecate the use of the phrase “lurking doubt” as it represents an invitation to this court to substitute its view for that of the jury. The question for this court is whether by reason of the matters raised the convictions are unsafe. For the reasons given, we dismiss this application.

 "They said CB had a vast amount of information about Mr Kerner's private life, details that nobody could have known unless they were in a relationship with him.

"They used evidence from a computerised register system which they said Mr Kerner altered to make it look like CB was in a class when she wasn't, and also relied on cell site evidence."

"Each of those grounds was subject to cross examination and found to be unreliable.

"It was found that CB could have learned the personal information by overhearing it or being told by other students.

"She stalked my client and found out a vast amount about his movements and personal life.

"As for the computer system, it transpired that anyone could have made the alterations as long as they had his password. Mr Kerner also gave evidence that he sometimes left his computer unlocked.

"And the cell site evidence was nullified when it was shown that it could support either side.

"The judge was clearly of the view that evidence was not sufficient for conviction, and this was reflected in her comments and the sentence she passed."

How do you prove that you didn't have sex with a lying schoolgirl who said you did?

She told jurors that Kerner took her virginity in one of the store cupboards, and claimed he had once taken her for a day-long sex session at his home while his wife at work.

How would you prove that you didn't take the virginity of a schoolgirl in a store cupboard, on a yoga mat, or that you didn't take her out for a day-long sex session in your home while your wife was at work?

The English tradition that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt has been suspended in the case of men accused of a historic sexual offence, but no English lawyer seems to have noticed this.

Is it because they are mostly female these days?

The rate at which women are being appointed judges is gathering momentum in a “snowball effect”, ensuring gender equality on the bench is not that far away

Male students are outnumbered by females at most UK universities. 

the latest Law Society statistics show that that 62.4% of students accepted onto LLB courses in England and Wales in 2012 were women 

The Division is led by the Lord Chief Justice, currently Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, assisted by the Vice-President of the Criminal Division, currently Lady Justice Hallett.

Lady Justice Hallett: 'Senior judge propositioned me after getting me promotion'

Perhaps he did, perhaps he didn't. If he did, perhaps he was joking. It is unlikely now that he will come forward and say he was only joking, is he? Feminazis complaining about sexism are infamous for their humourlessness. What if a male judge dissents from Lady Justice? It would be the easiest thing in the world for her to accuse him of a historic sexual offence to get him to toe the feminazi line. Just the mere hint of a threat would be enough.

Thomas is one of the Founding Members of the European Law Institute, a non-profit organisation that conducts research, makes recommendations and provides practical guidance in the field of European legal development with a goal of enhancing the European legal integration.

As for Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, it does sound like he will be voting to remain on 23 June 2016. This makes him a liberal, and we know what liberal judges do to the beta male victims of feminism, don't we?,_Baron_Thomas_of_Cwmgiedd

Don't expect things to improve if Britain votes to remain in the EU. Expect it to get much much worse and be very very afraid, especially if you are a beta male victim of feminism. You have no one at all to represent your interests because all the leaders of all the political parties are chasing the female vote and are terrified of alienating their female voters.

If you are poor, old and ugly, you already fit the profile of the average paedophile perfectly.

If you are wealthy and successful, you will probably have a queue of lying sluts saying you sexually assaulted them decades ago.  YOUR WEALTH AND SOCIAL STATUS IS NO PROTECTION.

Bhagavad Gita: "Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory [of established legal tradition ie the right of anyone accused of a crime to a fair trial to establish his guilt *beyond reasonable doubt*], the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

By the way, Britain has no alpha male though the are men who have alpha (ie leadership) qualities. If you are a man and have not yet been a victim of feminism, it doesn't mean it won't happen to you, only that it hasn't happened yet.

Oh, and the Directrix of Public Prosecutions is female.

Did the Crown Prosecution Service exceed its powers as John Humphrys was suggesting to Alison Saunders?

The head of the Crown Prosecution Service in London says that the demonization of young women in the media, especially those who’ve been out drinking, is contributing to the low conviction rate in rape cases.

Feminazis hate footballers

One defence lawyer has said that 70 per cent of cases in Crown Courts now are sex cases. The CPS (65 per cent of whose workforce is female) evidently has no concept of age discrimination. It zealously prosecutes offenders ranging in age from 12 to 101.
The more promiscuous the women, the higher the number of rape complaints.

Sweden has the highest rate of reported rape in Europe – about 63 per 100,000 inhabitants.

Catchy rap video by the Freedom party boss, Heinz-Christian Strache

Monday, 23 May 2016

Jews, the "Far Right" and liberal values

Bernard Shaw:

A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again.

Liberal values have broken the nationality of Western nations. 

Have the frighteners been put on the Mail as well as the Telegraph on Brexit? What are Lady Rothermere's views? More than a hint of anti-Brexitism in the Mail?

Along with the rest of the developed world – characterized by Generation Me, the Selfie, and a three-second attention span – the British have little hope of resisting the process of being managed into doing the right thing. And the right thing, in this case, is: voting to remain in a system wherein none of their votes will ever change anything ever again.

What are Lady Rothermere's views on Brexit?,_4th_Viscount_Rothermere 

Why is the Daily Telegraph sitting on the EU referendum fence?

Saturday, 21 May 2016

What would have happened to the gaily married celebrity who enjoyed a threesome with a gaily married couple under sharia?

YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful. 

Under sharia, there would be no question of allowing a clearly stated sexual offence to ever be called marriage or allowing sodomite couples to adopt children who have already suffered the misfortune of having been abandoned to the care system by their natural parents.

This is why Muslims reject Western liberal values

This dumfuck shit for brains jerk is so dumb it makes you want to puke. Why don't Western governments understand that Muslims don't want to end up like this jerk or his bastard offspring or the sluts he fucks? 

 The solution is simple. The solution is The solution is Islam.

Friday, 20 May 2016

‘EU is in process of collapsing on itself’ – Marine Le Pen to RT (EXCLUS...

EU used by the US to provoke Russia by suggesting Ukraine could join the EU