Rabbi Sacks and the consequences of his support for women's rights

You cannot reason with the left because parties of the left are stuffed with women.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) August 27, 2017

The more censorious, corrupt and incompetent Western governments become, the more Jews will be blamed.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017

Just as US Presidential candidates are coerced into declaring loyalty to Israel, the then Chief Rabbi of Britain Rabbi Sacks was also coerced into saying he supported the advancement of women's rights.

http://chiefrabbi.org/history-chief-rabbinate/

The Chief Rabbinate of England is an institution that first arose in the 18th century, initially evolving from the Rabbinate of The Great Synagogue in London, and gradually extending its influence to encompass both Britain’s provincial Jewish communities and those across the British Empire. That it evolved independently of a secular power, rather than being instituted by civil authorities, marks it out as unique within the European Rabbinates.

http://rabbisacks.org/reith-lectures-the-persistence-of-faith/

Sadly, supporting the advancement of women's rights meant supporting the advancement of fornicating feminism, leading to widespread bastardy, national degeneracy and eventually the decline and fall of all Western nations who condoned fornicating feminism.

In the video below, Rabbi Sacks bewails the degeneracy of the gentile, but is himself cowed by his fear of directly challenging feminism.

http://www.rabbisacks.org/wp-content/uploads/1990/11/1990_reith3.pdf and http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/p00gxty2 is evidence that he understands exactly what feminism is doing to the West, but dares not call it out, for fear of the consequences.

I think I know why he won't get answer my questions at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/my-public-letter-to-lord-sacks.html but he should at least try to pass it upwards if he does not feel himself up to dealing with them. If they cannot answer it either, then it is back to me to give the answers, hinted at in the links below:

The Temptation of Eve and why men must always pay for sex 

Feminists fucked with Judaism, then they fucked with Christianity, and now they are fucking with Islam

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline 

The price of sex - Part 1
The price of sex - Part 2

What happens if you don't heed my warning and advice?

Then white men will get their statues pulled down by the feminazis and their SJW beta male running dogs. 

Guardian writer Afua Hirsch, seen here, says Britain must remove Nelson's column because he was a white supremacist.

This will never end. pic.twitter.com/5RKiN4B63L

— Alba Gu Brath (@Alba_Rising) August 22, 2017

The conservatives who didn't defend Confederate monuments are part of the problem, now the left smell blood, they will tear everything down! pic.twitter.com/CGmU3FyiNz

— Mark Collett (@MarkACollett) August 27, 2017

As you can see from https://www.channel4.com/news/should-nelsons-column-be-torn-down-afua-hirsch-and-laura-perrins-debate white men are now so cowed they dare not even defend their statues themselves, but sent a feeble white Catholic woman to do it for them instead. She didn't do very well, did she? I would have told Afua Hirsch to wipe that supercilious smile off her face before someone does, but Laura Perrins who has blocked me on Twitter wasn't up to the job of saying that. (You will have to watch that video to see that supercilious smile, so please do, and get properly angry, and watch it several times if need be because I know the white man has now had his backbone filleted out by feminism and in his thraldom to the slutocracy nearly lost the ability to feel righteous anger.)

Is the presentation of this debate - do please have a look to see who is chairing this debate - a deliberate policy of systematic humiliation of the white man by the left? Why did no white man respond? Because he did not trust himself to do so, probably. Perhaps if he defended the statues too well he would be accused of hate speech, misogyny, causing his girlfriend to withhold sex from him or his wife to divorce him under the rules of no fault divorce and end up having his property confiscated by his wife and deprived of his children.

This hand should have been portrayed as belonging to a woman.

When you are being systematically cowed and humiliated, you pretend not to have heard the insult or felt the humiliation.This is the only stratagem now left to the emasculated white man, who now only hopes that the rest of the world does not see his humiliation too much or laugh too loudly in his presence.

1:10  Adam Wallace: "The white race won't survive if it doesn't deserve to survive."  https://t.co/Bkr6Lw0V4z

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) August 25, 2017