Translate

Monday 29 January 2018

Canadian woman in her early 30s seeks husband




https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/146783979649

British nationalists and British nationalists who have converted to Islam

Q:  Would Eddy Butler consider Spanish reverts to Islam traitors or ethno-masochists even though Spain used to be under the rule of the Abbasid caliphate and had been an Islamic country for seven hundred years, which is greater than it has been Christian?

A:  Eddy Butler answers:

"Reverts is an expression used by Moslem freaks to describe anyone who converts. The original Spanish converts were mostly forced. So any new convert is an ethno masochist who probably suffers from mental problems."

Q:  Why does Eddy Butler think that it is mentally ill for an infidel to adopt Islam but mentally sane to adopt Christianity? 

A:  I'll ask him.

Q:  So if Eddy Butler thinks that new British Muslims are mentally ethno-masochists, then what does he think of the Muslim English Democrats candidate David Dawud Haslett?

A:  I'll ask him.

Q:  "So any new [Muslim] convert is an ethno masochist who probably suffers from mental problems."- 😂😂 Does Eddy not realise that Christianity conquered Spain after the Islamic era and forced everyone to convert and persecuted anyone who refused to be convert? Spanish Christians must be mentally ill.

A:  Eddy Butler answers:

"Spain was Christian. It was invaded by ethnic aliens with an alien religion and culture - Arab Moslems. They forcibly converted many inhabitants to Islam. Spain was reconquered for Western civilisation and became Christian again. North Western Europeans who voluntarily decide to convert are ethno masochists who almost certainly suffer from mental health issues. Also most of Spain was reconquered well before the final fall of Granada in 1492 - and a lot (perhaps most) Moslems were expelled, or should i say repatriated."

Q:  Under the Abbasids, Christians and Jews, despite some hardship were still allowed to practise their face, which came to show that the Muslims respected the local culture. The Catholic conquerors literally exterminated everyone who was not an affirming Christian which then led to the Inquisition.

A:  Eddy Butler answers:

"If you go back far enough obviously all of Europe was not Christian. Only a buffoon would think it remarkable to state that. However Christianity was not adopted via an ethnic alien invasion and was adapted to be suitable to the local population. Roman Spain would have had a very strong Christian component prior to the Germanic invasions."

Q:  Eddy does not realise that Spain was pagan before the Visgoths invaded who first imposed Arianism and then Catholicism, which persecuted Jews and Arians under Roderic- this is what led Julian of Ceuta to side with the Abbasids to overthrow King Roderic. Christianity was as an alien creed itself.

A:  Eddy Butler answers:

"If you go back far enough obviously all of Europe was not Christian. Only a buffoon would think it remarkable to state that. However Christianity was not adopted via an ethnic alien invasion and was adapted to be suitable to the local population. Roman Spain would have had a very strong Christian component prior to the Germanic invasions."

Q:  I think that Eddy Butler is seriously mentally ill, he just does not know how to think for himself, he is extremely biased and has a very autistic issue with people when they choose Islam as their new way of life. He needs help...Desperately!

A:  I'll pass this on.

Q:  Roman Spain would have had a very strong pagan heritage which was replaced by invading christianising Visgoths or imperialistic Romans importing a Middle Eastern Israelite cult called Christianity. Christianity was enforced but then adopted, Islam was enforced and then adopted too.

A:  OK

Q:  Does Eddy Butler not realise that the biggest mentally ill acts in our communities are not Islamic reversion but drug addiction, alcoholism, fornication, homosexuality, illegitimacy etc? Would he want his children to be drug addicted MCSF fornicators [Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers] or virgin reverts to Islam?

A:  Probably not to both questions.

Q:  Would Eddy Butler say that Napoléon Bonaparte was an ethno-masochist traitor for suggesting the creation of a European community based on Koranic principles?

A:  I would support a European Islamic Union governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

Q:  Arthur Wagner, a member of the Alternative für Deutschland, has become a Muslim! https://www.thelocal.de/20180124/leading-member-of-far-right-afd-in-brandenburg-converts-to-islam/amp?__twitter_impression=true

A:  Eventually, the political landscape will be divided between those who are pro-theocracy (ie men and women who know that the preservation of civilised life depends on people who want to become the good parents of legitimate children and acknowledge the contribution good parents make to society) and those who are pro-feminist (ie unmarriageable men and women who have no intention or prospect of becoming parents of legitimate children and who won't even acknowledge that children are better off brought up by their two married parents living together).

Q:  So what will Eddy Butler and Mark Collett think of Arthur Wagner? Is he an ethno-masochist race traitor?

A:  Neither of them dare to discuss whether Western Man needs a religion now that they know Christianity is kaput.

Q:  Should Mark Collett and Eddy Butler not join the British Democratic Party?

A:  I will ask them.

Q:  Could you please ask Eddy and Mark what they think?

A:  About this question at https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answers/146702958977?

Q:  No, could you please ask Mark and Eddy what they think about Arthur Wagner's reversion?

A:  Eddy Butler: "Clearly the german is mentally ill"

Q:  Why are Eddy and Mark Collett not members of the British Democratic Party?

A:  I'll ask them.

Q:  I still have not heard Eddy Butler's conclusion on David Haslett's reversion to Islam.

A:  He says he can't be bothered to answer the questions of cranks.

Q:  Interesting. Eddy can answer questions related to Arthur Wagner and Islamic Spain but remains silent on David Haslett.

A:  We can guess the reason, can't we?

Q:  By Eddy's logic, is Frank Forte a mentally ill ethno-masochist race traitor for converting to Buddhism?

A:  I think Eddy only feels threatened by Islam.

Q:  If Eddy Butler lived in 4th century Rome, which would he choose: remain a Roman pagan worshipping the Emperor as a divine incarnation and all the other gods or convert to the Middle Eastern Judaean cult, Christianity, worshipping Jesus/ Yeshua, the crucified King of Judaea as a divine incarnation?

Eddy Butler answers:

"I would be the God Emperor. The Divine Edward - the first Germanic Emperor."

Q:  So basically Eddy Butler would have rejected Christianity after all due to it being just a foreign ideology set to overthrow his might of rule. So there you have it, the Romans, Germanics and Greeks were ethno-masochist race traitors for abandoning paganism for Christianity.

A:  You make an excellent point.

It is the responsibility of the leader to choose a new moral system if the current one is kaput or not good enough compared to the rival peoples around you.

Q:  Eddy is a fool and hypocrite for condemning British Muslim reverts but not British Buddhist converts like Frank Forte. He says Christianity is part of our way of life even though right at the start he would have rejected Christianity as foreign and conversion as treason.

A:  He is rather unprincipled, I'm afraid. His politics is all about having the highest possible status and avoiding being seen to be on the margins. This is why he joined the English Democrats though I begged him not to, for the sake of his reputation. Converting to Islam would be seen by his associates as surrender to the enemy and it is for this reason only that he shows his hatred and contempt for Muslims. Nationalism unsupported by a belief in a deity is ignoble, unprincipled, immoral, degenerate, ignorant, arrogant, racist, anti-Semitic, hateful and, worst of all, plebeian. This is why nationalists are shunned and the reason why I advocate theocracy under the divine law of the Abrahamic God, supposed to be omnipotent and perfectly moral.


Sunday 28 January 2018

Bandar Aceh's Islamic corporal punishment for sex offenders

The Absolute State of Ontario

Rabbi Mizrachi on faith




There is a discussion about law, justice and God.


Friday 26 January 2018

Qanun Jinayat in Bandar Aceh

Sent: Friday, 26 January 2018, 13:14:19 GMT
Subject: Qanun Jinayat in Bandar Aceh


Dear Sir or Madam

I know you will find this a very unusual request, but will try to explain what I am trying to achieve as briefly and as clearly as possible.

I am a political activist campaigning against feminism. It is my belief that feminism is an ideology that is harmful to society because it causes social problems such as juvenile delinquency, a higher crime rate, lower educational standards and the decline of the West because it encourages social parasitism and causes the Western labour force to become increasingly uncompetitive as well as their politicians to become increasingly weak, cowardly and incompetent.

You may have heard of the practice of slut-shaming that is now currently forbidden under feminism. 



The purpose of feminism is to undermine the patriarchy, and patriarchy can only exist if most people in society obey the rules of marriage. The most important rule of marriage is the prohibition against extramarital including premarital sex. In Britain, most children are illegitimate, and this must mean that Britain and the West generally is already a matriarchy.




All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive and declining societies are matriarchies. A matriarchy is a civilisation that is already extinct, or about to become extinct. Native American tribes that were matriarchal were no match for the European pioneers who had superior weapons and technology that had been made possible by an environment of promoting patriarchal moral values and respecting the institutions of marriage and the family.

What the five world religions have in common is their support of patriarchy ie marriage and the family.

Christianity has failed the West because Christianity is now synonymous with liberalism and liberalism is about promoting sexual liberation and global gay marriage. 

Because Christianity has failed and Judaism is for Jews only, the only religion left for Westerners who are now suffering from the disease of mind that is feminism is Islam, since Hinduism and Buddhism are alien to to Western traditions.

Islam is also in conformity with the Noahide laws that Judaism has prescribed.








It seems to me that the corporal punishment of sex offenders under Islamic law that takes place in Bandar Aceh is administered humanely and professionally.

Because I believe that the law should support marriage in the West, I have come to the conclusion that the only way for the law to effectively support marriage and the family is to punish sex offenders as Surah An-Nur [24:2] prescribes. 



Because Westerners are overwhelmingly feminist and Islamophobic, my ideas are rejected by the Western liberal establishment. Even nationalists who hate the pro-immigration policies of the liberal establishment cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that Christianity has failed and that the West needs a new religion that will be effective in maintaining the morality of their nation.

Because Britain is a matriarchy, it will not produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest. I live in Britain and fear that if the problem of increasing illegitimacy remains unaddressed, Britain will become a failed state. 

Sadly, because the liberal establishment control the liberal media, my ideas for British national renewal and regeneration are being deliberately suppressed. 

Because the nationalists who oppose their liberal establishment are themselves also morally compromised and accustomed to an environment of widespread casual fornication and illegitimacy, they too will suppress my ideas. Because most of them are unmarriageable bachelors who are often unemployed or unemployable and unskilled, they know that their prospects of marrying a decent woman and having legitimate children with her are slim indeed. 

If these alt-right YouTubers criticise feminism and immoral women, they will not only be deprived of the opportunity to have legitimate children, they will also be unable to fornicate with women not their wife because these feminists will be angry with them for criticising feminism. This will be too great a sacrifice for these still youngish atheist men to make. British politicians are aware that proposals to punish sex offenders will be rejected by voters. This explains why no senior male politician will ever denounce feminism because all the political parties of the West chase the female vote. The only way they can only impose corporal punishment on sex offenders is if they have a one party state prepared to implement 24:2 of the Koran.

The last time a British politician warned against the threat to the "human stock" of the British was a Jew, the late Keith Joseph. He was believed to be a Prime Minister in waiting, but had to make way for Margaret Thatcher in 1974 after he was widely denounced for criticising unmarried mothers. It could be said that Britain has officially been a matriarchy since 1974.





Because my ideas are frighteningly radical and British male politicians are cowardly atheists who are only interested in holding on to office, the long term British national interest will continue to be ignored and its citizens continue to marinate in a culture that is morally corrupting and degenerate, leading to each subsequent generation being more degenerate than the one before it, until Britain and the West becomes a desert of failed states.

In view of the reality of the environment in which I am campaigning to support marriage, it seems I will need to do much more than say what I have been saying for so long now about how the law must support marriage.

Because I have not myself been morally perfect, I am often accused of being a hypocrite by my liberal opponents. If I were to be lashed 100 times in public in Bandar Aceh, the point would be made that I am prepared to take my punishment to support policies of slut-shaming and in some way take this punishment on behalf of the British people - a symbolic gesture that I feel will demonstrate my concern for the British people and my preparedness to make sacrifices on their behalves that their own corrupt, cowardly, foolish and weak leaders refuse to do.

I understand Syahrizal Abbas is head of the Sharia Law Office of Aceh and the person to contact on the matter of having this punishment administered to me.  

Could you please confirm that this is the case and that the Indonesian government and its media are prepared to assist me and give this event publicity?

I anticipate that this event will attract worldwide publicity and will encourage tourism to Bandar Aceh as well as be very helpful in making the point that the law should support marriage as well as the fact that Western countries that do not forbid and punish extramarital sex fall below the minimum moral standards set by the Seven Noahide laws of Judaism. It is hoped the Indonesian government will also encourage the Jewish community of Indonesia to come to Aceh and witness this event which has the aim of remoralising the West and rescuing Western civilisation from the disease of the mind that is feminism.

I hope to hear from you as to how to take this matter further on having this punishment administered to me with maximum publicity from the international media.

Please note that I will not be seeking special treatment from the person administering the 100 lashes and intend to wear what is customarily worn by the women of Aceh when receiving the punishment. 

Regards
Claire Khaw 

THE RESPONSE I RECEIVED

Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 15:25:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Fw: Qanun Jinayat in Bandar Aceh

Dear Ms. Khaw,

Thank you for your email dated 26th of January 2018. We would like to acknowledge and appreciate your broad views on multidimensional aspects of feminism, which also touched upon the practices of beliefs, including the view of Islamic law and in particular the exercise of Qanun Jinayat in the Indonesian province of Aceh. 

At the outset, Indonesian society lives in a patriarchy manner. This philosophy is mainly supported by the general faiths that are consented by the Government in Indonesia, in particular under the Islamic belief as you have mentioned in your narrative. As you may be aware, Indonesia is the largest moslem populated country in the world. However, the general ideology of feminism is not something that is opposed of by the Indonesian society, especially when the topics have touched the issues related to fundamental human rights. You may also be aware, Gender mainstreaming today is becoming a value that is widely accepted around the world including in Indonesia, but not to be confused with its relation with matriarchy society.

In regard to your proposal, we are not in the position to facilitate such request. For your information, the laws in the Aceh Province is distinctive of the general national laws throughout Indonesia, in which it conducts the syariah laws under special autonomy region upon those who are convicted to breach the law and conducted through a transparent due process. Moreover, Qanun Jinayat or the Islamic criminal code by law only applies, or given, whereby violations are conducted within the jurisdictions of the region and it is also carried out strictly by due process of law.

If you would like to refer your campaign to the Indonesian media, we might be able to put you in contact with some of well known journalists who might be able to share your views and channel through proper course of actions.

Best Regards,

Maradona A. Runtukahu


Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2018, 19:09:14 GMT
Subject: Qanun Jinayat in Bandar Aceh

Dear Sir

Thank you for your response of today.

Your kind offer to put me in contact with well known Indonesian journalists who will draw attention of the Ummah to my campaign is greatly appreciated.

Best regards
Claire Khaw

Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2018, 09:25:46 GMT
Subject: Fw: Qanun Jinayat in Bandar Aceh

Dear Mr Runtukahu

Thank you very much for your offer to put me in touch with well-known journalists who will draw attention of the Ummah to my campaign.

It is greatly appreciated.

Best regards
Claire Khaw

Sent: Monday, 26 March 2018, 10:05:35 GMT+1
Subject: For the attention of Mr Maradona A. Runtukahu

Dear Mr Runtukahu

Thank you very much again for your offer to put me in touch with well-known journalists who will draw the attention of the Ummah to my campaign.

It is much appreciated.

Best regards
Claire Khaw


Sent: Monday, 16 April 2018, 20:28:42 GMT+1
Dear Mr Rutunkahu

Thank you again for your offer to put me in touch will well-known journalists who will draw the attention of the Ummah to my campaign. 

It is most appreciated. 

Best regards

Claire Khaw





Wednesday 24 January 2018

Claire Khaw makes enquiries about being slut-shamed in Indonesia in a bid to promote slut-shaming in the West to save Western civilisation


https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/satan

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/auberon-waugh-and-me.html

Auberon Waugh, now the Editor of the Literary Review, has gained a reputation as a controversial journalist. In conversation with Michael Parkinson, he talks about his father Evelyn Waugh, his childhood and his writing, which has included seven novels and his diary Private Eye. [Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs] Favourite track: Don Giovanni Act 1 by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Book: Other Men's Flowers by Lord A P Wavell Luxury: Vine

Monday 22 January 2018

Why Christianity won't save the West



MrCool Mug:


Your point about Brownies and Blackies and Ching-Chongs getting into Christianity doesn't really mean much to me. I've heard this from Heathens: that Christianity is full of coloured people now, so therefore "it isn't ours; we want our own religion." Utter nonsense. The intellectual Tradition is ours (Greek and Roman specifically), the religious fundamentals and rituals are Jewish. It was never ours in the sense that it solely came out of us; but then, nothing ever does. Different people have influenced each other for centuries. That doesn't mean you don't care about your own, and it doesn't mean that because you belong to the same religion as another race or tribe, that you therefore must mix with them. This is absurd. The whole situation is more nuanced than the average racist or Heathen can handle.
Belonging to the same religion solves many of our problems, which is what they don't want to admit. If we all (in the Alt-Right) became Catholics (for example), we would have immediate allies all across the world. You just have to come to the realisation, not that race isn't everything, but that race alone cannot save a civilisation. We wouldn't have to allow Catholic Hispanics to immigrate into the West, just because we're Catholic; we're confusing two different things: what is personal (religion) and what is political (the nation). It doesn't follow, that because we're the same religion, we should therefore bring in any foreigners. A nation is a nation, it has a dignity that it should preserve, and it is God given.
Christianity dies when it gets involved in politics: look at Anglicanism as the classic example. Listen to Malcolm Muggeridge on this very point. People don't understand Christianity any more, even Christians don't know what it is (many of them). It's not a political statement; it's a spiritual, transcendental exercise. Religion's whole point (particularly Christianity) is apolitical, is to be un-worldly and against what is current, and instead to focus on what is eternal.
The slightest bit of thought would reveal these truths, these common sensities, to the atheists and Heathens (no difference) in our movement. But they have an emotional interest in their solely tribal/racial view, which is also a religious view, and in my opinion makes them not so different from the Jews they hate so much.

My comments

It would be rational to worship the most powerful God, and the most powerful God is the Abrahamic God.

The West is more likely to Islamify itself than it is to re-Christianise itself. Your hysterical insistence that Christianity is not kaput is merely because you are a Catholic insisting that Catholicism is still fit for the purpose of maintaining morality when Catholic Ireland has fallen to gay marriage. There is no point claiming you are an adherent of a religion if you are not following its principles. The fact is that most Jews are not observant Jews and most people who call themselves Christians are not believing Christians. The very least your religion should be doing for its adherents is to support the institution of marriage. Christianity has clearly failed in this regard. Time, therefore, to take it out with the trash.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/half-of-priests-and-bishops-are-gay

The two ruinous World Wars Britain participated in was because it was without the guidance of the Koran. The Koran only approves of defensive wars and successful imperialistic wars. WW1 and WW2 were neither defensive wars nor examples of successful imperialism. Also, if the British had been Muslim, they would easily have replenished their population by means of polygamy after the War, instead of condemning most white British women to die childless spinsters. Stupid, ignorant, arrogant and even now so mulishly stubborn, they cling to their dessicated bones of Christianity that they only pretended to believe in anyway. Now, they are now so theologically ignorant even the Archbishop of Canterbury does not even know he is supposed to pretend he believes in the absurdity of the Trinity. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html

If you have an unofficial secular religion that trumps over your stated Christianity, then it means it has already failed. WW1 and WW2 were wars of British dog in the mangerism. If the two World Wars were to two games of Monopoly, it would be the British paying ruinously to prevent the Germans from completing their sets to prevent them putting up hotels, and in the process of bankrupting themselves and losing the game, twice.

I am agnostic and not Muslim. It seems obvious to me that if Christianity is kaput, then it needs to be replaced, because no people can do without a religion. Even Jews, who are the real superior race, know they cannot do without Judaism. Time to get real, peeps. Once you acknowledge that Christianity is kaput and that every people needs a religion, you will have to admit that Islam is the answer. I know this is hard for you, but it has been said Islam is Judaism Lite. My little idea of Secular Koranism is Islam Lite. Think of it as a kind of Chicken Tikka Massala religion specially created by me for the British palate, my gift to the white people I want to help in their time of trouble after living amongst them for so long ...  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

You are obviously an atheist clinging to the failed religion of your ancestors in the hope of defeating Jews and Muslims since you have admitted to being neither Catholic nor Protestant. Doubtless you chose Catholicism because it seemed to you to be the most powerful church in the world, but it too has failed because Catholic Ireland has fallen to gay marriage.  I am trying to explain to you that if your religion has failed, you need to find a new one that actually works. Think of it is an irreparably broken boiler. If you don't replace it, you won't have hot water and central heating. You can't keep the old broken one, because there is no space for it. So it has got to go and the new one brought in to replace it. I don't expect you to like this, but try to look on the bright side, eh? If you believe in God, then Muslims were sent by Him to make you correct your grave historical errors. Jews are a superior race because they have the highest IQ and have their own ethno-state, what you all long for. You do know that Judaism is the original and best form of divine ethno-nationalism, don't you? And Islam is divine civic nationalism. I am sorry you find what I say obnoxious and can completely understand why you might do so.

You probably don't know that the Koran acknowledges the Virgin Birth and Christ as a prophet of God. Points to note: Christianity does not accommodate Judaism, and Judaism does not acknowledge Christ.  Islam on the other hand accommodates both Jews and Christians.

If you wanted to establish a theocracy, you would not be using the New Testament which is full of extremist statements and silly stories, but only Jews would use the Old Testament as a basis of their theocracy. I am afraid there is nothing left that we can use.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html is how I have interpreted that wife-beating verse. I think it is fair enough and like to think that most reasonable and moral women can live with this.

You keep going back to Christianity because it is the religion of your ancestors. If you knew anything about the history of Christianity and what Christians are really supposed to literally believe in, its absurdity would repulse you. I know you are using Christianity as a weapon against Islam and the Muslim immigration you hate and fear, but I really don't think that the re-Christianising of the West is at all likely, because it really is morally and intellectually bankrupt. It is morally bankrupt because its clergy is corrupt and this is evidenced by the fact that Catholic Ireland fell to gay marriage, and it is intellectually bankrupt because it requires you to literally believe that Christ is simultaneously God Himself and His Son.

Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, Islam divine civic nationalism. Christianity is a rough draft and it is time for it to be discarded. Westerners must find the quickest most effective solution that is most likely to work, for their own sake and that of their children, grandchildren and descendants. Secular Koranism will accommodate Jews and Christians as well as Hindus, Buddhists, polytheists, atheists and agnostics such as myself. The most disruptive thing that would happen under Secular Koranism is the disestablishment of the Church of England. You should bear in mind that Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system, like EU law.


Please understand my position: I have chosen Islam by what I hope is a logical process of elimination. I don't think you need to literally believe in God to be able to discover the nature of the evils His laws contained in the Bible and Koran are intended to discourage. Belief in God is optional, but obedience to His laws compulsory - that would be the nature of theocracy. I know this sounds horrifying to many, but we already live under so many liberal laws that we loathe. Theocracy would be a marked improvement, because the prohibitions would be understood and expected to be for the long term national interest, not the groups privileged by feminists who hate white heterosexual men.

On feminism, immigration and the welfare state

Rabbi Mizrachi says stay away from lies and hypocrisy


Profile: Avigdor Lieberman

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/ultra-orthodox-party-assails-defense-minister-after-mall-visit-on-shab-1.5749173

Defense Minister remains defiant after anti-Shabbat provocation Liberman defends himself after coming under attack for attending anti-Shabbat rally in Ashdod. 'I don't want a haredi state.'

On the Amaleks and their values

Sunday 21 January 2018

Casual sex and how to pick up girls



Paul Weston on THAT Jordan Peterson Cathy Newman Interview.





Friday 19 January 2018

Alt-right gangbang featuring Millennial Woes



Millennial Woes joins them from 1:14


Apologies: I meant to say "I am a moral as well as a [political] philosopher."

Jews were the original ethno-nationalists, but the alt-right hate them.

Muslims were the original civic nationalists, but the alt-right hate them too.

If you think the alt-right are any better with Christianity, you would be wrong, because they are mostly atheist unemployable unmarriageable bachelors afraid of offending feminists who might withhold sex from them.

rabbisacks.org/story-tell-bo-5778/ addresses many points nationalists are scratching their heads about.



Possession is nine points of the law from 1:34:00

1:34:00  I chime in. 1:37:00  The narrow and wide interpretation of racism 1:40:00  It is racist to say black people are good at sport and d...