Translate

Friday 30 November 2018

Koraniyule 2018










































Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control refused to answer my question and have now blocked me




Luke and Ryan Hart - apparently co-opted by the matriarchy to further undermine marriage by making it an even worse bargain for men - are not asked and refuse to answer the obvious question

No need for draconian social media censorship under a one party state

Millennial Woes demands access to social media as a human right



The Age of Nationalism: A Conversation with Yoram Hazony



Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control want to make marriage an even worse bargain for men

Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control refused to answer my question and have now blocked me

Tuesday 27 November 2018

Yoram Hazony talks about The Virtue of Nationalism and tradition



16:00  Everybody wants to rule the world https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGCdLKXNF3w

19:00  The Koran is ambiguous about empire. On the one hand, it says only defensive wars are allowed. On the other, it says impose the jizya on those you have conquered. I suppose God means us to pick our fights carefully.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_military_jurisprudence

29:00 An Englishman's home is his castle - private property in the Koran and the conditions of visiting and seeking admission  https://discover-the-truth.com/2017/01/22/quran-2458-59-seeking-permission-before-entering-the-house/

37:00  The loss of free speech now under our matriarchy is because it is on notice that Trump and his supporters who want to restore the patriarchy threaten the status quo.

41:00  The media used to be more nationalist in the sense that it would know it was against the national interest to show a photo of Roosevelt in his wheelchair, so it wouldn't. The media now behaves like an ill-bred brat whose never married single mother never bothered to parent properly. Make no mistake, Yoram: the Culture War is really a Yin and Yang Battle of the Sexes between unmarried mothers with variously fathered illegitimate offspring and their running dogs against the men who want to become fathers of legitimate offspring who want to parent them properly.

45:00 Nationalism is a dignified sense of national identity and a government that unapologetically promotes the national interest without kowtowing to the parasitic classes created by the welfare state with the immoral unmarried mothers who badly parent their illegitimate offspring in no doubt that they will be slut-shamed as sex offenders to discourage them from their dysgenic reproductive choices.

56:00  Why do you say "capitalism" when you mean "feminism"? It is feminism that undermines marriage and by extension the patriarchy. In fact, everything about feminism undermines marriage. Yes, feminism is destroying the nation. When you say "capitalism", I believe you also mean "usury". You should really be more prepared to call a spade a spade.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectification_of_names


1:00:00  1:00:00  Empire is an institution. While Jews are not supposed to acquire empire, the gentile will not be able to completely refrain from warfare. The rules of warfare could be made more humane, however. http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/war.shtml

Wars between countries are explicable, but imperialistic wars are very difficult to explain to the loved ones of the men who died like flies.

Who can explain the Crimean War to those expected to do and die, but never question why?

How was WW1 explained to returning men?

How was WW2 explained to the British after they lost their world empire after two ruinous World Wars?  WW2 was of course a continuation of WW1. Apparently, Britain lost its world empire over Belgian neutrality or over the cancelled General Election of 1915 which the Liberal Prime Minister Asquith thought the Liberal Party would win more easily after a short successful war.

1:04:00  Tribal societies are primitive in the sense that they are polytheists and amoral. To be tribal is to disregard the interests of those who are not of your tribe. Islam was intended to transcend tribal interests and form a nation out of a union of tribes. Because Muslims have not put aside their tribal differences successfully, they fail.

1:11:00  Moses was not given the commandment to conquer the world because it is easier to keep your identity as a tribe if you stay small. Anyway, we can't all be God's Chosen People. The Jews had already conquered Canaan, in any case.

1:13:00  You object to universalism, but the gentiles need their own religion too. But what objection have you to a gentile religion ie Islam that gives justice universally which accommodates women, minorities as well as giving Jews and Christians a special status?  Perhaps you just object to the universalism of the matriarchy but not to the universalism of patriarchy?

1:16:00 Slavery is an institution, like marriage and prostitution. Institutions should be regulated not criminalised, to protect the parties. Slavery is after all an alternative form of welfare. We might sell ourselves into slavery to be housed and fed. Britain only wanted to end slavery to end the Spanish Empire, I believe. Both the Bible and Koran tolerate slavery.

Are you planning to come to the UK to promote your book amongst the despairing Brexiteers, Yoram? Or will there be riots at Oxbridge to prevent you from speaking?

Monday 26 November 2018

I discuss Mein Kampf and suggest that the degeneracy of the white race can be cured by restoring the patriarchy



1:01:00

Luke Ford's question:

Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?


CK:
A lot of Mein Kampf is about German matters of Germany in the 1930s. Its preoccupations would be quite different to the alt-right of the West now because alt-right is preoccupied with immigration and Nazi Germany didn't have an immigration problem, did it?

LF:
So let me just run it by you again. I'll just go point by point. Hitler had a biocentric worldview perspective on life: first of all a referenced nature so that is identical with the alt-right's perspective. The alt-right and its leaders are overwhelmingly atheists.

CK:
Hitler pretended to be Catholic. In his table talks he he actually favoured Islam because he thought Christianity was a stupid religion, although he was confirmed as a Catholic, so there were lots of things that he wanted to do but he knew he couldn't. He wanted to abolish usury. He did know something about Islam and thought it was a more masculine ...
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

Both Hitler and Himmler had a soft spot for Islam. Hitler several times fantasized that, if the Saracens had not been stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread through the European continent—and that would have been a good thing, since “Jewish Christianity” wouldn’t have gone on to poison Europe. Christianity doted on weakness and suffering, while Islam extolled strength, Hitler believed. Himmler in a January 1944 speech called Islam “a practical and attractive religion for soldiers,” with its promise of paradise and beautiful women for brave martyrs after their death. “This is the kind of language a soldier understands,” Himmler gushed.

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/187128/nazi-romance-with-islam

LF [pretending I had gone off topic when what I said was exactly on point because he did not like me suggesting that Islam is the answer because Christianity is kaput]:
OK, Claire, I need you to stay on topic. So Hitler had a biocentric worldview. His perspective on life was first of all referenced in nature. He contended that before anything else we must attend to nature the world of living things in their environments and is not separate from or above nature but rather a part of nature we need to come to grips with how our nature actually operates, we must align our lives with nature, we must obey nature's laws. That is the alt-right's perspective.

CK:
Is it? I wasn't aware of that. I didn't even know Hitler said all of that. It sounds very vague.

LF:
You know, it sounds pretty clear to me. I mean I don't know what to say if you don't see that that's the that's the building block for Social Darwinism ....

CK:
Is it arguing for Social Darwinism or something like that is that? Is that what you're saying?

LF:
I don't know how you can get more clear than this: Hitler had a biocentric worldview that we must  ...

CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean German-centric?

LF:
Does biocentric mean German-centric? Really that's what you're asking me? Biocentric is very clear, Claire, it means a worldview based in nature that humans must align themselves with nature, obey nature's laws that we're not separate ...

CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean empire?

LF:
Because we are in nature, frequently our choice is either kill or be killed ...

CK:
OK,  so he started acquiring empire and it ended badly so maybe that's not always the best thing.

LF:
I'm not talking about whether this is the best thing to do, I'm asking if you can come up with any significant differences between ... 

CK [answering the question immediately and succinctly]:

The alt-right are not about war but about pogrom.

LF [pretending I had not answered the question because he didn't like my answer]:

OK, you've got to stay on topic Claire. When I ask a question you've got to respond to the topic. We can't just go spinning off. Glib, do you want to jump in ...

[Glib and LF talk and I was invited again to comment on what they had just said, which wasn't about anything much in particular as far as I could tell.]

1:10:00

CK:
...  biocentricism meant social Darwinism: eugenics  ... was that what you meant?

LF:
I give up I can't be any more clear than than I was ...

CK:
Can somebody explain to me then? I don't think people understand either. By nature do you mean nature raw in tooth and claw?

LF:
Yes, that's that that's the beginning of the Mein Kampf worldview. It's the beginning of the Dissident Right worldview. The Dissident Right is not a theistic movement. The main intellectuals of the alternative right - Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor,  Kevin Macdonald - they're all atheists. They all have a a social Darwinian perspective on life which I'm trying to see how there's any difference from that and the worldview of Mein Kampf.

CK:
Well, Mein Kampf is really more about culture and sociology even because Hitler does write knowledgeably and some compassion about how the poor used to live and and architecture and and lots of other things but you know if you read Greg Johnson's White Nationalist Manifesto, there is actually very little about culture. It's basically "I'd like to kick them out and I want to kick all of them out by 2060" and that's it. Mein Kampf is a more rewarding read. I would suggest for White Nationalists and compare what the white man was in the 1930s and what he he is now. In fact, recently I was watching these videos of these schizophrenics in lunatic asylums in America and it  struck me how articulate even these mentally ill people stuck in asylums were compared to the tongue-tied people you have now. 
It really was astonishing. Obviously, something bad has happened to to the white race and and and this catastrophic drop in in IQ and obviously it's all to do with religion in the sense that the least that a religion can make you do is make you marry before you have children and parent or children properly - that is the very least. Forget all the frilly bits like not eating pork and shellfish and that kind of thing. That's the very least your religion should do for you and and if you won't enforce that then your population will age and become stupid and weak and people will come in and take your stuff, and that's what's what's happening now.

[Luke Ford mutes me and turns to Glib again to talk about nothing much in particular.]



Stupider and sluttier
https://www.theweek.co.uk/94224/why-iq-levels-are-falling

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Rabbi Sacks:

For a whole variety of reasons, some to do with medical developments like birth control, in vitro fertilisation and other genetic interventions, some to do with moral change like the idea that we are free to do whatever we like so long as it does not harm others, some to do with a transfer of responsibilities from the individual to the state, and other and more profound changes in the culture of the West, almost everything that marriage once brought together has now been split apart. Sex has been divorced from love, love from commitment, marriage from having children, and having children from responsibility for their care.

The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016. Fewer people are marrying, those who are, are marrying later, and 42 per cent of marriages end in divorce. Nor is cohabitation a substitute for marriage. The average length of cohabitation in Britain and the United States is less than two years. The result is a sharp increase among young people of eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, stress related syndromes, depression and actual and attempted suicides. The collapse of marriage has created a new form of poverty concentrated among single parent families, and of these, the main burden is born by women, who in 2011 headed 92 per cent of single parent households. In Britain today more than a million children will grow up with no contact whatsoever with their fathers.

This is creating a divide within societies the like of which has not been seen since Disraeli spoke of “two nations” a century and a half ago. Those who are privileged to grow up in stable loving association with the two people who brought them into being will, on average, be healthier physically and emotionally. They will do better at school and at work. They will have more successful relationships, be happier and live longer. And yes, there are many exceptions. But the injustice of it all cries out to heaven. It will go down in history as one of the tragic instances of what Friedrich Hayek called “the fatal conceit” that somehow we know better than the wisdom of the ages, and can defy the lessons of biology and history.

http://rabbisacks.org/love-brings-new-life-world-rabbi-sacks-institution-marriage/




2:10:00

CK:

In every nation and every government there will be in every nation every government will have a rent a mob and Antifa is our one now. 
Antifa are probably part of the Deep State. 

2:29:00

Claire, is the left simply more committed than the right?

CK:
Yes, simply because it's easier for them because they're already in charge at the top of the tree. Trump is trying very hard to dislodge them but he hasn't the manpower, I guess. There is no other big idea. I keep going on about religion simply because it has this kind of moral authority -  an instant appeal to people. If the alt-right is just about race and immigration it's not a big enough [idea]. If you wait for everybody to be affected to support you then then it'll probably be too late, so you need some Universalist idea that's capable of appealing to people but I guess the alt-right are the last people prepared to support marriage and family values.
****************************

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.
Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.
Intellectual corruption leads to your leaders not being able to submit to the truth, exercise logic or conform to the moral rules necessary for you to keep your society in existence and in good health.  

This is the only explanation I can think of for Luke's strangely obstructive behaviour when I tried to answer his questions, which the others also noticed.

IN THE COMMENTS

kissmyass682
Why'd Luke get so aggro with Claire? He went from 0 to a 100, is there some history there?

Claire Khaw
Not that I know of, except that, possibly, he didn't like the way my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"

Matvei Daniilovich
Wow, luke actually got a little triggered with Claire.

Claire Khaw
Since I never got to answer the question properly before he muted me, I can only think that it was because he did not like the direction my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"

Alejandro Black
Loved Luke’s Modafinil rage with Khaw

Claire Khaw
I don't think that was anything to do with drugs. 

Lou Duva
Very odd.

Claire Khaw
@Lou Duva I thought it was a bit odd too, but I think it was because he did not like the direction my answer to his question was going"Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"  From what I can make out, Luke was implying that both Mein Kampf and the alt-right want a pogrom.  He knew I would say that the answer lies somewhere in between the status quo of liberal democracy and the pogrom the alt-right are proposing ie the civic nationalism of Secular Koranism and he didn't want me mentioning that again on his show.









Saturday 24 November 2018

My brilliant solution to antisemitism: a Registrar and Register of Jews



IF JEWS DID NOT EXIST, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE INVENTED

If Jews did not exist, they would have to be invented. The Jews of China during the time of the Cultural Revolution were of course the wealthy, the landlords, the business owners and university professors.

Jews are now synonymous and conflated with the liberal elite who want to sabotage Brexit and continue with neoliberalism, borderless nations and neocon foreign policy.

ANTISEMITISM WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST AS LONG AS THE GENTILE IS CAPABLE OF THE DEADLY SINS OF ENVY, ANGER, PRIDE AND SLOTH AS WELL AS SCAPEGOATING

There will never be an end to antisemitism as long as the gentile is capable of envy. The Reform Jew is as stupid as the Liberal Gentile. Of course Jews will be hated for as long as the gentile is capable of the deadly sins of pride, anger, envy and sloth. The lower he sinks, the more he will hate the Jew, and he is sinking fast into the moral sewage that came with the disease of feminism that he is now nearly up to his neck.

MUSLIMS REPRESENT THE IMMIGRATION THE WESTERN GENTILE HATES AND FEARS

The Western gentile hates Muslims because Muslims are totemic of his hatred of the immigrants who have come to his land, but he especially hates Muslims because they are so numerous and visible and now look upon him with undisguised contempt.

JEWS REPRESENT THE POLITICAL CLASSES THE WESTERN GENTILE DESPISES AND DISTRUSTS

The Jew represents to the antisemite his political classes who clearly care nothing for him.  He thinks his politicians are either following orders from Jews or so stupid that they they do not know they are doing the bidding of Jews.

WHY JEWS KEEP GETTING THE BLAME WHEN IT IS FEMINISM THAT CAUSES IMMIGRATION AND PAEDOPHILIA

The problem is feminism but the antisemitic Islamophobe is too cowardly, lazy and intellectually dishonest to admit this because, however promiscuous and immoral his women, he will perceive them to be at least useful in that they represent potential sex partners for him, while the Jews and Muslims he hates do not. For this reason he would rather blame feminism, pornography and the failure of his religion and political system on Jews too.

MY PROPOSED REGISTRAR AND REGISTER OF JEWS FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF JEWISH TRIBAL MEMBERSHIP

May I ask Rabbi Bar-Hayim why the measures of herem are not longer used on Jews who commit Chillul Hashem? How about a National Register and Registrar of Jews in each country to keep members of the tribe in order? If they have broken the Sabbath, I am not suggesting that they be stoned, but they could certainly be struck off the Register by their rabbi so that as a non-Jew they escape the death penalty.

KAPUT CHRISTIANITY IS OBVIOUSLY IDOLATROUS SO THIS MEANS JEWS MUST ENCOURAGE WESTERNERS TO ADOPT ISLAM BECAUSE THEY MUST HAVE A RELIGION OR THEIR DEGENERACY WILL JUST DEEPEN AND ACCELERATE UNTIL THEY BECOME A FAILED STATE AND TAKE IT OUT ON JEWS

God if He created us clearly intended there to be Jews and gentiles. Judaism is for Jews only, and Islam for gentiles.

DIVINE ETHNO NATIONALISM, DIVINE CIVIC NATIONALISM

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

Islam is the only religion capable of regenerating the degenerate West anyway, since Christianity is kaput.

THE IDOLATROUS DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY THAT NO ONE REALLY BELIEVES IN, EXPLAINING WHY HYPOCRISY AND CHRISTIANITY GO HAND IN HAND

Not only is Christianity kaput, its absurd Doctrine of the Trinity is undeniably idolatrous. The doctrine is so absurd that these days most ignorant Post-Christians have no idea they are supposed to believe in this nonsense if they want to be properly Christian, and would reject it when told.

It is quite obvious which of the two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles is more in conformity with the Noahide laws and it isn't Christianity.

Perhaps Rabbi Bar-Hayim would like to pronounce on this.

ISLAM IS THE BEST FIT TO DO JUSTICE TO WOMEN AND MINORITIES, WITH JEWS BEING GIVEN A PRIVILEGED STATUS AS LONG AS THEY FULFIL THEIR DUTY TO THE GENTILE BY REMINDING HIM WHEN HIS LAWS FALL BELOW THE MINIMUM MORAL STANDARDS OF THE NOAHIDE LAWS EG WHEN HE STARTS PROMOTING - HORROR OF HORRORS AND ABOMINATION OF ABOMINATIONS - GLOBAL GAY MARRIAGE

Islam is after all the only religion that allows the gentile to be fair to his women (without being undermined by Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism) and minorities with Jews having a privileged status of being People of the Book. Muslims cannot after all deny that Islam is built on the foundations of Judaism and Christianity.

Once the West decides to adopt Islam at the suggestion of Jews and has returned to good moral order, the danger of pogrom-inclined antisemitism will abate.

 If every gentile became a Jew, then Jews would no longer be God's Chosen People, would they? Judaism is an exclusive club and not for everyone. Islam is a more a political party in a one party state.

"In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate" is from a Jewish source at https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

THE MORAL AND RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION OF THE JEW TO GENTILE WHICH HE MUST START PERFORMING PRONTO

I am afraid I have to remind you that Jews also have a duty to impose the Noahide laws on the gentile.

Rabbi Schneerson:

"We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher" (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)


USURY

Islam already gives a special status to the People of the Book and acknowledges that it was built on the foundations of Judaism and Islam. It acknowledges all the prophets of the Bible including the Virgin Birth. Even better, Islam bans usury, which means it will stop both Jew and gentile individuals and governments from getting into trouble ever again over the irresponsible lending and borrowing caused by usury. The gentile had a terrible habit of borrowing money from Jews under usurious terms and then expelling them from their country when they knew they could no longer repay their debt.

You do not seem to have noticed that economic policy neoliberalism and its progressive ie sexually liberated views backed by the military force of neoconservatism is also a quasi-religion which is globally implemented.

JEWS CAN ONLY BE THE LIGHT OF THE NATIONS IF THEY SPEAK TRUTH TO LIBTARDS AND TELL THEM RIGHT OFF

Jews will be looked on as the light of the nations when and if they are perceived to have done something useful for gentiles, instead of being perceived to be the creators and proponents of neoconservatism.

Prominent U.S. Jews, Israel Blamed for Start of Iraq War


White Man's Burden

The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.


I only mention the Koran's acceptance of the Virgin Birth as conclusive evidence of Islam being prepared to meet Christians half way. Not for a moment was I suggesting that you should believe in it!  A Virgin Birth is in theory possible, after all.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11894571/Rise-of-the-virgin-birth-four-IVF-clinics-admit-taking-on-such-cases.html

JEWS HAVE A DUTY TO TELL THE GENTILE THAT HIS DEGENERACY IS ACUTE AND CAN ONLY BE REVERSED BY ADOPTING SECULAR KORANISM

Nothing is guaranteed, but Islam offers a better chance of moral regeneration for the West than continuing with its current satanic rotten modern culture with the abomination of abominations, gay marriage!  If moral regeneration is achieved and the patriarchy restored, then Jew and gentile will enjoy small good rational government again. If we continue marinating in its current moral sewage, things will get worse for both Jew and gentile until the West is nothing but a series of failed states falling like dominoes to chaos, disorder, war and revolution.

Vincent Bruno is dismayed to be told that theocracy is necessary to make white people marry again

https://t.co/k5DOSS5dv4 — Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) March 27, 2024 10:00  Gender relations 12:00  Anthony Trollope 14:00  Being bot...