THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Friday 30 November 2018
Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control refused to answer my question and have now blocked me
No one wants to answer my questions.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
My question is directly relevant to whether the late Mrs Hart married in haste. Prevention is better than cure, don't you think?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
Not answering pertinent questions is a sign of bad faith, actually.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
War and revolution are the most destructive forms of violence which the matriarchy could prevent, just by answering our questions. Not answering them suggests they have something to hide. Blatantly refusing to answer them with an insult shows their undisguised contempt for us. https://t.co/ZaEFOaCvP2— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
This woman is obviously reading from a script and I would like to hear the other side.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
In a murder trial, you hear both sides: the case for the Prosecution and the case for the Defence. All you seem to have is the victim narrative with the feminist agenda of undermining marriage and making marriage an even worse bargain for men.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There are sociopathic, psychopathic, violent, murderous and evil men. Women should be warned to stay clear of them rather than be told by @CoCoAwareness that when they enter into toxic relationships that end in them and their children being murdered, there is someone to blame.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Since marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy, there is obviously a feminist agenda to undermine marriage and patriarchy with the consequence that your society, nation and civilisation will be undermined. This is what is happening now, in case you haven't noticed.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Marriage is the arena in which the eternal battle of sexes takes place. You can get peace through submission, dominance or the rational and moral resolution of conflicts. The purpose and effect of the victimhood narrative is to make marriage an even worse bargain for men.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I'm well aware sociopathic/psychopathic/violent/murderous/evil men don't come with a tattoo on their foreheads. That's why a period of courtship is necessary. To this end I asked @CoCoAwareness how long their mother knew their father before she married him. They refuse to answer.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Not only did @CoCoAwareness refuse to answer the question @Sarah_Montague did not ask them, she actually liked the tweets insulting me for daring to ask the question that she did not ask: how long did their mother know their father before marrying him?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
This was the insulting tweet Sarah Montague liked because, clearly, the Hart Brothers didn't want to answer my question, probably because they knew answering my question honestly would undermine their position. https://t.co/u4IJZg5wiW— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The Hart Brothers are good looking young men, aren't they? Doubtless taking the position they have in so public a manner would attract much female attention and, most probably, groupies.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
All the more reason why there should be a period of courtship before marriage, and why there should be no sex before marriage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You don't make much sense to be honest. Are you a groupie and a member of the unofficial harem of the Hart Brothers, if they do indeed have one? I really can't work you out.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I actually agreed with you that men don't have a tattoo on their foreheads saying they are going to abusive towards you. For some reason, you boasted about a convicted prisoner proposing to you from prison before saying you were trying to educate me. That doesn't make sense.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If we are going to be murdered, it would be by a family member or a sex partner. I wonder if there are crime statistics prove this.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Just because we are more likely to be murdered by a family member or sex partner, does this mean we are not to have spouses or family members? Surely not! There are already laws against murder and assault, and marriage is a child protection scheme.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am well aware that feminism has caused gender relations to become toxic. You do know that everything about feminism undermines marriage, don't you? Feminists have the stated agenda of destroying the patriarchy and patriarchy cannot exist without marriage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You are probably already aware of the fact that the Labour Party is socialist and socialists believe in gender equality. That's why the most militant feminists are in the Labour Party and that is why Hart Brothers are pandering to these women who are probably part of their harem.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
How many women directly or indirectly cause the death of men?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If you make marriage an even worse bargain for men, then you undermine marriage. Marriage is already a terrible bargain for men and you seek to make it even worse when all you need to do is tell women not to be such stupid sluts getting knocked up by losers and psychos.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
It would be even more shocking if women were killing each other.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I bet your husband is completely under your thumb. Is he allowed his own Twitter account?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Would "groupie" be a more respectful term? In an Islamic State, men may have up to four wives, but only if they can treat them equally and if they can provide for them. I imagine many gullible women throw themselves at the Hart Brothers. I guess this is a perk of their position.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If women are to be beaten at all, it is better that they are beaten by their husbands and male family members rather than strange men, surely?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What a shame you can only respond with a rude gesture to arguments you cannot answer.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Thanks for the retweet, @Dontlookback198. Why on earth is @MishalHusainBBC following you? I would just love the Beauty of the BBC to follow me!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I see you are avoiding the question! We can get domestic peace by submitting utterly to the dominant partner. I cannot imagine that you are not the dominant partner and he the submissive one. If it works for you, fine, but it may not work for every man.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I didn't say that violence must be inflicted. I asked "*If* women are to be beaten at all, it is better that they are beaten by their husbands and male family members rather than strange men, surely?"— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If a woman had to suffer rape, it is surely better to be raped by her husband than by a serial sex offender she does not know, surely? It is also marginally better to date raped than to be raped by a rapist jumping out from behind a bush. Are you getting my line of logic?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am merely pointing out that not every man wishes to marry a woman and then submit to her! No need to take it so personally. What works for your husband would not work for other men and we are talking about marriage being a bad bargain for *men*.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Of course, but we must be realistic and acknowledge realities. Let us say that there will always be a certain amount of violence being inflicted on men against men and men against women. Let us say that there is a certain amount of violence to be endured by all of us,— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There are ways of reducing levels of violence between men but for the moment we are talking only about violence against women by men. Violence on women by men can be inflicted by 1) their husband, 2) male members of the family, 3) men known to these women 4) complete strangers.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Let us say you have NO CHOICE but to endure violence against you by a man. From which men would you MOST PREFER to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 1, surely?) From which men would you LEAST PREFER NOT to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 4, surely?)— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Please pay attention. I have NOT said that rape should decriminalised, have I? I have posed a HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION and you, being a typical woman, do not know what it means, or affect not to. Which is it? Are you arguing from bad faith?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I hope you know that a husband and wife are entitled to have sex from each other. Marriages have been annulled for non-consummation. The best way to get round the problem of marital rape is to stipulate in the marriage contract the frequency of sexual congress.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Once you state the frequency of sexual congress the parties have agreed to in their marriage contract, then exceeding your ration could be treated as marital rape. This is the best way of doing justice to both parties to the marriage, don't you think?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Marriage is a battlefield on which the eternal battle of the sexes has always been waged.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There is no point denying that violence exists inside and outside marriage. Islam, being a religion of practical wisdom, accepts this and has a way of dealing with it through a graduated process of punishment on the recalcitrant wife. This is explained at https://t.co/NAn6CARHtV— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You are refusing to answer the question because you know that answering my question honestly would allow me to develop my argument, and you don't like the direction where this is going. Most unsporting of you, I must say.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Requiring engaged couples to agree a marriage contract before allowing them to marry would implicitly abolish no fault divorce, which is one my stated political goals.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You must agree with me that it is impossible to eradicate violence against women by men because we do not live in a perfect world. It is possible to reduce violence against women but it is impossible for it to eradicated completely. I have no idea why you find this controversial.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am just saying that it is worse for women to suffer violence inflicted by men who are strangers to them eg invading migrants and marauding soldiers who are raping and pillaging. Again, I have no idea why you find this so controversial.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Why are you pretending that I am *for* "murder, rape and women being beaten"? I suppose that is you arguing in bad faith again and trying to traduce and demonise me so you can ignore everything I have just said.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Obviously no one does this now, because it is not a legal requirement, but I am saying it should be.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Feminism causes immigration. Your cucked men and cucked male politicians are completely helpless to stop this now. Brexit is a male preoccupation, remain a female one. The BBC is just the Voice of the Matriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If Britain were a society of married fathers in control of their women and families, men would not be putting up with uncontrolled immigration for a minute, but they are men who have been orphaned from their traditions and deprived of their fathers by their unmarried mothers.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
We are a matriarchy all right. https://t.co/DfyW07YtFs
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies. All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. Patriarchy is the lesser evil. Our moral obligation is to chose the lesser evil.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The facts are all around you. A clueless childless woman is our Prime Ministrix. Feminists have infiltrated and now run all the important institutions of state. All our male politicians are useless hopeless cucks who have become women. The invaders continue to invade.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What do you think is the point I have not proven?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You voted to remain, didn't you? All the people you know voted to remain. You are happy senior male MPs are too cucked and helpless to implement Brexit. You want even more uncontrolled immigration to show your contempt for the men of your race in the class below you.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The Matriarchy is short-termist. May is clueless about the concerns of married parents and cares nothing for them. The worst thing is that the men in her cabinet are just as indifferent and clueless, even the married ones like @michaelgove who is a bastard, right, @BorisJohnson?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You voted leave?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
@WayThruCouns @Dontlookback198 @JenLWoodside @Sarah_Montague @MishalHusainBBC @naughtiej @AnthonyLarme @anti_fembot @MikeBuchanan11 @erin_pizzey @bindelj @whjm @janegarvey1 @DeborahJaneOrr @zarafaris @CoCoAwareness @PhilipDaviesUK @LPerrins @KathyConWom @DrJulesGomes @rabbisacks https://t.co/rejEYEjHjl— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
1:06:00 Men are now afraid to express their political views in their own home and become "servile" towards wives, probably hating themselves and then, when their wives get... https://t.co/o2ZZZV5MT7— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
"... bored and irritated with them anyway and divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce, they suddenly see red and end up murdering their wives and children."— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Why do you say that?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I think it is precisely because I have developed my faculty of imagination and analysis that I am capable of understanding male anger.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The people I have met on this thread are @naughtiej @bindelj @PhilipDaviesUK and @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am not a man, though I have described myself as the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman.
I don't know what you mean by my "projecting" male anger. Can a woman "project" male anger?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What are the "worst parts of masculinity"?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Our matriarchy was the result of the disease of the mind that is feminism eating away at the spine of patriarchy. When you talk about "female autonomy and freedom", you mean the right of women to fornicate, and the right of men to fornicate with them. Fornication is a mortal sin.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Is this a tweet about rising crime and what can be done about crime prevention? I rather suspect not! https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If you want to prevent crime, then prevent bastardy. If you want to prevent bastardy, then you have to shame sluts. Once you shame sluts and discourage bastardy, you will find yourself with a lower crime rate, thereby lowering the levels of violence against men by men. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
A slut is a fornicatress. An unmarried mother is definitely a fornicatress because the evidence of her fornication has been born and is in existence. The chief characteristic of a slut is the poor reproductive choices she makes eg choosing men who beat/murder them/their children. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Ah, the dreaded GIF. I always get these when the person responding has no coherent or intelligible answer to the point I make.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
A slut is by definition stupid, because she makes bad bargains and sells herself too cheaply. The soldiers of feminism are sluts. Since most Western women are feminists, this perfectly explains the progressive lowering of Western IQ. https://t.co/CEfFYQufxp— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Researchers say Western IQs dropped 14 points over last centuryhttps://t.co/UAzcbIBI5h— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Out-of-Wedlock Births Rise Worldwidehttps://t.co/51gHj34lid— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Who beat you up then?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I know they are not stupid, just unanswerable.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You can't say why though.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I asked a question and have noticed that you are reluctant to answer it.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Have I said anything narcissistic?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am making the inferences that you have something to hide: that your mother married in haste.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I have what lawyers call a Theory of Case. This means I have a narrative and you are curious to see where it will lead.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What do you think is the nature of the mental illness you think I might be suffering from? Aren't you by training an engineer and not a psychiatrist?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Is to be persistent to suffer from a personality disorder?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Persistence is a virtue when you are dealing with obstructive people who have something to hide.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Luke and Ryan Hart - apparently co-opted by the matriarchy to further undermine marriage by making it an even worse bargain for men - are not asked and refuse to answer the obvious question
Millennial Woes demands access to social media as a human right
Millennial Woes, banned by Twitter, praises Twitter and its functionalities eg retweets, notifications. It is "the heartbeat of the world connected to a web of social activity so you can effortlessly digest and interact with it - an incredible invention." https://t.co/5vLRuhUSQy— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
Millennial Woes on the "psychological abuse" inflicted on him by Twitter when his account was permanently suspended, the unspeakable horror of watching his followers go from thousands to zero, his disbelief and astonishment, the yo-yoing of his emotions from resignation to rage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
This would allow the state to keep tabs on public opinion and formulate public policy on this basis, dispensing with the need for public relations consultants and polling organisations like @YouGov who have behaved disgracefully by transparently displaying overt pro-EU bias.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
The Age of Nationalism: A Conversation with Yoram Hazony
Yoram Hazony is accused by William Galston of the heresy of "non-stop pummelling of John Locke" and of regarding Edmund Burke's theory as "utopian and disastrous". To reject John Locke, apparently, is to reject the US Declaration of Independence.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Galston: Jefferson said Locke and the US Declaration of Independence is no original thought, but merely the common sense of the American mind, which absorbed and endorsed the idea of natural rights: understandable, graspable, through reason alone and binding on all human beings.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
31:00 US illegitimacy rate is 40%. US and European countries have some very serious problems. Are they capable of persisting in the future?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Yoram Hazony: The US constitution was not just about securing the blessings of liberty, it was about securing the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. If there is going to be a posterity, we need to understand what's going wrong.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
1;16:00 Cultural Marxism in the sense of feminism mentioned. We know this because the woman mentioned it in the context of 50% illegitimacy.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control want to make marriage an even worse bargain for men
Why did no one point out to Luke and Ryan Hart's mother the folly of marrying in haste and repenting at leisure? Their uxoricidal and filicidal father never even had a proper job. Motherhood begins at courtship. https://t.co/fxo3TZRh8z @Sarah_Montague @CoCoAwareness https://t.co/JNftyJ0TZ0— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Surely warning women of the folly of marrying in haste and repenting at leisure would be more preventative, rather than knowing that whatever happens to them, there is always a man to blame? @CoCoAwareness @Sarah_Montague https://t.co/EdkH4yo6r7— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Why weren't the Hart boys asked by Sarah Montague why their mother married such a man? https://t.co/fxo3TZRh8z contains no explanation of why their mother married their father and does not even mention his occupation.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Shouldn't women be encouraged to make rational reproductive choices and be warned against marrying in haste and repenting at leisure? What a shame @Sarah_Montague never asked the obvious question of how their parents met and how long was their courtship!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Did neither of you never think to ask your mother why she married such a man?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Did you vote leave or remain in the EU referendum?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Convicted criminals are mostly the product of the casual conception, casual parenting and casual abandonment by immoral irresponsible mothers of their mostly illegitimate offspring.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
The last resort of men is violence to solve their problems. For women, their short term solution is to sell sexual services to men, and their long term solution to choose the father of their legitimate offspring with careful consideration. Marry in haste, repent at leisure.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Very happy to discuss my ideas with anyone who cares to listen!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
With what words did I blame which victims? Are you forbidding me from asking the obvious question that @Sarah_Montague was too cowardly to ask herself presumably in fear of provoking this very response from people like you?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Why was @Sarah_Montague neglecting her journalistic duty to ask obvious questions?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
I want to know how long Claire and Lance Hart knew each other before they married and whether their respective parents approved. Is that a state secret or something? @CoCoAwareness— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Accused of victim blaming because I asked the obvious question @Sarah_Montague didn't ask because she didn't want to be accused of victim blaming. Aren't journalists supposed to ask the questions that would be asked by the viewer/listener/reader? Is she just a propagandist? #wato https://t.co/rx3s1LW2q4— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Because it would answer my question of whether Claire Hart married in haste, of course!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
I see @CoCoAwareness are liking the tweets that accuse me of victim blaming but have not yet answered my questions on the history of their late parents' courtship whose marriage ended in uxoricide and filicide and the orphaning of their two Labour supporting sons. https://t.co/CsIZZ4hj3B— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
How long did Luke and Ryan's parents know each other before they married, please?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Can we be told how long Luke and Ryan's parents knew each other before they married, please?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
I can't believe that I am not going to get an answer after asking so many times. Surely such a matter is not the subject of the Official Secrets Act?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
If you marry someone who murders your sons, you must at least admit that your husband hunting skills are not what they should be. How long did you know your husband before your married him?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Are you saying I am not allowed to ask the obvious question to establish the truth that women who marry in haste repent at leisure?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Do listen to this. It is the matriarchy tightening its grip on the balls of probably irreparably damaged British masculinity. They are all too afraid to ask the obvious question and I have to do it for them, but they have all run away .... #coercivecontrol https://t.co/3P7EjVgEme— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
There seems to be something obviously wrong with these men, yet women entered into a relationship with these depressives, gamblers and n'er do wells only to complain later of being mistreated, abused or end up being murdered. A little discrimination and caution wouldn't go amiss. https://t.co/ZGx7PoUxpP— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Why don't you help women by telling them not to marry in haste so they won't find themselves repenting at leisure? Prevention is better than cure.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Men are better at violence than women, being physically stronger.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
A fantastic interview with Luke and Ryan Hart @CoCoAwareness on @BBCRadio4 #wato on #CoerciveControl, their father and #OperationLighthouse.— (((Alan Henness))) (@zeno001) November 29, 2018
Starts at 26:10 minutes in:https://t.co/dRnqvtw3BC…
cc @David_Challen @MichaelConroy68
It was an uncomfortable listen. In part because I noticed some of those tendencies in myself. Not in such a psychopathic degree. But enough to make me check myself before I wreck myself.— Rob Jessel (@robjessel) November 29, 2018
So fathers and husbands will no longer be able to lose their temper or shout at anyone at all without being accused of domestic violence and their wives and children calling the cops on them? It is astonishing that educated men can be co-opted into being turkeys voting for Xmas.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 29, 2018
Hahahah that’s exactly why we’ve stayed clear. A troll black hole, it would be fun, we just don’t have time— Luke & Ryan Hart (@CoCoAwareness) November 30, 2018
Another legitimate question you are refusing to answer. Because your mother married badly, marriage is now to be made a worse bargain for men to protect women who marry in haste. Everything about feminism undermines marriage without which patriarchy cannot exist.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
In a matriarchy that condones fornication, marriage would only be for those who want legitimate children who are now the minority. They will then be identified and persecuted to discourage this practice. You have been recruited to sell this satanic plan to the turkeys.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
You've been recruited because you have the perfect profile and most appealing looks to make an impression on the gullible, right down to your Blairite accented middle class English with glottal stops. In our demented matriarchy, your parents' folly gives you moral authority.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
Luke and Ryan Hart of Coercive Control refused to answer my question and have now blocked meNot asking or answering a question is a form of censorship, @Sarah_Montague !https://t.co/TVDibnhIU7— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
Tuesday 27 November 2018
Yoram Hazony talks about The Virtue of Nationalism and tradition
16:00 Everybody wants to rule the world https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGCdLKXNF3w
19:00 The Koran is ambiguous about empire. On the one hand, it says only defensive wars are allowed. On the other, it says impose the jizya on those you have conquered. I suppose God means us to pick our fights carefully. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_military_jurisprudence
29:00 An Englishman's home is his castle - private property in the Koran and the conditions of visiting and seeking admission https://discover-the-truth.com/2017/01/22/quran-2458-59-seeking-permission-before-entering-the-house/
37:00 The loss of free speech now under our matriarchy is because it is on notice that Trump and his supporters who want to restore the patriarchy threaten the status quo.
41:00 The media used to be more nationalist in the sense that it would know it was against the national interest to show a photo of Roosevelt in his wheelchair, so it wouldn't. The media now behaves like an ill-bred brat whose never married single mother never bothered to parent properly. Make no mistake, Yoram: the Culture War is really a Yin and Yang Battle of the Sexes between unmarried mothers with variously fathered illegitimate offspring and their running dogs against the men who want to become fathers of legitimate offspring who want to parent them properly.
45:00 Nationalism is a dignified sense of national identity and a government that unapologetically promotes the national interest without kowtowing to the parasitic classes created by the welfare state with the immoral unmarried mothers who badly parent their illegitimate offspring in no doubt that they will be slut-shamed as sex offenders to discourage them from their dysgenic reproductive choices.
56:00 Why do you say "capitalism" when you mean "feminism"? It is feminism that undermines marriage and by extension the patriarchy. In fact, everything about feminism undermines marriage. Yes, feminism is destroying the nation. When you say "capitalism", I believe you also mean "usury". You should really be more prepared to call a spade a spade.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectification_of_names
1:00:00 1:00:00 Empire is an institution. While Jews are not supposed to acquire empire, the gentile will not be able to completely refrain from warfare. The rules of warfare could be made more humane, however. http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/war.shtml
Wars between countries are explicable, but imperialistic wars are very difficult to explain to the loved ones of the men who died like flies.
Who can explain the Crimean War to those expected to do and die, but never question why?
How was WW1 explained to returning men?
How was WW2 explained to the British after they lost their world empire after two ruinous World Wars? WW2 was of course a continuation of WW1. Apparently, Britain lost its world empire over Belgian neutrality or over the cancelled General Election of 1915 which the Liberal Prime Minister Asquith thought the Liberal Party would win more easily after a short successful war.
1:04:00 Tribal societies are primitive in the sense that they are polytheists and amoral. To be tribal is to disregard the interests of those who are not of your tribe. Islam was intended to transcend tribal interests and form a nation out of a union of tribes. Because Muslims have not put aside their tribal differences successfully, they fail.
1:11:00 Moses was not given the commandment to conquer the world because it is easier to keep your identity as a tribe if you stay small. Anyway, we can't all be God's Chosen People. The Jews had already conquered Canaan, in any case.
1:13:00 You object to universalism, but the gentiles need their own religion too. But what objection have you to a gentile religion ie Islam that gives justice universally which accommodates women, minorities as well as giving Jews and Christians a special status? Perhaps you just object to the universalism of the matriarchy but not to the universalism of patriarchy?
1:16:00 Slavery is an institution, like marriage and prostitution. Institutions should be regulated not criminalised, to protect the parties. Slavery is after all an alternative form of welfare. We might sell ourselves into slavery to be housed and fed. Britain only wanted to end slavery to end the Spanish Empire, I believe. Both the Bible and Koran tolerate slavery.
Are you planning to come to the UK to promote your book amongst the despairing Brexiteers, Yoram? Or will there be riots at Oxbridge to prevent you from speaking?
Monday 26 November 2018
I discuss Mein Kampf and suggest that the degeneracy of the white race can be cured by restoring the patriarchy
1:01:00
Luke Ford's question:
Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?
CK:
A lot of Mein Kampf is about German matters of Germany in the 1930s. Its preoccupations would be quite different to the alt-right of the West now because alt-right is preoccupied with immigration and Nazi Germany didn't have an immigration problem, did it?
LF:
So let me just run it by you again. I'll just go point by point. Hitler had a biocentric worldview perspective on life: first of all a referenced nature so that is identical with the alt-right's perspective. The alt-right and its leaders are overwhelmingly atheists.
CK:
Hitler pretended to be Catholic. In his table talks he he actually favoured Islam because he thought Christianity was a stupid religion, although he was confirmed as a Catholic, so there were lots of things that he wanted to do but he knew he couldn't. He wanted to abolish usury. He did know something about Islam and thought it was a more masculine ...https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
Both Hitler and Himmler had a soft spot for Islam. Hitler several times fantasized that, if the Saracens had not been stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread through the European continent—and that would have been a good thing, since “Jewish Christianity” wouldn’t have gone on to poison Europe. Christianity doted on weakness and suffering, while Islam extolled strength, Hitler believed. Himmler in a January 1944 speech called Islam “a practical and attractive religion for soldiers,” with its promise of paradise and beautiful women for brave martyrs after their death. “This is the kind of language a soldier understands,” Himmler gushed.
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/187128/nazi-romance-with-islam
LF [pretending I had gone off topic when what I said was exactly on point because he did not like me suggesting that Islam is the answer because Christianity is kaput]:
OK, Claire, I need you to stay on topic. So Hitler had a biocentric worldview. His perspective on life was first of all referenced in nature. He contended that before anything else we must attend to nature the world of living things in their environments and is not separate from or above nature but rather a part of nature we need to come to grips with how our nature actually operates, we must align our lives with nature, we must obey nature's laws. That is the alt-right's perspective.
CK:
Is it? I wasn't aware of that. I didn't even know Hitler said all of that. It sounds very vague.
LF:
You know, it sounds pretty clear to me. I mean I don't know what to say if you don't see that that's the that's the building block for Social Darwinism ....
CK:
Is it arguing for Social Darwinism or something like that is that? Is that what you're saying?
LF:
I don't know how you can get more clear than this: Hitler had a biocentric worldview that we must ...
CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean German-centric?
LF:
Does biocentric mean German-centric? Really that's what you're asking me? Biocentric is very clear, Claire, it means a worldview based in nature that humans must align themselves with nature, obey nature's laws that we're not separate ...
CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean empire?
LF:
Because we are in nature, frequently our choice is either kill or be killed ...
CK:
OK, so he started acquiring empire and it ended badly so maybe that's not always the best thing.
LF:
I'm not talking about whether this is the best thing to do, I'm asking if you can come up with any significant differences between ...
CK [answering the question immediately and succinctly]:
The alt-right are not about war but about pogrom.
LF [pretending I had not answered the question because he didn't like my answer]:
OK, you've got to stay on topic Claire. When I ask a question you've got to respond to the topic. We can't just go spinning off. Glib, do you want to jump in ...
[Glib and LF talk and I was invited again to comment on what they had just said, which wasn't about anything much in particular as far as I could tell.]
1:10:00
CK:
... biocentricism meant social Darwinism: eugenics ... was that what you meant?
LF:
I give up I can't be any more clear than than I was ...
CK:
Can somebody explain to me then? I don't think people understand either. By nature do you mean nature raw in tooth and claw?
LF:
Yes, that's that that's the beginning of the Mein Kampf worldview. It's the beginning of the Dissident Right worldview. The Dissident Right is not a theistic movement. The main intellectuals of the alternative right - Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Kevin Macdonald - they're all atheists. They all have a a social Darwinian perspective on life which I'm trying to see how there's any difference from that and the worldview of Mein Kampf.
CK:
Well, Mein Kampf is really more about culture and sociology even because Hitler does write knowledgeably and some compassion about how the poor used to live and and architecture and and lots of other things but you know if you read Greg Johnson's White Nationalist Manifesto, there is actually very little about culture. It's basically "I'd like to kick them out and I want to kick all of them out by 2060" and that's it. Mein Kampf is a more rewarding read. I would suggest for White Nationalists and compare what the white man was in the 1930s and what he he is now. In fact, recently I was watching these videos of these schizophrenics in lunatic asylums in America and it struck me how articulate even these mentally ill people stuck in asylums were compared to the tongue-tied people you have now.
It really was astonishing. Obviously, something bad has happened to to the white race and and and this catastrophic drop in in IQ and obviously it's all to do with religion in the sense that the least that a religion can make you do is make you marry before you have children and parent or children properly - that is the very least. Forget all the frilly bits like not eating pork and shellfish and that kind of thing. That's the very least your religion should do for you and and if you won't enforce that then your population will age and become stupid and weak and people will come in and take your stuff, and that's what's what's happening now.
[Luke Ford mutes me and turns to Glib again to talk about nothing much in particular.]
Stupider and sluttier
https://www.theweek.co.uk/94224/why-iq-levels-are-falling
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html
Rabbi Sacks:
For a whole variety of reasons, some to do with medical developments like birth control, in vitro fertilisation and other genetic interventions, some to do with moral change like the idea that we are free to do whatever we like so long as it does not harm others, some to do with a transfer of responsibilities from the individual to the state, and other and more profound changes in the culture of the West, almost everything that marriage once brought together has now been split apart. Sex has been divorced from love, love from commitment, marriage from having children, and having children from responsibility for their care.
The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016. Fewer people are marrying, those who are, are marrying later, and 42 per cent of marriages end in divorce. Nor is cohabitation a substitute for marriage. The average length of cohabitation in Britain and the United States is less than two years. The result is a sharp increase among young people of eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, stress related syndromes, depression and actual and attempted suicides. The collapse of marriage has created a new form of poverty concentrated among single parent families, and of these, the main burden is born by women, who in 2011 headed 92 per cent of single parent households. In Britain today more than a million children will grow up with no contact whatsoever with their fathers.
This is creating a divide within societies the like of which has not been seen since Disraeli spoke of “two nations” a century and a half ago. Those who are privileged to grow up in stable loving association with the two people who brought them into being will, on average, be healthier physically and emotionally. They will do better at school and at work. They will have more successful relationships, be happier and live longer. And yes, there are many exceptions. But the injustice of it all cries out to heaven. It will go down in history as one of the tragic instances of what Friedrich Hayek called “the fatal conceit” that somehow we know better than the wisdom of the ages, and can defy the lessons of biology and history.
http://rabbisacks.org/love-brings-new-life-world-rabbi-sacks-institution-marriage/
2:10:00
CK:
CK:
In every nation and every government there will be in every nation every government will have a rent a mob and Antifa is our one now.
Antifa are probably part of the Deep State.
2:29:00
Claire, is the left simply more committed than the right?
CK:
Yes, simply because it's easier for them because they're already in charge at the top of the tree. Trump is trying very hard to dislodge them but he hasn't the manpower, I guess. There is no other big idea. I keep going on about religion simply because it has this kind of moral authority - an instant appeal to people. If the alt-right is just about race and immigration it's not a big enough [idea]. If you wait for everybody to be affected to support you then then it'll probably be too late, so you need some Universalist idea that's capable of appealing to people but I guess the alt-right are the last people prepared to support marriage and family values.
****************************
Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.
Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.
Intellectual corruption leads to your leaders not being able to submit to the truth, exercise logic or conform to the moral rules necessary for you to keep your society in existence and in good health.
This is the only explanation I can think of for Luke's strangely obstructive behaviour when I tried to answer his questions, which the others also noticed.
IN THE COMMENTS
kissmyass682
Why'd Luke get so aggro with Claire? He went from 0 to a 100, is there some history there?
Claire Khaw
Not that I know of, except that, possibly, he didn't like the way my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"
Matvei Daniilovich
Wow, luke actually got a little triggered with Claire.
Claire Khaw
Since I never got to answer the question properly before he muted me, I can only think that it was because he did not like the direction my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"
Alejandro Black
Loved Luke’s Modafinil rage with Khaw
Claire Khaw
I don't think that was anything to do with drugs.
Lou Duva
Very odd.
Claire Khaw
@Lou Duva I thought it was a bit odd too, but I think it was because he did not like the direction my answer to his question was going"Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?" From what I can make out, Luke was implying that both Mein Kampf and the alt-right want a pogrom. He knew I would say that the answer lies somewhere in between the status quo of liberal democracy and the pogrom the alt-right are proposing ie the civic nationalism of Secular Koranism and he didn't want me mentioning that again on his show.
Saturday 24 November 2018
My brilliant solution to antisemitism: a Registrar and Register of Jews
IF JEWS DID NOT EXIST, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE INVENTED
If Jews did not exist, they would have to be invented. The Jews of China during the time of the Cultural Revolution were of course the wealthy, the landlords, the business owners and university professors.
Jews are now synonymous and conflated with the liberal elite who want to sabotage Brexit and continue with neoliberalism, borderless nations and neocon foreign policy.
ANTISEMITISM WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST AS LONG AS THE GENTILE IS CAPABLE OF THE DEADLY SINS OF ENVY, ANGER, PRIDE AND SLOTH AS WELL AS SCAPEGOATING
There will never be an end to antisemitism as long as the gentile is capable of envy. The Reform Jew is as stupid as the Liberal Gentile. Of course Jews will be hated for as long as the gentile is capable of the deadly sins of pride, anger, envy and sloth. The lower he sinks, the more he will hate the Jew, and he is sinking fast into the moral sewage that came with the disease of feminism that he is now nearly up to his neck.
MUSLIMS REPRESENT THE IMMIGRATION THE WESTERN GENTILE HATES AND FEARS
The Western gentile hates Muslims because Muslims are totemic of his hatred of the immigrants who have come to his land, but he especially hates Muslims because they are so numerous and visible and now look upon him with undisguised contempt.
JEWS REPRESENT THE POLITICAL CLASSES THE WESTERN GENTILE DESPISES AND DISTRUSTS
The Jew represents to the antisemite his political classes who clearly care nothing for him. He thinks his politicians are either following orders from Jews or so stupid that they they do not know they are doing the bidding of Jews.
WHY JEWS KEEP GETTING THE BLAME WHEN IT IS FEMINISM THAT CAUSES IMMIGRATION AND PAEDOPHILIA
The problem is feminism but the antisemitic Islamophobe is too cowardly, lazy and intellectually dishonest to admit this because, however promiscuous and immoral his women, he will perceive them to be at least useful in that they represent potential sex partners for him, while the Jews and Muslims he hates do not. For this reason he would rather blame feminism, pornography and the failure of his religion and political system on Jews too.
MY PROPOSED REGISTRAR AND REGISTER OF JEWS FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF JEWISH TRIBAL MEMBERSHIP
May I ask Rabbi Bar-Hayim why the measures of herem are not longer used on Jews who commit Chillul Hashem? How about a National Register and Registrar of Jews in each country to keep members of the tribe in order? If they have broken the Sabbath, I am not suggesting that they be stoned, but they could certainly be struck off the Register by their rabbi so that as a non-Jew they escape the death penalty.
KAPUT CHRISTIANITY IS OBVIOUSLY IDOLATROUS SO THIS MEANS JEWS MUST ENCOURAGE WESTERNERS TO ADOPT ISLAM BECAUSE THEY MUST HAVE A RELIGION OR THEIR DEGENERACY WILL JUST DEEPEN AND ACCELERATE UNTIL THEY BECOME A FAILED STATE AND TAKE IT OUT ON JEWS
God if He created us clearly intended there to be Jews and gentiles. Judaism is for Jews only, and Islam for gentiles.
DIVINE ETHNO NATIONALISM, DIVINE CIVIC NATIONALISM
If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.
Islam is the only religion capable of regenerating the degenerate West anyway, since Christianity is kaput.
THE IDOLATROUS DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY THAT NO ONE REALLY BELIEVES IN, EXPLAINING WHY HYPOCRISY AND CHRISTIANITY GO HAND IN HAND
Not only is Christianity kaput, its absurd Doctrine of the Trinity is undeniably idolatrous. The doctrine is so absurd that these days most ignorant Post-Christians have no idea they are supposed to believe in this nonsense if they want to be properly Christian, and would reject it when told.
It is quite obvious which of the two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles is more in conformity with the Noahide laws and it isn't Christianity.
Perhaps Rabbi Bar-Hayim would like to pronounce on this.
ISLAM IS THE BEST FIT TO DO JUSTICE TO WOMEN AND MINORITIES, WITH JEWS BEING GIVEN A PRIVILEGED STATUS AS LONG AS THEY FULFIL THEIR DUTY TO THE GENTILE BY REMINDING HIM WHEN HIS LAWS FALL BELOW THE MINIMUM MORAL STANDARDS OF THE NOAHIDE LAWS EG WHEN HE STARTS PROMOTING - HORROR OF HORRORS AND ABOMINATION OF ABOMINATIONS - GLOBAL GAY MARRIAGE
Islam is after all the only religion that allows the gentile to be fair to his women (without being undermined by Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism) and minorities with Jews having a privileged status of being People of the Book. Muslims cannot after all deny that Islam is built on the foundations of Judaism and Christianity.
Once the West decides to adopt Islam at the suggestion of Jews and has returned to good moral order, the danger of pogrom-inclined antisemitism will abate.
If every gentile became a Jew, then Jews would no longer be God's Chosen People, would they? Judaism is an exclusive club and not for everyone. Islam is a more a political party in a one party state.
"In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate" is from a Jewish source at https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws
THE MORAL AND RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION OF THE JEW TO GENTILE WHICH HE MUST START PERFORMING PRONTO
I am afraid I have to remind you that Jews also have a duty to impose the Noahide laws on the gentile.
Rabbi Schneerson:
"We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher" (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
USURY
Islam already gives a special status to the People of the Book and acknowledges that it was built on the foundations of Judaism and Islam. It acknowledges all the prophets of the Bible including the Virgin Birth. Even better, Islam bans usury, which means it will stop both Jew and gentile individuals and governments from getting into trouble ever again over the irresponsible lending and borrowing caused by usury. The gentile had a terrible habit of borrowing money from Jews under usurious terms and then expelling them from their country when they knew they could no longer repay their debt.
You do not seem to have noticed that economic policy neoliberalism and its progressive ie sexually liberated views backed by the military force of neoconservatism is also a quasi-religion which is globally implemented.
JEWS CAN ONLY BE THE LIGHT OF THE NATIONS IF THEY SPEAK TRUTH TO LIBTARDS AND TELL THEM RIGHT OFF
Jews will be looked on as the light of the nations when and if they are perceived to have done something useful for gentiles, instead of being perceived to be the creators and proponents of neoconservatism.
Prominent U.S. Jews, Israel Blamed for Start of Iraq War
White Man's Burden
The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.
I only mention the Koran's acceptance of the Virgin Birth as conclusive evidence of Islam being prepared to meet Christians half way. Not for a moment was I suggesting that you should believe in it! A Virgin Birth is in theory possible, after all. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11894571/Rise-of-the-virgin-birth-four-IVF-clinics-admit-taking-on-such-cases.html
JEWS HAVE A DUTY TO TELL THE GENTILE THAT HIS DEGENERACY IS ACUTE AND CAN ONLY BE REVERSED BY ADOPTING SECULAR KORANISM
Nothing is guaranteed, but Islam offers a better chance of moral regeneration for the West than continuing with its current satanic rotten modern culture with the abomination of abominations, gay marriage! If moral regeneration is achieved and the patriarchy restored, then Jew and gentile will enjoy small good rational government again. If we continue marinating in its current moral sewage, things will get worse for both Jew and gentile until the West is nothing but a series of failed states falling like dominoes to chaos, disorder, war and revolution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Vincent Bruno is dismayed to be told that theocracy is necessary to make white people marry again
https://t.co/k5DOSS5dv4 — Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) March 27, 2024 10:00 Gender relations 12:00 Anthony Trollope 14:00 Being bot...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...