but they are too unsure of themselves, the cowards and hypocrites.
I did so on their behalves and for my troubles was excluded from the last Nationalist Unity Meeting.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/reasons-given-to-exclude-me-from.html
Reasons given to exclude me from a nationalist unity meeting, and my answers
Saying Breivik was not mad, but a lone anti-immigration terrorist does not mean you endorse terrorism.
If you agree with me that he was a terrorist, then you should ask yourself why he resorted to terrorism.
What could he have done instead?
Does the fact that even now governments refuse to acknowledge the concerns about uncontrolled immigration of the indigenous evidence that there was in fact no other way for Breivik to make his point?
If the entire Western world can pretend that Israel was nothing to do with 9/11 even after Osama Bin Laden explicitly stated that it was, then what hope is there for the likes of Breivik, who is after all only a lone terrorist?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Is there really no other way for those who oppose immigration to make progress through the political process?
Lord Glasman, a Labour Party guru promoting Blue Labour, a Jew no less, even recommended that Ed Miliband adopt BNP policy and stop immigration altogether.
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman
But the feminists got wind of it and now he is yesterday's news.
So Breivik was right about the feminists too.
I did so on their behalves and for my troubles was excluded from the last Nationalist Unity Meeting.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/reasons-given-to-exclude-me-from.html
Reasons given to exclude me from a nationalist unity meeting, and my answers
Saying Breivik was not mad, but a lone anti-immigration terrorist does not mean you endorse terrorism.
If you agree with me that he was a terrorist, then you should ask yourself why he resorted to terrorism.
What could he have done instead?
Does the fact that even now governments refuse to acknowledge the concerns about uncontrolled immigration of the indigenous evidence that there was in fact no other way for Breivik to make his point?
If the entire Western world can pretend that Israel was nothing to do with 9/11 even after Osama Bin Laden explicitly stated that it was, then what hope is there for the likes of Breivik, who is after all only a lone terrorist?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Is there really no other way for those who oppose immigration to make progress through the political process?
Lord Glasman, a Labour Party guru promoting Blue Labour, a Jew no less, even recommended that Ed Miliband adopt BNP policy and stop immigration altogether.
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman
But the feminists got wind of it and now he is yesterday's news.
So Breivik was right about the feminists too.
No comments:
Post a Comment