Questions for Andrew Brons of the British Democratic Party

http://britishdemocraticparty.org/contact/

My message to Andrew Brons of today:

"Whether ethno-nationalists like it or not, Civic Nationalism is the only way towards electoral respectability.  When racial nationalists say they will be voting UKIP at the 2015 General Election, they are in fact conceding that Civic Nationalists have won the argument."  

Would Andrew Brons care to comment on this?

I have a few more questions:

1. If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument, it is not time for ethno-nationalists to acknowledge this, and plan for the future on this basis?
2. If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument and voters use UKIP as the biggest stick with which to beat the Tories with at the 2015 General Election, how likely do you think the voter is to return to ethnno-nationalism at the General Election after that?
3. If you think it is unlikely that the voter would return to the ethno-nationalist parties after voting UKIP at the next General Election, do you think it is now time for the BDP and BNP to go civic nationalist sooner rather than later so that you are in a position to compete with UKIP at the next General Election?  
4. If you are thinking of going civic nationalist sooner rather than later, do you think have a non-white such as Claire Khaw in your party in a prominent position would show that you are doing more than paying lip service to civic nationalism and utterly transform your image from being racist evil extremist antisemites and Islamophobes to something more morally and intellectually respectable?
5. If you think civic nationalism is boring, do you think Claire Khaw would be the best person in Britain to make civic nationalism attractive, inclusive and exciting?  
6. Are you aware that the Claire Khaw has been described as a "British Nationalist Philosopher" by Hugh Muir of The Guardian?  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jan/02/hugh-muir-diary-bnp-conservatives 
7. Who else in nationalism has been described as such?  
8. Are you afraid of letting Claire Khaw into your party because you fear she will take over?  
9. What are you afraid she might do if Claire Khaw does indeed take over?
10. Why don't you let Claire Khaw do the job that you ethno-nationalists clearly cannot?
11. Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate or even extinct rather than admit that ethno-nationalism is a dead duck?  
12. Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate if not actually extinct than accept any advice or assistance from Claire Khaw even as you know that ethno-nationalism has been a miserable failure for so many decades now?  
13. Are you aware that Pride is a Deadly Sin?  
14. Is it your intention never to have this debate so that you can take your ethno-nationalist beliefs with you to your graves?  

I wonder if I will receive a response.

1. Will he pretend not to have received it?
2. Will the message be passed on to him by whoever deals with his correspondence?  
3. Or will it be deleted?
4. Or ignored?
5. If Andrew Brons does receive this and does not deign to respond, what might his reasons be?  
6. Would it be because he does not know how to answer the question?
7. Would it be because he fears to give a truthful answer?
8. If he does not reply at all is it because of incompetence or intellectual dishonesty or just plain out and out racism ie he does not think I deserve a reply because of my race?   

We shall see!

Any nationalist who wants this question to be answered is requested to get in touch with Andrew Brons so that he knows that you know that the question is hanging in the air.

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1682  (This is written by Kevin Scott, I believe.)

http://britishdemocraticparty.org/home-truths-from-abroad/ (Adrian Davies is the only one who earnestly advocates civic nationalism, but I can see the lot of them dragging their feet and blocking their ears, because, guess what, they don't want to do it.  For them to go civic, they would have to let me in, and that just wouldn't do it, would it?)

I am female and a foreigner, not white and male, so my views can safely be ignored. All they have to do is exclude me from their meetings and disable me from commenting on their little visited website.

Even if I am absolutely right about everything I say, they do not have to acknowledge this, they think to yourselves, and there is nothing I can do about it.

This is what these dishonorable men think and do.   But why would they wish to deny the truth?

Because these despicable men who fear to discuss this issue properly have become women. There is no other explanation, is there?