http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04l03fb From 35:45
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e I thought it interesting that Suzy Leafe thought it "unAnglican" to discuss matters of sexual morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It is interesting that the @c_of_e does not see its role to be that of maintaining morality. What is it for then?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Does anyone know the nature and purpose of the @c_of_e? Henry VIII always meant it to be a Creature of the State.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Let us say now that the @c_of_e is a creature of the sexually-liberated PC Liberal State.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Does anyone in the @c_of_e read the Bible? If so, why have they not noticed that the Bible is "homophobic"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It seems that not only is @c_of_e theologically ignorant they haven't read the verses at http://t.co/prMbSYCRYF
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
Hasn't @BBCR4Sunday noticed @JustinWelby is so theologically ignorant he doesn't know he is supposed 2 believe in the Trinity? @alantlwilson
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e Does http://t.co/2ZoNyXXJ6u suggest that @JustinWelby believes in the Trinity? Au contraire.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e If @JustinWelby doesn't believe in the molehill that is God, how likely is he to believe Christ is God?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e It is interesting Western Christians r blissfully unaware of importance of Nicene creed 2 being Xtian.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson The @c_of_e is like a man in drag claiming to be a woman while its adherents struggle to believe him.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson That sexual morality influences general standards of morality is not something the @c_of_e wishes to discuss.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson If it is not the role of the @c_of_e to maintain morality, is it for the elevation and employment of subversives?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson If the PC Liberal State already has its laws in force, why does it need @c_of_e to repeat/reinforce its message?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson If the @c_of_e were disestablished wd the morals of the nation improve, deteriorate or would there be no change?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson I suggest that if the @c_of_e were to be disestablished, there would be no change in the morals of the nation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It seems that the only purpose of the @c_of_e is to hold services in nice buildings where people can sing hymns.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It seems that the only purpose of the @c_of_e is to hold services in buildings where fornicators marry each other
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It seems the @c_of_e has no other purpose than to be a nice little earner for the C of E and its employees.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Now Catholic Church is liberalising n going on the same road to perdition of the @c_of_e whither goest morality?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e That the West is affluent and sexually-liberated may cause people to think that the latter caused former.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e When the West is no longer affluent because of its sexual immorality, then it wl b despised and shunned.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson The @c_of_e consists of men with third rate minds afraid of women with second rate minds, and no one can deny.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson It will be failure of @c_of_e n successive governments to address sexual morality that will end Western hegemony.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e I had to listen to that exchange *twice* to try and work out what it was really all about.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e I then saw Suzy Leafe on @Newsnight in https://t.co/njIwgD5uic so the penny dropped a bit more.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e I then read http://t.co/lZIk5VQLv9 and reading between the lines realised it wanted patriarchal Xtianity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e Is Suzy Leafe the best person to represent traditional Christianity? Her message is so obscure @CConcern
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e Suzy Leafe cannot be serious about being spokeswoman for anything if she is not on Twitter. @CConcern
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e If a spokeswoman cannot make her position clear even to someone interested in the subject ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e Is there no one at all in the C of E man enough to say what he means without wincing and retreating?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Council members of Reform are men http://t.co/iwtSceJ2s8 so why get Suzy Leafe to do their job for them? Cowards.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson There is no such thing as homophobia cos it is never irrational 2 fear those who promote homosexuality. @CConcern
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson Because the government promotes homosexuality, @c_of_e must do so too, seeing its role as a creature of the state
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e How depraved that both the gvt and the established church should be conspiring to corrupt public morals.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson A reasonable person wd expect the established church to protect marriage but instead it joins in its desecration.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e There really is no point Suzy Leafe dropping tactful little hints about what the C of E should do.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e What needs to be understood once and for all is that homo sex cannot be given equality with married sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson If it is the intention of @c_of_e to respect marriage, giving it to gays as a sex toy ain't the way. @CConcern
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday @alantlwilson @c_of_e The only socially responsible way to treat homos is to tolerate them if they don't flaunt their sexuality
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 12, 2014
@BBCR4Sunday If Susie Leafe wants @c_of_e to change its ways she shd call ask UKIP to call for its disestablishment. @CConcern @His_Grace
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 13, 2014
Frank Field says he sees the C of E as a creature of the state and expects the C of E to do its bidding. Suzy Leafe looks slightly pained.
The Bishop of Buckingham on the Ins and Outs and Same-Sex Marriage
He seems be entirely unaware of the significance of the institution importance of marriage at all, and it seems no one in the land is capable of pointing this out to him. He also seems so historically ignorant that he is unaware that the Church used to take it quite seriously.
http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/compraym.html Is the Church of England staffed almost entirely by men feeble in intellect and moral courage? Perhaps they are all just liberals? Suzy Leafe seems quite unable to get it together to give them a piece of her mind or explain why she has a problem with gay marriage.
If she is not up to the job, why don't the male council members do it for her? There are so many of them at http://reform.org.uk/about/council-members Why did they send a woman to do a man's job? Is it cos they don't trust themselves to say what they mean or cos they don't think they are pretty enough?
"I wonder why we are so uniquely hung up about sexuality."
He seems be entirely unaware of the significance of the institution importance of marriage at all, and it seems no one in the land is capable of pointing this out to him. He also seems so historically ignorant that he is unaware that the Church used to take it quite seriously.
http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/compraym.html Is the Church of England staffed almost entirely by men feeble in intellect and moral courage? Perhaps they are all just liberals? Suzy Leafe seems quite unable to get it together to give them a piece of her mind or explain why she has a problem with gay marriage.
If she is not up to the job, why don't the male council members do it for her? There are so many of them at http://reform.org.uk/about/council-members Why did they send a woman to do a man's job? Is it cos they don't trust themselves to say what they mean or cos they don't think they are pretty enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment