A really stupid exchange with a libtard about the disabled who thinks she won the argument

‘It’s possible for both wheelchair users and buggies to be accommodated on the bus, but ultimately these are disabled spaces’ – Doug Paulley
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) November 11, 2014

@parimalkumar @BBCr4today The disabled should take a back seat to parents of offspring. Child-rearing is more productive than disability.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 11, 2014

@ntfem @parimalkumar @BBCr4today please delete this offensive tweet.
— Thomas Brett (@Thomas_Brett) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @parimalkumar @BBCr4today Would you like to ask @Twitter to delete it on your behalf?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett @parimalkumar Not just offensive. You're showing your ignorance surrounding disability.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett @parimalkumar Of what am I ignorant?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett If you're referring to disabled people as less productive than child rearing, I'd say your ignorance is wide reaching.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Please explain how disabled people are more productive then the able-bodied.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett Many work & have children exactly like able-bodied people. Disability doesn't stop life you know?
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett What is the percentage of the disabled who work and pay taxes?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Awifefirst About 99% at least. Only a tiny minority are unable to work.
— Thomas Brett (@Thomas_Brett) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst Where did you get that percentage from?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Awifefirst i have exaggerated that. According to gov.uk, 46.3% of 'working age' disabled people are in work.
— Thomas Brett (@Thomas_Brett) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst You want employers to be forced to employ the disabled and pay them a living wage, I suppose.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst What is the proportion of GDP from the disabled compared to the able-bodied?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Really? How so? Just cos you say so?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst The Equality Act 2010 should be repealed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst Because it is totalitarian THOUGHT-CRIME, burdens small businesses and makes British labour UNCOMPETITIVE.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Why shouldn't finite resources be prioritised towards the productive and away from the unproductive?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst Are you saying people can never be disadvantaged by their disability, gender or age?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @Awifefirst Why not?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Thomas_Brett @ntfem Exactly. You see the person, not the disability. To the skills they have. To the ability they bring. The whole person.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Are u saying someone's ability to do his/her job can never be disadvantaged by his/her disability, gender or age?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett With the right support? No.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Why should employers be made to "support" ie hire employees who are obviously less able to do their jobs?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett That one statement shows you don't understand or you're being deliberately provocative. So which is it?
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett You don't seem to know the difference between a statement and a question. *I asked a question.* Will you answer?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett Your entire rhetoric shows either a lack of understanding or being deliberately provocative. So which is it?
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Why bother with my state of mind if you can just answer the question?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett When you refuse to answer a question, you end this conversation.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Thank you. You stopped answering first. https://t.co/WF8eL4ALRN is the question you won't answer, for the record.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem @Thomas_Brett I answered. Check back through the conversation. You even replied to my answer.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst @Thomas_Brett Did your tweet have the word BECAUSE to my WHY question?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem When you answer my question, I'll explain my answer again to you.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Other than that, this conversation is over.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst So childish and infantile. Anyone reading this would know you can't think of an answer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst I shall let you have the last word. Heh heh.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem No I just dislike your style of avoidance.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst You were the one who refused to answer my question and then lied that you had.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem I answered. You have previous with not answering questions. Then just ask more questions. It's a good aggressive tactic.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@ntfem By the way you've misunderstood what support means when it relates to disabled employees - which doesn't surprise me.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst On what basis do you claim I have misunderstood what "support" means when it relates to disabled employees?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem The content of your ie in your question. It presumes a fact which you cannot prove. And is untrue in majority of cases.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst I really have no idea what you are referring to.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Read your tweet. You made the claim about disabled employees.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst Which tweet are you referring to?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem The one you claim I didn't answer.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst The WHY question? Where was your answer that had the word BECAUSE?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Why does it need because?!
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst If I ask why you should answer BECAUSE and GIVE REASONS for your answer. It would be silly if you just typed "sdjlifjslfjsdkly8"
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Support costs are met through government grant usually & provide equality so disabled employees aren't disadvantaged productively.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst I ask again: "Why should employers be made to "support" ie hire employees who are obviously less able to do their jobs?"
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst Are you having trouble remembering what the question is?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem The ie on the question is factually incorrect. Support is usually paid for via government grants & helps provides equality.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst Why shd the employer or the government pay to support the disabled employee via government grants or help to provide equality?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Which means that disabled employees aren't less productive or less able on the whole.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Being patronising is a trait that gets you nowhere.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst Will you be answering the question at https://t.co/TWQXNXrMAT?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem I've answered it more times than I care to count. Now you can choose between deliberately provocative or simply unable to understand?
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst Why shd the employer or the government pay to support the disabled employee via government grants or help to provide equality?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem And the why? Because a civil society has a duty to every citizen.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst What is a civil society?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@ntfem Now I know you're playing games. And I'm done. Go play your silly games with someone else.
— Sasha Hunter (@Awifefirst) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst You cannot define a civil society?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

@Awifefirst r u saying that Britain was only a civil society since the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and that pre-1995 it was uncivil?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 12, 2014

[SNIGGER] Should this libtard have the vote?