Mangina running dog of feminazis accuses me of being a Nazi

Oh dear, the #justiceforched mob are unravelling! pic.twitter.com/NgI34Huy6m
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 16, 2015

@neitshade Someone mocks a Ched Evans supporter, therefore Ched Evans supporters are unravelling? Really? http://t.co/la7j7p6hkO
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem No, #justiceforched mob unravelling, so I take the piss. You seem to have trouble with logic. Is that why you're a Nazi sympathiser?
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade How is my logic at fault? It is impossible for me to be a Nazi. Does liking Germans as people make me a Nazi sympathiser?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Not that, no. There must be some other reason I got that impression. Now what was it? pic.twitter.com/XTfWQvYPzL
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade Why Claire Khaw is not a Nazi http://t.co/FJx1eb0MbT
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem You're not a Nazi because you say you're not? Another logic fail!
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade I did not more than just deny that I was a Nazi, I actually gave you reasons why it was impossible for me to be a Nazi.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@neitshade I knew it would get people to read my stuff which has nothing at all that is antisemitic in it, by the way.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@neitshade Antisemitism was endemic in Christian Europe way before Hitler was even born. Are u now accusing me of wanting to invade Poland?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem If you want specifics, how about the killing of disabled children, which you supported in 2011. That was too much even for BNP!
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade You mustn't worry about the BNP. They don't get the principle of free speech either, just like the LibLabCon.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@neitshade What I proposed was what the Nuffield Council, Royal College of Obstetricians and @C_of_E implicitly did. http://t.co/y5mK1CIMGy
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@neitshade The Groningen Protocol is already in force. http://t.co/zMerzDkxmx
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Killing to reduce suffering, vs your "Why should the taxpayer pay for her severely disabled child?" is sick. pic.twitter.com/HXNnWn67nU
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade Can you answer the question though?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem I already did, it just wasn't the answer you wanted.
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade Your answer to my question why did not have the word "because" in it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem This is Twitter, you idiot, 140 characters, sentence construction suffers.
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade You could tweet the answer in a series of sentences.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Or, if you're as clever as you think you are, you could see the answer without having to have it spelled out.
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade No, I can't and I am not as clever as you seem to think I am.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Oh, but you are. You are just as clever as I think you are.
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Like I'm going to worry about the opinion of a neo-Nazi!
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@ntfem Like I'm going to worry about the opinion of a neo-Nazi!
— Dave Davis (@neitshade) January 17, 2015

@neitshade It is really very interesting that you cannot answer the question and keep avoiding it though!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 17, 2015