Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Catholics reject Secular Koranism but won't really say why


http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/cpdxky/medieval-lives-birth-marriage-death--series-1---2-a-good-marriage
20th minute. Fornicators were whipped in a public place "in the usual way".



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_American_bastardy_laws#Bastardy_in_English_Common_Law

The balance of our population, our human stock is threatened. A recent article in Poverty, published by the Child Poverty Action Group, showed that a high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring them up. They are born to mother who were first pregnant in adolescence in social classes 4 and 5. Many of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness which are more important than riches. They are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels for drifters. Yet these mothers, the under-twenties in many cases, single parents, from classes 4 and 5, are now producing a third of all births. A high proportion of these births are a tragedy for the mother, the child and for us.
Yet what shall we do? If we do nothing, the nation moves towards degeneration, however much resources we pour into preventative work and the over-burdened educational system. It is all the more serious when we think of the loss of people with talent and initiative through emigration as our semi-socialism deprives them of adequate opportunities, rewards and satisfactions.

Yet proposals to extend birth-control facilities to these classes of people, particularly the young unmarried girls, the potential young unmarried mothers, evokes entirely understandable moral opposition. Is it not condoning immorality? I suppose it is. But which is the lesser evil, until we are able to remoralise whole groups and classes of people, undoing the harm done when already weak restraints on strong instincts are further weakened by permissiveness in television, in films, on bookstalls?
http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/101830


http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2015/03/25/cardinal-nichols-urges-priests-not-to-conduct-synod-debate-in-press/









On Papal Infallibility:

at

No comments:

Post a Comment