Just heard Paul Nuttall describe Trump as "quite appalling". Suzanne Evans doesn't care for Trump either. So it's got to be @RaheemKassam— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
The UKIP leadership election is an excellent test to see how racist anti-immigration white men are. @RaheemKassam— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
Will anti-immigration white men choose an inferior white candidate - Paul Nuttall - when they could choose a better one who is not white?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
The only UKIP members voting for Suzanne Evans would be its female members and its pussywhipped male members like @oflynnmep— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
A terrible dilemma for anti-immigration white male @UKIP members:— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
Paul Nuttall who described Trump as "quite appalling" should NOT become UKIP leader. Raheem Kassam supports Trump. https://t.co/QvDIMRs36Y— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
Paul Nuttall calls himself as the compromise candidate hoping to benefit from the racism of UKIP members. https://t.co/aos9bexsjn— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
If Paul Nuttall wins, it means most UKIP men remain incorrigibly racist. https://t.co/794wCuiWNb— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
Raheem Kassam is clearly the superior brown candidate. If white Paul Nuttall becomes leader, we will know why. https://t.co/Ag41QLzEKA— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 23, 2016
On a scale of 0 to 10, how much are white male racist members of UKIP wishing that Raheem Kassam was a white man instead of a brown man?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 24, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment