Was Twitter right to ban Tommy Robinson?

Tommy Robinson has been banned from Twitter for saying "Islam promotes killing people."

I happen to agree with this.

Judaism and Christianity are not exactly pacific either, so why should no comment be made about Jews and Christians killing their enemy in war but Muslims denounced for doing the very same thing?

If there are just wars, then there must also logically and necessarily be just acts of terrorism. Even Westerners acknowledge this because they practically deified Nelson Mandela who was convicted of terrorist offences.

One man's meat is another man's poison.

One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist.

Nelson Mandela managed to be both in one lifetime.

http://thebackbencher.co.uk/3-things-you-didnt-want-to-know-about-nelson-mandela/

Nelson Mandela was the head of UmKhonto we Sizwe, (MK), the terrorist wing of the ANC and South African Communist Party. At his trial, he had pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including mobilising terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places, including the Johannesburg railway station. Many innocent people, including women and children, were killed by Nelson Mandela’s MK terrorists. Here are some highlights

-Church Street West, Pretoria, on the 20 May 1983
-Amanzimtoti Shopping complex KZN, 23 December 1985
-Krugersdorp Magistrate’s Court, 17 March 1988
-Durban Pick ‘n Pay shopping complex, 1 September 1986
-Pretoria Sterland movie complex 16 April 1988 – limpet mine killed ANC terrorist M O Maponya instead
-Johannesburg Magistrate’s Court, 20 May 1987
-Roodepoort Standard Bank 3 June, 1988

Tellingly, not only did Mandela refuse to renounce violence, Amnesty refused to take his case stating “[the] movement recorded that it could not give the name of ‘Prisoner of Conscience’ to anyone associated with violence, even though as in ‘conventional warfare’ a degree of restraint may be exercised.”

Robinson complains about blasphemy laws by the backdoor. The real purpose of blasphemy laws is more about public order than protecting the feelings of people from offence. 

To say that "Islam promotes killing people" implies that Muslims are killers. To suggest Muslims in particular are killers is arguably inciting hatred against them and inviting Islamophobes to form the conclusion that they must adopt a strategy of "kill or be killed" and act on it.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/03/28/tommy-robinson-suspended-from-twitter-days-after-hyde-park-freedom-of-speech-event/

Indeed, such a strategy has already been adopted and implemented by violent Islamophobes. Punish A Muslim Day is on Tuesday 3 April 2018 according to this report.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/punish-muslim-day-letters-points-islamophobic-hate-crime-counter-terrorism-police-bradford-a8249571.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3520777/Muslim-woman-mown-grinning-far-right-activist-stops-PICTURE-anti-Islam-rally-troubled-Brussels-district-Molenbeek.html

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3879271/car-crash-newcastle-westgate-eid-accident-terror/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3865855/darren-osborne-charged-with-terrorism-related-murder-and-attempted-murder-following-the-finsbury-park-mosque-attack/

The hatred of Muslims in the West was created by uncontrolled immigration and the creation of protected groups privileged by PC laws.

The NATO policy of bombing Muslim countries in neocon wars and then letting them come here expecting them to be grateful explains why they Muslims are perceived to be terrorists.

Also, coming from a culture of patriarchy, Muslim sex offenders would be more efficient at preying on unsupervised adolescent schoolgirls than Islamophobic sex offenders, because Muslim sex predators are more likely to cooperate with each other by sharing information and resources while Islamophobic sex predators tend to work alone.

What a shame then that people are being distracted by what they think is protecting the free speech of the indigenous Islamophobe when it is really Western foreign, social, economic and immigration policy that is what should be discussed openly, honestly and robustly to get to the bottom of the matter.