Nick Land promotes several key philosophical and political ideas:
Accelerationism: Land is often described as the "Godfather of accelerationism." His version, particularly right-accelerationism (R/Acc), suggests that capitalism and technology should be accelerated to their logical extremes to dismantle current social structures, potentially leading to a post-human future where artificial intelligence or other advanced technologies might dominate.
Dark Enlightenment: This concept is tied to Land's later work and involves a critique of modern democratic systems, advocating for more hierarchical or authoritarian governance models. It includes skepticism towards egalitarianism, democracy, and human rights, promoting instead a form of neo-reactionary thought that values efficiency, order, and traditional or even monarchic forms of leadership.
Techno-Capitalist Acceleration: Land's philosophy sees technology and capital as forces that shape history in an almost autonomous manner. He envisions these forces as inherently progressive, suggesting that resistance to technological change is futile or counterproductive. His ideas incorporate a vision where technology evolves beyond human control, leading to a scenario where human influence over future developments might be minimal or nonexistent.
Hyperstition: A term coined by Land, which describes how certain ideas or narratives can become self-fulfilling prophecies. This concept blends superstition with hyperreality, suggesting that through cultural and technological means, certain myths or fictions can become reality.
Anti-Humanism: Much of Land's work explores themes where human-centric views are seen as limitations. He often writes from perspectives that are non-human or post-human, suggesting that the future might not include humanity in its current form or at all.Land's promotion of these ideas has often been controversial, associating him with the alt-right due to his critique of democracy and his promotion of certain race and eugenics-related views, although his initial work in the 1990s was more aligned with leftist accelerationism and cyberculture. His philosophy has influenced various fields, from political theory to art and music, with a significant impact seen in discussions around technology, capitalism, and the future of humanity.
The ARC (Alliance for Responsible Citizenship) is primarily associated with Jordan Peterson, but Paul Van Der Klay has also been involved in discussions and events related to it. Here's how each is connected:Jordan Peterson: He is one of the key figures behind the founding of ARC, announced in June 2023. ARC aims to address what its founders see as a crisis in Western civilization, focusing on issues like family, free exchange, environmental stewardship, and governance. Peterson has used ARC to advocate for conservative values, particularly emphasizing the importance of the nuclear family, traditional values, and a critique of modern "woke" culture and certain environmental policies. The organization hosted a major conference in London in October 2023, which featured Peterson prominently, along with other speakers who share similar ideological views.Paul Van Der Klay: While not a founder or central figure in ARC, Paul Van Der Klay, a minister in the Christian Reformed Church, has engaged with topics that intersect with ARC's concerns. His YouTube channel and podcast often discuss the influence of Jordan Peterson, theological and philosophical issues, and the cultural impacts of these ideas. Van Der Klay has commented on Peterson's work, including his connection to ARC, through his content. He explores how these ideas might relate to Christian theology or the broader cultural and intellectual landscape, often from a perspective of trying to understand or engage with movements like the one ARC represents.In summary, ARC is directly associated with Jordan Peterson as a founder, aiming to steer conservative discourse on various societal issues. Paul Van Der Klay, while not directly involved, engages with these themes in his commentary, connecting them to broader discussions on faith, philosophy, and culture.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12sJ3KeskgfQxYxnTP1SuCk8vR3e23i9vjYxAJcuK7U0/edit?tab=t.0
https://www.arcforum.com/arc-2025-info
Prof. Arthur Brooks, Prof. Sir Niall Ferguson, Bjorn Lomborg, Dr Jordan B. Peterson; politicians represented from Europe, North America and Australasia ranging from the former Australian Prime Ministers Tony Abbott and John Howard to the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Mike Johnson; leading scientists such as Dr Scott Tinker; business leaders including Sir Paul Marshall and Baroness Morrissey; and thought leaders and culture shapers Konstantin Kisin and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Are they neocons?
The term "neoconservative" (neocon) generally refers to individuals or groups with a specific set of political ideologies, particularly in the United States, characterized by:
A hawkish foreign policy, promoting democracy and interventionism abroad.
Advocacy for a strong military presence and the use of military force where necessary to secure American interests.
Support for free-market capitalism with a focus on economic growth, often with less emphasis on welfare policies.
A belief in traditional values, often aligned with conservative social policies.
Here's a brief analysis of each individual or group mentioned regarding their alignment with neoconservatism:
Prof. Arthur Brooks: Known more for his work in social science, focusing on happiness and leadership, rather than explicit political ideology. However, his association with conservative think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute might suggest some alignment with neoconservative economic principles, but he's not primarily known for foreign policy hawkishness.
Prof. Sir Niall Ferguson: A historian with a broad focus, including on the rise and fall of empires. His views often align with neoconservative thought on the importance of Western civilization and economic policies, but his stances on interventionism are more nuanced.
Bjorn Lomborg: An environmental economist, Lomborg is known for advocating pragmatic approaches to global issues, often critiquing what he sees as alarmist environmental policies. His focus isn't primarily on neoconservative foreign policy but more on cost-benefit analysis in global policy.
Dr Jordan B. Peterson: Peterson's public persona is more about cultural critique, psychology, and self-help, with conservative social views but not clearly aligned with neoconservative foreign policy. His involvement with ARC (Alliance for Responsible Citizenship) suggests an interest in broader cultural and political discourse but doesn't define him as a neoconservative per se.
Politicians like Tony Abbott, John Howard, Mike Johnson:
Tony Abbott and John Howard from Australia are known for conservative politics, with Howard particularly noted for economic liberalism and Abbott for traditional values, but neither strictly fits the U.S. model of neoconservatism, especially in terms of foreign policy.
Mike Johnson from the U.S. represents a more recent conservative movement, and while he supports traditional values and possibly economic conservatism, his focus has been more on domestic issues than the typical neoconservative emphasis on international interventionism.
Dr Scott Tinker: A geologist, his involvement in energy policy discussions doesn't explicitly tie him to neoconservatism unless one considers his advocacy for energy solutions as aligning with economic aspects of neoconservative thought.
Sir Paul Marshall, Baroness Morrissey: Both are in finance and business, with Marshall being notably involved in conservative media and education. Their political influence is more financial and cultural rather than directly aligning with neoconservative foreign policy.
Konstantin Kisin, Ayaan Hirsi Ali:
Konstantin Kisin critiques modern left-wing ideologies and advocates for free speech, aligning with some cultural aspects of conservatism but not necessarily neoconservatism's foreign policy.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali has become known for her critique of Islamism and advocacy for secularism and women's rights, aligning with some conservative values but her focus is more on cultural and social issues rather than foreign policy.
Conclusion: While some of these individuals share aspects of neoconservative ideology, particularly in economic policy, cultural conservatism, or a general support for Western values, none of them comprehensively represent the full spectrum of neoconservatism, especially its hawkish foreign policy stance. Each person or politician might align with certain elements but not the entirety of what traditionally defines neoconservatism. Thus, labeling them all as "neocons" would be an oversimplification. Their involvement might be better characterized under broader conservative or right-leaning movements with varied focuses. Answered by Grok
2:03:00 Classical liberalism
2:04:00 State churches and nation-states
2:05:00 Democracy and religion assumptions
2:06:00 Christian nationalism
US Christ-like in foreign policy?
2:08:00 Donald Trump is the first US President in a Post-Christian America?
2:17:00 "Performative assertion"
2:23:00 Plenary sessions
2:26:00 Jordan Peterson
2:32:00 Peter Thiel
2:33:00 AI
2:39:00 Jonathan Pageau
Estuary
The Mysterious ARC
The specific cost to attend ARC 2025 at ExCeL London isn't explicitly stated in the available information. However, here's what we can infer from the web results:
Event Overview: ARC 2025 is described as an information-rich and artistically laden conference, focusing on social, economic, cultural, and moral questions. It's set to take place from Monday, February 17th to Wednesday, February 19th, 2025, at ExCeL London.
Registration: There's a mention that no on-the-door registrations will be possible, implying that pre-registration is required, which typically involves some cost or fee.
Ticketing: While exact ticket prices are not specified, the structure of the event suggests there might be different ticket options similar to other conferences at ExCeL, potentially including standard, premium, or even group rates.
Comparative Events: Given the nature of similar conferences at ExCeL London, ticket prices can range widely depending on the event's scale, speakers, and additional offerings like networking sessions, meals, or exclusive content. For instance, other events at ExCeL might have tickets ranging from free for some industry expos to several hundred pounds for premium conference experiences.
For an accurate cost, you would need to check the official ARC website or contact the organizers directly, as they would have the latest information on ticket pricing, including early bird discounts, student rates, or special offers. Remember, the cost could also cover additional benefits like meals, access to exclusive sessions, or networking events, which aren't detailed in the provided web results.
2:43:00 Talking at people does not create leaders.
2:44:00 Critique by Jacob
2:45:00 Breakout sessions
2:46:00 The problem of Protestantism
The lying starts with the Trinity.
2:47:00 Hierarchy
2:48:00 Downton Abbey - the lord and his valet
2:49:00 The mirage of egalitarianism
2:50:00 Some people want to be the invisible servant.
2:51:00 Gamer convention
2:52:00 Breakout sessions
A breakout session is a smaller, more focused meeting or workshop that takes place within the framework of a larger conference, seminar, or convention. Here are some key characteristics:
Purpose: Breakout sessions aim to delve deeper into specific topics or themes that might not be covered comprehensively in the broader conference sessions. They provide an opportunity for more interactive, detailed discussion or hands-on activities.
Size: These sessions typically involve a smaller group of attendees compared to the main conference or plenary sessions, which might have hundreds or thousands of participants. Breakout groups can range from just a handful of people to several dozen.
Format: They can take various forms:
Workshops: Often include practical exercises, demonstrations, or group work.
Discussion Groups: Focused on Q&A, open discussions, or debates.
Presentations: Where a speaker or panel discusses a niche topic in detail.
Networking: Sometimes structured to facilitate connections among attendees with similar interests or roles.
Location: Breakout sessions might occur in separate rooms, areas, or even virtual breakout rooms in online conferences, away from the main auditorium or plenary area.
Benefits:
Engagement: They increase attendee engagement by allowing for more personalized interaction.
Specialization: Attendees can choose sessions that are most relevant to their interests or professional needs.
Networking: Smaller groups foster better networking opportunities.
Scheduling: Typically, these sessions are scheduled concurrently, allowing attendees to choose which topic or session they wish to attend. This parallel scheduling is common at large conferences to cover more ground or cater to diverse interests.
At conferences like ARC 2025 at ExCeL London, breakout sessions would serve to complement the main talks or discussions by offering deeper dives into particular subjects or providing a platform for interactive learning and networking.
2:56:00 ARC is invitation only.
Estuary meetings
2:58:00 War in Ukraine
New York Times
2:59:00 Sargon of Akkad
3:00:00 Elon Musk
3:02:00 Heretic burning
No comments:
Post a Comment