Tuesday, 16 October 2018

A Muslim man deconstructs Feminism

Mohammed Hijab talks about the "incoherent ramblings" of feminists.

"What nonsense is this?" he asks.


  • Mary Wollstonencraft
  • female education
  • female suffrage
  • feminism as a racist ideology.
  • Fawcett Society
  • Simone de Beauvoir
  • Betty Friedan
  • Germaine Greer
  • Lesbian radicals
  • Andrea Dworkin
  • Married Woman's Property Act
  • Matrimonial Causes Act
  • Divorced Woman's Act
  • married women were sold in Victorian England 
  • Virginia Woolf

My application to be on Millenniyule 2018


Claire Khaw has been promoting Secular Koranism since 2009 believing this to be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and morally regenerating a degenerate civilisation. The government supporting marriage and family values through 

1) the shaming of sluts and the men who cannot resist them by making fornication a sexual offence attracting corporal punishment as prescribed by 24: 2 of the Koran
2) abolishing no fault divorce
3) repealing the Equality Act 2010

would be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and returning the West to moral order. Unfortunately, this must mean dumping democracy and establishing a one party theocracy.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.  No pain, no gain.  

When did Britain start being a matriarchy? As long ago as 1974 when Keith Joseph criticised unmarried mothers and found Thatcher becoming Tory leader instead of him. I fear if no attempt is made to challenge the matriarchy before its 50th year, Western civilisation would end in ignominy.

Me discussing Secular Koranism with various people

The Conservative Party and its representatives who run Facebook debating groups do not believe free speech

Tatttoos, pre-fight hype, nationalism, the price of sex, restoring the patriarchy and environmentalism

Go to 1:37:00 if you want to know who I am complaining about at

but the best bit is before that when I discuss Christianity with Luke and Otto.

From 14:00

We discuss social media censorship. The first half of Crosstalk discusses this.

17:00  Tattoos and boxing

33:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista

37:00  Feminism

Trump is not able to do what he wants to do because he is operating in the conditions of a matriarchy. If he were operating in a patriarchy, he would have built the wall by now.  A patriarchy is a society of beta males led by an alpha male. This means beta males get to choose their leader without interference by single mother voters who are half the population who don't care about uncontrolled immigration and who keep voting Democrat or Labour. This means narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only. Currently, all political parties in the West have to appeal to the female voter or not alienate them to be voted into office.

PROPOSAL: Western Man is brave enough to propose and support the narrowing of the franchise to taxpayers only, instead of hopelessly and secretly yearning and waiting for pogrom and race war.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents

The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

The only way to paint a picture of your preferred political landscape is to give people an idea of what the new rules will be. It needs to be more than Greg Johnson's proposed pogrom and UKIP proposing internment camps for Muslims to galvanise enough educated and influential men already in the political establishment into restoring the patriarchy. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6196159/UKIP-calls-Muslim-prisons-stop-extremists-converting-fellow-inmates.html
My interview of Greg Johnson is below.

1:10:00  All self-respecting ideologies seek global domination eg Marxism, Christianity, Islam, capitalism, liberal democracy.

1:13:00  But Jews, Christians and Muslims do worship the same Abrahamic God! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

1:17:00  Muslims actually hate Secular Koranism because they don't think people who are not Muslim have a right to use the Koran. The white man will claim that Secular Koranism is their interpretation of the Koran and in this way claim the Koran and use its ideas to restore their patriarchy.  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-muslim-who-hates-secular-koranism.html

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV  Short quiz about Secular Koranism to clear up any misunderstandings!

You will not be required to bow to anything. Secular Koranism is a legal system which guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256, not a belief system and does not mean forced conversion to Islam, which you seem to assume it must entail! Remember, I am not Muslim.

It is believed that 2:256 in fact formed the basis of the First Amendment. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-first-amendment-was-derived-from.html

What I am trying to say is that you can kick out all the Muslims and still practise Secular Koranism. Indeed, you are more likely to be able to kick out all the people you want to kick out under Secular Koranism than continuing to reject it.

Once the patriarchy is restored ie male solidarity re-established and male co-operation made possible again, you will be able to accomplish all manner of things.

1:20:00  Flat rate income tax of 20%  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums


1:30:00  Gay sex is cheaper than straight sex.

1:36:00  Environmentalism, welfarism and a lower birth rate
How and why Brighton elected Britain's first Green MP

1:39:00  Democracy is a sacred cow that is not too late to slay.

Monday, 15 October 2018

Mohammed Hijab investigates Trinitarianism

The absurdity of the Trinity is that Christians are required to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God in order to be Christian. This is clearly idolatry.  http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=116

Mohammed should be grateful that Christians no longer take their religion seriously. Those who think themselves Christian are not Christian, but are too theologically ignorant to know this, like the Archbishop of Canterbury.


Otherwise, to "win" the argument, Christians might burn you at the stake or conduct the Inquisition or invoke the Blasphemy Act 1697.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697

Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for denying the Trinity.  https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/michael-servetus-burned-for-heresy-11629984.html

Islamophobes might have some of their fears allayed knowing that quran.com/2/56 guarantees freedom of belief and is believed by some to be the basis of the First Amendment. 

The First Amendment was derived from the Koran

Hate and fear is now the religion of the white man, not considerations of the national interest

The fact is that Christianity and Islam were derived from Judaism. Therefore it would be logical to conclude that both represented attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for his own advancement.

Since Christianity has failed, Islam must be its replacement.

The most successful form of ethno-nationalism is Judaism. If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

I don't see white nationalists even acknowledging the problem of white degeneracy, let alone addressing it.

White nationalists must surely understand that their skin colour alone cannot be a religion and learn a little more about their own history when they regularly waged war on each other even when they were the same race and religion. After the Pilgrim Fathers left the Old World for the New World to escape religious persecution, Christians merely continued Christian-on-Christian religious persecution on each other in the New World. Then, the Americans had a Civil War and participated in two World Wars. The war was waged by one alliance of white Christian countries against another alliance of white Christian countries.

The fact is that the white man is not only treacherous to others not of his race and religion, he is also treacherous to those of his own race and religion.

What does this tell us? Only that being unfair and unkind to someone on the basis of race and religion is only another category of injustice out of the many that we can inflict and could suffer ourselves.

The white man is suffering that is close to dementia that began as a neurosis caused by feminism. If there were more of them capable of a sustained rational discussion, things would be better for them, but they are now both timorous and aggressive, in a spiral of self-destructive emotions making them actually incapable of thinking their way out of trouble or understanding or acting on well-meant advice because they have become the women they are always complaining about. Denial is after all a feminine vice and they are now too ashamed to admit they have now become mere women with penis extensions.

What these white nationalists have concluded is that they would like to be free of the disease of feminism which causes immigration because the symptoms have become very uncomfortable indeed. However, they have not yet admitted that they are ill, or that they are suffering from a disease that must be cured for which they will have to seek professional advice and follow doctor's orders before things will get better for them.

Verily, God does not change the lot of a people who do not change what is in their hearts, and their hearts are full of hate and fear. Because they no longer believe in the religion of their ancestors, they have nothing else in common with each other but the hate and fear that they feel for their own political classes, immigrants of all races and religions, their women, for each other, but most of all, for themselves.