Wednesday, 10 January 2018

My answers to Sargon's alt-right survey

Are Jews oppressing white people?

Do clever rich people oppress stupid poor people? Do poor people always feel oppressed and blame others for their misfortunes, even if they are the author of their own misfortunes? If Jews do oppress white people, is it because they have a religion which makes them stronger, cleverer and richer than those with an inferior religion or without a religion at all? Aren't non-white Muslims oppressing white non-Muslims? Whether they are or not, won't white Islamophobes feel oppressed by immigrant Muslims because their own government obviously doesn't care about them and obviously cares about recently arrived Muslim immigrants more than they care about the white indigenous? Why don't the government of atheist gentile non-Muslim Islamophobes care about them? Because Muslims at least have their bloc vote which political parties can chase while trying to get racist anti-Semitic Islamophobes to do anything is like herding cats. Why is trying to get racist anti-Semitic Islamophobes to do anything like herding cats? Because they have no religion, are all beta males who don't listen to each other (because no beta male will accept the authority of another beta male). Because they are lowly born and badly educated, no one trusts them, not even other atheist anti-Semitic Islamophobes, because they have no morals and no principles and will pretend not to understand what you say if they don't like where it is going. This is the problem of the white race, basically. And you know what? They are so disgustingly low that they won't discuss the fact that they have no morals and no principles. They have no morals and no principles because they have no religion and no hierarchical structure through which to get anything done and are always turning on each other like weasels in a sack.

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption. Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption. Intellectual corruptions leads to an inability and unwillingness to admit the obvious and deal with it in a common sense way. In extreme cases, intellectual corruption will lead to the messenger being shot. If you shoot all messengers bearing bad news on sight, then it means you will soon receive no news. If you receive no news, you will be at the mercy of your emotions, appetites and events, like a lost sheep who is a hunted animal. And then life will become truly brutal, solitary, short and nasty.

Should inter-racial couples be forced to separate?

Of course not. Even if I were a white nationalist wanting a white ethnostate, I would use social pressure to discourage mixed race marriages rather than have the state annul the marriages of mixed race couples. If white men in a majority white country cannot make themselves attractive to women of their own race in their own country, then they do not deserve them at all, do they?

Should the government prevent people from leaving to preserve the race?

I can imagine white people who never thought of leaving the country to become economic migrants in other countries suddenly beginning to think it may be time to make arrangements to flee from a white ethnostate administered by the current members of the alt-right.

Should the state control education?

Yes, of course, and only in a good way and with selective education and rigorous examination standards, and everyone learning the same history and taking the same exams.

Should the State control the media?

If it were up to me, I would see to it that the state had its own state channel with the best dramas, documentaries etc while allowing other channels to exist subject to censorship to prevent the corruption of public morals.

Should the state control the economy?

Of course, to create the conditions that allows commerce and small businesses to flourish, rewarding hard work, innovation and enterprise.

Should the decisions of individual white people matter to the alt-right?

Of course. If I were a white nationalist then every other citizen's decisions affecting the nation would come to my notice and be assessed according to whether it was good or bad for the national interest if all citizens did the same thing.

Should women have a role in public life?

This is really a question about feminism. Doubtless outstanding women will come to the notice of the public whether men like it or not, but there is really no need to encourage women to enter public life at all when there is so much they can do outside it.

Wednesday, 3 January 2018

Is Joe Owens the scouse version of Claire Khaw?

Joe Owens demands that Mark Collett tell him what he means by "European traditionalism". I asked Mark too what he means by that and got no answer either.

Could it be that European traditionalism is a euphemism for Christianity?

If so, Nick Griffin agrees with him.

Is Christianity the solution though? Most nationalists are atheists believing in sexual liberation who have no intention of uncompromisingly defending the institution of marriage or shaming sluts, so it is hard to imagine how they might have the moral authority to impose a Christian theocracy. There would be the vexed question of whether the Christianity involved would be Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox, and probably decades of civil war amongst white people after all the non-whites, Muslims and Jews are expelled.

We also know some of these nationalists are pagans who will be fighting the Christians because they loathe all the Abrahamic faiths.

It is Secular Koranism that would accommodate all atheists, agnostics, pagans, Jews, Christians and Muslims.

I have sent Joe Owens a few messages via YouTube, but I doubt that he knows how to access it because the process is not straightforward. I would be happy to have a chat with him on my YouTube channel, so please pass this message on to him if you can.

He is a tough man with a bit of a chequered history.

He has a story to tell as you can see at

He is also a successful litigant.

The great thing about Joe Owens is that he is a masculine man with convictions who knows he is being ignored but won't give up and accept it.

Mark Collett flees from debate because he knows the futility of his pretending "European traditionalism" is going to save the day when he is too afraid to even mention Christianity.

Nick Griffin says it has to be Christianity, only because of the Hungarian and Polish example, but they are both Catholic. How likely is Western Europe to embrace Catholicism? Not on you nelly.

Owens and I have independently arrived at the conclusion that Mark and Millennial Woes have no answers.

Soon, all the female alt-right YouTubers will retire to have babies, and Mark will be on his own again.

MW is making YouTube of incredible irrelevance and people are laughing. I have not been following it myself, but here is how it is being described to me:


A guy called Kraut and Tea started a war with the Alt-Right and appears to have created a secret cabal to target which may or may not have been staged

I think that Kraut has trolled them all but practically everyone swallowed this "espionage" narrative
They obtained the info of that greasy european guy called Coach Red Pill.

And "leaked" to him that they knew his real name.

He made these surreal and hypobolic oscar worthy videos talking about someone knowing his name as if it was a murder.

The guy had already doxxed himself and the dark parts of the internet had already found out who he was from news reports.

He is, as Sargon put it, "a legitmate fraudster" which is an oxymoron if you ask me

He's one of the far right in the alt-right


This is not even about politics.


Yeah. It's war

The right against the alt right

At the same time, one of the "conspirators" put on a fraudulent event.


What is a fraudulent event?


Organised a free speech convention called "Kilroy"

Had no idea what that means by the looks of it

And invited a lot of people and then fleeced their fans for tickets and then uninvited half of the people they invited.

Then, they sent out contracts to everyone else making ridiculous demands and they refused to sign them.

They got rid of everyone who paid for it and then brought in their own mates as speakers.

These are the supposed conservative people


Perhaps they think they are playing cops and robbers, or cowboys and Indians.


You're catching my drift


He really is such a silly boy.

I guess you can only so far with saying "We want an ethno-state."


As mentioned previously in conversations.

A lot of narcissism


I would be embarrassed to be seen to be discussing such trivia.


It's a reflection of the whole


The degenerate whole ...


There's a lot of little boys that have not grown up out there


If the political establishment is bad, its opponents are even worse.


They overplay it's power as an instrument to impose your will.

Both radical left and right


They think making YouTube videos is political activism.


It's not

It's entertainment


While avoiding subjects that need to be discussed.


But entertainment with repercussions in the real world


But entertainment with repercussions in the real world


That's why it's funny
Imagined power is what this is all about

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

Can the perceived Muslim invasion be a silver lining in the cloud of immigration overshadowing the West?

The definition of a phobia is an irrational hatred and fear of something or other.

Islamophobes will of course say that it is never irrational to hate and fear Islam and Muslims, but I am of the view that everything happens for the best because we live in the best of all possible worlds because there is only one world anyway. I am a follower of Dr Pangloss.

Everything happens for a reason. What would happen to us if we were not capable of feeling pain or discomfort?

Why is the Post-Christian in fear of being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims?

Because he is Post-Christian, obviously.

It is unimaginable that a men practising patriarchal Biblical principles in which the government prioritises the preferences of married fathers would be so easily exploited by minorities and immoral women in their own land.

It is therefore obvious that Christianity has failed. However, because most Islamophobes are atheists who are ignorant of their Judeo-Christian heritage, they do not perceive that their problems are caused by the failure of Christianity, but by the minorities they feel themselves swamped by the most powerful and numerous of which are of course Jews and Muslims.

Because Islamophobes come from the lower strata of society, they are mostly uneducated, and the uneducated are not intellectually equipped to absorb abstract ideas or act on them. In fact, such people scorn ideas and prefer emotion and the strongest emotion they can summon up is their common hatred of those minorities they feel marginalised by.

The real problem is their government and politicians, who do not care about them. Most of them know this in theory, but because the government is an abstract idea and not something they can see, their hatred yet again descends on the minorities, who are at least visible to them in their lives, swamping their cities and making their presence known and enjoying privileges they themselves do not enjoy while they are themselves forbidden from complaining without being accused of hate speech which could attract a jail sentence.

The problem is not just their government but themselves, because their government is also afraid of those they govern: the infantilised mob who think everything will just get better the moment the minorities they hate can be exterminated or expelled.

Even if the minorities were exterminated or expelled, the fact remains that it was an overwhelmingly majority white and Christian country that let all those pesky minorities in in the first place. The nettle would still not have been grasped, even if the race war has already been fought and won by the white side.

But what is this silver lining of which I speak?

The cloud is of course the undeniable failure of Christianity. The West is only nominally Christian. The West is as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human.

The silver lining is its proposed replacement, the solution to their problems of lacking a moral system that protects them as a group and as a nation.

Judaism is for Jews only, but Christianity is kaput. When what you have eliminated the impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the answer.

What does Mark Collett think of your Secular Koranism?

Religion is not an optional extra but a necessity if you want to preserve the integrity and stability of your society. It is actually a law of nature.

Islam is "Judaism Lite".

Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

Secular Koranism is the Chicken Tikka Massala of Islam, created specially for the Western palate. 

The logic of Islam is theocracy: your laws always conform to your chosen system of morality the way liquid takes on the shape of its container

Monday, 1 January 2018

Rabbinical advice for 2018

This sermon is called The Fall of the Mighty. The young think they are mighty and will never grow old. They are also ignorant and arrogant.


Why feminists shun nationalist men

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

The Marriage Foundation will not be defending marriage