THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Tuesday, 21 July 2026
The propositions in the Declaration of Independence are Islamic
Why is it so hard for Americans to understand that the Founding Fathers were the first Europeans to move away from Christianity?
The view that God continually creates the universe anew at every single moment is known as Occasionalism. Several theologians and philosophers across different religious traditions have championed this concept:Al-Ghazali (1058–1111): A prominent medieval Islamic theologian who formalized this concept in Sunni Islam. He argued that created objects have no independent power to cause anything (e.g., fire does not burn cotton by itself); rather, God creates each and every event directly at that exact moment.Nicolas Malebranche (1638–1715): A French Catholic philosopher and theologian who took Cartesian philosophy and merged it with Christian theology to argue that God is the only true cause. He maintained that the physical world acts merely as the "occasion" for God to perform a new act of creation.Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758): A prominent American Reformed theologian who taught the doctrine of "continuous creation." He argued that God's upholding of the world is a series of repeated, moment-by-moment new creations out of nothing, entirely independent of the universe's past existence.
The silver lining in the cloud of being censored; talking to Tayo, Marcher and Mike Malzahn
MY FAVOURITE THINGSRaindrops on roses and whiskers on kittensBright copper kettles and warm woolen mittensBrown paper packages tied up with stringsThese are a few of my favorite thingsCream-colored ponies and crisp apple strudelsDoorbells and sleigh bells and schnitzel with noodlesWild geese that fly with the moon on their wingsThese are a few of my favorite thingsGirls in white dresses with blue satin sashesSnowflakes that stay on my nose and eyelashesSilver-white winters that melt into springThese are a few of my favorite thingsWhen the dog bitesWhen the bee stingsWhen I'm feeling sadI simply remember my favorite thingsAnd then I don't feel so bad
In early America, the formal legal practice of sentencing never-married mothers to public corporal punishment (such as public whipping, flogging, or the stocks) largely ceased during the late 18th century, specifically between the 1780s and the 1790s.Following the American Revolutionary War, the newly formed United States experienced massive legal and cultural transformations that fundamentally altered how "bastardy" and non-marital births were handled.The Shift in Punishment MethodsDuring the 17th and early 18th centuries, Puritan and early colonial legal codes heavily penalized unmarried pregnant women under strict fornication and bastardy laws. If a woman could not pay a financial fine, she was routinely subjected to public corporal punishment to shame her and deter the community.However, by the late 1700s, this practice dissolved due to several major historical developments:Rise of the Enlightenment: Post-Revolutionary American legal philosophy shifted away from public, bodily retribution. Lawmakers embraced the Enlightenment-era belief that public physical torture hardened criminals rather than reforming them.Transition to Financial Obligations: Courts shifted their primary focus from punishing the "sin" of the mother to protecting the town's purse strings. Jurisdictions heavily favored bastardy bonds over physical violence. These bonds legally forced both the mother and the biological father to provide financial child support so the infant would not become a financial burden to the local taxpayers.The "Cult of True Womanhood": By the turn of the 19th century, evolving cultural standards began to view women as inherently moral, delicate, and sentimental. Stripping a woman and whipping her in a town square came to be seen by the public as grotesque, inappropriate, and deeply un-American.Institutionalization: For women who could not afford fines or support themselves, states abandoned the whipping post in favor of the newly constructed almshouses, workhouses, and penitentiaries, where the punishment became institutional labor rather than physical pain.While social stigma, forced adoptions, and financial penalization of unwed mothers persisted deep into the 19th and 20th centuries, the physical whipping of never-married mothers by order of the state was effectively obsolete by 1800.
Abu Bakr executed apostates and rebels during the Ridda Wars (Wars of Apostasy) in 632–633 CE. Following Prophet Muhammad's death, many tribes rejected Medina's political authority, refused to pay the zakat tax, or followed false prophets. Abu Bakr launched military campaigns—led by commanders like Khalid ibn al-Walid—suppressing these rebellions, which resulted in the executions of those who refused to submit or recant.Historically and theologically, the nature of these executions is interpreted in a few ways:
Political Rebellion: Many modern and historical accounts note that these campaigns were primarily political and military responses to armed insurrection and secession, rather than strictly policing private religious belief.Refusal of Zakat: A prominent group among the rebels acknowledged Islam but refused to pay the required alms to Abu Bakr's central government. Abu Bakr famously declared he would fight anyone who withheld even a piece of rope that was traditionally paid.Capital Punishment: Traditional Islamic jurisprudence (including the four major Sunni schools and several Shia sects) looks back to the rulings and precedents of Abu Bakr and the Companions to justify capital punishment for apostasy.
In the Hebrew Bible, God frequently uses prostitution and adultery as a metaphor to describe the spiritual unfaithfulness of ancient Israel and Judah. This imagery serves as a way to illustrate the betrayal of the covenant, where the nation "played the whore" by abandoning God to worship idols and pursue foreign alliances.This symbolic language appears primarily in the writings of the major prophets:Ezekiel 16 and 23: These chapters contain some of the most striking and graphic imagery in scripture. God compares Jerusalem and Samaria to adulterous sisters who give themselves to foreign idols, "prostituting" themselves for alliances and wealth. Ezekiel uses the metaphor to express divine frustration and the severity of Israel's betrayal.Hosea 1–3: God commands the prophet Hosea to marry a woman who has engaged in prostitution ("a wife of whoredom") to physically act out the metaphor of God's relationship with Israel. It illustrates how God continually pursues His people with steadfast love, even when they turn away to worship other gods.Jeremiah 3: The prophet also employs this theme, accusing the people of "prostituting themselves with many lovers" by adopting the pagan religious practices of surrounding nations.Historically, this prophetic language is not a literal condemnation of the women of Israel as commercial sex workers, but rather a powerful, culturally understood device to describe a spiritual issue. In ancient Israelite theology, the covenant was often compared to a marriage, making the worship of foreign gods a profound form of spiritual adultery or unfaithfulness.
2:01:00 The terms of the transaction for sexual services
2:03:00 Men should only be required to support their legitimate offspring.
https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=24&verse=2
2:05:00 Marriage license
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/37017533/tom-cruise-splits-ana-de-armas-spark/
2:10:00 For the sake of society, make the choice for women who want to be suppliers of sex to men easy to understand and clear.
2:13:00 What women have to do to keep men wanting to be men and pay for women
Monday, 20 July 2026
Can male friendship survive if one man loves Taylor Swift and the other loathes her?
Does Christianity deserve the loyalty of Christians when it has failed them so many times already?
- Is the overwhelming majority of American women feminist?
- If the overwhelming majority of American women are feminist, wouldn't they have a vested interest in keeping the matriarchy going?
- If the overwhelming majority of American women is feminist with a vested interest in keeping the matriarchy going, does that make them corrupt?
- Is corruption ignoring truth?
- Are Megan Goldsby and Stefanie Cristos ignoring truth by refusing to acknowledge the fact that the West is a matriarchy suffering from degeneracy?
- Isn't degeneracy inevitable if matriarchy is a society prioritising the preferences of non-parents and unmarried parents who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring?
- Aren't Megan and Stefanie condoning unmarried parenthood by refusing to call out the sexual offences and mortal sins of unmarried parents after being told about the social disease of widespread illegitimacy by actively trying to suppress my conversation with them?
- Aren't the overwhelming majority of convicted prisoners from fatherless homes brought up by their unmarried mother?
- Even if Megan and Stefanie don't agree with my thesis that unmarried parents are the cause of degeneracy through bad sex partner selection because of a culture of casual sex, shouldn't they at least allow their fellow Americans to discuss the subject and reach their own conclusions independently?
- Aren't these women being allies of unmarried parents by refusing to call them out or even allowing the subject to be more widely discussed by their fellow Americans?
- If it is not the intention of Stefanie and Megan to be the allies of people who should be treated as sex offenders, why are they actively preventing the subject from being more widely discussed by the great and the good?
- If they have family members or friends who are unmarried parents, wouldn't it be better for society and their country as a whole to challenge the behaviour of people who should be treated as sex offenders?
- Isn't fornication on the list of mortal sins for Christians? https://www.catholic.com/magazine/blog/are-you-a-fornication-denier
- If most Christians no longer know or care that fornication is a mortal sin, why not?
- If Christianity has failed to support the institution of marriage, is it because liberalism has replaced Christianity as the operating political orthodoxy of the West?
- Is liberalism now the operating political theology of the West?
- Is liberalism plus feminism an ideology promoting individual liberty?
- Does individual liberty include sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting?
- What is the harm to society if most of men are slut-fuckers and most women are sluts producing casually conceived and parented bastards more likely to end up in the prison industrial complex of America where slavery is legal?
- If people deserve the government they get, what kind of government does a society of sex offenders deserve?
- Does feminism turn men into women by encouraging men to think, talk and behave like immoral women who do not care that illegitimacy is on the rise because their friends and family are unmarried parents?
- Isn't Islam the religion that deals most effectively with widespread illegitimacy through sharia by stating that unmarried parents are sex offenders attracting the punishment of public corporal punishment as stated in quran.com/24/2?
- Isn't the fear of public corporal punishment the only way of discouraging more unmarried parenthood?
- Isn't it obvious that illegitimacy is the social disease that causes degeneracy?
- Isn't degeneracy the phenomenon of ever lowering standards of education and morality?
- Isn't it entirely to be expected that women who are always the ones left holding the baby after they have been pumped and dumped would predictably be the ones condoning ever lowering standards of sexual morality?
- If Christianity has utterly failed to maintain decent standards of sexual morality in the West as well the divine right to rule that it was established to protect, what is the point of Westerners who want better government using something that has been the equivalent of a torn parachute resulting in the deaths of parachutists eg the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, the end of Christendom in 1918, the destruction of the institutions of monarchy, marriage and the family?
- Is it Christian chauvinism that is causing Westerners to cling to Christianity as their preferred religion even though they know it has failed many times before a sustainable or desirable identity?
- Won't Western nations become weaker, more corrupt and be more left behind the longer Western governments continue to ignore the elephant in the room ie widespread illegitimacy as the agent of chaos?
- Are all women who ignore the elephant in the room the foot soldiers of the matriarchy?
- Why should women who have become foot soldiers of the matriarchy have their preferences preferred by Western men claiming to be concerned about the future of the West?
- Are Western men who condone widespread illegitimacy part of the vested interests of matriarchy because they too reject marriage as a way of getting sex and legitimate children from women?
- Is there not a single Western men in the West in a senior position in politics or in academia teaching moral and political philosophy or economics prepared to call out the degeneracy of the matriarchy or at least challenge my ideas in public under their own name?
- If it is the case that there is no Western man in a senior position of influence with any integrity, does that mean the West has become Sodom and Gomorrah and is about to be destroyed after having been warned?
- If it is the case that Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed after being warned, will the West also be destroyed after having been warned by Claire Khaw and ignored by its women represented by Megan Goldsby and Stefanie Cristos? https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+19&version=NIV
- Can Claire Khaw be faulted for trying hard enough on her own as a process server while being mocked attempting to serve notice on Westerners claiming to be Christian who are now frantically avoiding service and their moral imperative?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah If there are not even as many as two righteous women in the global hegemon that is America, how likely is it that there will be as many as ten righteous men?
- Wasn't Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed because there were not as many as even ten righteous men?
- Isn't it all the more disgraceful that in the entirety of the global American Empire, there are not as many as two righteous women or ten righteous men prepared to facilitate the discussion as to whether widespread illegitimacy is indeed a social disease that causes degeneracy through the corruption of morals and confusion of the intellect? https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/lord-spare-our-land
- Was it the intention of Megan Goldsby to Stefanie Cristos all along to trick Claire Khaw into revealing personal details of herself and then pretend that they never spoke to her by refusing to post their conversation which was the whole purpose of the dialogue?
38:00 Smart Christians are people who refuse to argue about the Trinity because they already know the Trinity is morally and intellectually indefensible because it breaks the first and second commandments. It is idolatry to worship a man. It is Supreme Blasphemy to worship a man executed for blasphemy as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who forbade idolatry and blasphemy.
On false pride
Moral women turning round the supertanker of matriarchy
The propositions in the Declaration of Independence are Islamic
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2026/07/why-is-it-so-hard-for-americans-to.html 1:00 I am the opposite of being a nihilist. 2:00 A n...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...
