Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative is the central concept of his deontological ethics, defined as an unconditional moral command that applies to all rational agents regardless of personal desires or consequences. Unlike hypothetical imperatives, which are conditional on specific goals (e.g., "if you want to be healthy, exercise"), the categorical imperative dictates action simply because it is morally right.Kant formulated this supreme principle of morality in several ways, primarily:Formula of Universal Law: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." This requires testing if the principle behind an action could be consistently applied by everyone without logical contradiction.Formula of Humanity: "Treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only." This emphasizes the intrinsic dignity and autonomy of every rational being, forbidding their use merely as tools for personal gain.Kant argued that moral worth derives from duty rather than inclination or outcomes. Actions are morally valid only if performed out of respect for the moral law itself, making the categorical imperative a rule of pure practical reason that binds all rational beings unconditionally.
THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Tuesday, 16 June 2026
The Deadly Sin of Pride prevents idolatrous Christians from changing their mind
Online cemeteries, expedition, engagement, Trinity, Orthoboneheads v Protestants
Trust, Blasphemy and Heresy
Dread Christian Nationalism Captures CRC Synod 2026
The Christian Reformed Church (CRC) does not officially endorse Christian nationalism. Instead, many CRC leaders, scholars, and publications actively warn against the ideology, advising congregations to place the Kingdom of God above any earthly political allegiance.Denominational Stance & ConcernsWithin the CRC and broader Reformed communities, Christian nationalism is widely viewed as a dangerous fusion of religious faith and political identity that risks elevating nationalistic goals over the gospel.Theological Critiques: Leading CRC and affiliated scholars emphasize that the church's primary identity is found in Christ, not in earthly nations or political agendas. Publications like the Reformed Journal have directly challenged congregations to confess and repent of temptations toward nationalist ideologies, citing concerns that fundamentalist theology has been misused to justify mistreating immigrants and refugees.Broader Reformed Consensus: Across the wider North American Reformed landscape, conservative bodies like the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) have released extensive study reports pushing back against aggressive, militaristic, or theocratic interpretations of Christian nationalism, helping believers separate historic Christian orthodoxy from online, reactionary political movements.Intersection with the CREC Discussions about Christian nationalism within Reformed circles often touch upon the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC).The CREC is a separate denomination from the CRC that has garnered media and public attention for its unapologetic embrace of Christian nationalist principles, such as advocating that government officials should be exclusively Christian and rejecting the constitutional separation of church and state.High-profile political figures and organizations aligned with the CREC—such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—have brought this ideology into the mainstream, though these figures represent the CREC rather than the CRC.Broader Perspectives in Reformed ThoughtWithin the broader Reformed and evangelical tradition, opinions on political theology and church-state relations are mixed.While mainstream bodies strongly condemn the exclusion of others and unbiblical impositions of religion, certain individuals and scholars (such as those tied to the CREC or independent authors like Stephen Wolfe) argue for a form of Christian nationalism. They advocate for a post-millennial view where nations and civil magistrates are theoretically subject to Christ.However, the overwhelming consensus among traditional, historic Reformed denominations (including the CRC) firmly rejects theocratic coercion, emphasizing that the church and the state operate in distinct spheres.
Monday, 15 June 2026
Zionism is an Anglo-American Imperial Project
— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) June 15, 2026
https://schachett.blogspot.com/2026/06/project-schachett-reviving-old-german.html?m=1
3:00 Nazis in the family tree
7:00 Daily Mail
Mein Kampf
10:00 Edict of Expulsion of 1290
Oliver Cromwell invited Jews back in.
11:00 Jubilee
Dickens, Merchant of Venice, Jew of Malta
12:00 Concentration camps
13:00 Holocaust Denial
Judicial Notice
14:00 Over-privileged Jews
The purpose of the US colony of Israel
15:00 Aden and Gibraltar
16:00 Holocaust Denial in Australia, Cananda and New Zealand
17:00 Fiddler on the Roof
Palestine Mandate
18:00 British Israelites
19:00 WW2 and Fall of Singapore
HMS Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese
20:00 Bridge of the River Kwai
The end of the Raj
21:00 Penal transportation to Australia
Jews in America sent to Israel
22:00 Sodom and Gomorrah
Lot's Wife
23:00 Israel faces the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea.
24:00 American Association of National Noahide Clubs
25:00 Lunch
26:00 Shaming people for going to hell
27:00 Americans self-certifying their beliefs
29:00 Atheists should at least be honest and reasonable people.
31:00 Lucas Gage - evolver?
32:00 Certain boundaries
33:00 People who don't care about facts and logic must be shamed.
34:00 The Fractured State
35:00 Jews and Muslims
Secular Koranism
36:00 Vincent Bruno should be the first American to adopt Secular Koranism.
37:00 The categories of Secular Koranism are clear.
38:00 One nation under God
39:00 All Vincent Bruno has to do is stick to his guns on SK.
40:00 Caleb Maupin and CPI
41:00 Imperial reform
Obamacare, Nixon in China, Carter was allowed Education and Sharing Day
42:00 Spirituality
43:00 Cognitive dissonance
44:00 Trust in government needs to be restored
45:00 Fundamental principles of morality
The unofficial religions of America: feminism, liberalism, antisemitism, Islamophobia, neoconservatism, neoliberalism, intersectionality, 12 Steps
46:00 12 Steps
47:00 Moral inventory
49:00 4th Step
https://www.aacle.org/docs/Fourth-Step-Guide.pdf
1:03:00 AA is distinctly American.
1:05:00 Jews are also scared of Muslims.
1:06:00 America needs an OFFICIAL MORAL SYSTEM.
1:07:00 Christian universalism
1:09:00 Orthodox Christianity v Protestantism
1:10:00 Theosis
THE DAILY STARMER joins.
1:12:00 White people in America are mostly of German stock.
People who ask each other "What is consciousness?" are hypocrites and atheists pretending to believe in Jesus
Pretentious people often ask "What is consciousness?" not to seek an actual answer, but as a performative flex to signal deep intellect, foster an air of mystery, and steer conversations into abstract, unprovable realms where they can dominate the philosophical high ground.The behavior boils down to a mix of psychology and social posturing:The Performance of Depth: It projects an image of a brooding, intellectual thinker. Because the nature of human awareness is genuinely complex—even classified by science as an elusive phenomenon—asking about it sounds profound without requiring the speaker to cite any actual data.Semantic Ambiguity: Words can be stretched to mean almost anything. By using a nebulous term, the speaker can pivot to vague, new-age concepts or pseudo-scientific jargon to mystify the people around them.Control of the Discussion: By introducing an unresolvable problem, they render everyone else's opinions equally valid or invalid. It shuts down practical conversation and elevates the speaker to a perceived guru-like status.Albert Einstein famously reduced consciousness to its true, pragmatic scale, noting that the feeling of being a "separated" entity is merely an "optical delusion of our consciousness". In many scientific and psychological circles, true intelligence is actually linked to asking precise, actionable questions to solve tangible problems rather than ruminating on unanswerable ones.
The Deadly Sin of Pride prevents idolatrous Christians from changing their mind
Christians who don't believe in the afterlife. 1:00 The features of organised religion AKA the Abrahamic God 2:00 Heresy and blasphem...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...