THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Saturday, 10 October 2026
The things we are not allowed to say
Chad and I chat about depression and mood altering drugs
Marriage is the most humane and fairest form of eugenics
— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) October 9, 2026
11:00 Everyone changes when they get older.
15:00 Marriage is more difficult these days because of fornication and no fault of divorce as well as gay marriage and transgenderism. But marriage is eugenic, but you cannot or will not believe this. Marriageability is a eugenic trait.
18:00 Marriageability is a eugenic trait.
Marriage is eugenic.
To be marriageable, you have to want to be married to a member of the opposite sex not within the forbidden degrees of consanguinity and someone in this group has to be prepared to marry.
18:00 No DNA tests for fathers in Israel. Shocking.
21:00 Even if all the workforce were robots, someone needs how to know how to maintain and program the robots.
It is easy to demonstrate that SK USA is more viable than whatever the moronic, mad and malign matriarchy has in mind.
23:00 So someone else agrees with me that the DNA of sex offenders and the offspring of sex offenders should not continue. If most Westerners are sex offenders now, they should repent. You could help with that.
24:00 Marriage prevents people from having children if they are unable to find someone of the opposite sex not within the forbidden degrees of consanguinity to marry them.
Why not use an ancient institution everyone is familiar with instead of building castles in the air?
26:00 You can have a eugenics programme without sterilising anyone if you treat anyone having children without a marriage license as sex offenders.
27:00 Why would the US government permit the Balkanisation of America just to try out the ideas of an unmarriageable man who would be treated as a sex offender in a theocracy obeying the laws of the Abrahamic God?
That is why you hate God so much, isn't it?
28:00 Why would a global empire want to turn back time to the time of ancient city states to prove ... what?
https://share.google/aimode/U810ODXd4vnBi4SwT
28:00 You should know that the Akkadian Empire which united Sumerian city states practised marriage.
https://share.google/aimode/EzFVo2bcgHDkhpcTs
29:00 Feminism is the problem, so take it out with the trash with SK USA.
29:30 Women would make rational and moral decisions under SK USA, but you refuse to support it because it is not your idea though you could benefit from it.
31:00 Why do you think heterosexual men and women would allow you - who would be considered a sex offender by the Abrahamic God - to breed them like farm animals? Who do you think you are?
32:00 There was a reason why men allowed women to choose their husband or bachelors would kill each other to breed with the most attractive women leading to the extinction of the group.
32:00 Most women are not moral and political philosophers like me. SK USA allows American men of fighting age and American women of child-bearing age to choose each other on the basis of their assessment of each other as a spouse and co-parent.
33:00 Women have always been hypergamous. Men would be hypergamous too if they were women. Only monogamy would prevent women from being hypergamoous. This means you would have to accept a lower status in society as a non-parent, but you are too selfish to consider doing so.
33:00 In order for women to choose wisely, they would have to have loving parents and an extended family. In order to have loving parents, they would have to be reared to respect their parents and elders.
It's so simple but you will reject simplicity because it is not your idea.
34:00 Patriarchy creates more marriageable men and women than a matriarchy in which all moral men and women would be able to agree with each other that the next generation should be reared by their biological married parents living together in a loving relationship.
35:00 Most women are risk averse operating within the parameters of the here and now of what is possible for them in their lifetimes. Men on the other hand are more capable of abstract thinking and future planning.
37:00 Why don't you understand that most people are not like you or me? Shouldn't experience have taught you that they are either too stupid or scared to think outside the box and someone needs to do it for them by being clear about the rules?
38:00 You don't seem to know that Nazi Germany was pretty sexually liberated after Weimar Germany.
41:00 It depends on how you bring up your children.
41:00 You contradict yourself. On the one hand you say it is bad that children are used as slave labour by their parents, on the other you say it is a bad thing that children no longer help their parents and slow them down. Make up your mind.
43:00 Just marriageable whites and non-whites should be allowed to breed.
43:00 SK USA would have a register of races to measure their success, but you refuse to support it because it is not your idea, preferring to inflict on your fellow Americans an idea that is experimental because you insist on rejecting God, organised religion and marriage.
43:00 There is nothing scientific about racism.
44:00 The story you mention about European women choosing a husband just by looking at their back is fake or just part of the fun and games of a folk festival.
https://share.google/aimode/Vuv9vyU6wvPn6cVQe
45:00 Which men are going to choose which women's eggs?
46:00 "Eugenic religious fervour" sounds like SK USA!
It is interesting how your ideas of eugenics lead to mass extermination for men you don't fancy.
It is not too late to repent with SK USA.
But you won't because it is not your idea and prefer your mad scientist one.
Friday, 9 October 2026
Jonah - God going out of His way to present the Ninevites with the possibility of redemption
Thursday, 8 October 2026
Khalid Safir on the Trinity, Jeffrey Archer, First Amongst Equals and soap operas
Wednesday, 7 October 2026
If you believed in the Abrahamic God, why wouldn't you obey His laws?
@SteveSkojec Is something evil just because you call it so?
— OOOTLAM/Operating Only On Truth, Logic & Morality (@Book_of_Rules) September 28, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/@TheMTSPodcast
10:00 PVK only promotes Islamophobes and Christian mediocrities
https://www.livingstonescrc.com/events/sacramento-estuary-conference-2026/2026-10-16
13:00 If you believe in God, nothing's random.
Protestants don't make the distinction between mortal and venial sins.
14:00 Felony and misdemeanour
15:00 Vincent Bruno's agnosticism
16:00 Organised religions are the Abrahamic religions.
17:00 Greater compliance with the rules of marriage in a patriarchy
19:00 Mark Parker
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2026/10/why-is-it-very-cynical-move-to-remind.html
20:00 Shari
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2026/10/deliberately-vague-questions-by.html
25:00 Choosing the religion of your parents in your next life once you realise Jesus is not God
27:00 Nathan Ormond
28:00 God made laws for us to obey.
Monster God
29:00 God if He exists is not going to conform to Mark's and other liberals' standards of justice and morality.
God is love according to Christian Universalism.
30:00 Bums on pews
31:00 Chad just wants a social club and a friendly society.
32:00 Sunday social club
33:00 American Association of National Noahide Social Clubs
34:00 Abstract ideas
36:00 Narratives
37:00 Keyboard Army
Jess Purviance
38:00 Estuary Protocols not necessary for men with close friends.
39:00 Fake debate about authenticity and sincerity
Why is it a "very cynical move" to remind Christians that the Abrahamic God made laws for us to follow?
There is no textual or historical basis in mainstream biblical scholarship or Jewish, Christian, and Islamic traditions for the claim that two different gods were involved in the story of Abraham and Isaac. [1]What the Biblical Text Actually Says (Genesis 22)
- The Command: In Genesis 22:2, "God" (Elohim) tests Abraham by telling him to offer his son Isaac as a burnt offering. [1, 2]
- The Intervention: In Genesis 22:11–12, "the Angel of the Lord" (Malak YHWH) calls out from heaven and stops Abraham, saying not to harm the boy because the test of faith is complete. [1, 3, 4]
- The Identity: In classical theology and narrative structure, the Angel of the Lord is not a second, competing deity, but a messenger or manifestation of the same single God (YHWH / Elohim) who issued the initial command. [1]
Why People Might Misinterpret the Story
- Distinct Voices/Personas: Some readers interpret the transition from a harsh demand for sacrifice to a merciful cancellation as a psychological or moral contradiction, leading some modern commentators to rhetorically ask if God was "only joking" or testing boundaries. [5, 6]
- Distinction Between Gods and Cultures: Scholars note that the story actually serves the opposite purpose—it contrasts the single God of Abraham with surrounding Canaanite or pagan deities who routinely demanded child sacrifice (such as Molech), showing that the God of Israel rejects human sacrifice and provides a substitute ram. [7, 8, 9]
- Gnostic or Alternative Views: Minor, fringe esoteric or gnostic traditions sometimes split the Old Testament creator God (the Demiurge) from a higher god of mercy, but this is a later philosophical imposition rather than anything derived from the plain text of Genesis 22.
Would you like to explore how different religious traditions (Jewish, Christian, or Islamic) interpret the meaning of the Binding of Isaac?
The things we are not allowed to say
Bonnie Kristian's book in defence of evangelicals https://firstthings.com/the-monstering-of-evangelicalism/ https://bonniekristian.subst...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
I think having your child diagnosed as having Asperger's is a kind of insurance against people saying you are a bad parent or that your...