Translate

Sunday, 22 March 2026

The Feminization of Society | Louise Perry and Mary Harrington

 


4:00  Julie Bindel, lesbian and TERF

8:12  Mary Harrington: "Liberalism has overreached."

10:00  Louse Perry: "I'm not sure what I feel about Post-Liberalism now."

11:00  LP: "Mamdani and others who embody the zeitgeist - they are not liberals. Their deepest commit are not to liberal ideas." [Nudge nudge wink wink]

"There are still classical liberals flying the flag, and in my heart I want them to prevail."

14:00  "Woke and post-embodiment"

Tumbler

15:00  "Body radicalism"

25:00  Women in public life and men allowing it

26:00  "Men not thinking with their brains"

27:00   "Conflict styles and cultural preferences of women"

29:00  The police force have made men obsolete?

31:00  Disenfranchisement of women

32:00  Women already have their soft power before the vote.

34:00  Church ladies

White women and white men

35:00  Do women love open borders?

36:00  Feminism and diversity

37:00  "People from Syria and the Middle East and their group-based sex attacks"

39:00  Grooming gangs

40:00  Civic nationalism v what defines a woman

41:00  Ethnicity

42:00  Biological denialism

"People indigenous to a particular country"

"Cis-English"

43:00  Rotherham

44:00  "Granular assessment of the truth"

46:00  Julie Bindel

47:00  Christianity and feminism

48:00  Catholic feminists

49:00  Genesis

49:00  Fertility

50:00  US Fertility gap: Republicans have  on average one more children than Democrats.

51:00  Parents parent their children to be more ideologically like themselves. 

52:00  Is it possible to be both Christian and feminist?

53:00  Rising homophobia

The future belongs to those who show up.

54:00  Maternalism

55:00  "Having children for the sake of the race" 

56:00  Lowering fertility in China

57:00  Smartphones

Affluent Western countries fell below replacement thresholds in the 70s.

58:00  Industrial revolution lowered child  mortality rates.

1:06:00  Reasons for failing to reproduce?
at No comments:

Many are called but few are chosen; the cure exists before the disease


11:06 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The only way to support marriage and family values is to shame SL*TS.

11:06 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​It’s ok to have a crush on Louise Perry, Chris. She’s wholesome. Your wife won’t mind. Much. 😊

11:08 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Unmarried women are pro-feminist before they are married and become anti-feminist after they are married.

11:09 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Mrs Chris is a very sensible woman!

11:10 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Female clergy gives a very bad impression indeed.

11:11 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The extinct Romans had the Cult of the Vestal Virgin. At first they had to be aristocratic virgins, in the end they couldn't even find non-patrician non-virgins to join.

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The Church of England submits to the British monarch and the British monarch submits to Washington. The Archbishop of Canterbury is a Creature of the Liberal State submitting to the liberal order.

11:13 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​But why should men get first dibs? And women can step up only if there’s no adequate man willing or able to do the work?

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​That was why the Founding Fathers rejected monarchy!

11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Absolute monarchy is absolutely corrupt.

11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​@stefaniecristos8514 Women's work is very important and we know the consequence of women no longer doing women's work.

11:15 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Rational people would want to live in a meritocracy and republic.

11:23 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​the majority of work is available to both genders if the appropriate gender is not available to do it

11:24 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​the idea of the nuclear family and industrial working system is the main cause of these issues because it removes the family members from each other

11:29 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
​#3
​The point of Joan of Arc is the same as Judith, that no good men were willing to do basic things and God wanted to show the irreligious faction that He could defeat them with a little girl

11:30 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​Off to church. Where my wonderful female pastor will be giving me communion this morning. 😘

11:30 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​property was defined around that time @SibyIsOracle before that people wouldn't think in terms of property like we do now. The English enlightenment was fixated on it because of the looting

11:31 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Nobody had total control over anything, but it was seen as a series of obligations relating to everyone else in the world

11:41 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​The purpose of human law is to make goodness simple and universal so everyone knows what to do and not to do. But religion has many other functions. God is the source of logic as the Son is begotten

11:42 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Him wearing the dress is also against natural law on one hand, but its a response to disorders on the other hand

11:44 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Saying we are descended from the Jews is the same error people make when they say we are descended from monkeys

11:50 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Common sense was taken away by media in childhood

11:52 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
​#3
​Much better than what the plutocrats offer to the commons


50:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss religion. 
51:00  God is real. 
52:00  Joan of Arc
David, Saul and Gideon
53:00  Book of Samuel

54:00  250 years of American history has allowed us to easily agree that a constitutional republic is better than absolute monarchy. It may not seem like much, but it is a giant step for the political development of humanity. 

55:00  A benevolent and morally perfect God would value obedience because He wants us to have the benefit of the protection His laws give and would note our stupidity or ingratitude if we don't use them properly or at all. 

56:00  Women in public life have the effect of making men suspend their critical faculties if they are attractive and making them misogynistic if they find them repellent. 

57:00  Republicanism is a form of egalitarianism, but we must not go too far in our egalitarianism.

1:00:00  Many are called, few are chosen. 

AI Overview

"Many are called, but few are chosen" is a famous phrase from Matthew 22:14 in the Bible, concluding Jesus’ parable of the wedding feast. It means that while the invitation to salvation (the call) is extended to everyone, only a few respond in faith and obedience to be accepted (the chosen), highlighting that many hear the Gospel, but few truly follow. 

Key Aspects of the Phrase:
The Context (Matthew 22:1-14): A king throws a wedding banquet for his son. Initial guests refuse to come, so the king invites anyone they find. However, a guest is cast out for not wearing proper "wedding garments," representing those who do not truly accept Christ's righteousness.

The "Called" (General Call): This represents the broad, universal invitation to salvation extended to all people.

The "Chosen" (Chosen Ones): These are individuals who accept the invitation, repent, and live in faithful obedience.

Meaning: It serves as a warning that hearing the message is not enough; one must truly receive it and be transformed, rather than coming on their own terms.

Significance: It emphasizes that salvation is by grace, but demands a genuine, responding faith. 


1:03:00  Louise Perry 

1:04:00  Social exclusion

1:07:00  Locker room talk, gender roles and gender segregation

1:08:00  Secrets and censorship

1:09:00  Patriarchy

1:10:00  Transgenderism

1:11:00  Female Archbishop of Canterbury and female general

1:12:00  The path of least resistance

1:14:00  The Abrahamic God is a logical construct. 

1:15:00  God's guidance

1:16:00  Judaism

1:17:00  Logical questions about Jews

1:19:00  The rules of reason and morality

1:21:00  Mens rea

1:23:00  Using our judgement

Common sense

Jury trials

1:25:00  The vulnerability of complexity

1:27:00  Instruction manual

1:28:00  Built in egalitarianism/feminism 

1:30:00  Sharia and the West

1:32:00  The Amish

1:34:00  Corruption

1:35:00  Hierarchy

1:36:00  Men are conflicted between the burdens of patriarchy and the temptations of matriarchy.

Rules are made to be broken.

1:37:00  Divine intervention

1:38:00  The cure exists before the disease.

AI Overview

"The cure exists before the disease" is a significant theological principle, primarily in Judaism, suggesting that God creates the remedy before the sickness, or that solutions (tikkun) exist before challenges (kilkul). It implies hope, divine preparation, and that for every spiritual or physical affliction, a remedy is already provided. 

Key Aspects of the Concept:

Jewish Theology (Midrash): The Midrash (e.g., Lekach Tov) notes that the command to build the Mishkan (Tabernacle), a solution for spiritual brokenness, was given before the sin of the Golden Calf, indicating the cure precedes the malady. 

Spiritual/Moral Context: It highlights that for issues like "baseless hatred" (the cause of exile), the cure—"Ahavas Yisroel" (love for fellow Jews)—is already inherent and available. 

Biblical Perspective: The concept is connected to the idea that God provides sustenance and healing, even while a person is on their sickbed. 

Islamic Tradition: Similarly, a Hadith states that for every disease, a cure has been sent down by Allah. 

Alternative Contexts:

Scientific Approach: While distinct from the theological concept, modern drug discovery, such as in drug repurposing, often involves finding that existing compounds (potential cures) can treat newly identified diseases, which can appear as if the "cure" existed before the specific application. 

This phrase serves as a message of optimism and comfort, emphasizing that hope and solutions are inherent in the world's structure. 

1:39:00  Id, ego and supergo 

1:40:00  Consultation ie shura

Accountability

1:41:00  Humility as a virtue that allows people to admit their mistakes.

at No comments:

"Laura Loomer and the Hindus - www.HinduJudeoFreemasonry.blogspot.com"

3:00  Space begins.

6:00  My cute avatar 

10:00  YouTube or X?

11:00  Clavicular and his looksmaxxing

12:00  We are being suppressed while others are being promoted.

13:00  Long YouTube streams that say very little other than a few mantras

14:00  Kevin Flatt

16:00  Christians

Paul Vanderklay

Moral clarity

17:00  Properly titling our Spaces

18:00  Laura Loomer, Trump's No 1 Cheerleader

19:00  Shouldn't Trump's Spiritual Adviser Paula White have more influence?

20:00  Secular Jewess

Noahide laws

21:00  Milo

26:00  "Islamic right-wing Communism"

27:00   "Anything but Islam"

28:00  Islam, China and Russia

29:00  Indians are more submissive to America. 

US-Iran War is about targeting China. 

30:00  Indian diplomacy

31:00  Indians are a Noahide servant base.

32:00  Vincent hopes for the obliteration of Iran.

33:00  Russia is technically still a liberal democracy.

at No comments:

A, B and B+ schools under Secular Koranism and the reintroduction of slavery


2:00  Deep fake of Donald Trump promoting Secular Koranism


4:00  Why Secular Koranism
A minimum standard of morality is required for all civilised societies. 

5:00  The prohibition of usury makes sense even if you do not believe in God. 

6:00  The consequences of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting
Labour shortage is linked to uncontrolled mass immigration. 
8:00  No fault divorce linked to feminism
9:00  Children of the marriage do not have their interests considered by selfish feminists.
11:00 Illegitimacy and birth control

The pill would be the privilege of married  mothers who have completed their families and part of the toolkit of prostitutes working in licensed brothels.

12:00  Children reared in fatherless homes

Abortion is a non-issue once you get the suppliers of sex to heterosexual men to adjust their behaviour.

AI Overview

The motte-and-bailey fallacy is an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates a controversial, hard-to-defend position (the "bailey") with a modest, easy-to-defend statement (the "motte"). Under challenge, they retreat to the safe motte, then claim victory for the bailey once the opponent withdraws. 

Key Components & Examples:

The Bailey (Desired Position): The controversial, often unreasonable claim the speaker wants to uphold.

The Motte (Defensible Position): A simplified, often trivial truth that is hard to argue against.

The Shift: A speaker says, "Social media is destroying society" (Bailey), but when challenged, retreats to "Well, it's undeniable that social media has some negative effects" (Motte). 

Common Examples:

"Crystals can cure cancer" (Bailey) shifts to "Well, feeling hopeful helps healing" (Motte) when challenged.

"All politicians are corrupt" (Bailey) shifts to "Well, some politicians are corrupt" (Motte). 

This tactic, identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel in 2005, exploits the audience's inability to distinguish between the two distinct claims, functioning as a form of bait-and-switch.

13:00  Modern contraception has caused a greater demand for abortion on demand. 

15:00  Rules are made to be broken. 

16:00  "Direct negative effect"

17:00  Latent damage

18:00  The cure is worse than the disease.

19:00  Corporal punishment

20:00  Men never suffer from unwanted pregnancy.

21:00  It is incumbent on the party most at risk to take more care. 

Shotgun marriage

22:00  Why the Koran?

23:00  Attaching myself to a rising religious group worshiping the most powerful being conceivable would help obtain support for my ideas than simply telling people what I think would be necessary to fix society.

The nature and purpose of religion

24:00  The belief that good will be rewarded and evil punished in this life and the next incentivises people to behave correctly. 

25:00  Secular Koranism is addressed to atheists, agnostics and nihilists and an attempt to regulate their behaviour. 

26:00  "There is a law against it and the punishment will fit the crime" is the ultimate deterrent.

27:00  Crime and prison statistics

30:00  Men of fighting age of all races and religions tend to get into trouble with police more than men not of fighting age. 

33:00  Hypocrites who claim to be a member of a religious group

34:00  The Religion of Mum and Dad

Cultural Christians and Cultural Muslims

35:00  Shouldn't America be one nation under God trusting in God?

36:00  Only 5% of Americans are atheists?

37:00  Heretics

39:00  Iran has made the most of sharia. 

40:00  Uncontrolled mass immigration

41:00  Trump, ICE and Minneapolis

Income

43:00  Comparative religion

44:00  IC codes

45:00  White Nationalism has become Christian Nationalism.

46:00  Dividing people into race

47:00  Raymond Cattell

48:00  The Domestic Partnership will replace gay marriage.

49:00  Cross-referencing race and religion for research reasons

50:00  Race distinctions

51:00  Freedom of contract

52:00  How is Secular Koranism "Nazi"?

53:00  Job application form

55:00  DEI and POTUS

56:00  DEI is the current Woke religion.

58:00  White males would benefit from Secular Koranism. 

59:00  My liberal instincts

1:00:00  Criticisms of Secular Koranism

1:01:00  Polari

1:02:00  SIMOS joins to ask about lesbians holding hands and kissing in public.

1:04:00  Niqab

Iran

1:05:00  Sykes-Picot Agreement

Horror story about Iran

1:07:00  Controlling the interpretation

DECONVERTED MAN joins to denounce me.

1:09:00  Why Secular Koranism

1:10:00  Secular Koranism does not infringe against the First Amendment because it is not the government establishment of religion. 

1:12:00  Vincent Bruno

1:14:00  Objective measure of mixed race people

1:16:00  Gender is a social construct.

Genomes

1:18:00  Authoritarian

1:20:00  WW3 is being started by America.

1:22:00  Secular Koranism was conceived of in 2009.

1:23:00  VINCENT BRUNO joins to discuss Beyondism.

1:27:00  How Beyondism works under Secular Koranism

1:35:00  The natural way

1:36:00  Polygamy and incest under Beyondism

1:37:00  Not a hereditarian

1:40:00  FANTOM asks about slavery on Secular Koranism

1:41:00  Opening a  Slave Manumission account at the Department of Work, Pensions and Manumissions

Queens who become royal nannies and civil slaves

1:42:00  Slavery was what made America great. 

1:43:00  Slavery is an institution like marriage and prostitution.

1:44:00  Homicide in its varieties

Slavery is a way of regulating labour relations. 

1:45:00  Work release and workfare

1:46:00  FANTOM steelmans my proposal to reintroduce slavery.

1:47:00  Chattel slavery and indentured servitude

1:48:00  ROBIN joins to discuss public schools under Secular Koranism.

1:49:00  A, B and B+ schools

1:53:00  Equal distribution of educational resources

1:56:00  To make a point

1:57:00   A year's period of grace

2:04:00  My response to Simos's criticism

at No comments:

Saturday, 21 March 2026

The position Tucker Carlson should take on Israel; answering Christian questions on Secular Koranism


Catching up with Vincent Bruno

2:00  Tucker Carlson should stop saying Israel because Jews will think he means them. Whether or not he means them is not clear. He could be taking the position that I take on Jews ie that they are leaderless people who mostly do not know what they were made God's Chosen People to do and don't care to know. 

3:00  Human sacrifice

4:00  Aztecs

5:00  Sacrifice of kings

8:00  Lion King

12:00  The inability of the non-intellectual to understand abstract ideas

13:00  Race cannot be your religion. 

14:00  The components of religion: belief, values and principles

15:00  Who gets to become leader under this group survival strategy?

16:00  Law and politics

17:00  George Washington's warnings in his farewell speech

18:00  The penny that democracy has failed has not dropped with Americans.

19:00  Corporate America controls America. 

20:00  The system is the problem, not Jews. 

21:00  A one-party theocracy

22:00  One Nation Under God

In God We Trust

23:00  Men without connections afraid of being identified as heretics

A people's democratic dictatorship

24:00  The West is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

25:00  Life continued though the Roman empire fell. 

Secular Koranism is a secular theocracy.

26:00  Free will

Tucker Carlson

27:00  Being accused of antisemitism

28:00  The plutocracy control representative democracy.

30:00  Fantasies

31:00  A one-party theocracy operating Secular Koranism


33:00  A Western War of Idolaters?

35:00  People suffering from learning disabilities

36:00  Masculine authority

38:00  The maternal containment of Paul Vanderklay using feminine stratagems

42:00  The church as a social club

44:00  "Spiritual lack" = lack of conviction 

47:00  TLC = The Church of Jordan Peterson

48:00  Secular Koranism on Tucker Carlson

50:00  What I am trying to get Christians to do

52:00  Vincent Bruno

54:00  OTN solicits my views on the US-Iran War.

56:00  Secular Koranism

57:00  OTN suggests I join the Green Party.

58:00  I speak mainly to Americans because Britain is a US vassal state and most Britons do not even know this.

59:00  US citizens are sponsoring the plutocracy.  

George Washington's warning against political parties.

1:00:00  Secular Koranism on Tucker Carlson 


1:01:00  quran.com/24/2
1:02:00  The purpose of 65:4
1:06:00  Government marriage bureaus under Secular Koranism
1:07:00  Prostitution
1:08:00  Fornicatresses as a group of women supplying sex to men will be squeezed out by wives and prostitutes under a restored patriarchy.
1:09:00  The dowry as a booking/reservation fee
1:11:00  Christianity failed to protect monarchy, patriarchy, marriage and the family
1:14:00  Bob the Builder
1:16:00  What are Christian principles?
1:17:00  The New Testament is trumped up by the Koran. 
1:19:00  Jordan Peterson
1:20:00  The Jefferson Bible
at No comments:

Friday, 20 March 2026

Vincent Bruno prefers Laura Loomer to Tucker Carlson because he fears Muslims more than Jews

2:00  Vincent has irritable bowel syndrome.

3:00  Martha Welch

4:00  Cult leaders who get people to do absurd things

9:00  Aztecs, trial by ordeal,  Salem witch trials

11:00  New diet

12:00  Psychosomatic

13:00  Peppermint

16:00  Fad diets

18:00  Weight loss

19:00  People go online to say "ow"

21:00  Repetition, obstructive self-destructive malice

22:00  Laura Loomer in India

25:00  Iran

https://theloop.ecpr.eu/india-in-a-fix-amid-us-israel-war-against-iran/

37:00  Indians are conflicted.

38:00  Laura Loomer has moral clarity?

AI Overview

Arguments for Laura Loomer having "moral clarity" generally stem from supporters who view her as an uncompromising, unflinching activist who draws sharp lines between good and evil, specifically regarding Western civilization, loyalty to Donald Trump, and the fight against ideological opponents. In this context, her supporters see her actions not as disruptive, but as necessary, principled, and bold. 

Here is how her actions and rhetoric are framed by proponents as possessing moral clarity:

Uncompromising "Us vs. Them" Binary: Loomer frequently frames complex political issues as binary choices, such as "freedom vs. tyranny" or "citizens vs. invaders," which supporters interpret as a clear, uncompromised moral stance. 

Single-Minded Loyalty: Her unwavering loyalty to Donald Trump is often framed by supporters as a steadfast moral conviction in a political landscape they perceive as filled with "disloyalty" and betrayal. 

Fighting "Western Decline": She views her activism, including civil disobedience, as a necessary battle to save Western civilization from threats like immigration, Islamism, and cultural liberalism, positioning herself as a defender of traditional values. 

Directness and Lack of Nuance: Supporters argue that Loomer does not use "soft" language or euphemisms, instead labeling situations directly (e.g., calling for "Jew hate" to be recognized rather than just "antisemitism"), which is seen as a form of unvarnished truth-telling. 

Proactive Action: Loomer has stated that she lives her life in a way that requires "no explanation" and acts on her convictions regardless of the hate or retaliation she receives, which her supporters view as true courage and moral conviction. 

Contextual Definitions of "Moral Clarity"

The perception of Loomer's "moral clarity" often hinges on the definition of the term itself:

Conservative Perspective: Supporters may view her through the lens of a "culture of life" or a "struggle of good vs. evil," where her strong stand against perceived enemies is seen as a moral virtue.

Opposing Perspective: Critics often define her actions differently, viewing them not as moral clarity but as prejudice, vindictiveness, and a "stew of grievance and hatred". 

Note: The results indicate that many of her statements and actions, such as targeting employees for disloyalty or calling for the prosecution of Democrats, are highly controversial and viewed by many as extremist rather than purely moral.

39:00  MAGA

40:00  Israel 

Jews are really quite stupid people. 

41:00  Penal transportation

42:00  Slavery

44:00  Americans cannot be trusted.

46:00  Tucker Carlson

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/tucker-carlson-cia-claim-laura-loomer-slams-foreign-agent-act-violation-reported-to-doj-101773536625327.html

53:00  Oil prices

57:00  What does Trump expect NATO to do?

1:00:00  Tucker Carlson

1:03:00  Israel is a proxy of Washington.

1:05:00  Tucker is the biggest antisemite in  America now.

In Israel, journalists are prohibited from publishing news about damage caused by Iranian missile and drone strikes, particularly impact locations or footage near military sites that were hit, without military approval.

Breaking such an order can lead to prison sentences of several years, and under state security laws, up to 15 years.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1465620711623496&set=a.658024609049781

1:08:00  Secular Koranism with American Characteristics

1:09:00  Indonesia

1:10:00  Nick Fuentes, Christian Nationalism

at No comments:

Why Muslims find the TLC hostile territory even if its members are not mostly Islamophobes



I suppose a gift of mine is reading people really well. In Claire’s case, I think she’s seeking fatherly authority. It's likely a reason she’s Muslim, because she perceives a strength in its rigidity and character. Her untamability I feel serves to highlights the lack of masculine authority in TLC. I’ve tried to point this out explicitly and even model it as much as a measly comment section allows, but she still participates in that lack in a more implicit, visceral way by joining livestreams.

TLC clearly operates as maternal containment. I think PVK is incapable of leading in a holy masculine way, as a pastor should, either because he had a overtly toxic relationship with masculinity in his upbringing (and just doesn't talk about it) or a very enabling one that modeled conflict avoidance over confrontation. Either way, his leadership style shows a clear affinity for the maternal, which then filters down and spreads throughout the entire community.

It reminds me of your conversation with Sam about him considering stepping back from TLC. Throughout that talk, Luke, it felt like you were only entertaining Sam’s doctrinal disputes because, deep down, you view that drive for clarity as a sort of "tantrum" that just needs to be let out of the system. You seem to think that sort of thing just stands in the way of relationships, that if you just let Sam "vent," he’ll be fine and come back into the fold.

Thats classic maternal containment. You aren’t guiding him toward proper understanding or growth; you’re operating from an unhealthy motherly relational attachment. My voiew is: To hide from the fact that your own relationship to conviction and clarity is unhealthy and points to a deeper lack, I feel you attempt to "dunk" by flexing your mystical muscles (as both of you did in this livestream). To me, that’s an obvious projection of insecurity.

In the end, I believe the collective lack of masculine direction is just the same as Claire’s. You are all the same; you’re just afraid to admit that. Until then, you’ll just go in circles with endless conversations and give into the vice of that. That’s what TLC is at its very core: a distraction from accountability and a way to avoid confronting a deep spiritual lack. You are all just using each other for that. That's the tragedy.

Another thought on Claire.

I recall the question circulating in TLC: why are no Muslims here? Well, Claire is your answer.

The only Muslim willing to entertain this space is a western female convert*. Islam has what TLC avoids: doctrinal clarity, dominant masculine authority, strong accountability. Claire comes in with that rigidity, yet retains enough western socialization to tolerate the maternal containment. She's a mirror and a bridge, but notice which direction she's moving.

A born Muslim (particularly a man) doesn't need TLC's relational warmth. They have the community. What he'd demand is strength and clarity this space doesn't provide. Absence of Muslim presence isn't closed-mindedness. It's structural mismatch.


*  Claire Khaw is not Muslim.  


EmJay2022:
In a catharsis-driven culture, the shadow doesn’t get confronted, it gets distributed. TLC ends up circulating tension instead of resolving it, where talking about the good replaces doing it. When the foundation is disordered, the space built on it will mirror that.

CK:
Neal didn't want to discuss politics. He wanted to read me the New Testament. This is something Christians do for comfort, defence, distraction or malice. "Ha! I got that dumb non-Christian to listen to me quote huge chunks of the New Testament at them that was not even peripherally relevant to what we were  discussing - they will never get back the time they lost again!"  They are not really interested in discussing whether the Trinity is really idolatry because they are not interested in examining their beliefs to fix their problems.

EmJay2022:
I don’t think what’s happening here is Christian at all. They may believe they’re proselytizing you, but in reality they’re trying to assimilate you. Convincing a critic becomes a kind of symbolic victory. Winsome zero-sum.

CK:
If they were being properly Christian, they would be threatening to burn me at the stake!


at No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

The Feminization of Society | Louise Perry and Mary Harrington

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Perry 4:00  Julie Bindel, lesbian and TERF 8:12  Mary Harrington: "Liberalism has overreached....