Translate

Sunday, 7 June 2026

Asking a Christian teacher in economics if Jesus would want usury banned


49:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the banning of usury.
51:00  Aunt and uncle who were missionaries in Colombia
53:00  There was a time when Christians did not practise usury in Christendom. 

Jews were useful to Christians when Christians wanted to borrow money from them. 

When Christian monarchs tired of paying back their loans, they would expel Jews from their kingdom. 

54:00  Would Olson like to ban usury?

55:00  When Claire said "capital", she meant "principal", clearly. If you have repaid the principal, you can default on the interest payments. Banning usury would mean making all loan agreements contracted under usurious terms illegal contracts which courts would not enforce. Have you decided if Jesus was for or against usury?

56:00  Low interest rates would cause a housing bubble, wouldn't it?

59:00  So what causes boom-bust cycles?

59:30  What is the point of the Federal Reserve if not to regulate the economy through regulating interest rates to prevent boom-bust cycles?

Making the point that God can be reasoned with if you use facts and logic


12:17 PM
@OOOTLAM
​#1
​What Christians don't seem to accept is that the Abrahamic God if He exists is ABSOLUTELY LOGICAL AND MORAL.

12:18 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
​​OOT, can you explain the logic of the Abrahamic God in the story of Abraham and Isaac?

12:19 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​If you are shopping around for a religion, it would be illogical to worship anything less powerful than the Abrahamic God.

12:21 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@stefaniecristos8514 A rabbi I spoke to said the story of Abraham and Isaac was God making the point that human sacrifice and in particular son-sacrifice was forbidden. Christians still don't get it.

12:21 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@stefaniecristos8514 Thank you very much for your question!

12:23 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​Yes, Christians are made to feel riddled by guilt the whole time keeping them from exercising their moral reasoning and solving problems with facts, logic and theology!

12:23 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
​​Yes, I think that too, but was it a logical way to make that point?

12:24 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​We must focus on the Big Picture and see things through God's "eyes". Sorry about the anthropomorphism!

12:24 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
​​Was it logical for God to create humans? Give us free will?

12:24 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
​​Seems like the most illogical thing in the world to me lol

12:25 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@stefaniecristos8514 If it works, then it is logical. Nobody has a better explanation. The Abrahamic God is meant to be a compassionate God, one you can reason with!

12:26 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@stefaniecristos8514 Perhaps you remember the story of Abraham negotiating with God to spare the Sodomites.

12:27 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@stefaniecristos8514 God was clearly prepared to negotiate.

12:29 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@TinyTimtom Sodom and Gomorrah remain in Israel. @YoavBressler confirmed that Lot's wife can be found in Israel.

12:30 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@TinyTimtom The stories are useful for moral reasoning.

12:30 PM
@YoavBressler
​​Actually these cities may fall on the Jordanian side of the current border.

12:31 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@YoavBressler Sodom and Gomorrah have moved to Tel Aviv with its gay parades.

12:34 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​Actually, there is an annual gay parade in Jerusalem too since 2002.

12:35 PM
@TinyTimtom
​​once your wife and children know the truth, cant hide your crimes any longer

12:40 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​My comment containing information about violent incidents at gay parades in Jerusalem cut and pasted from Wikipedia has been deleted.

12:40 PM
@williambranch4283
​​In stories, we can make absurdities, which is why atheists hate religion as story telling

12:41 PM
@williambranch4283
​​But Naturei Karta are legalistic extremists like you, Claire ;-)

12:41 PM
@YoavBressler
​​Wikipedia has been deleted?

12:42 PM
@OOOTLAM
​#1
​@YoavBressler No, my comment cut and pasted from Jerusalem gay parade Wikipedia entry has been deleted.

12:42 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 How am I an extremist?

12:43 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Monomaniac. Everything is White vs Black

12:43 PM
@LoricaSancta
​​I thibk Okson, that Athesists maybe enjoy stories with limitations

12:44 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 I am a political activist, so you would expect me to behave like a political activist.

12:44 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 What is so monomaniacal about behaving like a political activist?

12:44 PM
@williambranch4283
​​I don't trust poitical activists ... both my women are political activists too ;-))

12:45 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 You don't believe in good and evil or right and wrong, do you? That's because you're an atheist and nihilist.

12:45 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 Just because you don't want to do something doesn't mean it is wrong.

12:46 PM
@OOOTLAM
​#1
​@williambranch4283 Why do you think all political activism is wrong? Weren't the Founding Fathers political activists?

12:46 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Everything I disagree with is wrong ... said by every political activist ever

12:46 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Yes, America's Founders were damned

12:46 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 What have I said that is untrue or illogical? If the answer is nothing, then I must be right, mustn't I?

12:46 PM
@LoricaSancta
​​was Telemachus a political activist

12:47 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 How would you know the Founding Fathers were damned?

12:47 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Telemachus hated house guests

12:47 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Damned by me

12:47 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 Why?

12:48 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Being contrary in time for national celebration ... most non-Americans want the US deleted

12:48 PM
@TinyTimtom
​​come on WB, we know TLCers dont read Homer lol

12:48 PM
@williambranch4283
​​I read Homer before he was Simpson ;-)

12:48 PM
@LoricaSancta
​​he traveleld widely to build support , made promises, but was a servant of his own oikos. he changed Ithacan history...but wouldnt have been an activist.

12:48 PM
@SeekingGenuine
#2
​@tiny no we LOVE the Simpsons

12:49 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 I think America should fulfil its manifest destiny.

12:49 PM
@williambranch4283
​​To kill Islam?

12:49 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 Who is going to make America fulfil its manifest destiny? Americans.

12:50 PM
@williambranch4283
​​I have no hatred for any Muslim, or anyone else. How can I be American?

12:50 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 The Founding Fathers were proto-Muslim Noahides who started a series of republican revolutions that ended Christendom in 1918. Americans should be proud of this.

12:50 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Tayo ... Hell was made for people who question - Augustine of Hippo

12:51 PM
@LoricaSancta
​​augustine said that light was angels if i think or i like to think its thr spark of divine consciousness. me and Augustine differ on that maybe

12:51 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@williambranch4283 The full list of "unalienable rights" mentioned by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence are contained in the Koran.

12:53 PM
@williambranch4283
​​Aztecs thought the Sun won't come up unless they kill some sucker

12:55 PM
@williambranch4283
​​How many millions of pregnancies terminated?

12:56 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#3
​and Claire admitted she's a TLC member

12:57 PM
@OOOTLAM
#1
​@teestrypzSOG I'm on the list.

Saturday, 6 June 2026

Calling the masculinity crisis a Feminism Crisis for maximum publicity


11:27 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
​#3
​Just catching up. What are Christian principles of masculinity?

11:28 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#3
​Don't men hate women for being soldiers?

11:28 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#3
​Don't women hate men for muscling in on female spaces?

11:30 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire mentioned to me that she was banned from this channel because the men were not man enough to deal with her arguments and she said you would not like engaging with Muslims.

11:31 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire understands the principles of femininity, but perhaps not the practice. She would punch your lights out for saying she thinks like a woman, probably.

11:32 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire thinks of herself as stepping into the breach because she thinks Western masculinity has all but disappeared. Where are the straight talking men?

11:35 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire would say only women should say what they want from men and only men should say what they want from women.

11:35 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Where are the straight talking men in TLC?

11:36 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Isn't Muhammad obviously more masculine than Jesus? He was a married father and did not die a virgin bachelor.

11:38 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire thinks that the real religion of the West is not Christianity or Liberalism, but feminism, and men are no longer man enough to say boo to the goose of feminism. What do the men think?

11:39 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Slut-shaming is one of the more radical ideas of Claire Khaw, though it is hardly original to her! Fornication is a mortal sin, according to Christianity.

11:42 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
​#1
​Meaning crisis = atheism crisis = masculinity crisis

11:44 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Let's call this a Feminism Crisis for maximum publicity!

11:45 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire continues to hope that TLC will get her on Tucker who is the most masculine man in the US because he speaks truth to power.

11:46 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Did any of you hear Jimmy Dore rejecting liberal democracy on Tucker? Wow!

11:48 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Claire, the eternal optimist, thinks even gay people can support trad marriage because Dolce & Gabbana - two gay men - were able to acknowledge the role of the family in rearing the next generation.

11:49 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Feminism confuses men bribing them with cheap extramarital sex to keep them quiescent in their matriarchy and submitting to the loss of their First Amendment rights as husbands.

11:50 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Old men become women in their old age, fearful of their wives who have the power to make their domestic life miserable.

11:51 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Revolutions only happen when the average age of the nation is fighting age making men of fighting age feel they have something to gain with their testosterone and risk-taking.

11:52 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
​#1
​Sadly, old men become old women in their dotage. Claire has been known to say that the American nation now has the personality defects of Blanche Dubois.

11:53 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​What is the average age of America?

11:54 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​The median age of the United States population is currently between 38.5 and 39.3 years, depending on the specific data source and year (2024–2026).

11:55 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​This represents a steady increase from 28.1 years in 1970 and 35.3 years in 2000, driven by declining birth rates and increased life expectancy.

11:56 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​The cruel Hindu practice of Sati may be linked to Indians getting their demographics wrong at some time in their history.

11:56 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​State Variations: There is significant geographic disparity, with Maine having the oldest median age at 45.1 years and Utah the youngest at 31.2–31.7 years.

11:57 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Future Projection: The median age is projected to rise to approximately 46.3 years by 2100 as the baby boomer generation ages and fertility rates remain low.

11:58 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​There is no escape for men: they have to pretend that they are prepared to die for the principle of being men or else be mocked for being effeminate.

11:58 AM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​All women have to do is make men want to marry them again. This includes not putting out until they have the ring on their finger.

12:00 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Marriage just needs to be seen to be a good bargain for men again. This means married parents have to be privileged over non-parents and never married parents treated as sex offenders.

12:02 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Brett's experience suggests women just need to be able to learn to STFU until they have that ring on their finger. Oh, and promise to love, honour and *obey*.

12:04 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Men need to learn to step into the breach, and women need to STFU. Easier said than done, I know. Men need to be knights in shining armour slaying the dragon of feminism.

12:06 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​It is not that hard to make the argument that feminism destroys opportunities of women becoming married mothers. Women have been unwittingly recruited into being the soldiers of casual sex.

12:09 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​Gender is not a social construct. That is the most fundamental error of feminism.

12:11 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​There are two gender roles in the room. It only takes one sex to grab the correct one and the other would be left with the remainder. Who is going to win the contest of moral reasoning?

12:12 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#1
​What do you guys think of Claire Khaw's interpretation of the wife-beating verse in the Koran?

12:14 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​Claire Khaw likes to think that women could easily win the contest of moral reasoning by being the first to grab the correct gender role in the room. Sisters can do it for themselves!

12:15 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​We are the beneficiaries of generations of patriarchy, Stefanie. All civilisations are built on patriarchy and empires are lost by lowering standards of sexual morality.

12:18 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​It is so obvious that most Western men are reluctant to resume the burdens of patriarchy and they are of course burdensome also to men who certainly don't all want to be married fathers.

12:19 PM
@aspasiapsychology
#3
​The dream of success that was sold to all of us women.... "independence" is also part of what they tell us is successful.

12:21 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​The real point of patriarchy is SPECIALISATION. Men and women are mostly better at performing their most important gender roles and should retain these roles for the efficient functioning of society.

12:23 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​We don't have to be perfect, just admit when we have been in error instead of dying on the hill of our errors whose denial has now become our sacrament and sacred belief system.

12:25 PM
@aspasiapsychology
​​Superhero time.

12:26 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#3
​Yeah, we're running out of time and fuel.

12:26 PM
@aspasiapsychology
​​We need more playfulness. All of us. To see that scenario as the inner desire to be a superhero, unfold.

12:27 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#3
​We don't have to be marriageable to support marriage. Married people in a monogamous society are of course already unmarriageable!

12:27 PM
@aspasiapsychology
​​Nudge don't nag! LOVE IT.

12:28 PM
@MaryamSafiyaKhan
#2
​Claire likes shaking people by the shoulders ....

Friday, 5 June 2026

Craig Biddle answers my questions on logic and morality


1:04:00  Is morality logical?


Yes, true moral morality is logical. So you have to it depends on what you mean by morality. So if by morality you mean traditional morality, the idea that being moral consistent, self-sacrificially serving other people, that is not only illogical, it's absurd. There are no facts that support that idea at all. There's not a fact in the world that supports the idea that you should sacrifice for other people. 
On the other hand, there's a world of facts that says if you want to live as a human being, then you must act in certain ways and not in other ways. We're looking at recognitions of facts. And this is how Ayn Rand builds her morality. She recognizes the fact that the very thing that gives rise to the possibility and need of values for human beings is human life. 
In order to pursue values, you have to be alive. We can recognize that fact. If you're not alive, you can't pursue values. Bam. There's one fact that we can literally recognize and go, "Oh, yeah, that's a fact." Another fact is that if you want to remain alive, you must pursue values. If you don't pursue values, you will not remain alive. That's a fact, too. This is the rock bottom foundation of Rand's morality which acknowledges these two facts. In order to pursue values, you must be alive. And in order to remain alive, you must pursue values. These are facts and they're rock bottom facts because they're the facts that give rise to the possibility and need of values, which is the realm of morality. 
So, so yes, this morality is logical because we can see the facts that give rise to the need of values and the need of a code of values to guide our thinking and actions so we can live and that's what morality is. And that's why Rand's conception of morality is absolutely logical. 
But any conception of morality that is not based on observable facts or that defies or denies or violates observable facts like the the morality of altruism or the morality of the predator. I want to steal their stuff and if I get away with it, I'm going to be off at the islands and having a blast. That's not logical either because it's actually not true that that's good for your life. That's that's not what living a fully human life consists of. And the fact that some people are either too irrational or too stupid to understand that is on them.
You and I know that in order to live a wonderful life, you need the self-esteem that comes from being productive and you need wonderful relationships with good people. And that if you don't have such things and if you know you're a rotten person and if all of your friends are rotten also or you've lied to them to try to have relationships with good people. Your life is a mess. And we know that. Everyone who can think knows that this is true. 
So it's just not true that being a predator is good for your life. And it's not true that being an altruist is good for your life. What is true is that using your mind to understand, pursue, and gain and keep the values that constitute a fully human life. That's true. And that's what Rational Egoism is all about. It's about using your mind to understand the nature of human beings and human life and the requirements of human flourishing and then acting accordingly. All of that is logical and all of it is grounded in reality. 
So that makes this a rational moral code. Real morality, demonstrably true morality is precisely logical. That's what it is. And the other kinds of morality are the opposite, which is why no one should accept them and everyone should repudiate them 100% at every turn.
1:17:00  Is America one nation under God?

People can say America is one nation under God. But if I say America is one nation under God, does that make it so? We would have to identify that as a thing that actually exists or I would just be saying something that doesn't have any corresponding reality to it. The problem with saying America is one nation under God is that there's simply no evidence for the existence of God. People have an idea of God in their head. But even that is not in any way fully baked. Like if you try to say to yourself and and define what God is, you're going to have trouble because if you say, "Well, he's the guy who created the universe." Well, that that doesn't make any sense. The universe is everything that exists. And if God existed "before the universe", where did He exist? And what did He use to make the universe? And who created God? 

You can ask a zillion questions around just that one claim that He's the creator. That makes it pretty clear that there's that there's a problem there. And then there's a zillion other problems with the idea of of God. He's supposed to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omni benevolent. Well, these are all negative things. There's nothing that He doesn't know. There's nothing He can't do, and He's never done any bad. Well, those are negative statements. And they're not asserting anything positive about what God is. They're just saying that He can do anything He wants. That's not not asserting a positive thing about God. That's just saying nothing can stop this guy, but to define something, you need to name its defining essential characteristic and that defining essential characteristic has to be something that we can either perceive or have rational grounds to believe is in existence. 

Take the concept of rights that I was just talking about very high level abstraction so we can't see it. You can't see rights, you can't taste them or touch them but we know they exist because we can recognize the fact that for a human being to live he must be free to act on the the judgment of his mind and to take the actions necessary for his life right so we can connect that abstraction to perceptual reality. We can't do that with God. There's there's no connection there whatsoever. God is a floating abstraction. It's just an an idea that no one has ever connected to reality by means of evidence. 

So if you say America is one nation under God, you basically said nothing. Now I know that historically before before we had really good reason to throw this idea out and we do now. Human knowledge progresses and one of the beautiful things that has happened in the past hundred years is that Ayn Rand became an adult and learned how to write and produce novels and books and explained some things that hadn't been explained before. One of those things she explained is what rights are and where they come from. We no longer need to try to rely on the fantasy of God for the existence of rights. 

As I said, that idea, even though it wasn't true, served to found America because there was enough truth in that we have rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. 

And it's true that we need a government to protect those rights or to secure those rights. And it's true that we need to outlaw force in various areas in order to do that. The Founding Fathers and the ensuing government and legal system that was set up substantially did those things. But that doesn't mean that the concept of rights that launched all of that is itself grounded in reality. If we want to ground that in reality, we have to really ground it in reality and not keep talking about a god for whom there's no evidence. 

I come from a religious family. My father's a minister. He's still alive, still kicking and still doing Bible studies. And my friend Maddox on the call with us here is also from a very religious background. I know where people are coming from on this stuff. But I urge you to check your premises. If you accept the idea that God exists, why do you accept the idea that He exists? Is it because your parents, preachers, and teachers told you He exists? That is not a good reason to accept that He exists. Is it because the Bible says He exists? I can show you books that say He doesn't exist. So then you have one book says He does, another book says He doesn't. They're all written by human beings. 

So there simply is no reason to believe in God. And there's every reason in the world to stop believing in God. Because there's no evidence for Him and because the idea of God unleashes hell on earth as it has for millennia. 

So we could we could talk more about this and maybe we'll talk more about it someday, but whoever asked that question, I urge you not to try to conceive of America as one nation under God because there's nothing there. 

What we are is we're one nation under reason is what we are. And that's why I wrote this article titled America the Rational. If we want to support and uphold and better apply the actual principles on which America is founded, namely the principle of individual rights and the specific principles life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. 

If we want to to understand and uphold those things, we've got to stop pretending that they come from God and start recognizing that there's a factual foundation for those rights and we can understand them through reason. Because then we can explain rights to other people and then they can understand and go, "Aha, that makes sense." And then if a whole bunch of people start going, "Yeah, it really makes sense. Now we know what rights really are and we can understand them, we can we can advocate them, we can protect them, and we can apply them much better." Then we can make this make America the beautiful more beautiful, which is what I would love to do. And I'm sure you do, too. I'm sure you want that, too. So, but the way to do that is not to argue from from a religious basis for rights.

Does Objectivism have codified principles?

The answer is NO. 


How many errors of logic can you spot in Ayn Rand's Objectivism as explained by Craig Biddle?

Christianity is a verbal contract, Islam a written contract


Divine bargain
1:00  Contractual bargain
2:00  Covenants
King John repudiated Magna Carta.
4:00  Divine law is the way to eternal bliss.
5:00  The Trinity is idolatry. 
6:00  Jews and Muslims deny the Trinity.
Thomas Jefferson was a proto-Muslim Noahide.
7:00  The Jefferson Bible
8:00  Red Letter Bible contains the teachings of Jesus like the Jefferson Bible. 
9:00  The Founding Fathers kept Christianity at arm's length. 
10:00  The Proposition Nation that excluded monarchy.
11:00  Westerners do not properly understand their own history because they do not understand church history.
12:00  The First Seven Ecumenical Councils
13:00  The Abrahamic God that forbade idolatry
Idolatry is a mortal sin. 
Purgatory is a churn of reincarnation. 
14:00  Reincarnation is grade retention. 
15:00  The 36 capital offences of  Judaism
16:00  Jews who refuse to read the Koran
17:00  The Koran > The Torah
18:00  Order, progress and justice with Secular Koranism

Thursday, 4 June 2026

The goose of the immortal souls of Christians is cooked if Christianity is indeed idolatry

 

1:00  The importance of US voters
2:00  Hypocrites pretending to be Jewish, Christian and Muslim
3:00  Observance is linked to status in a religious group.
4:00  Genuine belief in the Trinity
5:00  Not everyone is like me and enjoys having my beliefs challenged. 



7:00  TLC should get me on PVK and then on Tucker Carlson.
8:00  The First Amendment rights of American husbands have been destroyed by no fault divorce.
9:00  Wives of TLC
10:00 Stenfanie Cristos complaining that I am always law and never spirit.


13:00  Are idolaters cursed by God?
15:00  I was not asking for God to interfere with the free will of Islamophobes
16:00  LLM
18:00  Moral laws would support social conservatism.
19:00  Pass mark
20:00  The goose of the immortal souls of Christians is cooked if Christianity is idolatry.
21:00  The Abrahamic God is the most powerful being conceivable. 
22:00  Hypocrites and their short term worldly concerns
23:00  Tunji
26:00  Spirituality
27:00  Sam Tideman
29:00  Right rituals
Classical Theory of the Abrahamic God
31:00  Cursed by God
32:00  Deuteronomy 28
Luke Thompson's universalism
33:00  Pope Francis saying everyone has a reasonable chance of getting to heaven.
34:00  Isn't hell inconsistent with universalism?
35:00  Luke's circular reasoning about univeralism
36:00  Orthodox Christianity is more antisemitic. 
37:00  Evangelical Christians to blame for Zionism?
38:00  Zionism is a Protestant imperial project. 
39:00  Jerusalem: And did those feet in ancient time?
41:00  Zionism


43:00  Christianity makes you stupid.
47:00  The Woo of Orthoboneheads
48:00  The Antisemitic Church of John Chrysostom
49:00  Arthur Goldberg
51:00  Americans don't understand the First Amendment.
52:00  Westerners must ask each other the nature and purpose of religion and what is their unofficial religion.
53:00  CIA and the Catholic Church
55:00  Are Americans too ADHD to read the farewell speech of George Washington?
57:00  Are American men too weak, divided and stupid to be capable of campaigning successfully to abolish no fault divorce?

Discussing Christian fatalism with @HelpfulAhmadi and asking if Christians think like atheists


Ghana as Khalid's WW3 home

1:00  Political apathy
Jordanians mostly suicidal.
2:00  Inertia
4:00  SK to the rescue of the world!
5:00   SK Ghana
6:00   Drama and narrative
7:00   "Swatted"
11:00  Convictionless Christians
12:00  Speakers Corner
13:00  The American Pope
14:00  Greg Johnson/Morgoth


16:00  Marriage is half of Islam.
18:00  God values obedience according to Deuteronomy 28.
19:00  Guilt and conscience
20:00  Freudian Theory of Id, Ego and Superego
22:00  Maslow's  Hierarchy of Needs
23:00  Lying to ourselves: denial
25:00  Noah's flood/ 
Christian fatalism
26:00  Extremes in Christianity
27:00  George Washington's farewell times
28:00  Third Temple
Joshua Shalet


30:00  Jews in Israel
31:00  Zionism
32:00  Young Turks and Rabbi Mizrachi
34:00  Israel is American imperial prestige.
35:00  MAGA
36:00  Corporate America
YouTubers self-censor.
37:00  Morality cannot be passed on without marriage. 

Patriarchy > Matriarchy

39:00  Sexist media posts
40:00  Women assume the law is moral.
41:00   American husbands are afraid of their wife.

42:00  Catholicism
43:00  Matriarchy
44:00  Women are mostly stupid and kind.
45:00  Islam is absolutely logical.
46:00  White grievance culture =  white supremacy
49:00  Bread and circuses
Dog training
50:00  Christianity
52:00  Denial
53:00  Low grade jobs
54:00  Usury
55:00  Sharia
1:14:00  
Guard rails
56:00  Emotions of hatred and fear
57:00  Muslims
58:00  Gender issues
1:00:00  Sharia is guard rails.
1:01:00  AA Daily Reflections
1:03:00  Twelve Steps
1:04:00  Paradise is for the generous.
1:05:00  Drinking to get drunk and forget.
1:06:00  No escape for men.
1:07:00  Giving men a stake in society.
1:08:00  The rules keep changing.
1:09:00  Confused men and women
1:10:00  Muslims win arguments.
1:11:00  Objective Ethics on the nature and purpose of religion
1:14:00  My proposed social and political experiment 
1:15:00  Hindus have a lower birth rate than Muslims in India. 
1:16:00  Morality is not possible without marriage. 
1:17:00  No morality without marriage.
1:18:00  Christianity

Asking a Christian teacher in economics if Jesus would want usury banned

49:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the banning of usury. 51:00  Aunt and uncle who were missionaries in Colombia 53:00  There was a time wh...