Fear not, Free Speech in Britain! Claire Khaw rides to your rescue!
Join the EMMA WEST (RIGHT TO BE MOUTHY) SUPPORT GROUP
"While I disagree profoundly with what you say, I would defend to the death your right to say it."
I don't think anyone feared any violence from her. She really was only just mouthing off with her son on her lap.
But then there is s 5 of the Public Order Act that could in theory get you done for shouting at your wife in public ....
The offence is created by section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986:
"(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he:
(a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,
within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby."
This offence has the following statutory defences:
(a) The defendant had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be alarmed or distressed by his action.
(b) The defendant was in a dwelling and had no reason to believe that his behaviour would be seen or heard by any person outside any dwelling.
(c) The conduct was reasonable.
Crime and Disorder Act 1998
Section 31[Racially or religiously aggravated] public order offences.
(1)A person is guilty of an offence under this section if he commits—
(a)an offence under section 4 of the M1Public Order Act 1986 (fear or provocation of violence);
(b)an offence under section 4A of that Act (intentional harassment, alarm or distress); or
(c)an offence under section 5 of that Act (harassment, alarm or distress),
which is [F2racially or religiously aggravated] for the purposes of this section.
(2)A constable may arrest without warrant anyone whom he reasonably suspects to be committing an offence falling within subsection (1)(a) or (b) above.
(3)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—
(a)he engages in conduct which a constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence falling within subsection (1)(c) above;
(b)he is warned by that constable to stop; and
(c)he engages in further such conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.
The conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) above and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.
(4)A person guilty of an offence falling within subsection (1)(a) or (b) above shall be liable—
(a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or to both;
(b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine, or to both.
(5)A person guilty of an offence falling within subsection (1)(c) above shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.
(6)If, on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence falling within subsection (1)(a) or (b) above, the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of the basic offence mentioned in that provision.
(7)For the purposes of subsection (1)(c) above, section 28(1)(a) above shall have effect as if the person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress were the victim of the offence.
If found guilty, Emma West would be liable to a maximum fine of £2,500.
I am pretty sure that in the countries of the people she is complaining about, people can have a xenophobic rant about foreigners on public transport without being thrown in prison for a week without trial.
What is the BNP doing for this woman? Nothing, it would appear from http://www.bnp.org.uk/ at the time of posting.
And then they complain when a foreigner does their work for them ...
Is Emma West A Victim Of A Twitter Hunt? Tweeters Want My Tram Experience Woman Raped, Shot And Knifed
"Sort out your own countries. Don't come and do mine. Britain is nothing now. Britain is fuck all."
Emma West did not use any racially derogatory terms. What she said is a indictment of liberal failure, with their shite schools and shite values, who have turned Emma West into what she is now: angry, bitter and marginalised..
She is being punished for being a party pooper, for reminding liberals that liberalism has failed the white working classes, destroyed their communities and their dignity after so many decades of "progressive" "education" that have made them unemployable and illegitimate, because people like her won't shut up and die the way the liberal political establishment want them to do.