Nick Griffin remains the alpha male of nationalism. This of course speaks volumes about the quality of British nationalism and the quality of British nationalists. That is why the Muslims and Jews run circles round the degenerate gentile British political establishment, perhaps.
It was pointed out to me that this is a non-story these days, and the examples of unscathed politicians were listed: Sir James Goldsmith, David Mellor, John Major, Edwina Currie, John Prescott.
It could be made a story that the British are no longer shocked, I suppose, because they are so degenerate that no one thinks anything of a politician expecting a sex act in a car park after buying a female activist a takeaway curry.
It could be made a story that Nick Griffin is not a gentleman, but, hey, who is these days?
Does it matter that the British do not think anything of this sort of thing?
Does it matter that when white men call Muslims terrorists, Muslims call white men paedos?
Is it OK for white men to be known as paedos by the "international community"?
Does it matter that the British no longer care that their men are paedos, their women are sluts and their children are bastards, because they have no pride and no longer feel any shame?