Translate

Thursday, 21 June 2012

Why nationalists should discuss eugenics


It is disgusting how doctors spoil the pregnancies of women by mistakenly telling them that their foetus might have something wrong with it, or even causing a perfectly healthy baby to be aborted because it was wrongly identified as Down's Syndrome or having some foetal abnormality.

If the law allowed infanticide by the parents of an unwanted and disabled baby then this disgusting practice of spoiling the pregnancies of women would end.

My cousin, an older mother, was offered an amniocentesis. She declined and was given a terrible time. In the end she had a healthy child, but her pregnancy was ruined by anxiety and fear.

While people condemn me for proposing this, they display no compassion and respect at all for the mother whose pregnancy is ruined by negligent medical personnel who are gagging to perform intrusive and unnecessary medical tests on mothers at the expense of the taxpayer.


My proposal would be cheaper and better for all concerned, but the benighted and hypocritical British are too irrational to even accept my reasoning.

I would expect a man to see my reasoning, but these days most of them have turned to women with their knee-jerk responses to the liberal imperative to be compassionate at all costs.

It is worse when they are supposed to be NATIONALISTS, and a nationalist is supposed to care about the long-term national interest.

Actually, these days a nationalist is someone who is just wants the other races to leave their country, even if it is AGAINST the national interest to do so.

The long-term national interest is not served by making parents bring up unviable babies at the taxpayers' expense when most of the British are now DEGENERATE, ie they are stupider, weaker, illegitimate, have mental health issues, suffer from obesity and are pretty much educationally subnormal when compared to other countries whose people are mostly NOT singly-parented, who are always being invited by the UK government to come here and do the jobs the white working classes cannot do because they are too busy claiming welfare and knocking up the next generation of illegitimate and unemployable NEETs.


If I had a severely disabled baby I would not demand that my husband pay to bring it up out of his taxed income.

If I had a severely disabled baby I would want a husband capable of telling me he doesn't want it, if I am too maternal and irrational to say so myself.

Perhaps that is why so many of the British are now disabled, mentally unstable, obese, welfare-dependent and unemployable.

British employers will understandably not want to hire disabled workers, but the British Nationalist does not care, as long as they can demand that I be expelled from the party just for saying I do not want to bring up severely disabled offspring who will NEVER AMOUNT TO ANYTHING OR MAKE ANYTHING OF THEMSELVES.


I would say that the white working classes are even less able to bring up their disabled children than the middle classes.

I think most British nationalists expect the taxpayer to pay for the disabled children of the working classes.

But how can you be working class if you are disabled?

Why should ANYONE else pay for the disabled children of the working classes who will never be able to work if their parents cannot do so themselves?

It is completely INSANE.

The British nationalist probably thinks nationalism is about giving the white working classes who don't like immigration exactly what they want, whether it is good for the long-term national interest or not.

I beg to disagree.

Too bad Nick Griffin is too scared to tell them any differently. Otherwise, he will be completely on his own after having been abandoned by the BNP core supporters whom he will have fatally offended.

Most people who think of themselves as working class no longer work because no sane British employer would want to hire them. Why don't we just be honest and call them the LOWER CLASSES?

Why is British nationalism about representing these people? What hope can there be for nationalism if it only identifies itself with angry losers who cannot compete with foreign labour even in the field of unskilled manual labour??

The problem about British nationalism is therefore the problem of CLASS.  If UKIP were all racist they would probably get away with it because of their class.

What the voting public cannot stand is the idea of voting for a party that is both lower class and racist even if they agree with most of their policies.

It is therefore interesting to know that anyone genuinely patriotic who joins the BNP will find UKIP membership forever closed to him, leaving him with no other option but the useless and anodyne English Democrats and the even more untouchable and socially retarded NF who still insist on repatriating non-white British citizens.

For this reason the BNP should go civic nationalist, but Nick Griffin will do no such thing because he knows that this restriction from joining UKIP will make anyone of any talent still in the BNP less likely to challenge him on anything.


After all, anyone who crosses him will be finished in nationalism, and they will be expelled from their social club which they mistakenly think is fit for the purpose of being a political party.

The problem of British nationalism is therefore easily solved.

Go civic, discuss eugenics (ie reconsecrate the institution of Marriage by denouncing the evil and irrational  destructiveness of anti-eugenic feminism) and have me as your leader.  This would attract the educated, firm of mind and well-healed who do not flee and cower, like UKIP, the moment the R word is used against them.

I will transform the image of British nationalism and turn the British into a people who are rational, robust and resourceful, as their ancestors were, rather than the race of obese, sexually-diseased, fertility-impaired, mentally ill, learning and physically disabled illegitimate sex-addicted PC homosexuals they have now become.  All these problems can be laid at the disgraced and degenerate door of FEMINISM.

Satirical references have been made about my resemblance to Davros by my political ally David Jones, but I regard that as a compliment.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davros

If we form a party we will call it the Herbert Spencer Party of British Nationalism, so people will know exactly what we stand for.


Do not believe any stories about me being racist.   I do not have a single racist bone in my body.  If you are a voting citizen of this country and think that the lunatics are already in charge, I urge you to get in touch if you want to be involved in the establishment of a rationally small government, with lower taxes and fewer laws, which will herald the return of male and parental authority and end the rule of insane anti-eugenic feminist harridans.   

If you have children - whether legitimate or illegitimate - you would want a better future for them with a better quality of partner than you yourself have managed to find, would you not?

How can you have a better future when no political party dares to discuss the abysmal quality of the British gene pool?

Even the Muslims have become degenerate because they are so disgusted with the depravity of the locals that they refuse to breed with them and feel forced to marry and breed with their first cousins, which leads to birth defects that the NHS has to deal with.

This is a message to all the British citizens of all races who want the country turn over a new leaf from their slut and bastard ways and want to have in charge politicians to be capable of discussing difficult moral issues publicly, who know the meaning of free speech (which will be protected under the new constitution I have in mind) and are prepared to stand up for it.

Get your country back from the lunatics, SMASH FEMINISM.  

Go and discuss feminism with someone.  That is all you need to do.  Get this shit ideology exposed for the shit ideology that it is.   

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

A brilliant article Claire.

“The long-term national interest is not served by making parents bring up unviable babies at the taxpayers' expense” – true, but whose interest is served by this?

“British employers will understandably not want to hire disabled workers?” - they haven’t got much choice under the current regime!

“I think most British nationalists expect the taxpayer to pay for the disabled children of the working classes.” – they would do if they are national socialists.

“Why should ANYONE else pay for the disabled children of the working classes who will never be able to work if their parents cannot do so themselves?” – exactly, same could be said for a lot of things we have to pay for

“Why don't we just be honest and call them the LOWER CLASSES?” – what happened to the term ‘underclass’? Or how about ‘outcastes’?

“What the voting public cannot stand is the idea of voting for a party that is both lower class and racist even if they agree with most of their policies.” – so true!

“If we form a party we will call it the Herbert Spencer Party of British Nationalism” - what we need is not national socialism, but national elitism!