@shadihamid You risk making the same mistake as Goodhart, which is to believe upsetting "sensitive" liberals is an end in itself.— Jonathan Shainin (@jonathanshainin) March 20, 2017
It shocked me to read of David Goodhart apparently confused with me. While I am generally known to be a horror known for upsetting libtards through the use of truth and logic, David Goodhart is politeness and charm personified. I also look nothing like heartthrob Colin Firth.
|Is this Colin Firth?|
|Is this David Goodhart?|
Arrived today.— A Libertarian Rebel (@A_Liberty_Rebel) March 21, 2017
Intended just quick skim, but ended up reading all afternoon.
VG, illuminating, & thought-provoking.
Thanks, @David_Goodhart pic.twitter.com/nzOanUlfRd
Apparently, Jonathan Shainin and others of his ilk do not believe that white people have the right to national self-determination, though for some reason other races do, which is a bit racist, don't you think?
Why would the dominant race of any nation passively accede to allowing so many other races into their country in the name of being non-racist until they are no longer the dominant race, just because middle class feminazis in the Labour Party insist they must do so?
Why would any group voluntarily agree to lose status and be overwhelmed by other groups when they can easily prevent it by eradicating feminism and socialism? It is truly a mystery.
As I keep saying to anyone who will listen, the slut and socialist are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.
Letter to the FT about David Goodhart's case for "white self-interest" from US political scientist: pic.twitter.com/J06v0nfiul— Jonathan Shainin (@jonathanshainin) March 7, 2017