@Philosophi_Cat is clearly offended by Offensive White Man who said:
There is no bigger traitor in the history of the world than white women.
She says the white sharia meme is not funny. So what? Who cares what she finds funny or not funny? "It's just putting off women", she says. Putting women off what?
From being in the alt-right? Other than myself, I don't know of a single alt-right female YouTuber with a single original idea in her head. The only thing they have going for them is that they are easy on the eye. This means they will just end up distracting the men with their looks while inflicting on them the mediocrity of their thinking and the sheer banality of their views.
I cannot prove this, but it is perfectly possible that the White Sharia meme came from my idea of Secular Koranism.
I have been saying for a while now that the women should just be silent instead of competing against men and distracting them, even from the work of nationalism.
But what about me, you ask.
Am I not a woman?
I am the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman, conscious of my feminine privilege.
@Philosophi_Cat complains that offensive white men cannot make up their mind whether White Sharia is a joke or whether it is something they really really want.
She clearly fears they are not joking and might really really want it, and wants to censor debate on it. Typical female.
White Sharia represents a threat to white women, so I think we have every reason to get upset with it when it is promoting violence against us and it's really not done in a joking way.
Cut to the two offensive white men salivating at the idea of Patriarchy 2.0 without the Chivalry Edition talking about "Administrative Beatings" and "Punishment Beatings". They briefly discuss FGM and decide that on the whole it would be better if women were permitted to keep their clitorises because this would facilitate orgasm and facilitating orgasm would make women more likely to be impregnated, thereby pushing them closer to the state of being pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen, which is apparently the state of subjection white nationalist men dream of imposing on white women.
Nevertheless, if white feminist voters are preventing white male voters from getting their country back, then feminism is the cock blocker of nationalism and must be dealt with accordingly if you are a nationalist not easily put off when treacherous women throw their unfounded objections your way, must it not?
The subject must still be discussed, not just censored by alt-right female YouTubers, mustn't it?
When the offensive white men say that White Sharia is not Muslim Sharia but Traditional Christianity, she says there's very little that's Christian in what these offensive white men are saying, and says she doesn't think they are religious.
"Sharia is a lot more than putting women in their place," she says sternly. "It is cold cruel law governing every aspect of a person's life and it's incredibly harsh and brutal," she warns. "While Christianity did take away some of the freedoms pagan women enjoyed, it was never as controlling as Islam. Even under Christianity, European women still had to give their consent to marriage. They did have rights, and the idea that Christianity was ever as repressive as Islam is a lie that comes from feminists and Marxists to turn people away from religion. "
I have news for you, woman,
The Koran allows divorce and has a whole chapter on it.
It was Jesus who forbade divorce.
19 When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went into the region of Judea to the other side of the Jordan. 2 Large crowds followed him, and he healed them there.
3 Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
7 “Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?”
8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. 9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
"Islam literally means submission and it has a very black history of erasing peoples and cultures that it conquers."
Really? What is this building? Can you tell me what it is, boys and girls?
Wagging her finger at us, she says: "Don't think for a second that introducing White Sharia for white people is going to save European culture. You don't save your culture by adopting an alien culture."
Actually, what passes for Western morality (which she confuses with Western "culture") is rotten through and through and can no longer be saved. However, white people and their descendants still could in theory be saved from deepening and accelerating degeneracy, especially if they admit to the grave errors of liberalism, feminism, the sex revolution, indiscriminate universal suffrage, gay marriage, pluck up the courage to tell fornicating feminists to fuck off and pass a law shaming sluts as prescribed by https://quran.com/24/2
"I am not entirely sure why these people think sharia is a good idea. Are they obviously too dumb to figure out how their own culture works so they think Arabs with a double digit IQ have a better idea?"
How well is our idiocracy working?
Researchers say Western IQs dropped 14 points over last century
Isn't it funny how they've introduced a foreign idea like sharia and suddenly there's discord on the right? Why sow division among your own? How retarded are these people? If we want to save our culture, we need to venerate it, not to adopt the enemy's culture. This plays right into the hands of Muslims trying to take over our country. If I were a Saudi Wahhabist, I'd be quite pleased about the subversion of the right. At best these guys are uncreative and at worst they're completely compromised by Arabs. Why not actually use a term that is actually relevant to European culture if you want to promote such ideas? Why use the language of the invaders? You may as well wave the white flag of surrender because it is going to be the only white thing left soon. These guys sound like crypto-Muslims. They're promoting female genital mutilation, which has never been part of European culture, wanting to rape women as a means of control, talking about harems. It's kind of hard to believe their line about traditional Christianity.
Actually, these offensive white men said they women should keep their clitorises in order to facilitate pregnancy.
While women have rape fantasies of being raped, men also have rape fantasies of raping women. No rational patriarchy would allow men to go round raping other men's wives, mothers, sisters, daughters, would they? Obviously not, so there is no need for women to get unduly alarmed by hordes of men in a patriarchy going around raping other men's women.
Violence against women is normalised in Africa and Arab cultures where Islam is rampant. It has never been part of European culture and is not the kind of behaviour white men should aspire to. White Sharia comes across as a cover for their misogyny and sexual aggression. For all their talk of being alpha, they have not mastered their emotions and basic urges. Sexual aggression is not an alpha behaviour. It is the behaviour of someone who is uncontrolled and impulsive. There is a lot of self contradiction in these men and I am not sure they are the kind of people who would ever be capable of saving Western civilisation and are far too busy thinking about sex and not even honest about it. How are you a real man if you are going to be coy and manipulative with your intentions just like the women you complain about, in which case are women actually that bad or are you just projecting your emotional baggage on to women as a scapegoat? I am not actually all that worried about White Sharia becoming a real thing because the majority of men won't even go for it. The only men who support women being raped or forcibly impregnated are men who aren't capable of providing a safe, secure and loving environment for women in which she would willingly want to have children. Most white men don't have the insatiable blood lust that some other races do. They don't get off on the kind of stuff these guys are on about. Most white women would be horrified by it and the thought of raping a women would be a huge turn off. A lot of men would find it emasculating to be reduced to beating up a woman just to get sex. Making two-hour long podcasts about all the ways in which you want to abuse women is really creepy. White men are better than that. It's what sets them apart from the others. If you've got mummy issues and you have bad relationships, go get some therapy for your sick revenge fantasies because you're not normal and you're not helpful. They say they only want to rape women who didn't have good fathers and that somehow by raping them they are going to correct the raising that those girls didn't have so their attempts to prey on women who had terrible childhoods and are already traumatised and abuse them further although telling themselves that they are somehow doing the right thing by her and we're supposed to believe that is alpha behaviour. I don't think so. It's just disgusting.
Audio clip of offensive white men joking about raping fatherless sluts.
In the Koranic theocracy that I envisage, immoral fatherless sluts would end up working a brothel, and they would be given the option of refusing sexual services to any man whom they didn't fancy providing sexual services for.
In the Koranic theocracy that I envisage, brothel-keeping would be legal, government-inspected and licensed.
She rants on about the White Sharia meme being as degenerate as Hollywood. She calls it "a Trojan Horse for misogynistic men to push their agenda."
They aren't nationalists. Nationalism is about love. You can't call yourself a nationalist when you have such contempt for half your race. They talk about women like we aren't also suffering because of feminism. Feminism has gone out of its way to denigrate women claiming we have to act like men in every aspect of our lives or feel ashamed of ourselves. Feminism tells us we have to meet impossible standards of self-acceptance just so it can demoralise us and humiliate us further. White women are suffering just as much as white men in this disturbing propaganda of self-hatred. Why are these guys acting like women aren't being attacked too? Why are these men merely twisting the vice from the other end to crush women completely? If this meme can't produce positives that outweigh its negatives and the people who advocate for it can't produce an argument for it other than some unnecessary emotional outburst, then it needs to be counter-signalled till it dies and the guys promoting it cannot be considered thought-leaders of any kind. After all, would you like to be ruled by a group of men who only got a wife and kids because they kidnapped and raped her or would you like to be ruled by men who have a wife and kids because they earned it?
Has Philosophi_Cat in any way dealt with any of the issues @MGTOWisFREEDOM raised? NOPE.
Any further questions posted to me about Claire Khaw will result in blocking.