Henry V to the Archbishop of Canterbury:
My learned lord, we pray you to proceed
And justly and religiously unfold
Why the law Salique that they have in France
Or should, or should not, bar us in our claim:
And God forbid, my dear and faithful lord,
That you should fashion, wrest, or bow your reading,
Or nicely charge your understanding soul
With opening titles miscreate, whose right
Suits not in native colours with the truth;
For God doth know how many now in health
Shall drop their blood in approbation
Of what your reverence shall incite us to.
Therefore take heed how you impawn our person,
How you awake our sleeping sword of war:
We charge you, in the name of God, take heed;
For never two such kingdoms did contend
Without much fall of blood; whose guiltless drops
Are every one a woe, a sore complaint
'Gainst him whose wrong gives edge unto the swords
That make such waste in brief mortality.
Under this conjuration, speak, my lord;
For we will hear, note and believe in heart
That what you speak is in your conscience wash'd
As pure as sin with baptism.
Neocons organized in the American Enterprise Institute and The Heritage Foundation to counter the liberal establishment
Arthur Brooks – President of the American Enterprise Institute
Danielle Pletka – Senior Vice President of the American Enterprise Institute for Foreign and Defense Studies, former member of Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Gary Schmitt – Resident Scholar, Co-Director of the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies and Director of the Program on American Citizenship at the American Enterprise Institute, former Executive Director, Project for the New American Century, Executive Director for President Reagan's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, White House The Weekly Standard
Frederick Kagan – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
Joshua Muravchik – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
Michael Rubin – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
Think tanks, such as the American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, and the Atlantic Council, speak for those who fund them. Increasingly, they speak for the military/security complex, American hegemony, corporate interests, and Israel.
My view is that feminism operates by bribing men with fornication and other forms of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and distracting both men and women from the parenting of legitimate children. This adversely affects the quality of the national gene pool and causes what is know as degeneracy.
Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.
All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining, primitive and extinct civilisations are matriarchies.
A patriarchy is a society governed by the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy is a society governed by the preferences of unmarried mothers.
The West is now a matriarchy, and Britain has been a matriarchy since 1974.
Keith Joseph, Jew:
The balance of our population, our human stock is threatened. A recent article in Poverty, published by the Child Poverty Action Group, showed that a high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring them up. They are born to mother who were first pregnant in adolescence in social classes 4 and 5.
Many of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness which are more important than riches. They are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels for drifters.
Yet these mothers, the under-twenties in many cases, single parents, from classes 4 and 5, are now producing a third of all births. A high proportion of these births are a tragedy for the mother, the child and for us.
I do not see how anyone can deny this, but I wonder if Rabbi Sacks will continue to remain tight-lipped on the subject, perhaps out of fear of upsetting his wife, his two daughters or any granddaughters he may have.
My political activism consists of taking the problem to the person most in a position to address the problem of the West. I had an eureka moment when I arrived on Rabbi Sacks, but perhaps I should go over him and approach his wife, so she will give him permission to discuss the problem publicly and frankly.
After all, in important matters of morality, moral and reasonable men and women should have no disagreement and I have no doubt that the Rabbi Sacks' wife is not only moral, but in fact saintly. It is probably because he knows how blessed he is to have her as a wife that he does not wish to offend or upset her.
Rabbi Sacks discussing female moral development with two Jewesses one of whom is a feminist
The talk was supposed to be about moral education for Jewish women, but even Rabbi Sacks bottled out of discussing it, or the topic was changed at the last minute.
If anyone asks what Jews are for, then the answer must surely be that they are her to set moral standards for the rest of us by reminding us of the Seven Noahide laws. Perhaps Rabbi Sacks will consider discussing how many of these the errant British government has transgressed. It is after all a religious duty of Jews to repair the world under the principle of tikkun olam while Muslims have theirs of enjoining good and forbidding evil or waging jihad against the injustice, evil, degeneracy and dementia of feminist oppression.
Why democracy and feminism should be taken out with the trash in conformity with the principles of teshuvah
How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties and lowered our IQ
Pisa tests: UK lags behind in global school rankings
Christianity is now a moral vacuum filled by the disease of the mind that is feminism that bribes men and women with sexual freedom to distract them from maintaining and defending the patriarchy. For their own sakes, Jews should point out the failure of Christianity and suggest a replacement religion bearing in mind that not everyone is a Jew or is capable of adhering to its high-maintenance practices. The answer seems obvious to me, anyway, just as if it were a mathematical problem.
Rabbi Sacks and the consequences of his support for women's rights
Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them
What are the limits of Jewish responsibility?