Monday, 16 February 2015

Rationalism demonstrably a superior methodology to empiricism in matters of morality




The “no difference” theory is dead A US study finds that opposite-sex parents are better than same-sex parents.

Same-sex marriage and children’s well-being: Research roundup

The debate on the question of whether children brought up by gay parents do worse than children brought up by their biological parent married to each other living with each other is already a foregone conclusion, but the proponents of gay marriage know they can manipulate the evidence and pull wool over the eyes of those who are naive enough to wait for "all the evidence to come in".

A million Londoners worked out, using deductive reasoning, that invading Iraq would be a bad idea. Yet our MPs ignored them relying on the sexed-up Iraq dossier whose evidence was obviously distorted and manipulated to get Blair what he wanted: a chance to fight shoulder to shoulder with America in an unnecessary and aggressive war.

How do I know that the evidence in the Iraq dossier was obviously sexed-up and unreliable?

Because the Iraq Inquiry was announced in 2009 but the results of its investigations are still being withheld.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Inquiry

Because its findings are even now being withheld, we can conclude that they would be enormously damaging to the reputations of all those who voted for it, many of whom are still in Parliament.

The warmongering cunts who supported the Iraq war can be found at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2862397.stm

78% of the female MPs who voted for the war were Labour MPs and they are listed at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/78-of-warmongering-female-mps-were.html

Did you know that 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html Women are said not to be very good at thinking in the abstract, and tend to "reason" with their emotions. This may explain why women are less likely to defend the principle of free speech, because they are probably not quite sure what a principle is and what it is for. Men, knowing that reasoning with women is a futile exercise, end up by just trying to understand and predict their moods. In the process of doing so, they too have begun to think like women and now behave like women, and that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet. If it hasn't quite done so yet, it is perhaps analogous to a turd that keeps not being flushed away, but in time it will dissolve and go the way of all that is rotten, useless and past its sell by date, such as feminism and representative democracy ...

There is a reason why advanced societies are patriarchies.

There is a reason why patriarchies run on marriage the way cars run on petrol.

There is a reason why only social conservatism will respect the institution of marriage.

There is a reason why extramarital sex is always linked with degeneracy and the decline and fall of a civilisation.

There is a reason why all the Abrahamic faiths sanctify marriage.

There is a reason why there are no matriarchies that are also advanced civilisations.

From the answers to these questions, it is possible to deduce why extramarital sex is bad for your civilisation, but these empiricist proponents of gay marriage will bury their heads in the sand and ignore every appeal to reason and decency until "all the results are in".

Sadly, Western philosophers choose not to consider these questions but prefer ask each other stupid questions such as "What is consciousness?" and then not answer them properly.



Example of deductive reasoning:


Note how the angry and confused libtard keeps demanding "evidence" which even if given he would dismiss out of hand.  It is also telling that he cannot specify exactly the kind of evidence he requires. I had in fact already presented him with the evidence: the statistic that 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. He was so bent on dismissing the evidence that he pretended he had not received it even when he had already responded to it.


You are a rationalist using deductive reasoning if you conclude that gay marriage must be bad for society, and you will only accept this if you agree that marriage should only be for heterosexual couples.

You are an empiricist if you insist that no harm can come to society out of gay marriage just because you say you cannot see any harm in it.

When the majority of your MPs are so morally and intellectually impaired they cannot see the difference between recreational sex and reproductive sex, then they are either evil or demented.

Legalising gay marriage is conclusive evidence of degeneracy and dementia.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/female-mps-even-more-useless-than-male.html
at

No comments:

Post a Comment