If you cannot answer this question correctly, are you a feminazi, a feminazi apologist, or the jury who convicted Ched Evans?

@c_hanners @grumpypostie It is very interesting the jury decided that she did consent to have sex with Clayton McDonald but not Ched Evans.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie The acquittal of Clayton McDonald and the conviction of Ched Evans by the jury was perverse.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie The jury seemed to think she was too drunk to consent to sex to Ched Evans but did consent to sex with McDonald.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie The slag did not have any more to drink between having sex with Clayton McDonald and Ched Evans, did she?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie If you are under the influence the further away from the time you drank alcohol the more sober you would be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie The Welsh jury seemed to think that the further from the time you had something to drink the drunker you would be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie Scenario: C has sex with D1 first and D2 second after drinking. C did not drink more between having sex with them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

@c_hanners @grumpypostie Question: Would C be more drunk when she was having sex with D1 or D2?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 24, 2014

https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-ched-evans-chedwyn-evans

When he came to pass sentence the judge said: ".... [the complainant] was in no position to form a capacity to consent to sexual intercourse, and you, when you arrived, must have realised that."

That accurately reflected the way in which the verdict should be interpreted. 

The judges involved were:

• Lord Chief Justice Judge
• Justice Mitting 
• Justice Griffith Williams
• Judge Merfyn Hughes QC 

http://www.debretts.com/people-of-today/profile/7318/%28Thomas%29-Merfyn-HUGHES
Judge Merfyn Hughes was Labour Party candidate Caernarfon 1979. This would be the same party as the former Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer a Labour Party supporter who hopes to become a Labour MP for Holborn and St Pancras.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/31/keir-starmer-labour-mp-bid

Keir Starmer was the one who initiated the policy of favouring the accuser - female - at the expense of the defendant - male, and started the ball that is "Victim's Law" rolling.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/03/britain-criminal-justice-system-victims-law-public-prosecutions

The Labour Party is a party that promotes feminism. Lord Glasman, a Labour Peer, had his career destroyed by the feminazis of the Labour Party when he proposed policies these women found offensive and alarming.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Last month Labour Justice spokeswoman Helen Goodman circulated a critique of Blue Labour to all members of the Parliamentary Labour Party in which she claimed, "[Glasman] characterises as female all the aspects of New Labour he dislikes, whereas all the characteristics he applauds he draws as male. It looks more like something suitable for the psychotherapists' couch than a political tract."

What are we to make of their judgment?

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/deputy-head-quits-after-being-7827685

James Inman, the headteacher who puts gel on his hair - ugh -  who punished  pupil Tommie Rose for his enterprise. Are men in positions of responsibility who put gel on their hair not DISGUSTING?? [SHUDDER] How likely are they to be MCSFs? 

MCSF and other acronyms explained

The stinking cunting shitting matriarchy of Britian criminalises enterprise and initiative. http://t.co/7o5Lny4pG0
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 21, 2014

@ntfem This is what anti woman looks like. Look at this language. Nothing about this is ok.
— kim holleman (@Kiminbushwick) November 21, 2014

@Kiminbushwick Sometimes it is necessary to swear to make a point.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 21, 2014

@Kiminbushwick Eeek! I misspelled "Britain"!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 21, 2014

Tommie Rose, white, is punished.

Young Entrepreneur Of The Week: Bejay Mulenga

Bejay Mulenga, black, is praised.

But we all know about white middle class women who hate and fear white working class boys and who like posing with young men of another race because they are cute, exotic etc, right?

Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?

We also know who is in charge of the matriarchy and it sure as hell ain't the white working class female whom these white SNOBBISH middle class professional women despise together with their male counterparts. In fact, these snobbish white middle class professional women enjoy sneering at the working classes of their own race.

NATIONALIST MEN SHOULD GET THIS:
White women in charge of public affairs in the class above you hate you, fear you, sneer at you and don't care about you.

Know thyself, and know thine enemy.

Image from #Rochester pic.twitter.com/rOjTgpskmF
— Emily Thornberry MP (@EmilyThornberry) November 20, 2014

David Willetts blames feminism over lack of jobs for working men Conservative minister's comments on social mobility trigger criticism from the Labour party and the TUC
David Willetts was MADE TO APOLOGISE for saying this.

Why Lee Rigby's mother will NEVER be ennobled by the matriarchy, unlike the professional victim that is Stephen Lawrence's mother

Would Blue Labour's conservatism lead us back to female subservience?
We know what happened to Lord Glasman, don't we? The feminazis in the Labour Party stuck their stilettos into him and destroyed his career, and Ed Miliband went along with it because he is a pissing cunting shitting pussy-whipped morally-compromised slut-fucker who would not have bothered marrying the mother of his then illegitimate offspring if he had not become the leader of the Labour Party.



http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia

Ambitious young women today are taught to ignore or suppress every natural instinct, if it conflicts with the feminist agenda posed on them. All literary and artistic works, no matter how great, that document the ambivalence of female sexuality they are trained to dismiss as “misogynous.” In other words, their minds are being programmed to secede from their bodies … there is a huge gap between feminist rhetoric and women’s actual sex lives, where feminism is of little help except with a certain stratum of deferential, malleable, white middle-class men.

Middle-class men, neutered by office life and daunted by feminist rhetoric, are shrinking. Lesbianism is increasing, since anxious, unmasculine men have little to offer. Women are simply more interesting to them. Male homosexuality is increasing, because masculinity is in crisis and because maternal consciousness, severed from the support network of the extended family, has become a psychotic system, forcing the young to struggle for life against clinging personal fantasy.

White middle-class girls at the elite colleges and universities seem to want the world handed to them on a platter. They have been sheltered, coddled and flattered. Having taught at a wide variety of institutions over my ill-starred career, I have observed that working-class or lower-middle-class girls, who are from financially struggling families and must take a patchwork of menial jobs to stay in school, are usually the least hospitable to feminist rhetoric. They see life as it is and have fewer illusions about sex. It is affluent, upper-middle class students who most spout the party line — as if the grisly hyperemotionalism of feminist jargon satisfies their hunger for meaningful experiences outside their eventless upbringing. In the absence of war, invent one.

Feminazi Labour MP Jane Basham has reported my tweet

@Jane_Basham @KarenBUoM Slut-shaming and the abolition of the welfare state would be the cheapest, quickest and most effective answer.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

@Jane_Basham Entirely predictable that a feminist and leftist would seek to censor free speech and rational discussion of important issues.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

@Jane_Basham It is very interesting that a Labour MP should report me to Twitter for proposing political change. @Ed_Miliband @HackneyAbbott
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Is-feminism-dangerous-to-free-speech/221315967999943?fref=ts

Ed Miliband pussywhipped by Luciana Berger and forced to apologise
http://www.lucianaberger.com/2014/06/ed-milibands-statement-on-the-sun/

Feminazis in Labour destroyed Lord Glasman's career
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Let's face it, most men used to respect marriage ONLY BECAUSE it was the only respectable means of getting sex and having children.

Now that almost no one thinks it is necessary to marry before you have sex or children, marriage appears to have become redundant.

The more redundant marriage appears to be, the less likely it is to be respected, and more people will see it as stupid to respect it.

If most women are sluts and most mothers SSMs, then most children are bastards, and most men MCSFs or SPOSSMs.

SSM = Slut Single Mother https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

MCSF =  Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker

SPOSSM = Sex Partner of Slut Single Mother

MOBFOB = Mother of Bastard still living with Father of Bastard

FOBMOB = Father of Bastard still living with Mother of Bastard

You can imagine the morals and government of people who are mostly SSMs, MCSFs, SPOSSMs, MOBFOBs and FOBMOBs, can't you?

Since most people in Britain are as I described, it is not surprising that no political party in the land will support marriage.

What happens if we do not support marriage? It means the loss of parental and masculine authority, and fornicating sluts taking over, establishing their pornocratic matriarchy and turning your civilisation into SHIT.

What does it mean for men in the long term?
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/understanding-the-role-of-the-drone-bee-in-a-hive.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1326168/Secret-footage-shows-millions-British-chicks-killed-year.html

Our government will just turn into the government of Jamaica where the percentage of SSMs was already 85% in 2007.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

The majority of Jamaicans clearly have no interest in the 'traditional' western married nuclear family lifestyle. Otherwise we would not have 85 per cent of babies born out of wedlock. 

So the West and its people and government are heading towards Jamaica, but will not enjoy its fine weather.

If male politicians fear to do the right thing because they already know most of their voters will punish them for it, and they are paralysed by the political imperative of only winning the next election, is there a fatal flaw in democracy that cannot be solved without correcting the grave and tragic error of indiscriminate universal suffrage?

Is the fatal flaw of democracy a government for sluts and bastards for sluts and bastards? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Do people deserve the government they get?

Do politicians simply pander to the vices of their voters, fearing to give moral leadership because they know they will only be punished for it?

Are their manifestos nothing more than a list of bribes and promises they cannot keep?

Do politicians really know what is in the long term national interest it, or ever promote it?

Do feminists ever think of the national interest, or is it an alien concept for them?

Is feminism only about privileging women because they are women and nothing else?

Does feminism encourage women to be sluts and bribe men with cheap slut sex?

Are British men all the way up to the Prime Minister lower than sluts because they are terrified of offending them?

Are male politicians terrified of offending sluts because they are half their voters? (If most British women are sluts then most female voters are sluts.)

Do female MPs vote differently from male MPs?
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html

Should only taxpayers have the vote?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

Should bachelors be treated as second class citizens?
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html

Why not have a one-party state if it makes more sense?
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Why-not-have-a-one-party-state-if-it-makes-more-sense/353471931432677?fref=ts

Frank Field: "As debt levels soar, a national government [AKA one-party state] may be the only way we can pull through"
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/thousands-of-mothers-have-multiple.html 

Who will be MP in the marginal constituency of Keighly after GE 2015? Or more to the point, which horse shall I back?

https://twitter.com/SusanTodmorden/status/443467430325911554

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

Unpleasant things said about Susan Press who may be the Labour PPC for GE 2015:
http://lukeakehurst.blogspot.co.uk/2008/07/susan-press.html

http://www.keighleynews.co.uk/news/4047536.Journalist_is_bidding_to_be_town___s_next_MP/

She has said she "would not be afraid to tackle sensitive issues head on", which sounds promising. I rather liked Lord Glasman's BNP-esque proposals and perhaps she will find herself in a position to revive them.  It is really is the only thing that would work for Labour now.

The Blue Tory Labour peer forced to apologise for saying something genuinely popular.

To win GE 2015, they would actually would have to be more right-wing than the Tories, but that ain't hard to do when our Tory PM will go down in history for legalising gay marriage. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jul/21/lord-glasman-apologises-immigration-remarks  Perhaps Lord Glasman can be induced to spend the weekend with her in Hebden Bridge before being taken over to Keighley to have a look at the lie of the land.  That would be an excellent way of  getting oneself talked about.

If, for example, the Labour Party proposed repealing the Equality Act 2010 in their GE 2015 manifesto and promised an EU referendum too, then clinched it with the promise of abolishing no-fault divorce, the Tories would be left winded, stunned and writhing on the ground ...

Unpleasant things said about Kris Hopkins MP by Nadine Dorries:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/oct/08/nadine-dorries-twitter-spat-kris-hopkins#comment-27752954

All the parties are the same anyway, with candidates forced to toe the party line or else, and the LibLabCon are a corrupt cartel who conspire to deprive the "consumer" of choice by fixing the price, rigging the market and keeping out the competition.  We all know that.  However, just for a bit of fun, I will start taking an interest in what they do and say from now on.

At this stage I incline towards Susan because she followed me on Twitter, which I found enormously flattering when I discovered my new follower this morning, but I shall keep an open mind.  I intend to be scrupulously impartial and judge them on the eight following non-policy matters:

1. character
2. tactics
3. communication skills
4. creative risk-taking
5. integrity
6. ruthlessness
7. the ability to talk oneself out of hole
8. the ability to be economical with the truth without telling lies

Labour *must* give up its the idea of "winning with women"

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2013/08/29/winning-with-women/

Labour needs to dump its female voters and move to the right of the Conservative Party to win the next election.

This means the Blue Labour faction of the party needs to take control of the party. Its greatest champion is of course Lord Glasman, a family man, who should be invited to take a more prominent role from now on.

Lord Glasman engaging publicly with Diane Abbott would add greatly to the joy and gaiety of the nation. Lord Mandelson should be present to adjudicate between the two, so it is time to bring him out of retirement.

It is not winning with women, it is losing with sluts.  To craft party policy to bail out immoral and irresponsible fornicatresses who are bad mothers with illegitimate offspring is the road to perdition.  It must stop NOW.

http://www.progressonline.org.uk/event/winningwithwomen/ is the event at which this subject will be discussed.