Race and ethnicity in the USSR

0:45  Lithuanian national independence

2:45  Baltic States

4:15  The indigenous cadre class that happily administers its own region people on behalf of the Soviet Union and funded by the same.

6:00  Baltic States invaded by Soviet Union in 1940  

7:30  14 June 1941 Mass deportations of the commercial and governing classes to Siberia when the Soviets invaded. 

10:45  Denmark

11:15  Minsk Agreement  https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/08/18/minsk-agreement-failed-paul-craig-roberts/

14:00 Administrative exile

17:00  Japanese espionage 

17:30  Japanese attitudes towards Koreans

17:45  Internment camps for the Japanese during WW2  https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1992/02/02/bitter-harvest/c8389b23-884d-43bd-ad34-bf7b11077135/?utm_term=.2c8ca31e5c2c

19:00  http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rightsviews/tag/natsionalnost/

21:00 https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/ancient-rome/the-romans-and-the-druids/

22:30  Volga and Black Sea Germans

23:45  Catherine the Great

24:00  Being nasty to the Germans  http://spartacus-educational.com/2WWgermansBR.htm

Soviet measures in the area of minority rights became known as “nationalities policies,” after the Russian legal term natsional’nost’ that captures a cultural identity of a group and a citizen, while also having a political component. Nationality linked a specific group to an explicitly defined territory, which that group was entitled to administer as its officially recognized historical homeland.
http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rightsviews/tag/natsionalnost/

5:15  "In their exile they had learned nothing,
and forgot nothing." -Napoleon  https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/fr-reaction.htm
8:30  The Keiser Report https://www.rt.com/shows/keiser-report/433456-episode-max-keiser-1254/
10:30  Personal Interest v Nationalist Interest
11:30  Nostalgia for the Soviet Union
14:15  https://theculturetrip.com/europe/russia/articles/heres-why-soviet-ice-cream-was-the-best-in-the-world/
15:45  Education in the Soviet Union
16:00  Deteriorating standards of educatin worldwide
22:00  Pohl's conclusion about ethnicity
25:00  Antisemitism
28:00  South Africa
28:45  Racialised ethnicity - NATSIONALNOST
http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rightsviews/tag/natsionalnost/
30:00 Civic Nationalism
31:00 Apartheid
33:00 Soviet Jews most ignorant of their heritage
34:00  A system of predicting group behaviour should be created - psychohistory?  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional)
36:00 The Otto Pohl Cultural Centre for White People
37:30  The predatory Chinese in Ghana  https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/apr/23/influx-chinese-goldminers-tensions-ghana
38:45  Racism a desire to have a comprehensive theory of predicting human behaviour
39:45  Theories of racial superiority if correct can be beneficial if you have the humility to  extract the right moral lesson and learn from them
41:00  The abomination of gay marriage
41:15  Noblesse oblige
42:00 Liberalism an expression of white supremacy?  https://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-sachs-psyd/10-ways-white-liberals-pe_b_8068136.html
43:00 Evangelical Christians in Ghana:  80% Christian, 20% Muslim
44:15  Lagos extraordinarily dangerous
45:00  The criminal classes of Africa the result of urbanisation
45:45  Ghana 50% urban
47:00  Racism amongst Black Africans
48:00  How hospitable are we anyway, even to our own family and race?
49:30  Polygamy in Kyrgyzstan

Should Peter Mandelson present The Andrew Marr Show?

I anticipate the usual objections about his well-established pro-EU stance offending against journalistic impartiality.  However, it could be tempered by my presence in the show, for I have always been Eurosceptic and had a reputation for impartiality.

Even Nick Griffin acknowledged this after reading http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/interview-with-nick-griffin-may-2004.html

So, while The Andrew Marr Show becomes The Peter Mandelson Show if Peter were to present it, it would become The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show if we were both to co-host it and he to marry me.

I don't think people have any idea how entertaining and charming I can be if I put my mind to it.  

There will doubtless be the usual objections about my alleged "extremism", but the list of parties I have joined is testament to my determination to remain non-partisan and to leave my spoors in every party.   Even now, I exhort the political parties to merge into one party for the sake of the long-term national interest.

I have been a member of the following:

1. The Conservative Party
2. UKIP
3. The Labour Party
4. The BNP

It does seem that, taken together, I would be more impartial than Peter, who has only ever been a member of the Labour Party.

Indeed, my political experience may be wider than his in some or perhaps many regards.

The idea of having one's national laws subordinate to a supranational entity is something I found, as a nationalist,  instinctively abhorrent.

I was actively Eurosceptic as long ago as the Maastricht Bill, in fact.  Bill Cash and his other volunteers others I worked with then should remember me.

I could be the Stacey Herbert to Peter's Max Keiser, perhaps.  At any rate, I am sure Peter and I can work as a team, if not a couple.

Ah, to think of Peter and me, the Juan and Eva Peron of British politics!