No one wants to answer my questions.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
My question is directly relevant to whether the late Mrs Hart married in haste. Prevention is better than cure, don't you think?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
Not answering pertinent questions is a sign of bad faith, actually.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
War and revolution are the most destructive forms of violence which the matriarchy could prevent, just by answering our questions. Not answering them suggests they have something to hide. Blatantly refusing to answer them with an insult shows their undisguised contempt for us. https://t.co/ZaEFOaCvP2— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
This woman is obviously reading from a script and I would like to hear the other side.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 30, 2018
In a murder trial, you hear both sides: the case for the Prosecution and the case for the Defence. All you seem to have is the victim narrative with the feminist agenda of undermining marriage and making marriage an even worse bargain for men.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There are sociopathic, psychopathic, violent, murderous and evil men. Women should be warned to stay clear of them rather than be told by @CoCoAwareness that when they enter into toxic relationships that end in them and their children being murdered, there is someone to blame.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Since marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy, there is obviously a feminist agenda to undermine marriage and patriarchy with the consequence that your society, nation and civilisation will be undermined. This is what is happening now, in case you haven't noticed.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Marriage is the arena in which the eternal battle of sexes takes place. You can get peace through submission, dominance or the rational and moral resolution of conflicts. The purpose and effect of the victimhood narrative is to make marriage an even worse bargain for men.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I'm well aware sociopathic/psychopathic/violent/murderous/evil men don't come with a tattoo on their foreheads. That's why a period of courtship is necessary. To this end I asked @CoCoAwareness how long their mother knew their father before she married him. They refuse to answer.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Not only did @CoCoAwareness refuse to answer the question @Sarah_Montague did not ask them, she actually liked the tweets insulting me for daring to ask the question that she did not ask: how long did their mother know their father before marrying him?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
This was the insulting tweet Sarah Montague liked because, clearly, the Hart Brothers didn't want to answer my question, probably because they knew answering my question honestly would undermine their position. https://t.co/u4IJZg5wiW— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The Hart Brothers are good looking young men, aren't they? Doubtless taking the position they have in so public a manner would attract much female attention and, most probably, groupies.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
All the more reason why there should be a period of courtship before marriage, and why there should be no sex before marriage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You don't make much sense to be honest. Are you a groupie and a member of the unofficial harem of the Hart Brothers, if they do indeed have one? I really can't work you out.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I actually agreed with you that men don't have a tattoo on their foreheads saying they are going to abusive towards you. For some reason, you boasted about a convicted prisoner proposing to you from prison before saying you were trying to educate me. That doesn't make sense.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If we are going to be murdered, it would be by a family member or a sex partner. I wonder if there are crime statistics prove this.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Just because we are more likely to be murdered by a family member or sex partner, does this mean we are not to have spouses or family members? Surely not! There are already laws against murder and assault, and marriage is a child protection scheme.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am well aware that feminism has caused gender relations to become toxic. You do know that everything about feminism undermines marriage, don't you? Feminists have the stated agenda of destroying the patriarchy and patriarchy cannot exist without marriage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You are probably already aware of the fact that the Labour Party is socialist and socialists believe in gender equality. That's why the most militant feminists are in the Labour Party and that is why Hart Brothers are pandering to these women who are probably part of their harem.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
How many women directly or indirectly cause the death of men?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If you make marriage an even worse bargain for men, then you undermine marriage. Marriage is already a terrible bargain for men and you seek to make it even worse when all you need to do is tell women not to be such stupid sluts getting knocked up by losers and psychos.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
It would be even more shocking if women were killing each other.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I bet your husband is completely under your thumb. Is he allowed his own Twitter account?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Would "groupie" be a more respectful term? In an Islamic State, men may have up to four wives, but only if they can treat them equally and if they can provide for them. I imagine many gullible women throw themselves at the Hart Brothers. I guess this is a perk of their position.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If women are to be beaten at all, it is better that they are beaten by their husbands and male family members rather than strange men, surely?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What a shame you can only respond with a rude gesture to arguments you cannot answer.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Thanks for the retweet, @Dontlookback198. Why on earth is @MishalHusainBBC following you? I would just love the Beauty of the BBC to follow me!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I see you are avoiding the question! We can get domestic peace by submitting utterly to the dominant partner. I cannot imagine that you are not the dominant partner and he the submissive one. If it works for you, fine, but it may not work for every man.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I didn't say that violence must be inflicted. I asked "*If* women are to be beaten at all, it is better that they are beaten by their husbands and male family members rather than strange men, surely?"— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If a woman had to suffer rape, it is surely better to be raped by her husband than by a serial sex offender she does not know, surely? It is also marginally better to date raped than to be raped by a rapist jumping out from behind a bush. Are you getting my line of logic?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am merely pointing out that not every man wishes to marry a woman and then submit to her! No need to take it so personally. What works for your husband would not work for other men and we are talking about marriage being a bad bargain for *men*.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Of course, but we must be realistic and acknowledge realities. Let us say that there will always be a certain amount of violence being inflicted on men against men and men against women. Let us say that there is a certain amount of violence to be endured by all of us,— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There are ways of reducing levels of violence between men but for the moment we are talking only about violence against women by men. Violence on women by men can be inflicted by 1) their husband, 2) male members of the family, 3) men known to these women 4) complete strangers.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Let us say you have NO CHOICE but to endure violence against you by a man. From which men would you MOST PREFER to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 1, surely?) From which men would you LEAST PREFER NOT to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 4, surely?)— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Please pay attention. I have NOT said that rape should decriminalised, have I? I have posed a HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION and you, being a typical woman, do not know what it means, or affect not to. Which is it? Are you arguing from bad faith?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I hope you know that a husband and wife are entitled to have sex from each other. Marriages have been annulled for non-consummation. The best way to get round the problem of marital rape is to stipulate in the marriage contract the frequency of sexual congress.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Once you state the frequency of sexual congress the parties have agreed to in their marriage contract, then exceeding your ration could be treated as marital rape. This is the best way of doing justice to both parties to the marriage, don't you think?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Marriage is a battlefield on which the eternal battle of the sexes has always been waged.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
There is no point denying that violence exists inside and outside marriage. Islam, being a religion of practical wisdom, accepts this and has a way of dealing with it through a graduated process of punishment on the recalcitrant wife. This is explained at https://t.co/NAn6CARHtV— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You are refusing to answer the question because you know that answering my question honestly would allow me to develop my argument, and you don't like the direction where this is going. Most unsporting of you, I must say.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Requiring engaged couples to agree a marriage contract before allowing them to marry would implicitly abolish no fault divorce, which is one my stated political goals.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You must agree with me that it is impossible to eradicate violence against women by men because we do not live in a perfect world. It is possible to reduce violence against women but it is impossible for it to eradicated completely. I have no idea why you find this controversial.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am just saying that it is worse for women to suffer violence inflicted by men who are strangers to them eg invading migrants and marauding soldiers who are raping and pillaging. Again, I have no idea why you find this so controversial.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Why are you pretending that I am *for* "murder, rape and women being beaten"? I suppose that is you arguing in bad faith again and trying to traduce and demonise me so you can ignore everything I have just said.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Obviously no one does this now, because it is not a legal requirement, but I am saying it should be.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Feminism causes immigration. Your cucked men and cucked male politicians are completely helpless to stop this now. Brexit is a male preoccupation, remain a female one. The BBC is just the Voice of the Matriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If Britain were a society of married fathers in control of their women and families, men would not be putting up with uncontrolled immigration for a minute, but they are men who have been orphaned from their traditions and deprived of their fathers by their unmarried mothers.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
We are a matriarchy all right. https://t.co/DfyW07YtFs
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies. All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. Patriarchy is the lesser evil. Our moral obligation is to chose the lesser evil.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The facts are all around you. A clueless childless woman is our Prime Ministrix. Feminists have infiltrated and now run all the important institutions of state. All our male politicians are useless hopeless cucks who have become women. The invaders continue to invade.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What do you think is the point I have not proven?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You voted to remain, didn't you? All the people you know voted to remain. You are happy senior male MPs are too cucked and helpless to implement Brexit. You want even more uncontrolled immigration to show your contempt for the men of your race in the class below you.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The Matriarchy is short-termist. May is clueless about the concerns of married parents and cares nothing for them. The worst thing is that the men in her cabinet are just as indifferent and clueless, even the married ones like @michaelgove who is a bastard, right, @BorisJohnson?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You voted leave?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
@WayThruCouns @Dontlookback198 @JenLWoodside @Sarah_Montague @MishalHusainBBC @naughtiej @AnthonyLarme @anti_fembot @MikeBuchanan11 @erin_pizzey @bindelj @whjm @janegarvey1 @DeborahJaneOrr @zarafaris @CoCoAwareness @PhilipDaviesUK @LPerrins @KathyConWom @DrJulesGomes @rabbisacks https://t.co/rejEYEjHjl— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
1:06:00 Men are now afraid to express their political views in their own home and become "servile" towards wives, probably hating themselves and then, when their wives get... https://t.co/o2ZZZV5MT7— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
"... bored and irritated with them anyway and divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce, they suddenly see red and end up murdering their wives and children."— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Why do you say that?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I think it is precisely because I have developed my faculty of imagination and analysis that I am capable of understanding male anger.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
The people I have met on this thread are @naughtiej @bindelj @PhilipDaviesUK and @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am not a man, though I have described myself as the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman.
I don't know what you mean by my "projecting" male anger. Can a woman "project" male anger?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What are the "worst parts of masculinity"?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Our matriarchy was the result of the disease of the mind that is feminism eating away at the spine of patriarchy. When you talk about "female autonomy and freedom", you mean the right of women to fornicate, and the right of men to fornicate with them. Fornication is a mortal sin.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Is this a tweet about rising crime and what can be done about crime prevention? I rather suspect not! https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
If you want to prevent crime, then prevent bastardy. If you want to prevent bastardy, then you have to shame sluts. Once you shame sluts and discourage bastardy, you will find yourself with a lower crime rate, thereby lowering the levels of violence against men by men. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
A slut is a fornicatress. An unmarried mother is definitely a fornicatress because the evidence of her fornication has been born and is in existence. The chief characteristic of a slut is the poor reproductive choices she makes eg choosing men who beat/murder them/their children. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Ah, the dreaded GIF. I always get these when the person responding has no coherent or intelligible answer to the point I make.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
A slut is by definition stupid, because she makes bad bargains and sells herself too cheaply. The soldiers of feminism are sluts. Since most Western women are feminists, this perfectly explains the progressive lowering of Western IQ. https://t.co/CEfFYQufxp— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Researchers say Western IQs dropped 14 points over last centuryhttps://t.co/UAzcbIBI5h— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Out-of-Wedlock Births Rise Worldwidehttps://t.co/51gHj34lid— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Who beat you up then?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I know they are not stupid, just unanswerable.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
You can't say why though.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I asked a question and have noticed that you are reluctant to answer it.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Have I said anything narcissistic?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I am making the inferences that you have something to hide: that your mother married in haste.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
I have what lawyers call a Theory of Case. This means I have a narrative and you are curious to see where it will lead.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
What do you think is the nature of the mental illness you think I might be suffering from? Aren't you by training an engineer and not a psychiatrist?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Is to be persistent to suffer from a personality disorder?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Persistence is a virtue when you are dealing with obstructive people who have something to hide.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018
Luke and Ryan Hart - apparently co-opted by the matriarchy to further undermine marriage by making it an even worse bargain for men - are not asked and refuse to answer the obvious question
