Yvette Cooper's definitive definition of "Far Right"

Yvette Cooper:

On immigration [Trump] Far Right. My point is about the Far Right being divisive, inflaming division and people pitting themselves against each other and frankly I think it is also Far Right to talk about massive tax cuts for the richest people in the country and healthcare cuts or Obamacare cuts or NHS cuts as UKIP have done for the poorest people in the country. That, to me, is a Far Right agenda.

So, everything this feminazi dislikes is "Far Right." Gotcha. "Far Right" is a term of abuse libtards use on any proposal that smacks of common sense that they dislike. Now we get it.

I would only be too happy to give my definition if I am invited on air to do so.

In the months and years to come, a satisfactory definition of civic nationalism will be of crucial importance to the social cohesion in the West, if it is not to descend into naked racism, xenophobia, Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.

When MSM has got over its shock and hysteria, they might like to consider airing some of my ideas. 

It is possible to be a woman without being a slut, whore or feminist

The study monitored the use of the words “slut” and “whore” by UK Twitter users over three weeks from the end of April. It found that 6,500 individuals were targeted by 10,000 aggressive and misogynistic tweets in that period.

Internationally, more than 200,000 aggressive tweets using the same words were sent to 80,000 people in the same period – and according to the study, more than half of the offenders were women.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/25/yvette-cooper-leads-cross-party-campaign-against-online-abuse?CMP=twt_gu

1. Not every woman is a whore, so to call a woman a whore if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic.
2. Not every woman is a slut, so to call a woman a slut if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic. 
3. Surely feminists are able to accept that it is possible to be a woman without being either a whore or a slut?
4. All feminists without exception support the right of women to have premarital sex, ie to fornicate ie be sluts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_sin  http://quran.com/24/2
5. The definition of slut should be tightened up. An interesting discussion of how many sex partners a woman has to fornicate with before being called a slut can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0XVgioi29I from 1:21. A matter to be decided by philosopher, perhaps. The woman in question confessed to having 50 to 60 sex partners and suggested that a slut should be a woman who has had sex with upwards of 100 men.  
6. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw expressions of social conservatism? 
7. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw slut-shaming? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
8. Is it the intention of feminazis to desecrate the institution of marriage which can only be supported by shaming sluts? 
9. Is it the intention of feminazis to abolish traditional marriage, because it is the foundation of all patriarchies?
10. If more than half of the offenders who tweeted aggressively used "whore" and "slut" were women, then why can't men use those words too? 
11. Are feminazis suggesting that only women can use the words "slut" and "whore", but not men? 
12. Would it be an idea to have a men's, women's and unisex section of Twitter so everyone can just say what they want within the rules of their respective groups? 
13.  It is surely only misogynistic to say, for example, "I hate women," but why are the feminazis presuming to tell us whom we may or may not hate? That would be THOUGHTCRIME.
14. Are feminazis trying to define misogyny as "anyone women - who are mostly sluts and whores - hate"? 
15. The corruption of language is the corruption of thought, and the corruption of thought leads to error, evil, disaster and doom.

Is "Pakiphobic" Britain really ready for a Pakinstani Shadow Home Secretary?

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Labour-Party-Shadow-Cabinet-New-Appointments-Are-Listed-In-Full-After-Ed-Miliband-Reveals-New-Team/Article/201010215754607

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadiq_Khan

We shall see, won't we?

Talented and effective though he may be, there is just a chance that making him Home Secretary is a step too far when we all know how  "Pakiphobia" is running rampant in this country. 

If I were Ed and had to reward him for running my leadership campaign, I would have made him Shadow Foreign Secretary.  The idea of the pretty but brittle Yvette Cooper being Foreign Secretary would  raise hackles too, especially amongst the more traditional nations who don't like having to deal with uppity white women.  

At this rate I don't see that Ed will be getting anywhere near power, if his Shadow Cabinet appointments are anything to go by. 

Like a Chinese emperor, he is far away and out of touch with the British public, but not as out of touch as David Miliband who supported the war and was dumb enough to say that he still supports it, reminding me of what Talleyrand said of the Ultramontane:

"They have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.”