Why am I being ignored by Dr Edward Dutton, YouTuber, theologian and anthropologist?

To: ecdutton
Sent: Friday, 20 September 2019, 14:50:23 BST
Subject: A theological discussion on my YouTube channel?

Dear Dr Dutton

I do hope it will be possible for us to discuss the nature and purpose of morality as a group evolutionary strategy.

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-purpose-of-morality-which-comes.html

Regards
Claire Khaw

***********

To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:21:12 BST
Subject: May I know if you have heard of Secular Koranism?

************

To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:37:27 BST
Subject: Why should we not worship the Abrahamic God and/or follow His laws?

*************

To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:47:03 BST
Subject: Is the White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) a tribe?

**************

To: ecdutton
Cc: Mark Collett ; Millennial Woes
Sent: Friday, 18 October 2019, 12:24:18 BST
Subject: Accelerationism at the North of England Patriotic Alternative Conference 2019

Dear Dr Dutton

Would you confirm that this topic was being discussed? I assume that the reason why no videos have been released on the event other than the bland one by Mark Collett and Laura Towler is simply because they would fall foul of hate speech laws.

Would you also confirm that the reason you are ignoring me is because you have been told not to engage with me by Mark Collett and Millennial Woes in order to deprive Secular Koranism of the oxygen publicity?

How ethical is this considering you are what would be considered an educated man as well as both a theologian and anthropologist?

You may have heard that it is the mark of an educated man to entertain an idea without accepting it.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/03/will-millennial-woes-have-deleted-my.html

Regards
Claire Khaw

Millennial Woes:

I don't think paganism is feasible as a solution because I don't think enough people believe in it or and I don't see it spreading fast enough.  Christianity has had the stuffing knocked out of it to say the least over the last century so I don't know if it can recover or if it can recover in time. The other option is atheism which just is where we are just now anyway and then the fourth option is Islam and there are people who think that we're just going to inevitably become Islamic and that has various implications. Would we be assimilated into the Muslim immigrants' demographic group in which case it would be their version of Islam that ruled Europe or would it be that we adopted Islam and modified it as we did with with Christianity? Would it be our version of Islam? I might get some flack for saying this stuff or even for entertaining this. I'm just sort of putting it over there, just speculating on how are we going to resist Islam and what are we gaining by resisting Islam. Are we gaining nihilism and just more vapid consumerism or are we regaining strength and vitality somehow? Again, these are all questions that other people need to address and I can only put the question out there but I do think that it's something that we we can't afford to just ignore. I remember at the TBG in December there was a guy who really got very irate with me for suggesting that maybe Islam will be the only way out of the nihilism, out of globohomo, and if it will be so then the choice is "Do you want Islam or do you want globohomo?" so not a fucking nice choice but if you want to avoid that then you have to find a way to resist Islam and resist globohomo, and as I say, I don't see what that would be at this point. Maybe something will materialise.

Why Neanderthal Man died out

I think the Amalekites are supposed to represent - matriarchal Neanderthals. Balaam called them "the first of nations" in Numbers, 24:20.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 5, 2015

http://discovermagazine.com/2004/apr/who-killed-neanderthals0419

Because homo sapiens discovered marriage and supported family values while Neanderthal man did not.  (There is of course a moral in this somewhere.  Can someone tell me what this might be?)

Neanderthal man was matriarchal, homo sapiens patriarchal.  The latter defeated the former because the patriarchy is clearly better-organised, more cohesive and stronger as well as more likely to ensure that the male who is the best provider gets to reproduce, thus producing a better quality next generation, instead of the  free for all fuck-fest you get in a matriarchy in which the poor and depraved breed with the stupid and slutty, lowering moral and educational standards as well as the quality of the next generation, as we are seeing now in the 21st century Britain.   Currently, most babies born in Britain have mothers who are Slut Single Mums who couldn't find a husband or who didn't know or weren't told by their slut and bastard liberal parents not to have a child out of wedlock.

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TFTA600695RFVNVH1

http://www.nowpublic.com/strange/most-british-babies-now-born-out-wedlock-some-migrants-its-tiny-minority

If a patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, then the matriarchy is society that condones female promiscuity. It should be reasonably clear by now which is the lesser evil.

Of course, there is no evidence of this to support my contention and the few anthropologists I have approached are either too busy or too afraid to discuss this with me ie that Homo Sapiens, who institutionalised marriage, easily defeated the Neanderthals who had not.  In any case, I do not see how the institution of marriage can be inferred from archaeological evidence anyway. Even if archaeologists claimed they found wedding photographs, wedding rings, marriage contracts, decrees nisi and absolute belonging to long dead homo sapiens but none to Neanderthal man, those of us who remember the Hitler Diaries would treat it with healthy scepticism, I hope.  

My point is that they *cannot* prove my theory wrong. It is quite simply unassailable. 

It is so obviously, beautifully simple. Is there a prize for me to claim? No anthropologist can disprove this theory anyway.

My penetrating insight astonishes even me. It seems that I am after all a genius. It is really now time to stop being modest. If I don't blow my own trumpet, no one else will.

I have already contacted the Royal Anthropological Institute http://www.therai.org.uk/
and was advised to contact the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology.  http://www.babao.org.uk/index/index

It is to be hoped that a Claire Khaw Anthropology Prize will be created in my honour and awarded every year to prize-winning anthropologists.  I have in mind that Bruce Parry http://www.bbc.co.uk/tribe/bruce/index.shtml and fancy giving him one.  Actually, I wouldn't mind giving the delightful and delectable Dr Alice Roberts one too.