Translate

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

Why is Peter Hitchens soft on SSMs?

Peter Hitchens: proposing only to leave SSMs alone when they should be denounced and punished, because it is the only language stupid sluts understand.  Why is he afraid of them?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1319183/Stopping-new-unmarried-mothers-benefits-reform-make-richer.html

Peter Hitchens:

"There's only one lasting, simple welfare reform package this country needs. It goes like this. First, an announcement that nine months from today, all benefits of any kind for new unmarried mothers should cease.

Note the word 'new'. Existing victims of one of the stupidest policies in human history should continue to get their handouts and subsidised homes until their children are grown. It is not their fault, or their children's, that they were misled by weak and wicked politicians into this way of life.

They should not be condemned or harassed."

Why not?  Is Peter Hitchens afraid of SSMs?  Is he afraid his wife and her friends will disapprove of his proposing taking any stronger action against these irresponsible and promiscuous women who are the equivalent of cancer cells in any society?  What does his wife think should be done about SSMs?  Nothing?  

Clearly, if she disapproves of his views on SSMs she might give him a hard time, or even divorce him for holding views she dislikes.  Perhaps that is why he is afraid of proposing doing anything more than just leaving these bastard-bearing sluts alone.  

As we can see from reading http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20130526/focus/focus3.html tolerating illegitimacy is tantamount to inviting a cancer to grow in your body and inviting members of your society to become an inferior race.



https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-legalise-brothels-in-Britain/292618650867502
SSMs can still work in brothels after the Equality Act 2010 is repealed.  It is one of the twin pillars of feminism.  Once no-fault divorce is also done away with, then both legs of feminism will be cut away from her, and this foul pernicious ideology finally die a well-deserved death.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/degenerate-british-government-pays-slut.html


24:2

The [unmarried] woman or [unmarried] man found guilty of sexual intercourse - lash each one of them with a hundred lashes, and do not be taken by pity for them in the religion of Allah , if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of the believers witness their punishment.





No comments: