THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
2:00 The difference between Christian reasoning and Jewish and Muslim reasoning
2:45 Christian values
3:00 Christian values that Baruch finds abhorrent
3:45 Christianity is about saying you believe things which you may not necessarily believe in to be one of the gang, Judaism and Islam is about actually doing things in a rule-based way.
4:30 "The more disturbing aspects of fundamentalist Christianity" - the threat of hell
8:00 The universal love of Christianity
9:00 Islam is also claims this
9:15 Ditto Judaism
10:00 Eastern religions are not monotheist at all.
11:00 If you don't believe in the Trinity, you are not Christian
12:00 Justice and Love
14:00 Compassion for the criminal
14:30 The mumsy view of Christianity: forgive everything, tolerate everything
16:00 The idolatry and blasphemy of the Trinity
17:00 Jews are understandably shy of pointing out to Christians the idolatry of Christianity bearing in mind their tradition of persecuting of Jews
17:30 The chaos of Christianity according to Baruch
18:30 Jews and Muslims pray to the ineffable Abrahamic God, while Christians pray to an executed revolutionary or his mum
19:30 God is rather more than the mumsy comforting woman who is your mate's mum that you might bump into at the supermarket
20:00 Shavuot - the cosmic marriage between God and Jews https://www.huffingtonpost.com/levi-benshmuel/shavuot-love-lessons-from_b_872203.html
The Bible also says this about God: “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A6&version=NIV
23:00 Secular Koranism is just a boring little idea to prop up the patriarchy and deprive you of extramarital sex to continue the existence of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation
26:00 Marriage is a eugenic game of musical chairs being played from generation to generation
27:00 Conservatism
28:00 Gay marriage
29:00 Flexible monogamy is a lower standard than traditional marriage
30:00 John Major's Back to Basics campaign
30:30 The meaninglessness of unprincipled mainstream of Conservatism which brought in gay marriage under a Conservative Prime Minister
32:00 But for Judaism, Jews would not exist.
33:00 Marriage is an institution for all advanced civilisations, not just for the Abrahamic faiths
34:00 The nihilism of atheism and childlessness
35:00 If Baruch had children, he would want to pass on Judaism to his offspring
37:00 The benefit of having a cultural identity imposed on you even if you reject it at the time or subsequently reject it
39:00 Tradition is what we do to please our fathers.
40:00 White nationalists don't even have a cultural identity to reject and now have to go about creating an identity that they can accept and they cannot agree on this. Most are antisemites, many are not even Christian, and those who want to regress into paganism will not have the support of the majority. White nationalism is dead in the water if white nationalists refuse to acknowledge the need to restore the patriarchy and continue to reject the utility of organised religion.
42:00 Spiritual self-transcendence
45:00 Football matches
46:00 Football chants and war cries https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxL24XYFV7w
"By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared."
Any woman who wants to become a wife and mother of legitimate children should be able to see the harm feminism does her and women like her because feminism makes men unfit for marriage and reluctant to marry.
MY PLAN OF ACTION
1) Say to people who already have legitimate children that Secular Koranism offers them a better society for their children, grandchildren and their descendants.
2) Say to people who aspire to have legitimate children that Secular Koranism offers them a better chance of getting married and finding a marriageable spouse.
3) Say to LGBTs that they can still have the kind of sex that they want provided they don't flaunt their sexuality but that gay marriage and the civil partnership will be abolished, and also inheritance tax.
4) Get SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) on board who are at least prepared to admit that they would not have become SSMs if they knew they would suffer 100 lashes per bastard.
5) Say to people who have no intention of ever becoming parents of legitimate children for whatever reason that they will be tolerated as long as they do not expect to be the equal of parents of legitimate children.
What better way of showing how evil men are and how useful you are when you protect children and women from these monsters at taxpayers' expense in your role as Social Worker?
All these violent and abusive men who are also fathers and husbands and all those women to rescue!
What better way of making yourself feel good, useful and needed about "saving" children that you will never have as a spinster by removing them from their parents?
Of course, it would be in your interests to pretend all men are guilty and evil. In this way do you make yourself more important to the more gullible members of the public.
Of course you will never support laws that prevent women from having sex with men not their husbands because if all women made sensible choices about their sex partner who must also be their husband, you'd be out of a job!
That is why no social worker will support slut-shaming.
Feminism causes immigration and turns women into sluts.
How long are British men going to put up with this disgusting treachery from their immoral women? Have they no sense of shame? Don't they even care what other nations think of them?
If I am taken away by the agents of the Big Sister State for my heresy against their sacred religion of feminism and their sacrament of sluttery, I expect British men to defend me, because no one else has gone out his way to say what I have said and done what I have done to warn them of their folly of worshiping sluts. I am not even a white or male, but just want to live in a country where the men are not afraid of immoral women whose morals are lower than that of even a common prostitute. Is that really too much to ask?
Male politicians in Europe are now so emasculated they cannot now deal with national affairs without being in fear of being thought a nasty brute by stupid sentimental infantile female voters who don’t give a damn about the future of their civilisation.
Because very few women contribute to civilisation, they are not interested in anything that is not about them. This is why they applaud when invaders arrive in their cities as they did in Munich and collectively conspire to undermine the rules of traditional marriage with feminism, which they know is the oxygen of the patriarchy.
Treacherous women with bastard offspring, sluts and socialists say such things as “All children are legitimate, even if they are bastards.” By denying bastardy they of course deny marriage. They will only be happy when all children are bastards, all women sluts so that their bastard offspring will be adjudged the same in status as everyone else’s.
Islam at least acknowledges that extramarital sex deserves and requires corporal punishment in order to prevent a situation in which most of your women are sluts, most of your children bastards and most of your men MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) incapable of standing up for any principle, certainly not the one of speaking the truth as they see and understand it, much less defending European cities against invasion by migrant swarms.
Women who are single and looking tend to make indiscriminate displays of compassion because they think men prefer women who are stupid and kind.
They don't really mean it, but they feel they have to do this because they know men would be put off by rational and ruthless women with a will of iron, like me, perhaps.
Imagine if you were trying to manipulate a powerful lunatic, imbecile or a capricious woman of low intelligence and morals. You would have to find out their preferences and pander to them. Indeed, you would have to change your behaviour and mirror their behaviour and thinking in order to appease and manipulate them.
However, the danger of this is that you end up becoming like the capricious irrational and immoral slut, lunatic or imbecile you are trying to manipulate.
What will happen to your society if the rest of the world knows that no one is in charge and that the nation's perceived alpha male is even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than his voters?
Even Nigel Farage has softened his message against migrants as a result of the publication of that photo of that drowned boy.
What do you think happens to dementia sufferers, stupid sluts and imbeciles?
They would be exploited, cheated, used and abused.
This is what is happening to the West now, because no Western nation has an alpha male leading them because you cannot be an alpha male if you are afraid to criticise the worst of your women - SSMs, who are lower than prostitutes.
If there is no official alpha male who dares to criticise SSMs (Slut Single Mothers with illegitimate offspring) who are lower than prostitutes, then we live in a matriarchy, and all matriarchies without exception are primitive or declining societies. (SSMs are lower than prostitutes because prostitutes at least have the virtue of making men pay for sex and giving them a price up front, unlike sluts who pretend it is free but load it with all kinds of hidden charges for the man they are transacting with and society in general. Men must always be made to pay for sex because free slut sex corrupts their characters and turns them into men afraid of sluts in just the way a drug addict would be afraid of his drug dealer no longer selling him the drug to which he is addicted. Marriage for men is always the riskiest and most expensive form of sex, even in the days of the patriarchy.)
British politicians stopped criticising SSMs in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 after his Edgbaston speech for talking about them destroying "our human stock". http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron Male MPs have not criticised SSMs for 41 years and they are not suddenly going to start now since they are even more castrated now than they were in 1974.
Even Peter Hitchens, Britain's foremost Conservative thinker, won't criticise sluts because his late mother was an adulterous suicide. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html If the sins of the fathers are visited on their sons, then so does the weight of a mother's adultery cripple her son's ability to denounce her sin and those of others like her.
This is why male politicians are stupider and more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters whom they presume to lead. These so called leaders are still pandering to the lowest, stupidest and most hypocritical of women still looking to trick a man into a relationship with them by pretending to be stupid and kind.
The trouble with democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that the preferences of the beta male have been entirely marginalised. All political parties chase the female vote precisely because it is capricious but crucial to being elected and staying in office.
(Why are beta males important? They are important because they do most of the work and are the ones whose lives are sacrificed if there is a war. Beta males are still important even if sluts don't fancy them and will cheat on them at the first opportunity because those of them who think "A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta" would still be maintained by the welfare state paid for out of the taxes of the beta male for making this "lifestyle choice". If beta males are demoralised and marginalised then very little work will be done and even defensive wars cannot be won. It is of course the beta male who objects to immigration.)
So this is the basis on which our much-vaunted democracy rests - the preferences and unstated agenda of stupid, immoral and irresponsible sluts with the vote whom male politicians dare not criticise because they know they cannot be reasoned with. We live in a declining and morally degenerate matriarchy all right.
Migrant crisis http://t.co/IOKxLoRDQS Easy for the media to bounce hypocritical UK politicians into weeping crocodile tears.
Can anyone define what extremism is, without looking it up?
Can a government be extremist without knowing it?
Why is the government always assuming it can never be the one guilty of extremism? Surely that is in theory possible?
"So as we talk about the threat of extremism and the challenge of integration, we should not do our country down – we are, without a shadow of doubt, a beacon to the world."
Is Cameron suggesting that "doing our country down" is a sign of extremism? And that Western government is perfect?
"the focus of my remarks today is on tackling Islamist extremism – not Islam the religion"
The only difference is Muslims who decide to stay in the West and keep their heads down, and those who choose to go to Syria and fight under the Caliphate or commit acts of terrorism in the West.
The Koran does state that Muslims have a duty to fight oppression and there is no doubt that Muslims will perceive that Muslims are being oppressed if Muslim countries are invaded and regime-change imposed on them by the West.
"like any extreme doctrine, it is subversive."
Any ideology that is diametrically opposed to yours would be logically "subversive".
Feminism is subversive to the patriarchy and marriage.
Muslims respect the institutions of marriage and the family, and have noticed that PC Liberalism is subversive to these institutions.
"At its furthest end it seeks to destroy nation-states to invent its own barbaric realm. And it often backs violence to achieve this aim – mostly violence against fellow Muslims – who don’t subscribe to its sick worldview."
Muslim terrorists who object to Western foreign policy have worked out that Western foreign policy is the direct consequence of Western democracy and have therefore deduced that the only way to challenge Western foreign policy is to put the frighteners on the people who keep voting for the same shit parties who perpetuate the shit foreign policy they object to.
Was there a single BNP voter who was a victim of the 7/7 bombing? Statistically that would be unlikely. (The BNP were the only party in the land who offered an alternative non-Zionist foreign policy. Michael Adebalajo actually considered voting for them, and was said to have approached a BNP organiser running a paper sale in Woolwich and discussed UK foreign policy with him.) http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/how-end-problem-of-terrorism-without.html
As for Muslims killing Muslims, we already know Nazis kill other Nazis (Night of the Long Knives) and Commies also kill other Commies (Trotsky was assassinated by Stalin's secret police). Atrocities are often committed in war and revolution. The English had the English Civil War and the Americans their American Civil War.
Islamic State are doubtless purging their own ranks of whom they perceive as being subversives and traitors, as you would expect, really.
"basic liberal values such as democracy, freedom and sexual equality."
Democracy only lasted 180 years in Athens.
Freedom? Freedom to do WHAT? What is this sexual equality? Does he mean gay marriage?
"Ideas which actively promote discrimination, sectarianism and segregation."
Like ladies withdrawing after dinner? That would be sex segregation, I suppose, and having male and female toilets.
What sectarianism is he referring to?
"Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others."
PC Liberals and their protected groups are privileged by law over social conservatives, are they not?
Christians have no freedom of contract to refuse to bake sodomite cakes for LGBTs and no right to refuse to have them as guests in their B&Bs.
"And ideas also based on conspiracy: that Jews exercise malevolent power; or that Western powers, in concert with Israel, are deliberately humiliating Muslims, because they aim to destroy Islam. "
Cameron has never heard of the Israel Lobby or AIPAC, clearly.
"In this warped worldview, such conclusions are reached – that 9/11 was actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan; that British security services knew about 7/7, but didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash."
These views cannot be disproven, can they?
They cannot be disproven the way God's existence cannot be proven or disproven.
"And like so many ideologies that have existed before – whether fascist or communist – many people, especially young people, are being drawn to it. We need to understand why it is proving so attractive."
If you are Muslim and you care about other Muslims, you would be inclined to think that the NATO invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan did not improve life for Muslims in these countries.
You may have noticed that the UK government has not given any convincing reasons to justify these invasions and may even have noticed that the Chilcot Enquiry's findings have had their publication delayed to protect the MPs who called for and voted for these invasions.
'So when people say “it’s because of the involvement in the Iraq War that people are attacking the West”, we should remind them: 9/11 – the biggest loss of life of British citizens in a terrorist attack – happened before the Iraq War.'
"When they say that these are wronged Muslims getting revenge on their Western wrongdoers, let’s remind them: from Kosovo to Somalia, countries like Britain have stepped in to save Muslim people from massacres – it’s groups like ISIL, Al Qaeda and Boko Haram that are the ones murdering Muslims."
"Far from being Tony Blair's "good war", Nato's assault on Yugoslavia was in its own way as immoral as the assault on Iraq. But as the Iraq war has become discredited, so it is even more important for the supporters of "liberal interventionism" to promote the line that Kosovo was in some way a success. The Council of Europe's report on the KLA's crimes makes that position much harder to maintain. And if it plays its part in making people more sceptical about any future western "liberal interventions", it is to be warmly welcomed."
Western interventionism does not exactly create for Westerners a fund of goodwill, does it?
"the adherents of this ideology are overpowering other voices within Muslim debate, especially those trying to challenge it. There are so many strong, positive Muslim voices that are being drowned out."
Those inclined to go on jihad are unlikely to be persuaded by the elderly and the middle-aged telling them not to go.
The already know elderly risk-averse male relations reliant on the NHS would not wish to go on jihad, and their comfortable and complacent parents would not wish to go on jihad either.
As for the clerics who insist that all terrorism is by definition wrong, that is not what the Koran really says, does it?
008.038
YUSUFALI: Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them).
PICKTHAL: Tell those who disbelieve that if they cease (from persecution of believers) that which is past will be forgiven them; but if they return (thereto) then the example of the men of old hath already gone (before them, for a warning).
SHAKIR: Say to those who disbelieve, if they desist, that which is past shall be forgiven to them; and if they return, then what happened to the ancients has already passed.
008.039
YUSUFALI: And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
PICKTHAL: And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah. But if they cease, then lo! Allah is Seer of what they do.
SHAKIR: And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely Allah sees what they do.
008.040
YUSUFALI: If they refuse, be sure that Allah is your Protector - the best to protect and the best to help.
PICKTHAL: And if they turn away, then know that Allah is your Befriender - a Transcendent Patron, a Transcendent Helper!
SHAKIR: And if they turn back, then know that Allah is your Patron; most excellent is the Patron and most excellent the Helper.
008.041
YUSUFALI: And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.
PICKTHAL: And know that whatever ye take as spoils of war, lo! a fifth thereof is for Allah, and for the messenger and for the kinsman (who hath need) and orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, if ye believe in Allah and that which We revealed unto Our slave on the Day of Discrimination, the day when the two armies met. And Allah is Able to do all things.
SHAKIR: And know that whatever thing you gain, a fifth of it is for Allah and for the Messenger and for the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, if you believe in Allah and in that which We revealed to Our servant, on the day of distinction, the day on which the two parties met; and Allah has power over all things.
Could Western foreign policy be described as "desisting"?
"Ask yourself, how is it possible that when young teenagers leave their London homes to fight for ISIL, the debate all too often focuses on whether the security services are to blame?"
If you were an Islamophobe, you would just love the idea of Muslims being targeted for being Muslim and expect them to like it or lump it or leave the country, wouldn't you?
Secretly or not so secretly, Islamophobes want Muslims all to be radicalised and become terrorists so they can just mow them down with their machine guns after they have locked them up in one big mosque and set fire to it if they try to escape ....
If you were Muslim, you would be quite likely to be radicalised once you are aware of the extent and depth of the Islamophobia against you.
"And how can it be that after the tragic events at Charlie Hebdo in Paris, weeks were spent discussing the limits of free speech and satire, rather than whether terrorists should be executing people full stop?"
I am sure even the terrorists knew they had forfeited their lives after they gunned down Charlie Hebdo.
I don't recall anyone saying that these gunmen should have been let off if they were caught alive or that gunning people down for whatever reason should not be allowed. The debate was whether Charlie Hebdo "had it coming".
"When we allow the extremists to set the terms of the debate in this way, is it any wonder that people are attracted to this ideology?"
What does he mean by allowing the extremists "to set the terms of the debate"?
"For all our successes as multi-racial, multi-faith democracy, we have to confront a tragic truth that there are people born and raised in this country who don’t really identify with Britain – and who feel little or no attachment to other people here. Indeed, there is a danger in some of our communities that you can go your whole life and have little to do with people from other faiths and backgrounds."
"So when groups like ISIL seek to rally our young people to their poisonous cause, it can offer them a sense of belonging that they can lack here at home, leaving them more susceptible to radicalisation and even violence against other British people to whom they feel no real allegiance."
"Instead of being a slut, SSM (Slut Single Mother) or a man afraid of sluts and SSMs, why not become a jihadi warrior?" is probably quite a seductive suggestion.
"let’s not forget our strongest weapon: our own liberal values."
The West's strongest poison which it causes its own citizens to imbibe regularly is its own liberal values that produced the foreign policy complained of by Muslim terrorists - liberal interventionism or Western militarism, if you prefer.
Muslims living in the West inclined to become Muslim terrorists are also disgusted by the permissive sexual mores of the West, which has now plumbed new depths with gay marriage.
Two gay men get it on with each other in a funeral parlour. East Enders is shown at 7.30 pm.
Two men kissing each other in broad daylight in a public place.
East Enders is shown at 7.30 pm.
"We should contrast their bigotry, aggression and theocracy with our values. We have, in our country, a very clear creed and we need to promote it much more confidently. Wherever we are from, whatever our background, whatever our religion, there are things we share together."
Islam is about forbidding extramarital sex, liberal values is about having sex wherever, whenever with whomever. Those who regard sodomy as an abomination, as the Koran instructs them to, would regard gay marriage with as much disgust as a gourmet would experience if invited to eat shit.
"We are all British. We respect democracy and the rule of law. We believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of worship, equal rights regardless of race, sex, sexuality or faith."
So all the white British people who are descended from generations of white British people who disapproved of LGBTs were never British?
If we don't subscribe to the Cameronian view of Britishness then we are automatically no longer British?
"We believe in respecting different faiths but also expecting those faiths to support the British way of life. These are British values. And are underpinned by distinct British institutions. Our freedom comes from our Parliamentary democracy. The rule of law exists because of our independent judiciary. This is the home that we are building together."
What freedom is this? The freedom to fuck wherever, whenever with whomever? No thanks.
"Whether you are Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Christian or Sikh, whether you were born here or born abroad, we can all feel part of this country – and we must now all come together and stand up for our values with confidence and pride."
Must we all be glad to be gay? If not, will we be punished?
If we were all gay there wouldn't be much of a next generation to be British or be seen as degenerate Britons any more.
"And as we do so, we should together challenge the ludicrous conspiracy theories of the extremists. The world is not conspiring against Islam; the security services aren't behind terrorist attacks; our new Prevent duty for schools is not about criminalising or spying on Muslim children. This is paranoia in the extreme."
If people hate you enough they will willingly believe any lie about you, no matter how obviously ludicrous.
"In fact that duty will empower parents and teachers to protect children from all forms of extremism – whether Islamist or neo-Nazi."
Muslims and Nazis are quite likely to denounce Israel, Jews, Zionists and Zionism, I imagine.
"We must stand up to those who try to suggest that there is some kind of secret Muslim conspiracy to take over our government, or that Islam and Britain are somehow incompatible."
Islam is about social conservatism, degenerate PC Liberalism is about desecrating the institutions of marriage and the family.
"People who say these things are trying to undermine our shared values and make Muslims feel like they don’t belong here, and we will not let these conspiracy theorists win."
Actually, the Far Right and Muslim radicals are agreed that democracy and Christianity is a dead duck. Interestingly, a Caliph is just a dictator who undertakes to govern using Koranic principles in a one-party theocracy.
"And here’s my message to any young person here in Britain thinking of going out there:
You won’t be some valued member of a movement. You are cannon fodder for them. They will use you.
If you are a boy, they will brainwash you, strap bombs to your body and blow you up."
But if you are a brave jihadi warrior, they might reward you with sex slaves.
"If you are a girl, they will enslave and abuse you."
Jihadis are supposed to marry their sex slaves, I believe.
"using people who really understand the true nature of what life is like under ISIL to communicate to young and vulnerable people the brutal reality of this ideology"
If it is perceived as HMG propaganda, it will be dismissed out of hand.
"empowering the UK’s Syrian, Iraqi and Kurdish communities, so they can have platforms from which to speak out against the carnage ISIL is conducting in their countries"
These Syrians, Iraqis and Kurds would refugees and their statements would be made under duress. The intelligent radical would know to dismiss whatever they say as government mouthpieces.
"countering this ideology better on the ground through specific de-radicalisation programmes"
Will this mean preventing us from using deductive reasoning and coming to the natural and obvious conclusion with the available and undisputed facts?
"we need our internet companies to go further in helping us identify potential terrorists online."
How far have they gone already, and how much further does Cameron want them to go?
"They – the internet companies - have shown with the vital work they are doing in clamping down on child abuse images that they can step up when there is a moral imperative to act. And it’s now time for them to do the same to protect their users from the scourge of radicalisation."
Sounds like Cameron wants internet companies to block certain websites from their customers. Which ones?
"the Home Secretary has already announced a review of sharia courts."
Sounds like the government proposes to interfere in the process of arbitration.
"new protection orders which came into force last Friday and were used immediately by Bedfordshire police to prevent two girls being taken to Africa."
What would be the terms of these protection orders?
"passive tolerance of practices running totally contrary to our values."
Will Muslims be expected to apologise for Muslim terrorism the moment an Islamophobe demands an apology from him?
This is going to be fun and so going to make Muslims stop wanting to blow us up!
"The failure of social services, the police and local authorities, to deal with child sex abuse in places like Rotherham was frankly unforgiveable."
It was only too predictable that the coppers were not going to take the complaints seriously.
"police, already not caring enough about teenage girls being abused, could not be bothered with dealing with the flak of being accused of racism; it is not because they were being ultra-careful not to target an already maligned ethnic group.
The reason there was inaction and poor practice in tackling this crime early on is not political correctness but rather racist cowardice combined with a distaste for the victims. It is precisely because the liberal left has refused to tackle the thorny issues surrounding race and ethnicity that the likes of Ukip are able to colonise it so successfully."
Nobody cares about abandoned children who were carelessly conceived then carelessly abandoned by their unfit promiscuous irresponsible Slut Single Mothers (whom no MP will criticise) into care homes.
"And look what happened in Tower Hamlets, in the heart of our capital city. We had political corruption on an epic scale: with voters intimidated and a court adjudicating on accusations of ‘undue spiritual influence’ for the first time since the 19th century. As the judge said: those in authority were too afraid to ‘confront wrongdoing for fear of allegations of racism’."
This decision is being appealed by the ex-Mayor of Tower Hamlet found guilty of a criminal offence by a clearly biased Election Court judge who thought he could find Lutfur Rahman guilty of a criminal offence without the involvement of the police charging and arresting him.
"We undertook an immediate review when it became apparent that extremists had taken over some of our schools in the so-called Trojan Horse scandal here in Birmingham. But I have to be honest here – one year on, although we are making progress, it is not quick enough. It has taken too long to take action against the governors and teachers involved in the scandal and to support the schools affected to turn themselves around."
All these parents wanted was keep their children's school environment Islamic ie without sex ed, which encourages British schoolgirls to be sluts.
"So as part of our Extremism Bill, we are going to introduce new narrowly targeted powers to enable us to deal with these facilitators and cult leaders, and stop them peddling their hatred."
Sounds like Cameron is proposing to ban them from Twitter and Facebook.
"And we will also work to strengthen Ofcom’s role to enable us to take action against foreign channels that broadcast hate preachers and extremist content."
Which channels are these?
"I have charged Louise Casey to carry out a review of how to boost opportunity and integration in these communities and bring Britain together as one nation. She will look at issues like how we can ensure people learn English; how we boost employment outcomes, especially for women; how state agencies can work with these communities to properly promote integration and opportunity but also learning lessons from past mistakes - when funding was simply handed over to self-appointed ‘community leaders’ who sometimes used the money in a divisive way.
Louise will provide an interim report early next year. And we will use this report to inform our plans for funding a new wider Cohesive Communities Programme next year, focusing resources on improving integration and extending opportunity in those communities that most need it."
"Taking on extremism in all its forms – both violent and non-violent."
Why not have a National Debating Society on Foreign and Domestic Policy with a large cash prize for secondary schoolchildren and adults with televised debates allowing viewers to vote by text on Saturday evenings instead of the usual crap?
"Britain has never been cowed by fear or hatred or terror.
Our Great British resolve faced down Hitler; it defeated Communism; it saw off the IRA’s assaults on our way of life. Time and again we have stood up to aggression and tyranny."
Immigration is caused by feminism causing women to have fewer babies and become working mothers. Normalising working mothers leads to normalising divorced mothers, and normalising divorced mothers leads to normalising never married mothers who are known for their bad parenting skills. Schools attended by these badly-parented children inevitably have to lower standards with the result that school-leavers are not fit to be employed. This makes local labour unattractive compared to foreign labour.
Professor @seenafazel's study suggests male relatives of sex offenders 5 times more likely to commit similar crimes
http://t.co/cquoXpBHdy
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) April 9, 2015
A new study suggests genetic factors may play a role in determining how likely someone is to commit sexual offences. Research published in the International Journal of Epidemiology indicates that brothers and fathers of men convicted of sexual offences are up to five times more likely to be convicted of sexual offences than men in the general population. The report authors concluded that genetic factors were found to make a substantial contribution to this increased risk, with the shared family environment having a relatively small influence. The study, conducted by researchers from Oxford University and the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, used statistical methods to analyse data on all 21,566 men convicted of sexual offences in Sweden between 1973 and 2009. Seena Fazel is the report author and Professor of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Dr Bradley Hillier is a consultant in Forensic Psychiatry (working with mentally disordered offenders at South West London and St Georges NHS Trust).
Interview begins at 1:51.
James Naughtie:
The brothers and fathers of convicted sex offenders are 5 times more likely than men in the general population to be sex offenders themselves. This is the claim of researchers who published their findings in the International Journal of Epidemiology. They claim as well that genetic make-up is the key, not the simple fact of being brought up close to an offender, sharing the environment as it were, with them. Let's talk to Professor Seena Fazel who is author of the report and Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Oxford and to Dr Bradley Hillier as well who is consultant in Forensic Psychiatry working in London. Good morning to you both. Professor Fazel first of all, what was your raw material, who did you look at, how big was the group and how long did you study them for?
SF:
It was around 21,000 Swedish convicted sex offenders - they were men - and we looked at them for 37 years so we looked at their family pedigrees over 37 years and examined whether family pedigrees first and second generation relatives were sex offenders.
JN:
And you found a definite link?
SF:
We found a link to the fathers and brothers, as you say, up to a five-fold increased risk of being sex offenders themselves.
JN:
And have you managed to your satisfaction to rule out that that link is something environmental - in other words things that those people were subjected to or saw or felt when they were young were responsible rather than genes?
SF:
The environment does have a contribution but we thought the genetic contribution probably contributed to about 30 to 50% of the risk and we did that by looking at different ways of modelling the family pedigrees so for instance if you take a family where you have a half brother growing up in the same family as a full brother we found quite a large difference in the risk of sexual offending: they are growing up in the same environment yet the only difference is the genetic difference - around 25%. So that was one of the ways that this way of researching it can model these risks.
JN:
Dr Hillier, are you impressed?
BH:
Well, as with any of Professor Fazel's large population studies they do provide valuable insights into the role various factors in offending and in this case the role of genetics, possibly. I think this is something we need to take into account in the understanding of sexual offending which currently is based on attitudes and social learning and being exposed to particular environments.
JN:
So in a way that's easier for us, isn't it? We tend, don't we, to think of impacts on people and trying to either ameliorate those impacts or take those into account when we are trying to treat them. We don't tend to think about genetics because there is nothing we can do about it.
BH:
Perhaps what Dr Fazel is doing is inviting us to take a step back from behaviour and look at causal factors and he is showing some association which may provide future targets for treatment. In terms of treatment I am minded in terms of what your Thought of The Day speaker said in terms of prevention being better than cure, and I work in an organisation called the International Association for Forensic Psychotherapy with international members from Germany where they have the project prevention Dunkelfeld [?] - not anything sinister but it is the dark field that is unseen offending. The network of clinics which has [buy in?] from governments, universities and charities work with people who have concerns about their own risks of sexual offending.
JN:
So, if you come from a family and you sense or are being told that there is a genetic risk of sexual offending you can go yourself and seek help?
BH:
That's right. You can do in Germany but of course in the UK you have a law of mandatory reporting of sexual offences including viewing internet pornography and child pornography on the internet.
JN:
Does it go more widely than this, do you think, Professor Fazel, in other words, are sexual offenders at heart violent offenders? Is there a link that isn't just about sexual offending here, but is a wider one as well, about people's behaviour and the extent to which their behaviour more generally comes from their genes?
SN:
Well, I think there is a bit of both and there is probably a contribution from the genes for instance high impulsivity that leads to violent offending but there may also be something specific to sexual offending and that might also be genetically determined for instance hyper-sexuality or not being able to figure out boundaries in relationships - that might be genetically determined. Prevention is key here and one of the possibilities that this type of work leads you to think towards is that if there are high risk families already receiving services from child and family services or other services it might be that these families can receive other interventions around normal relationships.
JN:
Is this something you would like to see, Dr Hillier?
BH:
Well, this is certainly I'd like to see. I think it is important to bear in mind we are dealing with very small absolute numbers even though this risk is something that in a family level is increased by five-fold in terms of the numbers of the general population that this may affect. We deal with very small numbers and sexual offending does remain a rare event.
JN;
Dr Hillier and Professor Seena Fazel as well, thanks to you both very much.
Why will no man to discuss this? Because there are no real men any more and because they are scared of sluts in the feminazi-run BBC, where every other producer is female. Self-censorship is much much more insidious than overt censorship and all the men living in a pornocracy are afraid of losing their privileges. Seena Fazel blocked me on Twitter for saying what I said below, but imagine if all men in the West collectively pretended not to hear or understand what I am saying? Would they be not turning a blind eye to what sluts are doing - breeding yet more degenerate bastards who will turn out to be sex offenders when they grow up? Is this why some young Muslims would rather go join ISIS and die than be part of a pornocratic matriarchy where men whose job it is to investigate the truth and analyse the truth such as journalists routinely look the other way when confronted with it?
@vaughanbell@seenafazel No mention about their mother. Were they illegitimate? I think we should be told. Classic case of BAD MOTHERING.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Mind you, it will be difficult to tell if most Swedes are illegitimate and most mothers Slut Single Mothers.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel If u r a bastard then your mother is a slut. If your mother is a slut then you are half full of stupid slut genes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel A stupid fornicating slut would by definition choose her sex partner(s) badly and make bad reproductive decisions.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel The reason why there is a paedo under every bush in the West is because most Western women are SLUTS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel If paedophiles are mosquitoes, then Slut Single Mothers ("SSMs") are stagnant ponds of water.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel A mother should not be judged merely on her parenting skills but on the quality of her offspring when born.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel If most women are having recreational sex then they are more likely to suffer from unwanted pregnancy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel A slut suffering from unplanned pregnancy will probably have been knocked up by some loser with a large sex organ.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Why are the British getting stupider and stupider? Cos knocked up sluts allowed any low status loser to screw them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel West getting poorer/stupider/weaker/more depraved cos it is now a matriarchy ie ruled by marriage-destroying sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel What created marriage-destroying sluts? Feminism created, encouraged and rewarded marriage-destroying sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel All advanced civilisations are patriarchies and all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel A matriarchy is established in the absence of traditional marriage, which means forbidding extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Patriachies recognise that laws are required to make people respect marriage but the matriarchy has ended all that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dsygenic. Nordic women infamously promiscuous before it became globally acceptable.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Imagine the society we wd hv if most women fornicating sluts obsessed by cock fucked useless bastards. Oh wait ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel How telling that your "research" does not even mention in passing bad reproductive choices of sex offender's mother
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel The position of men in a matriarchy is that all men are lower than sluts. Did you know that?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel The leader of a patriarchy wd be an alpha male chosen by beta males. In a matriarchy alpha male chosen by females.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise and Western men are terrified of sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Western gvts should bear in mind matriarchal Bonobos are an endangered species while other other chimps are not.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell Surely @seenafazel n Dr Bradley Hillier were exercising self-censorship by omitting to examine the MOTHERING of sex offenders?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Matriarchy/pornocracy - where men defer to the worst of women - SSMs. They deserve hatred ridicule and contempt.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel A matriarchy is where the richer, stronger and cleverer submit to be ruled by those poorer, weaker and stupider.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@vaughanbell@seenafazel Matriarchal Neanderthals were superseded by patriarchal homo sapiens who invented and practised marriage.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 9, 2015
@EducatingJess Why should your mother's choice of a sex partner not also be taken into account?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2015
@EducatingJess What kind of a woman likes screwing sex offenders and then gets knocked up by them?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2015
@ravenwolf68@Spidere Why is no one even asking about the mother of the sex offender in question and whether the sex offender is a bastard?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2015
@EducatingJess If your father is a sex offender and your mother was knocked up by him, what does it say about her as a person?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 10, 2015
@YvonneARoberts I am very grateful to you for saying that. Yours is the first sensible response I have received so far!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@ntfem common sense says should look at all the causes?
— Yvonne Roberts (@YvonneARoberts) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts Common sense is becoming disturbingly rare these days. Seena Fazel blocked me just for pointing out the obvious.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts If we inherit our physical characteristics /mental dispositions from our parents then we also inherit the good with the bad.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts It has been said that birds of a feather flock together. A sex offender would probably attract a certain kind of woman.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts A woman attracted to a sex offender must surely be irresponsible with low intelligence and low standards of sexual morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts The woman attracted to a sex offender n who goes on to have a child by him is not one you would like your only son to marry.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
@YvonneARoberts Sexual depravity + low standards of sexual morality/social responsibility + low IQ = ANOTHER GENERATION OF SEX OFFENDERS
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2015
