http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_harassment,_alarm_or_distress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_scale#United_Kingdom
If found guilty she could be imprisoned for up to 6 months or pay a fine of up to £5,000.
This is the way the government intends to deal with anyone who complains loudly and publicly about immigration using the Public Order Act, even when it is quite obvious that what Emma West did caused no public order problems on 18 October 2011 for she was only arrested her after manufactured outrage was generated when it was posted on YouTube on 4 December 2011.
res ipsa loquitur, as the lawyers say.
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-arrested-Tram-Experience-footage/story-14020313-detail/story.html
Her prosecution is clearly politically-motivated by a Director of Public Prosecutions who is openly and unashamedly a supporter of the Labour Party to whom immigrants are its clients.
Is it the role of the DPP to initiate a malicious prosecution and false imprisonment of a woman with a history of self-harming to intimidate those who wish to complain about immigration into silence?
Of course not.
Free speech anyone? But I think Censorship laced with State Intimidation is the preferred tipple of the liberal political establishment who have betrayed the white working classes, treated like the badly-brought up illegitimate children whose sexually-liberated free-loving parents now wished they had smothered at birth.
I still like to think a good lawyer would get her off and get Keir Starmer sacked as Director Public Prosecutions for an act of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, or at any rate get the decision of the CPS to prosecute her judicially reviewed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_English_Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_imprisonment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution
Is the BNP getting together a decent firm of lawyers to see that she doesn't get fucked over by the liberal establishment? Is it fuck.
David Ewings of Ewings & Co is her brief. http://www.ewings.uk.com/criminal.html
He seems perfectly competent to me except that he seems all on his lonesome own, and maybe Emma West needs someone bigger and better like one of the firms listed at
http://www.legal500.com/c/london/crime-fraud-and-licensing/crime to show she is not going to take any shit from the cunting liberal establishment with their trumped-up charges and their manufactured outrage.
If only I were the leader of the BNP, eh? But I'm not, so white working class people had just better curl up on the ground and protect their head with their arms while taking more kicks to the head by the liberal establishment and their immigrant voters to whom they gave so many British passports. Cos that is the way things are now.
Deuteronomy 28:43.
http://bible.cc/deuteronomy/28-43.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_scale#United_Kingdom
If found guilty she could be imprisoned for up to 6 months or pay a fine of up to £5,000.
This is the way the government intends to deal with anyone who complains loudly and publicly about immigration using the Public Order Act, even when it is quite obvious that what Emma West did caused no public order problems on 18 October 2011 for she was only arrested her after manufactured outrage was generated when it was posted on YouTube on 4 December 2011.
res ipsa loquitur, as the lawyers say.
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-arrested-Tram-Experience-footage/story-14020313-detail/story.html
Her prosecution is clearly politically-motivated by a Director of Public Prosecutions who is openly and unashamedly a supporter of the Labour Party to whom immigrants are its clients.
Is it the role of the DPP to initiate a malicious prosecution and false imprisonment of a woman with a history of self-harming to intimidate those who wish to complain about immigration into silence?
Of course not.
Free speech anyone? But I think Censorship laced with State Intimidation is the preferred tipple of the liberal political establishment who have betrayed the white working classes, treated like the badly-brought up illegitimate children whose sexually-liberated free-loving parents now wished they had smothered at birth.
I still like to think a good lawyer would get her off and get Keir Starmer sacked as Director Public Prosecutions for an act of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, or at any rate get the decision of the CPS to prosecute her judicially reviewed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_English_Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_imprisonment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution
Is the BNP getting together a decent firm of lawyers to see that she doesn't get fucked over by the liberal establishment? Is it fuck.
David Ewings of Ewings & Co is her brief. http://www.ewings.uk.com/criminal.html
He seems perfectly competent to me except that he seems all on his lonesome own, and maybe Emma West needs someone bigger and better like one of the firms listed at
http://www.legal500.com/c/london/crime-fraud-and-licensing/crime to show she is not going to take any shit from the cunting liberal establishment with their trumped-up charges and their manufactured outrage.
If only I were the leader of the BNP, eh? But I'm not, so white working class people had just better curl up on the ground and protect their head with their arms while taking more kicks to the head by the liberal establishment and their immigrant voters to whom they gave so many British passports. Cos that is the way things are now.
Deuteronomy 28:43.
http://bible.cc/deuteronomy/28-43.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment