It does look like it could be Jack Buckby because he is young, politically active, has met Markus Willinger, and is reproducing large chunks of Generation Identity at
In my opinion, there can only be one correct answer.
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/5975-generation-identity-chapter-1
But what ideas has he apart from the ideas of Liberty GB, an Islamophobic party even more Islamophobic than the BNP contained in the following links
and his failed Culturalism?
Why Jack Buckby's idea of National Culturalism cannot work
As you can see at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/more-speculation-on-reasons-why-i-am.html Jack Buckby does not like me and cannot provide coherent ideological reasons for doing so.
Quite often my rivals simply hate me for saying the things that they dare not say. They call it "grandstanding" because, not surprisingly, I do get a lot of attention when I say the things I say. It is quite understandable, in a way, that many nationalist men would hate to see me succeed where they have failed, since I am but a female and a foreigner, or something infinitely more sinister ....
I am the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a female, and am nothing like what they have come across before. Apparently, they want to be led by someone just like themselves - timorous failures - thereby allowing the matriarchy to control the terms of debate.
If you were a sane lunatic would you let someone like you - that is, another lunatic - represent your interests, or someone who is actually sane, knows what the problem is and has the solutions?
In my opinion, there can only be one correct answer.
The kindest thing to do is to assume that they do not know what they want, and proceed to tell them what it is that they do want.
Compared to Jack I am an intellectual giant.
3 comments:
You fail to understand something. Generation Identity is a leaderless resistance. We are led by a common spirit and ambition. There are, however, people (among them Markus) who can be seen as leaders of our movement, even if they don't have this title "officially." I see formal leadership as unnecessary.
You fail to understand something. Generation Identity is a leaderless resistance. We are led by a common spirit and ambition. There are, however, people (among them Markus) who can be seen as leaders of our movement, even if they don't have this title "officially." I see formal leadership as unnecessary.
I really cannot imagine anything happening without someone taking some organisational and directing role.
If you are leaderless then how can you be asked questions, or make proposals, even if they are rejected?
Is all you envisage a collective refusal to vote?
The least you can do is establish a debating society!
Post a Comment