Are senior judges ruling Dominic Grieve had "no good reason" for blocking Freedom of Information request for Charles letters lefty Republican types?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/prince-charles/10691937/Prince-Charles-letters-Attorney-General-acted-unlawfully-judges-rule.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dyson,_Lord_Dyson

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Richards_(judge)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Pitchford

What do you think?

I think it is petty-minded, spiteful and malicious.  It is natural for a thoughtful man to have an opinion and a passionate man to have a strong opinion.  But these nasty lefty royal-bashing plebs are having a go again, I see.

If Charles has influenced public policy at all, he hasn't influenced it quite as much as I would like.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285332/Follow-Islamic-way-save-world-Charles-urges-environmentalists.html

If the outcome of this is that Charles is to have all his letters of a political nature published online then I would be the first to applaud this, as long as his website is comment-enabled.

If you want to read his letters, here they are at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/prince-charles/9622334/The-secret-letters-Prince-Charles-sent-to-Tony-Blairs-government.html