@RobbieGibb I will make a point of watching Sir Paul Coleridge on #bbcdp today at 12. @MarriageF @harrybenson6 @TheConWom @kathycps @whjm
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Poor Sir Paul. He defended the institution of #marriage in our #matriarchy and paid with his job. That is how evil #feminism is.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Sir Paul has been punished by the matriarchy whose purpose is to undermine marriage because it is synonymous with the patriarchy
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it Sir Paul Coleridge that it is now time to stop being polite about the matriarchy who r irrational, selfish n evil.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Put it to Sir Paul that marriage is eugenic n bastardy dysgenic: most ppl r sluts n bastards in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that the world is basically divided between 2 groups of ppl: people who respect marriage n ppl who don't.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul feminism keeps men quiescent by stuffing their mouths with free slut sex: the only thing it has men want.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that it is feminism that encourages women to be sluts ie to have extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul "The moment men say it is OK for women to be sluts their civilisation goes down the toilet."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that feminists NEVER EVER address their minds to promoting the long term national interest.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that feminism is only about privileging women at the expense of men, the elderly n the next generation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that only repealing the Equality Act 2010 and abolishing no fault divorce would destroy #feminism.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that the way to apportion blame in divorce is to require engaged couples to agree a marriage contract.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that the lower the standards of sexual morality in women the lower the standards of general morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that the only way to discourage sluts is to implement the policy of slut-shaming. http://t.co/BMcN0SDRnO
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that the only logical way of properly respecting marriage is to forbid extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that the British regard as more sacred their right to have extramarital sex than marriage itself.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that representative democracy is fatally flawed if it cannot make itself respect marriage again.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb While I know Sir Paul is not a constitutional lawyer, he must see that the current system cannot be reformed, only overthrown.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that no leader of a UK political party will uncompromisingly support marriage cos they know no one cares.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that the only way of drawing attention to himself n his cause is to take the cow of feminism by her horns
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that at the very least, he must be prepared to say what needs to be done in order to get what he wants
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that he will get nowhere at all if he fears to offend feminists and his friends and family who are.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that it is shameful for supposedly alpha males to be afraid of offending omega females - SSMs.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb SSMs are other categories of mothers are explained at http://t.co/0g4CvaqjDY
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that chasing the female vote has got us to where we are. http://t.co/bYwOq5z7lX @MerrynSW
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it Sir Paul that feminazis have lowered criminal standard of proof for men accused of sex crimes. http://t.co/asNq5ujOcO
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it 2 Sir Paul that ower standard of proof 4 men accused of sex crimes n women in Cabinet = matriarchy entrenching itself
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul: patriarchy = a society condoning male promiscuity; matriarchy = a society condoning female promiscuity
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that all patriarchies are advanced civilisations and all matriarchies are declining and primitive ones
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. http://t.co/3yEH7CLV3x
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that #womenbishops is yet another sign of the #matriarchy entrenching itself.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that women in power will tend to conspire to lower standards of sexual morality, for biological reasons.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Please put it to Sir Paul that there is no point giving up his job to campaign for marriage if he does not do it successfully.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it 2 Sir Paul that all that is needed for men 2 win this battle is thru men being prepared to say what needs to be said.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb Pls put it to Sir Paul that women do think differently and think in a lefty libtard way while men tend to recognise reality more
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb It is time for Sir Paul Coleridge to have a Twitter account. I met @bindelj @elondonmosque and even exchanged kisses with her.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@RobbieGibb @bindelj @MarriageF @TheConWom @kathycps @harrybenson6 @Lperrins Claire Khaw's theory of sex and politics http://t.co/ksfqyT7j6M
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
Prissy reaction by feminist female to views she dislikes:
@DrBattyTowers @BBCWomansHour Katrina Scott.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@DrBattyTowers @BBCWomansHour Yes, she is confident no one will challenge her, they wouldn't dare, everyone loves #womenbishops, blah blah
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@DrBattyTowers @BBCWomansHour You will find an indication of my views on #womenbishops at http://t.co/DlMnmSINlG
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@ntfem Well, I can honestly say that those are not views I have previously encountered. Nor am I likely to engage with them further.
— Sara Batts (@DrBattyTowers) July 15, 2014
@DrBattyTowers I thought that would be the reaction of the typical female: ignore, censor and smear. Thank u 4 engaging thus far, however.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
@DrBattyTowers You should really be writing essay style answers to those questions I asked, if you had any intellectual integrity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 15, 2014
Her lefty Twit friends then pile in and you can read what they say athttps://twitter.com/PeterOuld/status/488981160132100096
https://twitter.com/gedrobinson/status/489001249686437888
Interesting that they don't think they even need to discuss the issue because they have so "obviously" won it, isn't it?
No comments:
Post a Comment