The Truth About Evil by John Gray
Nowhere does Gray even define evil, while I have: evil is inflicting suffering unnecessarily in defiance of God's laws while indulging in one, some or all of the Seven Deadly Sins.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29951222
In this episode of Point of View, John Gray romps through Darwin, survival of the fittest and the Social Darwinism of Herbert Spencer, but ends with breath-taking complacency:
In this episode, Gray does not mention feminism, atheism, immigration, the matriarchy or even ISIS. Why is Gay treated as some wise man even as libtards everywhere pretend they do not hear anything I say? They know very well what I am saying, but they know that to pretend not to hear is the only way of dealing with me. It is either that, or outright assassination to discourage the others.
We can infer from the fact he his having a column in The Guardian means he knows to trim his message to fit the prevailing libtard wind. I, of course, do NOTHING OF THE SORT, and have no intention of doing so.
Nowhere does Gray even define evil, while I have: evil is inflicting suffering unnecessarily in defiance of God's laws while indulging in one, some or all of the Seven Deadly Sins.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29951222
In this episode of Point of View, John Gray romps through Darwin, survival of the fittest and the Social Darwinism of Herbert Spencer, but ends with breath-taking complacency:
Capitalism has survived the financial crisis that began in 2007, and there's no reason to think it faces any imminent prospect of global collapse. Equally, there's no reason to suppose capitalism is going to resume its advance. To my mind the most likely upshot is that the future will be like the past, with the world containing a variety of economic systems. Whatever happens, it won't be determined by some imaginary process of social evolution. It will be human decisions, interacting with the uncontrollable flow of events, which lead the world into an unknown future.
In this episode, Gray does not mention feminism, atheism, immigration, the matriarchy or even ISIS. Why is Gay treated as some wise man even as libtards everywhere pretend they do not hear anything I say? They know very well what I am saying, but they know that to pretend not to hear is the only way of dealing with me. It is either that, or outright assassination to discourage the others.
We can infer from the fact he his having a column in The Guardian means he knows to trim his message to fit the prevailing libtard wind. I, of course, do NOTHING OF THE SORT, and have no intention of doing so.
Just listened to John Gray's Point of View. He doesn't say much, does he? Nothing much will happen or change, he says.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
John Gray is a member of the senescent group of men, tired, boring, past their prime and wanting only security and comfort. @BBCRadio4
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
The last thing a philosopher like John Gray would want is to discuss any of his ideas with anyone. More than his job's worth. @BBCRadio4
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
As long as John Gray keeps churning out the same old tired boring shit, he will get paid and that is all he cares about. @BBCRadio4
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
The only reason why a "right-wing" philosopher like John Gray is allowed access to the airwaves on the @BBCRadio4 is cos he says NOTHING.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
John Gray doesn't want the hoi polloi getting in touch of him. Why, imagine if anyone had a question - that would never do! @BBCRadio4
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
The only Conservative thinkers allowed on the BBC are geldings like @ClarkeMicah, Roger Scruton and John Gray. @BBCRadio4
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
It is beyond imagination that @BBCRadio4 would let anyone who wasn't in their PC libtard gang to have their views represented at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
Libtards at the BBC know they can forever sneer and marginalise anyone with non libtard ideas and there is FUCK ALL I can do.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
You would have thought that Conservative thinkers would get together to do stuff together, form or a club or something, but they don't.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
What I hate about democracy is the sheer shitting pissing lying cunting crapping fucking ineptitude of it all. NO ONE IS IN CHARGE.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
In a liberal democracy, nobody is really in charge; everyone just protects their patch and co-operates only if they are made to do so.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
The difference between a dictatorship and a democracy: in a dictatorship the buck stops, while in a democracy it just goes round and round.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 7, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment